Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 8 2018

we want to thank Josh homes for being on the couch with us here today and we had

that press conference at the beginning so not everybody got their time you guys

are good sports no thank you thank you have you got a nice lesson in insider

trading right I actually needed that yes sir whatever hits her to come for the

rest of the day to watch it and see the whole thing well a lot to discuss in

this hour and certainly a lot coming up in the next we're back here at noon

Eastern but now here's Harris and we begin with breaking news president

Trump's legal team has now responded in just the last few seconds to Robert

Muller's latest offer for a presidential interview this is outnumbered over time

i'm harris faulkner now to the breaking news the president's attorneys releasing

a statement saying they have sent a letter now to the special counsel

regarding its request to sit down with President Trump in its Russia

investigation meanwhile Rudy Giuliani is once again calling on Muller to wrap it

up this investigation chief White House correspondent John Roberts is live with

the latest on this so break it down we knew that there was something coming

today what is it then Harris good afternoon to you it just as you were

introducing me there I was finishing up a phone call with Rudy Giuliani who told

me that he thinks that this should all be over by September the first no saying

he doesn't know if it will be over by September the first but he thinks that

Robert Muller should be able to wrap it up by then he told me if it goes much

past the beginning of September then everybody who's involved in this

investigation could be accused of interfering with the election because if

this thing does drag on it gets closer and closer to those all-important

midterms but the response to Muller went out about an hour ago I've got two

statements from the president Saline attorneys Jay Sekulow saying quote we

have responded in writing to the latest proposal from the Office of Special

Counsel regarding its request to interview the president it is not

appropriate at this time to comment publicly about the content of that

response from Rudy Giuliani millions of pages of documents along with testimony

from dozens of witnesses have been provided where restating what we have

been saying for months it is time for the Office of Special Counsel to

conclude its inquiry without further delay speaking again to that September

first timeline the Giuliani thinks that Muller should ever wrapped up by now

while Giuliani would not go into the details of the counteroffer he did tell

Fox News it's not a refusal but at the same time it's not a completely

unreasonable position I can see a way he told me in which they Muller may agree

with it Giuliani says the chances of Muller accepting the offer depend on two

things a how much they really want an interview with the president and B the

degree to which they are willing to say this may be our last chance to get the

sit-down with the president Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz was on Fox

News earlier today in America's newsroom he thinks this strategy is to present

Muller with something he cannot accept listen here well I think the tactic is

emerging and it's fairly clear the president wants to testify his lawyers

don't want to testify so the lawyers are going to set up a series of conditions

so it put it in terms of the Godfather they're gonna make Muller an offer he

can't accept and in the end Muller will say look I can't accept this offer so

we're gonna subpoena you the president will be able to say look I wanted to

testify it was mo turned me down Giuliani acknowledged that Muller may

indeed try to step in to the president if an agreement for an interview can't

be worked out the president's attorneys have repeatedly stated that they would

fight any attempt in court to subpoena president Trump Gershowitz suggesting

that this fight could go on for months and end in a draw

Giuliani also told me this morning that they may be willing to allow the

president to answer some questions that go to the issue of obstruction of

justice if Muller could give them a couple of

sample questions that aren't quote red flags that don't look like he's tried to

set a trap but so many attorneys across this land who have commented on this

Harris believed that they are trying to set a trap for the president Giuliani

telling me that even if Muller would have accept this offer that was

transmitted about an hour ago there's still an awful lot of work to do before

Muller would get a chance to sit down with the president

there's developments they just come so quickly I know I thought maybe you were

getting another one because people know that we wear earpieces and they wonder

is a clairvoyant know we're actually being talked to while we're talking

before we let you go John because I want to talk about the timing of this it is

90 days today until the midterm election so you know you're talking about

wrapping something up in less than 30 days or do you let that bleed toward the

November election that's actually not Bob Muller's concern right now but it

certainly is a political concern yeah I don't think that Muller is concerned at

all about that other other than the fact that some pressure may be brought to

bear in the you know court of public relations and politics that Oh Muller is

dragging this thing out longer than it should be which may play in the

president's favor if you get some sympathy on that point at the same time

though the president doesn't want this thing dragging toward the election

because you know if there were to be some sort of stunning revelation that

happens say 30 days before the election that could have an impact too so it's

definitely in the president's interests to either NE not have this happen or if

it does happen happen under very stringent conditions and happen quickly

we'll see all right great to see you always with the breaking news John

Roberts let's do more Republican congressman Louie Gohmert of the House

Judiciary Committee great to have you today I want to start with your thoughts

on now the answer back from the president's team legal team to Robert

Muller well I hope Dershowitz is right that they've laid conditions that motor

won't accept because it'd be a disaster Eric Holder lied to us a number of times

testifying before Congress he should have he was held in contempt should have

gone to jail but Harris I totally believe him when he says look I've known

Robert molar for 30 20 30 years and he is not gonna stop until he gets some

kind of indictment against the president and I think he's right that's what molar

