Trump news on Youtube Mar 4 2018

news alert no one expected this mega donor offers president Trump millions to

get top construction project completed you'll be surprised with all the

poisonous talk originating from liberal elitists we some of the time overlook

that some effective which Americans really support American values there is

even a large number that likes our president envisioned that not every rich

person is a greedy socialist Trump broadly turned down donations from these

agents submit his campaign what's more a significant number of these individuals

keep on offering support in some cases quietly however support in any case

presently one Frank and outstanding businessmen and head honcho will put his

cash where his mouth is he as of late made an amazing offer to the Trump

administration it's an offer that will unquestionably make one of trumps

greatest promises a whole lot less demanding via Western journalism the

Trump administration is weighing an offer from casino magnate and big-time

Republican donor Sheldon Adelson to partially find the construction of a new

embassy in Jerusalem US officials said Adelson a staunch ly pro-israel

billionaire has offered to pay the difference between the total cost of

construction and what the administration is able to raise from other donors in

the evangelical Christian and Jewish communities it is unclear how much money

Adelson one of the Republican Party's biggest in a Sears and a major supporter

of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is willing to contribute to

the new embassy total building costs for new diplomatic facilities particularly

high-profile embassies regularly reached several hundred million dollars the new

US Embassy in London which officially opened in January came with a 1 billion

dollar price tag obviously the London embassy cost a cool billion on account

of the imbecilic regulation and corruption of merry old England

considering how eager the Israeli government is for the

you asked to move their embassy to Jerusalem it won't be any place near

that costly Adelson's money will go far in disposing of any barriers to the

embassy with private trade turning out government flunkies won't have the

capacity to slow down referring to budget costs we've seen on numerous

occasions advanced in our nation halted as a result of number crunchers liberals

in Washington frequently thwart Trump's plans by declining to finance his goals

that won't be a lot of an issue if a very rich person is handing out the

money the State Department has promised to move their workplaces to Jerusalem

this May despite the fact that quite a bit of their staff will even now be

working out of Tel Aviv plans for a little suite of workplaces are under way

however with the rollout that could take quite a long while to finish if left up

to government financing gratefully they won't need to hold up that long if

Adelson is permitted to contribute with his infusion of money the embassy can be

worked in a matter of seconds a vibrant modern office will serve our ambassadors

in the heart of Israel it will be an unmistakable sign that America is

supporting the nation presently in the event that we can just get a very rich

person to finance the wall what do you think about this do not hesitate and

write your thoughts in the comment section below thank you for reading ht--

american conservative herald Western journalism journalism

For more infomation >> No One Expected This! Mega-Donor Offers President Trump Millions To Get Top Construction Project ... - Duration: 3:47.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's tariffs on steel imports to impact South Korea's steel industry - Duration: 2:01.

The Trump administration has controversially decided to slap hefty tariffs on steel and

aluminum imports... from countries including key allies like South Korea.

He's facing criticism from those countries and at home, but it looks like President Trump

plans to make good on his pledge.

And this leaves South Korea's steelmakers in a tough spot, the U.S. being their third

biggest export market.

Our Park Ji-won has more on the consequences of the move, which many say could spark a

trade war.

President Trump's recent bombshell announcement about imposing a 25 percent tariff on all

steel imports is expected to deal a massive blow to South Korea's steel industry.

The U.S. is one of the major export destinations for South Korean steelmakers.

Last year,... the United States was the third largest importer of Korean steel products,...

after China and Japan.

Specific producers,... such as those that make steel tubes for oil wells,... send more

than half of their exports to the U.S. market,... and they are the ones most concerned about

the Trump administration's move.

South Korea's steel industry is also worried that price competition in other overseas markets,...

except the U.S.,... will intensify.

However, some local experts believe Trump's trade measures could eventually benefit the

South Korean steel industry,... as it will boost the price of steel around the world.

"If the U.S. goes ahead with the 25-percent tariff on all steel imports,... it will lead

to an increase of American steel products,... which will ultimately cause global steel prices

to go up."

President Trump announced on Thursday that his administration will impose 25 percent

and 15 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports,... respectively,... in the coming

days.

Park Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump's tariffs on steel imports to impact South Korea's steel industry - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

We Just Found Out Who The Heavily Decorated Army Major Escorting Trump At Graham's Funeral Is - Duration: 5:27.

For more infomation >> We Just Found Out Who The Heavily Decorated Army Major Escorting Trump At Graham's Funeral Is - Duration: 5:27.

-------------------------------------------

Trey Gowdy Wrecks Schumer With Facts After He Voted 'No' on Trump Nominee Because He Was White - Duration: 2:26.

For more infomation >> Trey Gowdy Wrecks Schumer With Facts After He Voted 'No' on Trump Nominee Because He Was White - Duration: 2:26.

