Wednesday, August 15, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 15 2018

One Number Just Revealed Nancy Pelosi's Chances Of Impeaching Trump

The November midterm elections are just around the corner.

Both parties are gearing up for an election that could determine the fate of Donald Trump's

Presidency.

And one number just revealed Nancy Pelosi's chances of seizing power and impeaching Donald

Trump.

It's no understatement to say that the midterm elections will be a battle over Donald Trump's

political future.

If Democrats win back the House their unhinged base will demand the new majority initiate

impeachment proceedings against the President.

Midterm elections are contests of base mobilization.

Whichever party's voter base is more enthusiastic to vote will triumph in November.

One measure of enthusiasm is to examine the candidates' fundraising reports.

And an exclusive Bloomberg investigation found a record number 73 Democrat challengers are

outraising their Republican opponents.

Bloomberg reported:

"DEMOCRATS ARE HOPING A BLUE WAVE OF SUPPORT WILL CARRY THEM TO VICTORY IN THIS FALL'S

ELECTIONS.

IN THE MEANTIME, THEY'VE CAUGHT A GREEN WAVE OF CASH—THE TORRENT OF MONEY POURING

INTO DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN COFFERS HELPED 73 HOUSE CANDIDATES OUTRAISE REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS

AND OPPONENTS IN RACES FOR OPEN SEATS IN THE SECOND QUARTER, A BLOOMBERG ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL

ELECTION COMMISSION DATA SHOWS."

Historically, this is normal.

The party out of power gains seats in a midterm election year.

Their voters are furious over losing the last Presidential election and are primed to send

a message.

Additionally, Republicans are defending 42 open seat races, which is a higher number

than normal for a party in power.

These races tend to be toss-ups or favor the opposition party because the majority party

can no longer count on a well known and well funded incumbent to run as their candidate.

Both of these numbers have Democrats like Nancy Pelosi drooling over the possibilities

the future holds.

They are measuring the drapes and counting down the days until Pelosi holds the Speaker's

gavel.

At that time, Democrats will – despite their campaign trail rhetoric – move to impeach

President Trump.

But all is not lost for Donald Trump and the GOP.

Republicans have the advantage of running with a booming economy providing wind at their

backs.

Second quarter gross domestic product growth clocked in at 4.1 percent.

And unemployment is at its lowest point since 2000 while consumer confidence is around an

18 year high.

Republicans have a record to run on.

Democrats are also conducting a foolhardy campaign to make Donald Trump's immigration

policies the central issue of the midterm elections.

While this issue is so to energize the Democrat base, it will also marshal Republicans to

rally behind candidates who pledge to fight for Donald Trump's Make America Great Again

agenda.

Democrats – and many in the fake news media – foolishly thought Trump's hard-line

immigration proposals were political death in 2016.

In reality, they were the fuel that powered his victory.

While Democrats are positioned to have a good showing in November, there are still three

months until Election Day and with a good economy and favorable issue fights ahead of

them, no one should count the Republicans out.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in the 2018 midterm

elections

For more infomation >> One Number Just Revealed Nancy Pelosi's Chances Of Impeaching Trump - Duration: 13:12.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's spokeswoman was just cornered on his n word tape scandal and her response is stunning - Duration: 1:30.

For more infomation >> Trump's spokeswoman was just cornered on his n word tape scandal and her response is stunning - Duration: 1:30.

-------------------------------------------

Michelle's Closest Allies Just Turned On Her Hard After Trump Exposes Her Huge Lie - Duration: 7:34.

For more infomation >> Michelle's Closest Allies Just Turned On Her Hard After Trump Exposes Her Huge Lie - Duration: 7:34.

-------------------------------------------

Former CIA Official Says Trump Is Trying To Move The US Toward Authoritarianism - Duration: 1:59.

John, good to talk to you again.

Just talk to me about what Hans

was just saying.

The thing about John Brennan and

others that are named here that

gets under the president's skin

is criticism of this

administration, none of which is

affected by whether or not you

and others like you have

clearances.

>> Not at all, Ali.

This is ridiculous.

I can think of few things the

president has done that more

directly indicate a kind of

authoritarian attitude in his

governing style.