wants to get and when I hear that Giuliani is saying oh if it goes past

September 1st Moeller will be blamed for you know

playing politics and affecting election Muller could care less he would

love to affect the election this is a guy that sat down looked Trump in the

face said basically begging him to point him again as director of the FBI and

when he doesn't get it he get become special counsel of an area he's totally

disqualified from because he was FBI director and part of the investigation

into Russia trying to buy uranium that enabled Hillary to get cepheus to

approve the sale so they could make 145 million Muller should be investigated

and instead he is a special counsel this is a guy that doesn't care up but he's

hoping he will affect the election and screw over the president you always

manage to break it down to some new category that we haven't seen so you've

just driven us anna-lena flip the switch on robert muller and and it is

interesting where we are right now though you say he wouldn't care about

politics anyway lay conditions such that he won't accept wouldn't he then slap

the president's team the president with a subpoena and would that be better or

worse we'll see that's that's the way Muller will look at it and I used to be

a pretty good lawyer because I could put myself in their shoes it you're an

excellent lawyer well it was a judge and chief justice but from look at it from

our standpoint okay he times this 90 days before the election and says we

want to ask questions knowing that they'll probably come back with

conditions he can't accept he will have to do a subpoena and even if the

president does agree to testify then he gets him in a perjury trap which will

help him indict the I mean they indicted Mike Flynn when the FBI officer said

look there is no CEO there's a way to avoid because that's you know every

attorney that I've interviewed judges of it they're like Harris you don't sit

down with the Special Counsel you don't do a sure that question is you should

not is no one able to situational counsel and just not get into a perjury

trap it's really difficult very very difficult

especially when you've got people like Weisman and Muller that they don't mind

breaking the law to put people in jail they've done it before they'll do it

again as long as they've got the power and they've got the power so so from our

standpoint if he's if the lawyers and are willing to let the president sit

down and I know it's the president decision but he should not do that just

it's it's wrong it shouldn't do it but it is the mower story Lincoln's counsel

he said that well because Trump president Trump is a smart guy and he

really believes he knows he's not guilty of anything he's being investigated for

so why shouldn't he sit down when there are other implications they would do

anything to find something to indict him for they will twist anything he says no

matter how he says it and try to make it into an indictment and from Muller

standpoint okay so they he can't accept the terms

then he's fighting the president saying I got here obstructing you're hiding so

they're fighting over the subpoena and that affects the election Muller would

love it before I have to let you go congressman is there anything to say

about a positive movement forward by the president and Muller going back and

forth in all this it sounds like a fruitless dance from what you're saying

but politically for the president what does this accomplish well it is the

president still saying I'm still willing to sit down here the terms and

conditions but I don't think there are any that Muller would accept other than

just will ask what we want to because he wants to drag this out he wants to keep

spending millions of taxpayer dollars without any oversight Rosen Stein was

involved in the Russian investigation with Moeller and so they're going to let

this go on Rosen Stein ought to be investigated but

as long as Rosenstein is the Deputy Attorney General then the president's in

trouble and justice is not being done Wow

and can you get up from the table is it like art of the deal where you sit down

and and I'm serious I mean if it's a lot tougher it's tougher it's a lot tougher

because once you begin to waive your fifth Amendment rights and judges you

know I've warned people felons accused felons once you waive your Fifth

Amendment rights and begin to testify you've waived your right but now there

are questions in a deposition that you can say we're not answering that and

then you go litigate it to the judge again lower would love that it drags it

out even longer it keeps him spending millions of dollars and creates more

political trouble for Republicans and the president boy you have given us a

whole lot to think about and talk about now as you always do congressman energy

and mower is thought about everything I've mentioned interesting from the

great state of Texas you set us up for this hour sir thank you very much

thank thank chairs absolutely let me tell you what I'm talking about because

the man next to me he's been nodding this entire time Richard st. Paul is a

former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney you're listening and what are

you hearing that you're agreeing with first of all you don't sit down with the

special prosecutor I've been in the office within that federal agent my

client was a defendant and you know doing a proffer talking about what my

client knows about this particular area whether that can lead to getting a

bigger fish how gives to people who sit down with the prosecutors those who have

nothing to lose and those that have everything again

the people have everything to gain is those people who don't want to go to

jail by cooperating those who have nothing to lose are not facing in a

criminal potential criminal out light the president has everything to lose

because Muller is seeking to capture the big fish and will and he sees him as the

big fish absolutely he's at the top of the food chain so the president has

everything to lose by sitting down with mother all right can I just ask in the

beginning we were looking to see if there were any connections between the

Trump campaign and Russia and the word really

and rudy giuliani gets this right the word collusion is not the crime it would

be conspiracy or obstruction of justice we have now paddled our boat into the

middle of the water so far afield of either Shore of those top types of topic

you know there's the political sit down for the base the president may not even

need to do that anymore in terms of getting following because of what's

going on and he's playing ball by answering back to Muller excellent point

why should the president sit down when he's not being accused if there's no

edge says there's no evidence that he colluded it now

is not a legal definition is not under Title 18 of the criminal so why do they

even use that word it's a very simple term for people to digest but they're

but the the main term is is conspiracy to to violate campaign finance from

crimes so what happens is that foreign one harder to prove than the other is

that why they use that one well no it's it's all the same things so

that's it's all the same in terms of what the actions are so there's there's

no foreign money allowed into our elections

what Muller is looking at is whether Russian operatives funded the Trump

campaign to elect the president that's that's the conspiracy that's the

campaign violations that's the collusion between Intel agencies have looked at

this and said they meddled but not to the benefit of one candidate or the

other I don't where else does it meet which is exactly right why would the

begin why would the president sit down when there is no Alec there's no Alec

strong allegation there was no information that says that he was

involved with this conspiracy to violate a campaign finance laws more criminal

laws at that why would you sit down one so we're trying to get also to another

point of breaking news real quickly Muller has said that he wouldn't indict

or can't indict a sitting president yet you hear congressman Gohmert talking

about their seeking for something they're just looking something to indict

on can you or can't you indict a president you can if you if you break

the law obviously you can be indicted whether you can be removed from office

is those are two different things absolutely that's political all right

sit tight for just a second Richard because we have more GOP representative

Chris Collins of New York was indicted on

insider trading charges today and we saw the federal prosecutor here in the state

of New York we can't recovered at last our on outnumbered

he's charged with tipping off family members and other people because he had

inside information on a on a medicine called an 8 yep

what do you make of this at this point so apparently he was on the board of an

eight and he gave his son and his son's fiancee father information which

allegedly saved them information about the stop which allegedly save them

almost a million dollars okay the question though that his attorney his

attorney has already raised his defense which is that representative Collins did

not benefit from this insight knowledge now that's one of the elements to prove

that you're guilty of inside trading oh that's interesting yeah do it to hurt

yourself right so he didn't benefit now his

family members may have benefited but he didn't benefit now the information has

to be non-public and so that's why it's called insider trading cuz it has to be

non-public I saw that with Martha Stewart's case but she benefited

remember she sold this right before it went downhill but I'm reading that he

couldn't have traded that stock for a lot of different reasons but he's a

congressman and yeah okay so Richard what do you make of what we're learning

now that he was already investigation under investigation by ethics committee

having to do with the same medical product innate and that's probably how

we got this federal investigation because the information they learn from

the ethics investigation then went to the Department of Justice through the U

at the Southern District of New York because obviously he's a congressman

here in New York but whether one thing is ethical as we saw with the Senate

amendment Menendez which was unethical to fly planes that your friend provided

for you and in vs. whether that's criminal is two different things okay

while what he may have done if he did it is unethical the question still remains

did he benefit from the inside training and I and again that's the defense only

bar because you know his it has been shown that his son didn't his son's

fiance and her dad and unfortunately the law doesn't seem to have evolved to

cover of others Wow yep that's that's gonna be

like I said his kind of shut it does her like I don't know

well whoever the his attorney said that you're gonna hear a little more about

his defense and about the their representation of him of represent acaso

little later but that's certainly gonna be what they're hanging their hat on all

right real quickly I know it's not your lane in politics but if you were his

counsel would you tell him to get out of the race not the race but would you tell