-------------------------------------------

Hero to Conservatives Everywhere Disputes Trump's Tariffs and Trade Wars Ideas - Duration: 4:02.

Hero to Conservatives Everywhere Disputes Trump's Tariffs and Trade Wars Ideas

Donald Trump's fights with the establishment might just be getting started.

When the 45th president was still just a contender for the Oval Office, he took on a field of

16 other Republican hopefuls by staking out an extreme case against the country's growing

entanglements with international trade treaties.

Even though it clashed with traditional Republican ideas, it gave him the support in the primaries

he needed to win the nomination over candidates like Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.In the general election,

it helped him win over crucial states in the Upper Midwest like Michigan and Wisconsin.

But when Trump announced this week that he plans to impose sweeping tariffs on imported

steel on the grounds of national security, according to The New York Times, he set himself

up against the man most conservatives view as guiding light for the movement over most

of the last century – Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman.A video posted to

YouTube in November 2015 by the conservative website LibertyPen contrasts the approaches

of Trump and Frieman to international trade, and should be a handy guide for the arguments

that are going to be arising over Trump's latest move — possibly for the remainder

of his time in office.

At the time the video was posted, it was only a theoretical possibility Trump would be president,

but it's definitely worth revisiting now.Friedman, who died in 2006, was one of the top intellectuals

of post-World War II America.

His memory is as revered among conservatives as it's reviled by liberals.

In fact, liberals probably despised Friedman in much the same way they hated Ronald Reagan

in the 1980s or fear and loathe Trump today, and for the same reason: They're afraid

of a man who consistently proves them wrong.Friedman did that over and over again.

And the underlying rule in his worldview, summed up in the 1962 book aptly titled "Capitalism

and Freedom," is a satisfying answer to every Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and "social

justice" grifter out there who wants to shake down American businesses for the so-called

benefit of the "underprivileged," when it's actually those "activists" who

benefit the most.Friedman's rule was simple, as he explained it in a 1970 essay for The

New York Times:

"There is one and only one social responsibility of business — to use its resources and engage

in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the

game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud."For

that to work on an international level, though, for there to truly be "open and free competition,"

and every country should stay "within the rules of the game."

Trump has made clear for a very long time that he doesn't think other countries are

playing fairly – most notably China – and he sees the imposition of tariffs like the

ones he announced this week as a step toward making that happened.

Some leaders of the conservative movement will disagree — like the current editors

and writers of the National Review (who made no secret of their opposition to Trump as

a candidate, but seem to be grudgingly coming around).

So, in all probability, would the late Milton Friedman, a man who considered Reagan a personal

hero.Friedman was as anti-establishment as Trump, so it's unfortunate the men are representing

different sides in the GOP of the 21st century.

But Trump's fights with the establishment might only be getting started.

Please like and share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you appreciate President Trump

sticking it to the establishment.

How do you think Milton Friedman would have viewed Trump's presidency?

Scroll down to comment below!

For more infomation >> Hero to Conservatives Everywhere Disputes Trump's Tariffs and Trade Wars Ideas - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

March 4 Trump brings president's supporters downtown - Duration: 0:30.

For more infomation >> March 4 Trump brings president's supporters downtown - Duration: 0:30.

-------------------------------------------

We Just Found Out Who The Heavily Decorated Army Major Escorting Trump At Graham's Funeral Is - Duration: 5:02.

For more infomation >> We Just Found Out Who The Heavily Decorated Army Major Escorting Trump At Graham's Funeral Is - Duration: 5:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Disgraced Staffer Just Sold What She Secretly Took From Him For $10 Million dollars! - Duration: 7:01.

BREAKING: Trump's Disgraced Staffer Just Sold What She Secretly Took From Him For $10

Million dollars!

White House communications director Hope Hicks, one of President Donald Trump's most trusted

and longest-serving aides, abruptly announced her resignation Wednesday, leaving a void

around a president who values loyalty.

Much speculation is surrounding the rather abrupt departure of the soon-to-be-former

White House Communications Director.

Though she has not even vacated the West Wing yet, she is said to be receiving offers by

the truckload promising eight-figure paydays if she is willing to go on the record to provide

juicy insider details of the inner workings of the Trump administration to powerful publishers

and producers eager for dirt.

Before the ink was even dry on Hicks' resignation, just one day after her so-called "white

lies" testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, one of New York City's publishing

house editors was attempting to contact Hicks to make her an offer she couldn't refuse

– $10 million to write a "candid, truthful, sensitive tell-all about her life in Trump

Land—the good, the bad and the ugly."

A high-profile literary agent from New York City, Eric Myers stated Hicks could easily

get a $10 million advance, "If she really did promise to throw the office doors wide

open and tell all."

Then came a female Hollywood producer-screenwriter with yet another high dollar offer…and the

parade offers began with different variations of the same question – "What would it

take to do your story as a mini-series or on the big screen?