To pull clearances from someone

is something that you see happen

when leaders of countries that

are trying to move them in that

direction try to silence their

enemies, along with other things

they do.

And clearly nothing that John

Brennan has said or that the

other intelligence people on

this list have said has anything

to do with classified

information.

The reason you pull someone's

clearances, the unique reason

really, is if they have abused

or in some ways released in an

unauthorized way classified

information.

These people haven't done that.

They have only spoken out using

their first amendment rights to

state their personal opinions.

Looking at abuse of classified

information, the president might

look in the mirror.

You recall what he did when he

released inappropriately

classified information it's said

from an Israeli report when he

talked to the Russians.

>> Right.

>> So I think it's just across

the board a foolish thing to do

and I believe Katy Tur was

probably correct in saying this

is nothing more than a

distraction at this point.

The other point I'd make to you

is that in my understanding and

having been involved in these

cases, typically there is some

sort of a hearing before this is

done.

Typically there is an appeal

process.

And often these cases can

escalate to a federal court.

I doubt anyone in the white

house has thought through any of

For more infomation >> Former CIA Official Says Trump Is Trying To Move The US Toward Authoritarianism - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

Trump required people to sign unconstitutional NDAs - Duration: 1:08.

taxpayers.

They don't work for Donald

Trump, the family or personal

business.

They work for the government of

the United States.

>> No Anderson, they would not

be enforceable.

I was a lawyer for the Obama

campaign, transition and white

house.

We never dreamt of one.

I never heard of them.

Sarah Sanders, I'll say it, she

was out and out lying today,

Anderson.

Because if you listen to what

she said, she said they're

common in the classified

but that's not what we're

talking about here.

Immediate ra reports are omarosa

didn't even have a security

clearance.

So the law is that the first

amendment protects the right of

government officials when they

leave to speak.

It's a part of freedom of

speech.

And that's why it is reported

that don mcgahn, my friend Jim

was very lawyer ly.

But that's why it was reported

that don mcgahn said essentially

go ahead and sign, it can never

be enforced against you.

So this is one more.

But the fact that Donald Trump

required people to sign an

unconstitutional document is one

more piece of evidence of his

For more infomation >> Trump required people to sign unconstitutional NDAs - Duration: 1:08.

-------------------------------------------

El gran descuido de la reina Letizia frente a Melania Trump con su vestido - Duration: 4:37.

For more infomation >> El gran descuido de la reina Letizia frente a Melania Trump con su vestido - Duration: 4:37.

-------------------------------------------

What Trump Just Exposed Spells DOOM For Mueller's Team Of Corruption - Duration: 4:05.

For more infomation >> What Trump Just Exposed Spells DOOM For Mueller's Team Of Corruption - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

Pro-Trump FOX host Geraldo just blindsided Trump with a strong response to Omarosa attack - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> Pro-Trump FOX host Geraldo just blindsided Trump with a strong response to Omarosa attack - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

The Trump Impeachment Movement Just Got What They've Been Waiting For - Duration: 3:32.

For more infomation >> The Trump Impeachment Movement Just Got What They've Been Waiting For - Duration: 3:32.

-------------------------------------------

Watch Sarah Sanders defend Trump calling Omarosa a 'dog' : White House Press Briefing - Duration: 34:40.

good afternoon the images from the Honorable Kerry ceremony at Joint Base

pearl harbor this month made us all proud to be Americans President Trump is

committed to getting the almost 8,000 left behind from the Korean War home and

bringing closure to the families who have been waiting for more than 60 years

the process of identifying and verifying the remains is challenging but one that

this administration is committed to overseeing this process its Kelley mikeg

the director of Defense for powa MI a accounting agency leading DoD's

worldwide operation of research investigation recovery and

identification and supporting functions director mikeg strives to provide the

fullest possible accounting of our missing personnel the director along

with his colleagues dr. John bird the defense Pio w in MI accounting agency

laboratory director and dr. Timothy McMahon director of DoD DNA operations

have joined us today to offer remarks and take their questions on this topic

after this I'll be back up to address other questions and news today ladies

and gentlemen good afternoon the August 1st repatriation and homecoming in

Hawaii of the remains of the Korean War unaccounted for was a poignant

manifestation of the commitment secured by President Trump and pledged by

Chairman Kim at the Singapore summit for the families of the 7700 still

unaccounted for from the Korean War this first step in fulfilling this commitment