him to get give up his seat right now or wait for the facts to follow based on

the bar that you just set legally I would say stay stay an absolute

interesting yeah Richard same guilty person doesn't get out first time on the

mezzanine on outnumbered overtime Oh prosecutor and criminal defense attorney

come back thank you with a special house election too close to call still in Ohio

they say the big endorsement from the president that may have made all the

difference we are live in the Buckeye State stay

close

For more infomation >> GOHMERT: TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM RESPONDS TO MUELLER'S LATEST OFFER TO INTERVIEW THE PRESIDENT - Duration: 18:34.

-------------------------------------------

NFL superstar Aaron Rodgers just waded into Trump's LeBron feud with powerful statement - Duration: 2:29.

For more infomation >> NFL superstar Aaron Rodgers just waded into Trump's LeBron feud with powerful statement - Duration: 2:29.

-------------------------------------------

Trump just got humiliating news about the fate of his star on Hollywood's "Walk of Fame" - Duration: 2:15.

For more infomation >> Trump just got humiliating news about the fate of his star on Hollywood's "Walk of Fame" - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Talks Tough On Iran - Duration: 1:59.

For more infomation >> Trump Talks Tough On Iran - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

WSJ: FMR TRUMP ATTORNEY MICHAEL COHEN UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR TAX FRAUD - Duration: 15:14.

senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano joins me now there is so much

to feast on here Paul Manafort sin a whole world of hurt

how important is Rick gates oh he's the the critical testimony that the

government provides because he has presented an intimate knowledge of all

of the financial shenanigans that the government has accused the Paul Manafort

of engaging in from income tax evasion to bank fraud to lobbying for a foreign

country without registering for it the greatest of these is the income tax

evasion in the bank where that's the one he spent the the ones he spent the most

time with so you have the go back and forth between these two guys who I mean

from what it looks like we're committing crimes and from what you and I were

talking about there's some some evidence there of that what does that have to do

with the President of the United States it has nothing to do with the president

the president's name has been prohibited from being mentioned by the judge now

the judge can only prohibit that of the lawyers witnesses mentioned the

president's name twice once with respect to the name of the building Trump Tower

and once with respect to the president likes the Yankees and we have some

tickets for him well then come the president they call him Donald Trump he

wasn't the president at the time those are the only references which are

innocuous but this really this trial has zero to do with Donald Trump the person

or Donald Trump the president is it problematic that clearly there were some

illegal things going on with Paul Manafort for the president at all when

it comes to having worked for the Trump campaign no no this does not cover the

years that Palmer that this trial does not allege facts that the government

says occurred during the time the Paul Manafort was the president's campaign

manager I mean this goes back to 2012 and ends around 14 or 15 but it doesn't

get into 16 for Manta Ford only managed the president's campaign for about four

months in the summer of 2016 why do you think then bob muller is perched

well for the wreaths for the reasons that this judge has said which is you

only want Paul Manafort you're only squeezing and the judges phrased

residues they don't speak this way from the bench but the other judge has been

very candid very colorful your your only squeezing Paul Manafort because you want

him to testify against the president now the response to that is we are lawyers

and we have ethical duties we are prosecutors if we find evidence of

crimes we must pursue that criminality whether it's our original mission or not

that is a truthful statement with their obligation they can pursue it themselves

or they can pass it on to another prosecutor and have it pursue our case

they pursued it themselves you're a judge looking at this case potentially

how much time could Paul manna for face because that's where the pressure comes

in correct I think if he's convicted he's likely to be sentenced to 60 years

in jail he's exposed to more but that's likely what it will come down to if he's

convicted of all these allegations but the conviction depends on whether or not

for the most part because there's some documents here that support the the

government's case but for the most part the conviction rests or falls on rick

gates and the job of the metaphors lawyers which as Peter Doocy just told

us will start in about 30 minutes is to destroy him on the witness stand all

right Pete hagseth and I talked about this last hour from a political

standpoint but from legality standpoint I'm curious to know how important is it

to know that Paul Manafort had dealings with this former pro Russian Ukrainian

president who we know is as dirty as they come you know again the judge

ordered the government not to use pejorative terms about these Ukrainian

officially don't call them oligarchs call them the former president because

the church doesn't really want to sanitize things but he doesn't want to

add a prejudicial term to describe them I honestly don't think that the origin

of this money being a Ukrainian oligarch or whatever well in effect the ultimate

outcome the ultimate outcome that is whether mana Ford is convicted or

acquitted will be determined by whether or not the jury believes gates

if Gates is to be believed the evidence of criminal behavior

is truly overwhelming gates credible or not in your estimation ah you know the

government does this all the time and dates a group of people and cuts a deal

with one of them some people say this is a bribe

you know in return for letting you plead guilty to a very little crime you're

giving us the testimony we want to hear you're not going to go to jail and your

colleague he's convicted will jurors often believe that they believe the

criminals riding on criminals yes they built they believe that all these

confessions he made yesterday including robbing his own partner and boss Paul

Manafort are believable I got a break news now with you here on the mezzanine

has seen some arms and

legs with some very interesting actors some of them criminal what do you make

of it all I think it's a lot larger than anybody imagined at the time that Jeff

Sessions recused himself and allowed his deputy Rod Rosenstein to appoint a

special counsel and in a sense this is this is egregiously unfair to the

president that they have now instead

Trump's attorneys are planning to send a letter now to the special counsel

possibly as soon as tomorrow that will largely rebuff their latest offer for a

sit-down interview with the president the president's legal team objects to

the fact that it will still include questions related to obstruction of

justice because they claim that's outside the original purview of the

Russia probe something the judge and I have been talking about there's a whole

lot outside of that former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Tom Dupree