I can get the financing, like tomorrow, and make you rich and even more famous.

You have an incredible story.

Let's talk!"

White House insiders speak of Hicks' time at the White House noting that should the

29-year-old decide to spill all she would be an incredible resource due to the detailed

diary she kept of her time in the White House.

In a statement, President Trump praised Hicks for her work over the last three years, saying

he "will miss having her by my side."

Many producers and publishers have stated if she should decide to publish it may be

prudent for Hicks to hold an auction, thus allowing Hicks to walk away with an agreement

to keep some 15% of the total sales.

White House insiders are conflicted with some reporting Hicks has decided to publish a tell-all

memoir and others citing Hicks' unquestioning loyalty to the Trump administration and her

longstanding friendship with President Donald Trump himself as reasons she will not do so.White

House insiders speak of Hicks' time at the White House noting that should the 29-year-old

decide to spill all she would be an incredible resource due to the detailed diary she kept

of her time in the White House.

One publishing executive stated of Hicks – "Next to Ivanka and Melania, Hope is the woman closest

to the president.

She knows all the secrets, all the foibles, all the quirks."President Trump has had

multiple communications directors in 400-some odd days in office with tenures lasting from

just 10 days with the infamous Anthony Scaramucci to Hicks herself lasting just over 170 days.

Sean Spicer served in the Trump administration as Press Secretary and he recently announced

his own plans for a tell-all book of the happenings in the West-Wing of his own.

Hicks resigned on Wednesday after serving in the Trump administration since the beginning

of his presidency.

Though Spicer definitely will have the dibs on some insider info, even more highly anticipated

is James Comey's book – "A Higher Honor: Truth, Lies and Leadership" due to come

out in mid-April.

Given the accusations of perjury against Comey during his testimony before Congress and the

leaking of memos to the press by Comey's "friend" at Comey's direction, as well

as the criminality of the conduct of the FBI itself during Comey's leadership tenure

there is much speculation as to just how truthful Comey's book will be.

The book currently has a lengthy list of back orders in anticipation of its release date.

Trump's first campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, recently published a book that President Trump

had high praise for.

Lewandowski also is said to have briefly dated Hicks during the campaign while he was said

to have been married to another woman.

Hicks also dated accused spousal batterer and former Staff Secretary Rob Porter.One

thing is certain about Hicks is she knows how to keep her mouth shut when she chooses

to do so.

During her time in the Trump administration's communications department, Hicks rarely gave

interviews or even on-the-record statements to the press.

This has caused the press to develop a rather devoted interest in getting her to open up

and talk.

However, many are certain that she will not risk her relationship with President Trump

to do so.

Hicks said in a statement, "There are no words to adequately express my gratitude to

President Trump."

She added she wished Trump and his administration the "very best."

Before Wednesday's announcement, Hicks had not been happy for some time, according to

two people with knowledge of her thinking who were not authorized to discuss the matter

publicly.

One person said Hicks had been increasingly feeling the stress of the position.

The Daily Mail reports of an unnamed White House insider as a source, stating – 'The

thing is Hope's one of Donald Trump's most loyal colleagues and friends.

She's not one to destroy that relationship and she is certainly under some sort of nondisclosure

agreement.

Moreover, the various investigations by the special counsel andCongresss could target

her.

So she has to be very careful about jumping into any deals."

One literary agent who has represented Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists told the Mail that

many in the entertainment and media industries see Hicks's story as a political blockbuster,

citing Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House" as an example.

Wolff's book, which has been criticized as inaccurate in parts, nevertheless was widely

popular on its release in January, with sales of the book topping 1.7 million.

The agent stated of Wolff and Hicks – "Michael Wolff with his unauthorized tell-all has sold

something like 900,000 books, and it's made him a millionaire, even though there's been

questions about some of his reporting.

Believe me when I say that the publishing world and Hollywood are in a state of excitement

over getting her to agree and sign on the dotted line.

I'd kill to have her as my client."

For more infomation >> Trump's Disgraced Staffer Just Sold What She Secretly Took From Him For $10 Million dollars! - Duration: 7:01.

-------------------------------------------

Growing Backlash Over Trump's Tariff Plan - Duration: 0:39.

For more infomation >> Growing Backlash Over Trump's Tariff Plan - Duration: 0:39.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Jokes Melania Might Leave Him At Gridiron Club Dinner - Duration: 3:32.

'Who's going to be the next to leave? Steve Miller or Melania?' Trump pokes fun at White House exits.

Just a few hours after he suggested that perhaps America should follow China's lead with

the whole "president for life" thing, President Donald Trump took the stage to tell

some jokes at the annual Gridiron Club Dinner, an event intended to honor the free press

in Washington, D.C.