has undoubtedly provided a seed of hope last week over 700 of these family

members gathered in Arlington Virginia to receive government updates and they

were resoundingly appreciative of the successful advocacy of the president and

his administration two of those family members who attended Charles and Larry

McDaniel were the recipients of the dogtag their father Master Sergeant

Charles McDaniel of Indiana it was a sole personal effect

by the North Koreans the remains of those 55 cases are well into the

painstaking multifaceted analyses by dr. John bird and his forensic science team

in Hawaii and in the coming weeks dr. Tim McMahon and his dedicated DNA

specialists in Delaware will begin their meticulous testing the mettle of our

scientists and the capabilities of our labs will be challenged but in the

months and years ahead they will make identification from these

remains and give families long sought answers we are guardedly optimistic the

one august repatriation is the first tangible action of others which with

with which we will be able to account for more of our missing from the korean

war the second aspect of the korean of the singapore commitment was the

recovery of remains in North Korea which DPRK officials reaffirmed last month we

are in the midst of exploring next steps as well as discussions with the Korean

People's Army for the express purpose of resuming joint field operations and

having additional repatriations but our mission to search for find an account

for missing Department of Defense personnel from World War two through

Operation Iraqi Freedom is one not limited to the Korean Peninsula today

186 personnel from DPA and private partners are deployed in seven nations

and yesterday 50 of those members returned from Laos and the Philippines

our global mission is humanitarian in every respect because the impact of a

missing American to their family is not constrained by time or generations and

it leaves an enduring pain and void this is why former enemies like Vietnam use

cooperation on the PIO wmia mission as a bridge to normalization and today's

thriving bilateral relationship with the United States the fact that the United

States of America vigorously pursues the fullest possible accounting of our

missing reflects our values as a nation the sacred obligation if not moral

imperative remains a high priority for the Department of Defense

inherent to the exceptional teamwork resources and resoluteness provided by

multiple agencies is a solemn vow that those who were sent off in harm's way

and are missing will not be forgotten and their families will receive answers

to their decades of uncertainty my colleagues and I welcome your questions

gentlemen I was with President Clinton in 2000 when he went to a place in

Vietnam north of Hanoi where one of these recovery efforts were under

underway so I some familiarity with this even there when things are discovered it

takes a long time to establish the trail forensics a I'd like to ask you both

what condition are the remains or the parts of remains you've received so far

and how challenging will the forensic work be ahead of you a long long way or

with what you received something to get you close to identifying and confirming

we we would characterize the preservation of the remains as moderate

to poor as a general consideration however what our lab specializes in is

making identifications in circumstances where you have very little to work with

and so I'm confident that we're going to do well with the remains in these 55

boxes over the coming months and and maybe the next several years when you

look at what's at stake we're going to be doing a lot of DNA sampling and

that's what dr. McMahon's lab does is they process the samples and then they

go into a mass database where they can be compared to all of the other samples

that we've generated from remains from North Korea and also compared to the

family members and so it takes some time to get the samples process through the

lab at athletes takes some time to get them into the mask comparison but once

they're in there we'll start looking for the the quick identifications that can

be made where you have compelling matches that showed themselves early on

we also look for comparisons to dental records that can

be distinctive we look for individuals that are unusual in the sense of being

very tall very short very old anything that distinguishes somebody we can

usually get a good clue and identify them faster but because of the

preservation of the remains that will just sort of guide the kinds of methods

that we can bring to bear on the case and and the case will be very DNA our

very DNA intensive in terms of the way that we're going to go about this what

does that number represent lives individual no it's the number of boxes

that the remains came in and at no time did did we expect there to be one body

one box nor did the North Koreans try to pitch it that way to us when we were in

one we have a high confidence so in the early 90s for five years the North

Koreans would reap a treat unilaterally remains that they had recovered out of

those 208 boxes over those five years we estimated after DNA sampling 400

individuals now from that 200 were Americans so the likelihood is you're

correct there may be some of un sending forces there may be some South Korean

soldiers remains as well as Chinese and North Korean what our laboratories both

DNA and the forensic laboratory have the technology and the capabilities by which