agrees watch they have to have a reason for answering these questions this is

not a fishing expedition the questions have to be relevant to the charge that

Muller has namely to investigate tampering with the 2016 election this is

not an opportunity for Muller to basically ask the president wide-ranging

questions anything he wants to know it has to be linked to his investigatory

mandate chief White House correspondent John Roberts obviously on the North Lawn

now outside the White House John and good afternoon to you Harris the parks

department here meticulously grooming the lawn so that's why he here the leaf

blower in the background we're also watching the president's Twitter feed to

see if he might weigh in on the latest news about Cohen though the president

has been encouraged to limit his tweets when it comes to talking about legal

matters we do know that the president's attorneys are working on a response to

the Muller letter of last week outlining the parameters of how he would like an

interview with the President to go we are told by sources that the response

letter from the president's legal team will not be forthcoming today so that

puts it at tomorrow at the earliest sources telling Fox News that the

president's legal team deeply concerned about molars desire to ask the president

questions related to obstruction of justice in their proposal letter to

Muller which was sent a number of weeks ago the president's legal team wanted

the questions limited to Russia the election and whether there was collusion

with the Trump campaign their contention is that that was what Muller was

appointed to investigate and they do not believe that the president should be

subject to questions regarding article 2 of the Constitution which spells out

presidential powers Muller said that in addition to asking those questions about

Russia and the election and possible collusion he also wants to ask about

obstruction of justice Rudy Giuliani telling Fox News early this morning

quote we have a real reluctance about allowing any questions regarding

obstruction of justice here's more from Tom Dupree on the subject obviously the

president is a busy person and if this is information that you can get in a

different way then you're obligated to try to get it through that source before

trying to get it from the President of the United States

so this is an argument that the president's legal team has been making

that that Moeller they believe has not fully demonstrated the need to talk to

the president that he is the only person who can give Moeller the information

that he's looking for it's unclear at this moment as well as what the

president's attorneys are going to go for in their response letter but I was

told that one possible scenario that might be acceptable would be an

in-person interview to talk about rush of the election and possible collusion

and then any questions about possible obstruction or any questions that would

go to the issue of obstruction of justice would be in written form again

here's Dupree the president obviously would like to do things in writing that

gives them time to think about their answers to craft the right answer as

opposed to a face-to-face interaction where you know as we've seen a lot

witnesses sometimes don't quite get it right under the pressure of the moment

Rudy Giuliani telling Fox News again that the president wants to continue

down the road of negotiation to try to make this happen he believes that if he

can get in a room with robert muller he can convince him of his innocence and

that there was no collusion but what the president's attorneys really fear here

Harris is that if he starts asking him questions about obstruction and then

brings him back in after he gets more information that really could be setting

a perjury trap which could be really bad news for the president Harrison all

right John Roberts thank you very much let's bring in James Freeman now an

assistant editor of The Wall Street Journal editorial page author of the

brand new book borrowed time on store shelves today great to see you in a beer

I well there's been a lot of breaking news in your paper in the last hour or

so you've got the Michael Cohen tax fraud investigation going on

but I want to talk specifically about where we are with a sit-down interview

and you know James I have been reporting based on what we know that once Robert

Muller would get to the president we might see a quick wrap-up so it's easy

to understand why the president might want to sit down yeah I think this this

is part of a negotiation it's been going on for a while I think maybe we're

thinking maybe it's not going to wrap up so soon if they're at an impasse so this