Unlike the widely-televised White House Correspondents' Association dinner, which Trump decided to

skip last year, there are no cameras allowed inside the white-tie Gridiron event.

So while we don't have the benefit of seeing video of the president's performance, we

do have the White House pool report—as well as eyewitness accounts—to give us a sense

of what went down.

It was, most reviews indicate, slightly less disastrous than the 2016 Al Smith dinner,

during which Trump was booed for his so-called "jokes" about how much Hillary Clinton

"hates Catholics."

In his remarks Saturday night, Trump acknowledged that he's not known for self-deprecating

humor by suggesting his staff warned him it could be a problem.

"I told them not to worry.

Nobody does self-deprecating humor better than I do," the president joked.

Trump also excused his late arrival by suggesting that Jared Kushner couldn't get through

security.

He said he offered Attorney General Jeff Sessions a ride to the event but he "recused himself,"

belying a very real concern the president has expressed in the past.

"I won't rule out talks with Kim Jong Un," Trump said, per Axios.

"As far as risks with talking with a mad man—that's his concern, not mine."

He combined an attack on CNN with a shot at his former chief adviser, saying, "It's

been a very tough year for CNN.

They've lost a tremendous amount of credibility this year.

And your best reporter, Steve Bannon.

That guy leaked more than the Titanic.

Boy, did he leak."

According to Mother Jones Washington bureau chief David Corn, Trump "humiliated" his

wife, First Lady Melania Trump, who accompanied him to the event.

He was likely referring to a joke Trump made about his recent spate of White House departures.

"So many people have been leaving the White House.

It's invigorating since you want turnover.

I like chaos.

It really is good," he said.

"Who's going to be the next to leave?

Steve Miller or Melania?"

In recent weeks, multiple stories about Trump allegedly paying off mistresses during the

early years of his marriage to Melania have been made public.

For what it's worth, Trump did reportedly wrap up his speech by thanking the members

of the media in attendance for all they do "to support and sustain our democracy,"

adding, "I mean that."

It appears that the president did successfully find a way to make self-deprecating jokes

about himself.

But in the process, he made light of some of the most disturbing and concerning issues

plaguing his presidency, from the prospect of nuclear war to the lack of security clearances

for his top advisors and even the precarious nature of his own marriage.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Jokes Melania Might Leave Him At Gridiron Club Dinner - Duration: 3:32.

-------------------------------------------

After Alec Baldwin Unloads On POTUS, Trump Humiliates The Smug Liberal Actor - Duration: 6:03.

After Alec Baldwin Unloads On POTUS, Trump Humiliates The Smug Liberal Actor

Noted liberal celebrity Alec Baldwin recently slammed President Donald Trump in an interview.

Never to be outdone, the President has responded, quickly putting the actor to shame and leaving

him humiliated.

You don't want to miss this.

Most people are aware of Alec Baldwin's politics.

Like many shallow Hollywood celebrities, he's an outspoken liberal.

For decades he's voiced his support of Democratic candidates and issues.

He's a longtime friend of the Clintons — big surprise there.

Once upon a time, he was a celebrated actor.

But, in recent years, he's been forced to do television to keep up appearances.

For a few seasons, he appeared on NBC's 30 Rock, where he got attention playing a

Reagan-style conservative businessman.

After that show died, he's been impersonating a real Reagan-style conservative, President

Donald Trump.

In a recent interview for the Hollywood Report, Baldwin opened up about his experiences playing

Trump.

Even though he hasn't hesitated to put on the wig, he had nothing but bad things to

say.

He called playing Trump "agony."

Yeah, getting paid to impersonate the President of the United States for a popular comedy

show is so hard, Alec.

How about we trade places?

I'll be happy to do your job.

"Every time I do it now, it's like agony.

Agony.

I can't.

If things don't go in the right direction for the midterms," Alec Baldwin whined,

according to The Hollywood Reporter.

"I could go out on the street, stand on any corner and tap 10 people on the shoulder.

And all 10 of them, in all likelihood, would be more qualified — ethically, morally,

intellectually and spiritually — than Trump.

I'll vote for Mitt Romney.

I don't care.

Anybody over this guy.

It doesn't matter."

Pretty typical response from an entrenched liberal.

This guy supported Crooked Hillary, after all.

He really believes that Democrats can win over Congress in the Mid-terms.

Then, they would somehow get Trump out of office.

That kind of delusional thinking is what's driving people away from their party — and

making them a laughing stock.

It's particularly hilarious how he complains about Trump.

What's so bad about the man, Alec?

He's lowered taxes for Americans, brought back jobs, and is defeating ISIS.

Oh, you're upset about the wall?

Millions of Americans suffer thanks to illegal immigration.

But, I guess Alec is scared he'll lose some of his servants.

Rich Hollywood celebrities aren't hurt by illegal immigration.

Their jobs aren't in jeopardy.