to differentiate those remains over the course of the next several years I think

you mentioned you're in some discussions with the north

about potential future actions maybe to search for more remains and joint

efforts as such I think the Pentagon and the Secretary Madison mentioned that

what if I find if I'm to understand right the Bush administration ended the

program in which the US officials would be helping search for the remains in

part because of security concerns our own forces there

can you describe kind of what you're looking for from the north that could

resume those kind of operation join operations and you know what steps you

need to talk those who are there may be so for ten years we operated between

1996 and 2005 over time collect conducting 33 joint activities with the

North Koreans security is primarily our responsibility for our personnel we also

pay attention to communications having communications abilities as well as

having an ability to medevac our personnel should they get hurt what we

would be looking for from the North Koreans is again a commitment from them

that communications medical evacuation requirements can be met and more

importantly that we can conduct these joint operations in a collaborative way

as we had done for 10 years it all comes down back into 2005 to their behavior on

the international stage the president rightfully so was concerned that their

nuclear activities their missile activities were countermanding and

counterproductive to our joint operations which is why we suspended

talks that are going on or is it specifics about being in the field that

you're really looking at both so secretary Pompeo and getting a

reaffirmation from the North Koreans last month affirm that they do want to

establish communications with us and to conduct joint operations we have not

started those negotiations we will do so it is on a separate track however as you

well pointed out it could be drawn into the greater geopolitical stream but for

now we're treating it as a military-to-military contact but more

importantly as a humanitarian endeavor that's separate and distinct from

anything else and by the way the 45 countries that we work with

all right felices as a humanitarian endeavor including countries like Russia

and China where we have a tremendous cooperation with them the recent death

of former congressman bill hinden of North Carolina brought back a lot of the

rehashing of serious charges he made that those were in Vietnam either as

prisoners or dead were not fully accounted for has the book finally been

closed on those Americans who served in Vietnam and were prisoners of war it has

so right now there are close to 1,700 1,600 that are remain missing and

unaccounted for within that set of unaccounted for is what we call last

known alive it's a small subset of individuals who for whatever reason

we're seen alive that's a certain point during the war and we remained

unaccounted for our priority with the Vietnamese is to get at that subset

small subset I think it's down to 25 not necessarily prisoners of war but again

last known alive at the time that they were seen

of the remains in the 55 boxes can we confirm for a fact that all of them are

human remains or are we still questioning that yes we we did a cursory

inspection of the remains and once on before we loaded them on to our military

aircraft just to ensure that at least some of what was in each box was human

when we got to asan in South Korea we spent two days going through every box

in detail conducting what we call a field forensic review purpose of that

review is to ensure that every item is consistent with being human and if there

were any animal remains we would have cold them out at that point as it was we

did not find any animal remains do we have any idea how many people that we're

looking at yeah no we don't you know there is a scientific process to

estimate that and I wish it were very fast because I think a lot of people

would really like to know the families would love to know that information but

unfortunately it's going to take months of analysis to start to get a refined

estimate do you have timeline

can you characterize what it has been like to work with

a particular part of this process have they been working with

okay so the the first question is mr. mikeg mentioned we're in the process of

planning next steps so we can't say we have any timeline today for bringing

back more remains we're hopeful that we will be in the not-too-distant future I

will say though in terms of having worked there I worked there in the past

during the 1996 to 2005 years I spent a lot of time in the field there and then

I went into once on with our team on July 27th and there was a very different

feel to it this time it was a a much more friendly welcoming and collegial

approach this time compared to the way it used to be looking ahead to next week

ambassador Bolton will meet with officials in Israel and Ukraine as well

as with his Russian counterpart in Geneva as a follow-up to the Helsinki

summit to discuss a range of important national security issues lastly we

extend our prayers to the families of those injured and deceased after the

tragic bridge collapse in Genoa Italy as well as to the victims of this morning's

attack in London the president condemns this horrible attack on innocent

civilians instead is ready to provide assistance to the United Kingdom and

with that I'll take your questions Jonathan from the president via Twitter

on Omarosa describing her as crazed a crying

lowlife a dog is this any way for a president to talk about any American let

alone somebody that he hired and made the highest-ranking african-american

in his white house I think the president is certainly voicing his frustration

with the fact that this person has shown a complete lack of integrity

particularly by the actions following her time here at the White House the

president wanted to give her a chance and he made clear when General Kelly

came on and he voiced concerns that this individual what didn't have the best

interest of the White House and the president in the country at heart

the president said do what you can to get along and if you can't he gave him

full authority to carry out the decision to let her go look I think he's made

again the frustrations III think all not only those of us here in the White House