question of can the obstruction questions be written or or do they have

to be done in a live interview and I it seemed like Muller recently it said okay

some of them can be written but he still wants us I'm questioning there and I

think the president's lawyers are wise to say make this be about Russia which

was what this investigation was supposed to be about contains us under it's

understandable that you know written verses the spoken word you're gonna have

at Ernie's present anyway and I know the president you know gets criticized by

some for not being economic with his words I would say probably most I mean

he's very candid when he speaks you know and tweets and so the question then

becomes how did the the written deal ever get on the table in the first place

Muller's gotta know that's gonna be something that everybody would want well

I think as long as if Muller is saying okay I'll do some written but others I'm

going to question you live then his team may feel like they have enough to go

after the president on obstruction now as you've discussed and I'm sure the

judge would tell us mr. Dershowitz is explained on this network why there's a

really high bar to getting an obstruction case against the president

he is the one who holds all the executive authority under our

Constitution obviously so so there are issues there I think we'd have if they

can't settle this dispute we might have a dispute like we saw in the Clinton era

in terms of Special Counsel of fighting over a subpoena but I know you look at

the polling very carefully you look at the politics of this issue when I talk

with potential voters and those are the people who really count because it's

who's going to go to the polls yes in the midterms and in 2020 most people

can't even remember originally what this case was about and and they hear the

word collusion and they think well some people say it's not a crime Rudy

Giuliani doesn't you know doesn't think it's a crime there are many

experts by the way who say that that particular thing is not a crime Road

conspiracy actually would be the crime thread but people don't even recall

potential voters where we started with this but they see criminality Paul

Manafort Rick gates yep where are we in terms of

this being an issue for the voters well we see a lot of cases but they don't

directly relate to that original charges also I think what you're asking I think

the answer is that it is politically sustainable for I know the president

keeps saying he wants to talk to Muller I think it's politically sustainable for

him to say no because of this fact that it's now more than 2 years since the

government began investigating this alleged collusion we're still not seeing

evidence of alleged collusion and I hear it from both Republicans and Democrats

strategists who work on campaigns this is not what people ask about yeah when

they're in swing districts around this country so who is this serving because

Democrats today from you know your reporting on this I am - some are saying

that you know in terms of this issue the resist resist is back like never before

but that doesn't drive people to the polls for Democrats or Republicans Trump

idea within the Democratic Party and I'm not saying that's all Democrats but I

don't think that's a political winner I think some people in the party realize

that but as far as whether it serves one party or another mr. Muller and this is

the reason this is problematic he is almost unaccountable and can pursue this

because any attempt to manage him by the duly elected leadership is now seen as

interference last question as we head up to the midterms now and people make

their choices how much do you think people are focused on this issue before

after the midterms I don't think they are I think if there's no difference

leading up in post right now I think if President Trump wants to make this with

his Republican colleagues about the economy they've got a pretty strong hand

yeah so in other words why sit down now before the midterms because it won't

make much difference I don't I don't think his polls are gonna go up if he

sits down but there's big downside if he's trapped in some unrelated statement

that isn't accurate right all right your book is called borrowed

it and and we're kind of on borrowed time because we've got it great but

congratulations Thank You ppreciate you thanks good to be here president Trump

going all-in hoping his endorsement will push the GOP candidate across the finish

line in Ohio special election today Democrats are hoping for an upset of

course with polls showing a tight race for that House seat live report with

analysis stay close plus the Trump administration renewing sanctions

against Iran Democrats don't like the move so will it force Iran to change

some ways they say that they want us to be sincere really they're calling death

for America

you

For more infomation >> WSJ: FMR TRUMP ATTORNEY MICHAEL COHEN UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR TAX FRAUD - Duration: 15:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump warns nations from trading with Iran amid U.S. sanctions - Duration: 1:52.

U.S. President Donald Trump has warned that countries trading with Iran will not be doing

business with the United States.

His Tuesday morning tweet came as Washington's new sanctions on Tehran took effect overnight.

For more and this and other news around the world we turn to our Ro Aram….

Aram…

President Trump appears to be calling on U.S. allies to join in the isolation of Iran.

That's right Mark….In particular, Trump's warning seems to be aimed at the European

Union.

That's because the EU is trying to protect European businesses that are trading in Iran

from facing U.S. sanctions.

In his tweet, President Trump said the latest sanctions on Iran were the most biting sanctions

ever imposed, adding they will "ratchet up to yet another level" in November.

Washington is rolling out unilateral sanctions on Iran in stages following Trump's decision

to withdraw the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.

The next round of punitive measures will come into effect in November and will target Iran's

oil industry.

The EU's foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, responded to President Trump's tweet by urging

European firms to ignore the White House.

Also on Tuesday a blocking statute aimed at protecting EU firms took effect.

It involves possible punishments to European companies if they comply with Washington's

demands, while offering them a chance to sue the U.S. for interference.

Russia, which remains a signatory of the 2015 deal along with the EU and others, also slammed

the U.S. sanctions on Iran.

Moscow's foreign ministry issued a statement saying Russia will do everything necessary

to save the deal and protect its economic relationship with Tehran.

For more infomation >> Trump warns nations from trading with Iran amid U.S. sanctions - Duration: 1:52.

-------------------------------------------

Former CIA Director John Brennan Destroys One Trump's Biggest Russia Witch Hunt Claims - Duration: 1:44.

saying, and unlike this

president, I respect the need to

protect sources.

I guess what I'm trying to get

at is one of Donald Trump's

attacks on the intelligence

community where you spent the

vast majority of your career and

on law enforcement, which is

both sides of those, CIA run by

his hand picked appointees and

before that, by a political

supporter, Mike Pompeo.

The FBI now run by his hand

picked nominee, Christopher

WRAY.

He attacks them constantly.

Is it -- should he have been

warned by the FBI that there

were Russian agents in trump

tower?

Do you know if there was enough

information in possession of the

U.S. Government that in

hindsight maybe he should have

been warned?

>> Certainly the campaign was

given defensive briefings by the

FBI what they should be on the

lookout for.

But if there were ongoing

investigations at the time,

which Jim Comey and others have

acknowledged that in late July,

there were -- those

investigations were opened.

It's very, very difficult to

reveal details of an

investigation while at the same

time protecting the integrity of

that investigation.

So I know that the bureau tried

to balance their need to warn

and to advise the two campaigns

about the potential for foreign

interference.

But at the same time, continue

to pull those investigative

threads and they continued to

pull them throughout the course

of the campaign and during the

period between election and

inauguration day and subsequent

to that.

But the bureau has to be able to

protect sources and methods and

be able to ensure that their

investigation is going to be

able to continue.

>> And that was something that

was cherished and held dear by

For more infomation >> Former CIA Director John Brennan Destroys One Trump's Biggest Russia Witch Hunt Claims - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

Trump warns nations from trading with Iran amid U.S. sanctions - Duration: 1:48.

U.S. President Donald Trump has warned that countries trading with Iran will not be doing

business with the United States.

His Tuesday morning tweet came as Washington's new sanctions on Tehran took effect overnight.

For more and this and other news around the world we turn to our Ro Aram….

Aram…

President Trump appears to be calling on U.S. allies to join in the isolation of Iran.

That's right Mark….In particular, Trump's warning seems to be aimed at the European

Union.

That's because the EU is trying to protect European businesses that are trading in Iran

from facing U.S. sanctions.

In his tweet, President Trump said the latest sanctions on Iran were the most biting sanctions

ever imposed, adding they will "ratchet up to yet another level" in November.

Washington is rolling out unilateral sanctions on Iran in stages following Trump's decision

to withdraw the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.

The next round of punitive measures will come into effect in November and will target Iran's

oil industry.

The EU's foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, responded to President Trump's tweet by urging

European firms to ignore the White House.

Also on Tuesday a blocking statute aimed at protecting EU firms took effect.

It involves possible punishments to European companies if they comply with Washington's

demands, while offering them a chance to sue the U.S. for interference.

Russia, which remains a signatory of the 2015 deal along with the EU and others, also slammed

the U.S. sanctions on Iran.

Moscow's foreign ministry issued a statement saying Russia will do everything necessary

to save the deal and protect its economic relationship with Tehran.

For more infomation >> Trump warns nations from trading with Iran amid U.S. sanctions - Duration: 1:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump has offered to send Pompeo to North Korea again: Bolton - Duration: 2:04.