Nor are they in danger when communities are flooded with drugs and gang violence.

Yet, they'll lecture the rest of us, calling us racist, if we demand improvements.

It appears President Trump caught wind of Alec's little temper tantrum.

After boasting his own career impersonating Donald Trump, Alec had the gall to complain.

So, the President decided to fire back, putting the actor in his place.

Anyone wondering what President Donald Trump thinks of Alex Baldwin's impression of him

on "Saturday Night Live" no longer has to wonder.

The president tweeted about it Friday morning.

"Alec Baldwin, whose dying mediocre career was saved by his terrible impersonation of

me on SNL, now says playing me was agony.

Alec, it was agony for those who were forced to watch.

Bring back Darrell Hammond, funnier and a far greater talent!" the president wrote.

[Source: Fox News] Alec Baldwin, whose dying mediocre career

was saved by his terrible impersonation of me on SNL, now says playing me was agony.

Alec, it was agony for those who were forced to watch.

Bring back Darrell Hammond, funnier and a far greater talent!Ouch!

That's got to hurt.

Trump's never been one to pull punches.

When a celebrity or politician says something nasty, he hits right back.

People have been "shocked" that a President would be so bold.

Yet, they never seem to mind when people talk that way about him.

Liberals and the media have always trashed conservative leaders.

They have no problem mocking them, slandering their hard work, going after their families,

or accuse them of racism.

Yet, when one President decides to fight fire with fire, the liberals pitch a fit.

Democrats operate with a double standard.

They are fine with saying whatever they want, but God-forbid we do the same.

President Donald Trump has destroyed their pathetic little scheme.

He's punching back — and with fury.

I mean seriously, Alec.

Is it agony to play Donald Trump on TV?

To get paid huge salaries to perform on one of the longest-running shows?

You're a rich, entitled, privileged elitist.

You're upset that your buddy Hillary Clinton didn't win.

Get over it.

Millions of Americans were suffering, thanks to the toxic policies of the left.

Those Americans voted for a man who is actually working on their behalf.

I guess that's the real agony for leftists: seeing regular Americans thriving.

I wholeheartedly agree with the President.

Bring back Darrell Hammond.

He was a top-notch performer who impersonated countless figures, including Trump.

And, he was much funnier.

For more infomation >> After Alec Baldwin Unloads On POTUS, Trump Humiliates The Smug Liberal Actor - Duration: 6:03.

-------------------------------------------

No More Free Money President Trump Cuts Off Millions in Military Aid to Pakistan - Duration: 21:04.

No More Free Money: President Trump Cuts Off Millions in Military Aid to Pakistan

The Trump administration announced on Friday it will not be sending military aid totaling

$255 million to Pakistan.

The monetary aid was denied to the Pakistan government in response to its ineffective

action against terrorists and militants on its soil.

The Hindustan Times reported:

The Trump administration on Friday announced the United States will deny Pakistan military

aid amounting to $255 million as it expects Islamabad to take decisive action "against

terrorists and militants on its soil".

"The United States does not plan to spend the $255 million in FY 2016 in Foreign Military

Financing for Pakistan at this time," said a spokesperson of the President's National

Security Council in a statement to Hindustan Times.

"The President has made clear that the United States expects Pakistan to take decisive action

against terrorists and militants on its soil, and that Pakistan's actions in support of

the South Asia Strategy will ultimately determine the trajectory of our relationship, including

future security assistance.

"The Administration continues to review Pakistan's level of cooperation."

The statement reflected and sealed the administration's complete disillusionment with Pakistan, which

had sought to brazenly disregard the explicit warnings issued by President Donald Trump

personally and leading members of his cabinet, such as secretaries James Mattis and Rex Tillerson.

"This could be the severest blow dealt to Islamabad by this administration if it indeed

decided to withhold it," said a leading US expert on Pakistan, who did not want to

be identified.

"There is more coming," the expert added.

First reported by The New York Times, the move to withhold the money, which may not

be large but would have signaled US backing, is reported to have come shortly after Pakistan

refused to hand over to the Americans an operative of the Haqqani Network apprehended during

the rescue of an American-Canadian family in October.

The Haqqani Network is an affiliate of Afghan Taliban and works out of Pakistan, inflicting

massive casualties on US-led international coalition in Afghanistan.

Frustrated by Islamabad's reluctance to give them, the United States has tied large

portions of military aid payments to Pakistan to its actions aimed at debilitating the network.

Pakistan, however, has chosen to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in such payments over

2015 and 2016, instead of kicking out the terrorists.

And it has lost equity.

The Trump administration was clear from the start it wouldn't countenance continuity

in ties and aid without real changes.

"We have been paying Pakistan billions and billions of dollars at the same time they

are housing the very terrorists that we are fighting," President Donald Trump had said

unveiling his new South Asia strategy in August.