but frankly I think most of America would be happy to ignore it

unfortunately the individuals in this room continue to create a large platform

for somebody they know not to have a lot of credibility for someone they frankly

refuse to give a platform to when they worked here at the White House it wasn't

until this individual started to negatively attack this president in this

administration and try to tear this entire place down that she received the

type of platform and rollout that she's getting I think it would be great if

every single person in this room and every single person in the

administration never had to talk about this again and we actually got to focus

on the real policies and the real things that not matter just to people in this

building but certainly all Americans african-americans Hispanics and

everybody in between I think that would be the best thing that we could

certainly do for our country Jill

see his attacks on Omarosa as part of a pattern of insulting prominent African

Americans people he's taken four decides recently improved on lemon Mexican water

is his claim that football players protesting racial injustice don't know

their protests look the president this has absolutely nothing to do with race

and everything to do with the president calling out someone's lack of integrity

the idea that you would only point a few of the things that the president has

said negative about people that are minorities the fact is the president's

an equal-opportunity person that calls things like he sees it he always fights

fire with fire and he certainly doesn't hold back on doing that across the board

I'm not gonna get into the back-and-forth on who has signed an NDA

here at the White House I can tell you that it's common in a lot of places for

employees to sign NDA's including in government particularly anyone with a

security clearance John may have to be happy to go by any of that means he gets

to take your question but um the president said he kept tourists on

despite complaints from my colleagues because she was personally supported by

then sorry are you he said he kept her on despite complaints about her behavior

because she was personally supportive of Hammonds

nice things about him is that true any other officials that are working in this

White House right now I'm not aware of them Jessica since you

don't want to talk about it tomorrow I have a bunch on Turkey that hopefully

you want make the period oh I don't know we'll do our best

you have a reaction to president hairdo on calling for a ban on u.s. electronics

like iPhones and what the president encouraged a similar ban on Turkish

products by her I certainly don't have a policy announcement on that front at

this point sort of the same thing there was a report from our colleague of

Reuters that the u.s. is a warning turkey of increased pressure so on any

details on how that was conveyed what additional steps might look like and the

US would take additional steps before that you're in for the detained American

pastor on my token law how the information from Turkey was received or

how the information from the United States to Turkey we can tell you that at

the Turkish ambassadors requests as you know Ambassador John Bolton

met with the ambassador of Turkey yesterday here at the White House and

continue to raise and point out the concerns that we have one last one the

president encouraged Israel's government to release a Turkish citizen in July and

today this frustration with apparent anomaly

sameness American past certainly the president has a great deal of

frustration on the fact that pastor Brunson has not been released as well as

the fact that other US citizens and employees of diplomatic facilities have

not been released and we're going to continue to call on Turkey to do the

right thing and release those individuals sugar does the President or

this White House believe that it is a violation of Department of Justice

protocol if the special counsels investigation goes beyond September

first I'm not going to say that we would say necessarily a specific violation but

I think we've been very clear that not only do we but all of the American

people want this to wrap up John thank you Sarah two questions on Turkey as the

relationship between the president and President Erdogan grows peripheries my

question very simply is are we going to see the restoration of the readouts of

honey halls between the president and other world leaders that was terminated

on the day after president Erdogan's election and although we know that he

are the president made a congratulatory call to him there's been no readout

sense is that going to be restored certainly we'll continue to keep you all

posted not just on calls with Turkey but other hit up state calls as well and

provide readouts when we have them date first and the speak has been on a

surprise offensive that have killed about a hundred Afghan

security forces a couple dozen and civilians as far as we know the

president was visiting with the 10th 10th Mountain Division yesterday at Fort

Drum they've served in Afghanistan does this new offensive as he still

committed to his strategy that he outlined a year ago for Afghanistan or

is this new offensive give them the idea that maybe a different approach it might