Let's start with those comments by U.S. President Donald Trump's top national security adviser.

John Bolton has been speaking to Fox News,.. telling them that North Korea HAS TO start

taking concrete steps on denuclearization.

He also mentioned that President Trump is prepared to send Secretary of State Mike Pompeo

back to Pyongyang to keep the dialogue between the two sides going at the highest level.

Lee Seung-jae reports.

U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton says President Trump has offered to send Secretary

of State Mike Pompeo to Pyongyang once again,... to meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un,...

and continue the ongoing negotiations on dismantling the regime's nuclear weapons program.

In an interview with Fox News on Tuesday,... Bolton revealed Trump made the proposal in

his most recent letter to Kim,... which was delivered to North Korean Foreign Minister

Ri Yong-ho during last week's ASEAN forum in Singapore.

Asked about the possibility for a second summit between Kim and Trump,... Bolton said there

aren't any plans yet,... but President Trump is "prepared to meet at any point".

He added that what's really needed isn't more rhetoric,... but "performance from North Korea

on denuclearization."

Bolton dismissed North Korea's calls for an easing of sanctions,... saying the Trump administration

will continue to enforce them,... until Pyongyang denuclearizes.

Bolton says the U.S. has lived up to its side of the Singapore Declaration,... but North

Korea,... he feels,... has not taken the steps needed to denuclearize.

Bolton also downplayed the significance of North Korea returning 55 boxes of remains

of presumed American soldiers killed during the Korean War,... saying it's just one part

of the agreement the two sides reached in Singapore.

He went on to say the North should return the remains of all foreign soldiers without

having to be asked... since there's no point withholding remains from a conflict that ended

several decades ago.

Lee Seung-jae, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump has offered to send Pompeo to North Korea again: Bolton - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

LeBron James' first tweet after Trump attack is going megaviral - Duration: 1:54.

For more infomation >> LeBron James' first tweet after Trump attack is going megaviral - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

Battle over the Trump Hollywood star - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Battle over the Trump Hollywood star - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Just Shut Down Robert Mueller - Duration: 10:26.

Donald Trump Just Shut Down Robert Mueller

Speculation has been running rampant that Robert Mueller is investigating Donald Trump

for obstruction of justice.

Will he bring down the President?

Trump shut down this line of inquiry with one move.

Trump's legal team presented arguments to Mueller that Trump did not obstruct justice

when he fired James Comey.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

LAWYERS FOR DONALD TRUMP HAVE MET SEVERAL TIMES WITH SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER

IN RECENT MONTHS AND SUBMITTED MEMOS ARGUING THAT THE PRESIDENT DIDN'T OBSTRUCT JUSTICE

BY FIRING FORMER FBI CHIEF JAMES COMEY AND CALLING INTO QUESTION MR.

COMEY'S RELIABILITY AS A POTENTIAL WITNESS, PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH THE MATTER SAID.

ONE MEMO SUBMITTED TO MR.

MUELLER BY THE PRESIDENT'S LEGAL TEAM IN JUNE LAID OUT THE CASE THAT MR.

TRUMP HAS THE INHERENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION TO HIRE AND FIRE AS HE SEES FIT

AND THEREFORE DIDN'T OBSTRUCT JUSTICE WHEN HE FIRED MR.

COMEY AS DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION IN MAY, THESE PEOPLE SAID.

ANOTHER MEMO SUBMITTED THE SAME MONTH OUTLINED WHY MR.

COMEY WOULD MAKE AN UNSUITABLE WITNESS, CALLING HIM PRONE TO EXAGGERATION, UNRELIABLE IN CONGRESSIONAL

TESTIMONY AND THE SOURCE OF LEAKS TO THE NEWS MEDIA, THESE PEOPLE SAID.

The case is airtight.

As President, Trump has the Constitutional power to fire any official at any time.

And the FBI is not an independent agency.

The Director still reports to the Executive Branch.

It is within Trump's power as head of the Executive Branch to order any investigation

shut down or opened.

There have been norms developed since Watergate to prevent this, but Trump crossed no legal

line when he wondered out loud if Comey could find a way to let former National Security

Advisor Michael Flynn go.

The Journal reported that Mueller heard the arguments:

"IN GIVING THE MEMOS TO MR.

MUELLER, THE PRESIDENT'S LAWYERS HOPED TO GET A SWIFT CONCLUSION TO THE OBSTRUCTION

OF JUSTICE PIECE OF THE INVESTIGATION AND, POTENTIALLY, AN EXONERATION OF THE PRESIDENT,

THE PEOPLE SAID.

THE OBSTRUCTION-RELATED MEMO ADVANCED OTHER ARGUMENTS BEYOND THE MATTER OF THE PRESIDENT'S

EXECUTIVE POWERS, CITING CASE LAW THAT THE LAWYERS BELIEVED BUTTRESSED THE CONTENTION

THAT MR.

TRUMP HAD NOT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE.

MR.

MUELLER DIDN'T OFFER A RESPONSE TO THAT MEMO OR TO THE ARGUMENTS PERTAINING TO MR.

COMEY'S RELIABILITY AS A WITNESS, PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH THE MATTER SAID.

THERE IS NO INDICATION HE ACCEPTED THE LAWYERS' REASONING OR HAS DROPPED THE PART OF HIS INQUIRY

THAT IS LOOKING AT ANY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY THE PRESIDENT.

ALL MR.

MUELLER COMMUNICATED WAS A WILLINGNESS TO RECEIVE LEGAL SUBMISSIONS FROM THE LAWYERS,

THE PEOPLE SAID."

Mueller has zero case on obstruction of justice.

The law and Constitution are on Trump's side.

His lawyers proved that in their arguments to Mueller.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Just Shut Down Robert Mueller - Duration: 10:26.

-------------------------------------------

Cuomo Can't Stomach Rosie, Tells Her To Leave Trump Alone for Her Dignity's Sake - Duration: 4:02.

For more infomation >> Cuomo Can't Stomach Rosie, Tells Her To Leave Trump Alone for Her Dignity's Sake - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump has offered to send Pompeo to North Korea again: Bolton - Duration: 1:57.