"But that will have to change, and that will change immediately."

But there was no marked change in Pakistan's behaviour, as was publicly attested by a top

US military commander, General John Nicholson, in November, three months after Trump's

unequivocal warning.

There have been signs, instead, of resolute defiance, such as the release of Lashkar-e-Taiba

founder Hafiz Saeed from house arrest, An outraged White House used unusually harsh

language and tone to demand his rearrest, with a warning that failure could have "repercussions"

for bilateral ties.

Saeed remains free, and Pakistani officials have sought to shift the blame for it on the

independence of the country's judiciary, when law enforcement and prosecution remain

with the executive branch.

And they sought to blame India for providing insufficient incriminating evidence — in

connection with the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks carried out by Saeed's Lashkar-e-Taiba.

There is a US bounty of $10 million for the man's arrest.

Denial of aid, many critics of Pakistan argue, will unlikely make an impact on Islamabad

and they have called for harsher measures.

Stripping Pakistan of the status of a non-NATO ally, for one, which could cost it military

aid in terms of money and equipment.

And, more punishing perhaps, would be to declare Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism, such

as Syria and North Korea, which could severely cripple Pakistan.

That's the impending "more" indicated by the South

Asia expert.

For more infomation >> No More Free Money President Trump Cuts Off Millions in Military Aid to Pakistan - Duration: 21:04.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Just Told A Crowd "Listen You Motherf*ckers…" And They Went Absolutely WILD! - Duration: 5:47.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Just Told A Crowd "Listen You Motherf*ckers…" And They Went Absolutely WILD! - Duration: 5:47.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Trump Just Met With NRA - Duration: 24:09.

BREAKING: Trump Just Met With NRA

BREAKING: Trump Just Met With NRA To Make New AWESOME Move For 2A – He Tricked Libs

All Along!

President Trump and the White House have slipped back on the support for the universal background

checks proposed for gun purchases.

While this does not mean that background checks for guns will not be supported or improved,

it just says that there is currently not support in place for the universal background checks

that some liberal Democrats may have called for.

Trump initially seemed to support the idea, which makes sense because the President should

listen to all ideas and make a firm decision on them after considering their potential

to be a benefit.

It seems as though the White House is backing off the concept of universal background checks.

Many Americans realize that the background check system should be improved to help prevent

people with mental illness, criminal backgrounds, or even getting the police called a dozen

times like school shooter Nikolas Cruz from purchasing a gun legally.

The reason the White House backed off the support of a universal background check is

that the word "universal" means something different to many people.

The White House was smart to withhold support because Trump has not yet been able to read

and adequately submitted legislation pertaining to universal background checks.

It's hard to support something without it being in writing, analyzed, and discussed.

The lack of Trump's blind support for something he has not yet read is churning the guts of

the liberal Democrats as they embellish on another meltdown, even though Trump and the

White House put their foot down firmly with some common sense.

Democrats like Senator Dianne Feinstein will not be happy with this.

The Hill reported more on the pullout: "Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders

said Trump supports "not necessarily universal background checks, but certainly improving

the background check system."

"He wants to see what that legislation, the final piece of it looks like," she told

reporters at the White House.

"Universal means something different to a lot of people.

He certainly wants to focus and improve on the background check system."

The comments come after Trump stunned many in Washington by voicing support for many

gun control proposals during a meeting with lawmakers that aired live on television.

During the Wednesday meeting, Trump appeared to agree with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.),

who said that "Americans want universal background checks."

"You have a different president now," Trump told the senator.

"You went through a lot of presidents and you didn't get it done.

You have a different president.

And I think, maybe, you have a different attitude, too.

I think people want to get it done."

The president has previously supported a more modest proposal written by Murphy and Senate

Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) designed to bolster the existing background check system,

but not expand it.

Sanders's comments come one night after Trump met with representatives from the National

Rifle Association (NRA), a group that Trump urged lawmakers to defy on guns even though

he long supported it.

She said the president promised the NRA "only that he'll continue to support the Second

Amendment."

Trump's meeting with the NRA has sparked irrational upset among Democrats as they see

every tragedy as a means to push the narrative on gun control.

Liberals and Democrats often push their agenda as soon as any tragedy happens, not even waiting

until the victims have been picked up off the floor.

They exploit victims for their own cause, and it's quite disturbing.

When Trump and the White House decide that they will not support something that they

have not yet read, then it's perfectly reasonable and a decision bolstered with common sense.

If President Trump reads it and likes it, then he'll act on it and push it through

the necessary protocol to be turned into a law.

That will take time as it goes through the chain of command.

While people discuss background checks, they're also debating boycotts, and corporations are

cutting ties with the NRA.

None of which makes any sense because neither the NRA nor the corporations had anything

to do with the Parkland school shooting that prompted all of this into action.