be needed certainly no announcements or changes in

policy from the president's rollout last August the president addressed that

question directly via Twitter I'd refer you back to him I can certainly say I've

never heard him use that term or anything similar

you asked the president I didn't have to because he addressed it to the American

people all at one time you asked him direct again the president

answered that question directly on Twitter earlier today I can't guarantee

anything but I can tell you that the president addressed this question

directly I can tell you that I've never heard it I can also tell you that if

myself or the people that are in this building serving this country every

single day doing our very best to help people all across this country and make

it better if at any point we felt that the president was who some of his

critics claimed him to be we certainly wouldn't be here this is a president who

is fighting for all Americans who is putting policies in place that help all

Americans particularly African Americans just look at the economy alone this

president since he took office in the year and a half that he's been here has

created 700 thousand new jobs for African Americans that's 700,000 African

Americans that are working now that weren't working when this President took

place when President Obama left after eight years in office eight years in

office he had only created 800 or 195,000 jobs for African Americans

President Trump in his first year and a half has already tripled what President

Obama did in eight years not only did he do that

for african-americans but for Hispanics 1.7 million more Hispanics are working

now this is a president who cares about all Americans who is committed to

helping them and is putting policies in place that actually do that Kevin

started Kristin I'm gonna go ahead a Kevin coming away go ahead just to be

clear you can't guarantee it look I haven't been in every single room I can

tell you the president has addressed this directly he's arrested directly to

the American people and I can tell you what the focus and the part of the

president is and that's on helping all Americans and certainly this is somebody

who has been in business for decades and you're just now hearing some of these

outrageous accusations after the fact he's dealt with people all over the

world it wasn't until he became a candidate for president that you started

to hear some of these salacious and ridiculous claims and certainly I think

if you look at the actions that this president has taken certainly the

policies that he's enacted you can see the heart of who he is and you can see

exactly what he has done and the type of president person he is Kevin if you

Sarah just a very quick one on something that palmarosa said today she called the

president unfit mentally unfit for the office as someone who worked with her

how surprised are you at the the level of her animus toward this president

toward this White House and if I could father I'm certainly I think like most

people that worked with her very disappointed that she would go to such a

self-serving and somebody who blatantly cares more about herself than our

country to make up some of these outrageous claims and accusations look

she worked here for a year and it didn't have any of these things to say in fact

everything she said was quite the opposite and not just the year that she

worked here but the time that she spent on the campaign trail and I think it's

really sad what she's doing at this point very quickly I wanted to ask you

just very briefly we read earlier this afternoon that the Trump campaign

has made an arbitration action against omorosa

and I'm just curious and I know there's separate entities but is it likely that

the White House is considering pursuing something in the way of possible action

toward Omarosa for violating it I certainly wouldn't go on to comment on

any potential ongoing legal matter major moment ago you said one of the motives

from roast was to tear this entire place down what do you mean by that and do you

have or others here have ongoing concerns that while she was here she

taped other conversations that could either be damaging to the reputation

this White House or relevant or is something you'd rather keep right I

think the greatest concern we have is the lack of integrity that this

individual has shown I think Sarah she played a tape recording of a

conversation with the president you have any doubt that that is an authentic

conversation that she had with the president I don't the president said he

was unaware in that conversation is that was that a truthful representation of

what he knew at the time what was he just trying to make all neurosis feel

that as I said moments ago the president had had a direct conversation with

general Kelly asked him to try to work things out if it didn't he gave general

Kelly the full authority to make decisions about hiring and firing

including with respect to Omarosa because he knew what would have happened

he knew he'd approve on the timing I think is he knew that it was certainly a

possibility but as to the fact whether or not general Kelly had called the

president I don't think he had at that point we've heard the president declare

that the so-called Islamic state terror group has been

practically vanquished you know especially in Iraq and Syria

well the Defense Department yesterday lead Inspector General for operation

inherent resolve in fact says that their forces are estimated to be anywhere

between twenty eight thousand six hundred and thirty one thousand six

hundred fighters which would be about the number that they had at their peak

so has Isis been practically backpack certainly we know that the Caliphate has

been practically destroyed certainly there are continued to be Isis fighters

and that's why we continue to take all of those threats seriously and look for

ways every single day to defeat them and protect American people and our allies

to the question again I get that you can cite things statistics that might be

positive statistics for policies the president has done he's V other

minorities what do you say to people who look at the pattern of comments that the