U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton says...

North Korea has to start taking concrete steps on denuclearization.

Speaking to Fox News,... he also said President Trump is willing to send Secretary of State

Mike Pompeo back to Pyongyang to keep the dialogue momentum going.

Park Hee-jun reports.

U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton says President Trump has offered to send Secretary

of State Mike Pompeo to Pyongyang once again,... to meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un

and continue negotiations on denuclearization.

In an interview with Fox News on Tuesday,... Bolton revealed that Trump made the proposal

in his most recent letter to Kim,... delivered to North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho

during last week's ASEAN Regional Forum in Singapore.

But contrary to Bolton's remarks,... the U.S. State Department said it has nothing to reveal

at this point.

Spokesperson Heather Nauert told reporters there is nothing to announce concerning any

future trip to North Korea by Mike Pompeo,... but said she isn't going to predict what could

happen,... leaving possibility of another visit open.

Bolton also said that although there aren't any plans yet for a second summit between

Kim and Trump,...

President Trump is "prepared to meet at any point".

He added that what's really needed isn't more rhetoric,... but North Korea making progress

on denuclearization.

Bolton also dismissed North Korea's calls for an easing of sanctions,... and reiterated

that the Trump administration will continue to enforce them until the North's complete

denuclearization.

And while the U.S. has lived up to its side of the agreement reached in Singapore,...

he said he felt North Korea was not doing enough.

Although the North returned 55 boxes of remains of presumed American soldiers killed during

the Korean War,... Bolton downplayed its significance saying it's just one part of the agreement,...

and that it should return the remains of all foreign soldiers,... as there's no point withholding

remains from a conflict that ended several decades ago.

Park Hee-jun, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump has offered to send Pompeo to North Korea again: Bolton - Duration: 1:57.

-------------------------------------------

30-Year-Old Bernie Clip Shows Him Agreeing With Trump: Media's Untrustworthy - Duration: 2:37.

For more infomation >> 30-Year-Old Bernie Clip Shows Him Agreeing With Trump: Media's Untrustworthy - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

Steve Schmidt Perfectly Explains Why Trump Is Freaking About Felony Russia Charges - Duration: 1:52.

campaign, not a lot of chances

that they didn't know what the

meeting was about, they all told

this lie to the press, to each

other, to the rest of the white

house, that the idea of every

one of those people on the list

of six names that Robert Mueller

sent over, after it came out

wasn't about adoption, could be

in serious legal jeopardy.

>> No doubt that's true.

What we've known for a long

time, was there collusion?

Of course there was.

When the leading officials of

the presidential campaign go to

a meeting with Russian

intelligence operatives for the

purpose of receiving dirt on the

democratic party's nominee for

president, they were colluding

with a hostile foreign

intelligence power.

What I don't know is does it

meet the legal definition of

felony conspiracy against the

United States?

And that's what we're going to

find out over the course of the

investigation.

But I know this for sure -- on

any of the campaigns that we

worked on together and we worked

on two presidential campaigns

together, and I know for sure

whether you're talking about the

senior people who we were in

opposition against on the Obama

campaign, on the John Kerry

campaign, people that we know

well.

Not a single person on any of

those campaigns around Barack

Obama or John Kerry, the they

were called and asked do you

want to meet with Russian

intelligence operatives,

officials, people with ties to

the Kremlin to get dirt on

George W. Bush or John McCain,

the answer would have been hell

no, and they would have called

the FBI.

>> That's what people do.

When we come back, we go inside

the courtroom where the

prosecution's star witness

pulled back the curtain on Paul

manafort's criminal enterprise.

Also ahead, blue wave rising.

How anger at the president could

get a Democrat close enough to

rattle Republicans in a deep red

part of Ohio.

Stay with us.

But he has plans today.

So he took Aleve this morning.

Hey Dad.

For more infomation >> Steve Schmidt Perfectly Explains Why Trump Is Freaking About Felony Russia Charges - Duration: 1:52.

-------------------------------------------

Stormy Daniels' lawyer just brutally trolled Trump over his racist "birther" attacks on Obama - Duration: 1:37.

For more infomation >> Stormy Daniels' lawyer just brutally trolled Trump over his racist "birther" attacks on Obama - Duration: 1:37.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Administration Re-Imposed Sanctions On Iran - Duration: 0:26.

For more infomation >> Trump Administration Re-Imposed Sanctions On Iran - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

Jeff Sessions Just Said The One Thing Every Trump Supporter Was Waiting To Hear - Duration: 12:21.

Jeff Sessions Just Said The One Thing Every Trump Supporter Was Waiting To Hear

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been on the receiving end of a lot of criticism from

President Trump and many of his supporters.

It has led to months of speculation about Sessions job security.

But Sessions just stepped up and said the one thing every Trump supporter was waiting

to hear.

Ever since Donald Trump took office, the left has used the federal district courts to override

his agenda.

This full-scale assault on the Constitution's separation of powers and the rule of law has

been especially pronounced on immigration issues.

Every time Trump uses his executive authority, as is set by article I of the Constitution,

the left files a challenge in either Washington, D.C. or California because they know the bench

is stacked with radical left-wing judges.

This situation played out when President Trump rescinded Barack Obama's illegal executive

amnesty program.

DACA – which is really a Department of Homeland Security memo that lays out how the Obama

administration will enforce immigration law – was implemented ahead of the 2012 election.

Trump campaigned on repealing the program and followed through last September.

The left immediately launched a legal challenge, and Washington, D.C. District Court Judge

John Bates has now ordered the Trump administration to restart the DACA program.

This judicial assault on the rule of law did not sit well with the Trump administration.

The Justice Department issued a statement where Sessions savaged the Judge's decision

to force the Trump administration to implement Obama's illegal DACA executive amnesty program.

Sessions wrote:

"WE STRONGLY DISAGREE WITH THE DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION ON FRIDAY IN THE DEFERRED

ACTION FOR CHILDHOOD ARRIVALS (DACA) CASE.

THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH'S AUTHORITY TO SIMPLY RESCIND A POLICY, ESTABLISHED ONLY BY A LETTER

FROM THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IS CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WILL TAKE EVERY LAWFUL MEASURE TO VINDICATE THE DEPARTMENT

OF HOMELAND SECURITY'S LAWFUL RESCISSION OF DACA.

"THE LAST ADMINISTRATION VIOLATED ITS DUTY TO ENFORCE OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS BY DIRECTING

AND IMPLEMENTING A CATEGORICAL, MULTIPRONGED NON-ENFORCEMENT IMMIGRATION POLICY FOR A MASSIVE

GROUP OF ILLEGAL ALIENS.

THIS WRONGFUL ACTION LEFT DACA OPEN TO THE SAME LEGAL CHALLENGES THAT EFFECTIVELY INVALIDATED

ANOTHER PROGRAM THEY ESTABLISHED—DEFERRED ACTION FOR PARENTS OF AMERICANS AND LAWFUL

PERMANENT RESIDENTS (DAPA).

DAPA'S IMPLEMENTATION WAS BLOCKED BY THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

AND NEVER ENTERED INTO EFFECT.

THESE TWO POLICIES DECLARED BY OFFICIALS OF THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION—BY POLICY LETTERS

ONLY—HAD BEEN CONSIDERED BY CONGRESS AND REJECTED.

Sessions also attacked the recent trend of district court judges usurping the power of

the executive and legislative branches to set federal policy:

"THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S ACTION TO WITHDRAW THE POLICY LETTERS SIMPLY REESTABLISHED

THE LEGAL POLICIES CONSISTENT WITH THE LAW.

NOT ONLY DID THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO WITHDRAW THIS GUIDANCE LETTER,

IT HAD A DUTY TO DO SO.

AS FORMER PRESIDENT OBAMA PREVIOUSLY SAID, THE CHANGES THEY ATTEMPTED TO EFFECT THROUGH

THIS POLICY LETTER CAN ONLY BE LAWFULLY ACHIEVED BY CONGRESSIONAL ACTION.

THE JUDICIAL BRANCH HAS NO POWER TO EVISCERATE THE LAWFUL DIRECTIVES OF CONGRESS—NOR TO

ENJOIN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH FROM ENFORCING SUCH MANDATES.

"WE HAVE RECENTLY WITNESSED A NUMBER OF DECISIONS IN WHICH COURTS HAVE IMPROPERLY

USED JUDICIAL POWER TO STEER, ENJOIN, MODIFY, AND DIRECT EXECUTIVE POLICY.

THIS IGNORES THE WISDOM OF OUR FOUNDERS AND TRANSFERS POLICY MAKING QUESTIONS FROM THE

CONSTITUTIONALLY EMPOWERED AND POLITICALLY ACCOUNTABLE BRANCHES TO THE JUDICIAL BRANCH.

IT ALSO IMPROPERLY UNDERMINES THIS ADMINISTRATION'S ABILITY TO PROTECT OUR NATION, ITS BORDERS,

AND ITS CITIZENS.

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND THIS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WILL CONTINUE TO AGGRESSIVELY DEFEND

THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH'S LAWFUL AUTHORITY AND DUTY TO ENSURE A LAWFUL SYSTEM OF IMMIGRATION

FOR OUR COUNTRY."

Bates' argument is that, essentially, it's unconstitutional for Trump to be President.

But Trump supporters were thrilled to see Attorney General Jeff Sessions step up and

swat down this nonsense.

Do you agree that judicial supremacy is out of control?

Let us know your thoughts in

the comment section.

For more infomation >> Jeff Sessions Just Said The One Thing Every Trump Supporter Was Waiting To Hear - Duration: 12:21.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Hammers America's Top Enemy, Fixes Obama Mistake - Duration: 12:47.

Trump Hammers America's Top Enemy, Fixes Obama Mistake

Over the last year and a half, we've said this a lot—the Trump administration is once

again rolling back one of the many terrible decisions made by Obama.

How many times has Trump done this?

Too many to count, really.

You might remember one of Trump's first executive orders.

He forced government agencies to eliminate two old regulations for every new one.

That one move destroyed Obama's policy of massive government oversight.

It kickstarted the economic boom we are enjoying today.

In addition to that: President Trump nixed the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a hallmark

Obama deal.

He withdrew us from the Paris Climate Agreement—something Obama obligated us to (without even consulting

America).

Now, perhaps the biggest mistake of Obama's administration is finally being corrected.

At the stroke of midnight.

From The Right Scoop:

The Trump administration is within hours of reimposing sanctions on Iran that had been

lifted under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, from which the US has withdrawn.

"What's happening today is part of a coordinated campaign of pressure President Trump put in

place from day one of his administration," a senior administration official told reporters

on a press call Monday…

Administration officials said the snapback sanctions would limit Iran's ability to

purchase U.S. dollar banknotes, would impede the country's ability to trade gold and

precious metals and would prohibit Iran from selling or transferring Iranian graphite,

as well as aluminum, steel, coal and software used to integrate industrial processes.

Even liberals were upset over the Iran Nuclear Deal.

Obama rolled over and gave Iran everything, with the "promise" that they wouldn't

make nukes.

Most experts agreed that without a few short years, Iran would be nuclear capable.

An Iran with WMD's is completely unacceptable.

Most nations with nukes are very reluctant to use that.

That is, they never will.

But Iran?

Don't even wonder.

Iran with nukes would have kicked off World War III.

They would have immediately used them to attack Israel, American allies in the Middle East

and Europe, and United States soil.

Iran would have used its military might to join forces with other rogue nations.

The death toll would be catastrophic.

But that nightmare has been everted.

Thanks to President Trump.

He promised a long time ago, before he was elected, that he would end the Nuclear Deal.

He made good on that promise, despite the heavy pressure from liberals.

Now we can sleep safe, knowing that Iran is being punished for its reckless behavior.

They will have to radically change their ways before the sanctions are lifted.

That includes making peace with the U.S. and our ally Israel.

It seemed Obama never even tried to make that happen.

He just gave the enemy state everything—including billions.

Really makes you wonder whose side

he was on?

No comments:

Post a Comment