Americans would benefit from improved background checks that require a mental health exam and

a look at each buyer's history with the police.

Nikolas Cruz had the cops called on him dozens of times, and even if he escaped charges being

pressed, he still should not have been allowed to purchase his weapons.

Having the cops called for a noise violation because you're having a loud party is one

thing.

Having the police called numerous times for incidents that may have involved violence

should automatically trigger something in the background checks that allow the decision

making process more information about the buyer.

Criminals can always get their guns on the street, but Americans should remain tough

and not make it easier for them.

The good guys with the guns will always prevail and a reliable background check makes sure

the most trustworthy

and responsible people

own firearms.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Trump Just Met With NRA - Duration: 24:09.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Knocked 3 MASSIVE Wins Out Of The Park This Week While The Media Was Looking The Other Way - Duration: 7:03.

For more infomation >> Trump Knocked 3 MASSIVE Wins Out Of The Park This Week While The Media Was Looking The Other Way - Duration: 7:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Knocked 3 MASSIVE Wins Out Of The Park This Week While The Media Was Looking The Other Way - Duration: 7:02.

For more infomation >> Trump Knocked 3 MASSIVE Wins Out Of The Park This Week While The Media Was Looking The Other Way - Duration: 7:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Sets Off Clever Plan To Cost Sanctuary State Billions And A Seat In Congress, You'll Cheer - Duration: 3:00.

news alert sweet revenge president Trump set off clever plan to

cost sanctuary state billions in deceit in Congress you'll cheer liberal

pioneers in sanctuary states have set themselves against President Trump since

the start of his presidency they couldn't have stonewalled him any

more than they as of now half from announcing their whole state a sanctuary

state to declining to permit their cops to help ice and any capacity they have

opposed the government in ways that influenced Patriots skin crawl president

Trump and the DOJ have not trifled with this lack of respect furthermore they

have at last discovered only the best approach to punish them for their

undermining ways they should simply ask a basic inquiry on the 2020 census and

California could be out of luck so now freeze is ascending from Callie's

liberal leaders top Democrats here are increasingly worried the

administration's restrictive policies and the potential inclusion of a

question about citizenship on the next u.s. census could scare whole swathes of

California's large immigrant population away from participating in the decennial

count resulting in an undercount that could cost the state billions of dollars

in federal funding over the next decade and perhaps the loss of one of its 53

seats in the US House of Representatives by the president including an inquiry

regarding citizenship on the following census Democrats are worried about the

possibility that it would shield illicit workers from participating in it also

since California has one of the biggest illegal immigrant populace that would

cause the registration results to be to a grave degree incorrect this could at

last reasoned California to lose one of their seats in Congress also billions in

government funds which if each one of those funds is going to illegal

immigrants at any rate is precisely what ought to happen citizens shouldn't pay

billions of dollars to help illegal immigrants as you may expect Governor

Jerry Brown has just started attempting to think

a route around it and he has no issue spending Californians imposed dollars to

do it California's Democratic Governor Jerry

Brown on Wednesday proposed spending more than forty million dollars on the

state's own census related outreach efforts to avoid the Fate this is a

reasonable response from him since as indicated by California's Secretary of

State Alex Padilla the following statistics could have pulverizing impact

zones california indeed that is too awful Jerry should have contemplated the

majority of this before he started to undermine federal law and our president

what do you think about this do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the

comment section below

For more infomation >> Trump Sets Off Clever Plan To Cost Sanctuary State Billions And A Seat In Congress, You'll Cheer - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

Trey Gowdy Wrecks Schumer With Facts After He Voted 'No' on Trump Nominee Because He Was White - Duration: 2:14.

Trey Gowdy Wrecks Schumer With Facts After He Voted 'No' on Trump Nominee Because

He Was White Chuck Schumer refused to confirm a Trump judicial

nominee based solely on his skin color, but Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) helpfully corrected

the top Democrat with something he doesn't encounter very often – facts.

Schumer admitted on the Senate floor earlier this week that he would not vote to approve

the nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum for a vacancy on the U.S. District Court for the

District of South Carolina, because he is white and is replacing two minority nominees

of former President Barack Obama's.

"Quattlebaum replaces not one, but two scuttled Obama nominees who were African American,"

he said.The implication was clear – Trump was supposedly forcing (scuttling) the black

nominees out and replacing them with his preferred white nominee.

The implication, however, was void of facts.

Gowdy to the rescue …Indeed, Gowdy is referring to Obama's first choice for the seat, Judge

Alison Renee Lee, whose judicial competence was called into question when she lowered

the bond for a pair of criminals who were released and subsequently murdered people,

as well as his second nominee, Justice Donald Beatty, who became Chief Justice of the South

Carolina Supreme Court in February of 2017.

Those don't exactly sound like people who were 'scuttled.'