president has made specifically about African Americans and feel like he is

singling those folks out because of their race are they are they missing

something are they deluding themselves what what do you say to them because

there are lots of people out there who look at the pattern and say yes he's he

says negative things about a lot of people but there seems to be a

particular pattern of singling out African Americans and commenting in

particular about their their intelligence or lack thereof and their

looks I certainly don't think so I think as I said that the president has said

similar things about a number of individuals certainly that are not

African American or any other minority I can simply talk to you about the

policies and the person that the president is I think if again the person

that a lot of his critics say he is certainly wouldn't have been in business

with him for decades certainly he wouldn't have had Bill and Hillary

Clinton they attended his wedding a number of Democrats begged him for

campaign contributions I mean if they were who he said he was why did they

have these relationships with him I think it is very convenient that these

accusations started the president became someone running for

office he has shown time and time again through his actions through his policies

that he wants to be a president for all Americans that he wants to do everything

he can to make America better and not just for a certain group of people but

for everybody I think that he has made a number of comments about plenty of

people and to try to single that out to one group is frankly silly because I

think if you did a comparison he's probably got a lot more nasty things out

there about some other people I'm sorry do you think that I mean the president

is somebody who's always gonna fight fire with fire

this is something that isn't new and it's something the American people knew

when they voted for him and they overwhelmingly elected him to be the

president of the United States and since he took office he has governed in a way

that is helping all Americans frankly if we want to look at who's creating

divisions in the country I think the media has done more to divide this

country certainly far more than this president ever has by elevating people

like the author of this book by focusing on a sparsely attended rally instead of

all of the policies that this administration and that this president

are enacting that are helping people not just on the economy but on school choice

on prison reform that's disproportionately affected African

Americans and Hispanics this is a president who is governing to help all

Americans and I think we'd all be better off if the media gave that just a little

bit more attention John Robin thanks a lot Sarah you expressed how you feel

about Amoroso since the publication of this book how was she you

by fellow staff members here at the White House while she worked here what

she did she pull her own weight which include is untrustworthy did you trust

her I'm just trying to get a sense about whether your view of her has changed

with the publication of this book certainly I've expressed some

disappointment I'm not going to get into a back-and-forth on personal feelings

that I have with a former colleague I think that the focus not only of my time

here but of this administration is looking forward and how we can actually

implement policies that matter to the American people not who like to in the

building behind me Brian when the first time the moment investigation indicted

some Russians this administration sanctioned those Russians the twelve

that were recently indicted twelve Russian nationals

does this administration plan to also level sanctions against them I don't

have any announcements all right what quick follow-up you said you would like

everyone to stop talking about this particular subject including the

administration so are you saying you would like the President to stop

tweeting about Omarosa I think if the media continues to give

it wall-to-wall coverage the administration in some cases will be

forced to respond but I think it would be better off for all of us to walk away

and focus on some things that matter

salanas professional secretary max he's in Brazil right now and visiting all

their concerts in South America and how much this his trip has to do with

countering the growing presence of China in the region certainly we have a lot of

shared values with the countries that he's visiting we would always like to be

the priority partner for those countries and we hope that those relationships

will continue to bail up and we'll keep you posted if he has any updates from

the truth last questions Steven bearing in mind

that the Trump campaigns announcement that it's pursuing arbitration

necessitates attention can we talk and it can actually wants more about the

practice of assigning people to non-disclosure agreements because all

right let me ask you what it says about the expressions of loyalty or lack

thereof the people who worked on that wall why do people need to be

contractually obligated to forever after in perpetuity never say anything

negative about the president any member of his family any product they should

produce why is that necessary again it's common in a lot of protect

the corporate interests what what's the particulars also despite contrary

opinion it's actually very normal and every administration prior to the Trump

administration has had in DA's particularly specific for anyone that

had a security clearance this White House is

treating someone like Omarosa silent because right now what with the Trump

campaign is doing is he's forcing her essentially to defend herself and

potentially even pay damages why is that necessary that's a question you would

have to ask the Trump campaign it's certainly not a question that I could

answer as somebody that's an official government capacity

No comments:

Post a Comment