Gowdy also called Schumer out for his political and racial grandstanding, citing another white

nominee in South Carolina that the New York Democrat didn't oppose.Gowdy finished by

dropping a factual People's Elbow on Schumer, then going for the pin with a little snark.

"Marvin Quattlebaum is uniquely well qualified for the bench and universally respected by

all in South Carolina," he said.

"Hopefully Senator Schumer can find a way to look at really unusual factors (like qualifications)

in the future."

For more infomation >> Trey Gowdy Wrecks Schumer With Facts After He Voted 'No' on Trump Nominee Because He Was White - Duration: 2:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Plan To Cost Sanctuary State Billions - Duration: 24:09.

Trump's Plan To Cost Sanctuary State Billions

Sweet Revenge!

President Trump Sets Off Clever Plan To Cost Sanctuary State Billions And A Seat In Congress,

You'll Cheer

Liberal pioneers in sanctuary states have set themselves against President Trump since

the start of his presidency.

They couldn't have stonewalled him any more than they as of now have.

From announcing their whole state a 'sanctuary state' to declining to permit their cops

to help ICE in any capacity, they have opposed the government in ways that influence patriots'

skin crawl.

President Trump and the DOJ have not trifled with this lack of respect.

Furthermore, they have at last discovered only the best approach to 'punish' them

for their undermining ways.

They should simply ask a basic inquiry on the 2020 census and California could be out

of luck.

So now freeze is ascending from Cali's liberal leaders.

Top Democrats here are increasingly worried the administration's restrictive policies

— and the potential inclusion of a question about citizenship on the next U.S. census

— could scare whole swaths of California's large immigrant population away from participating

in the decennial count, resulting in an undercount that could cost the state billions of dollars

in federal funding over the next decade and, perhaps, the loss of one of its 53 seats in

the U.S. House of Representatives.

By the president including an inquiry regarding citizenship on the following census, Democrats

are worried about the possibility that it would shield illicit workers from participating

in it.

Also, since California has one of the biggest illegal immigrant populace, that would cause

the registration results to be to a great degree incorrect.

This could at last reason California to lose one of their seats in Congress, also billions

in government funds.

Which, if each one of those funds is going to illegal immigrants, at any rate, is precisely

what ought to happen.

Citizens shouldn't pay billions of dollars to help illegal immigrants.

As you may expect, Gov. Jerry Brown has just started attempting to think of a route around

it, and he has no issue spending Californians impose dollars to do it.

California's Democratic governor, Jerry Brown, on Wednesday proposed spending more

than $40 million on the state's own census-related outreach efforts to avoid that fate.

This is a reasonable response from him, since, as indicated by California's Secretary of

State, Alex Padilla, the following statistics could have 'pulverizing impacts on's California.

Indeed, that is too awful.

Jerry should've contemplated the majority of this before he started to undermine federal

law and our president.

What do you think about this?

Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank you for reading.

H/T American Conservative Herald, Politico

For more infomation >> Trump's Plan To Cost Sanctuary State Billions - Duration: 24:09.

-------------------------------------------

While the Media Was Looking the Other Way, Trump Knocked 3 Big Wins Out of the Park This Week - Duration: 4:31.

While the Media Was Looking the Other Way, Trump Knocked 3 Big Wins Out of the Park This

Week If you only listen to the mainstream media,

the last week of news has been dominated by two events: the gun control controversy and

yet another staff shakeup at the White House.

As is often the case, there is a lot more going on than the shouting headlines suggest

— which is a pretty good reason to not listen exclusively to the left-leaning press.

While the media has obsessed over guns and an Oval Office insider most people hadn't

heard of until this month, the Trump administration has actually had some pretty solid "wins"

that went unnoticed by the network talking heads.

As Politico Magazine journalist Danny Vinik reported, these policy changes could have

big implications for the direction of the country, even if they aren't making front

page news.

Here are three of them, in no particular order.

The EPA Backs Down The Trump White House scored a major win when

it came to rolling back an Obama-era regulation within the Environmental Protection Agency.

A rule pushed by environmentalists during the last administration had strict time limits

for fixing methane leaks from oil and gas wells, but experts within the energy industry

said the regulations were overly harsh and hurt oil and gas production.

"This week, the EPA sided with industry, giving oil and gas companies up to two years

to fix methane leaks and eliminating a requirement that forced them to fix leaks during emergency

or unscheduled shutdowns," Politico explained.Detected leaks will still be repaired, just on a time-table

that is more realistic than the previously stringent guidelines.

"Under the new proposal, operators must repair leaks during the next scheduled shutdown

or within two years, whichever is sooner," the news magazine continued.

Charter Schools Get a Boost

Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is a Cabinet member who liberals love to hate.

She came under harsh and often personally insulting scrutiny during her confirmation

process, largely because the left saw her as a wealthy socialite who was merely "playing

teacher."

Now she's the one schooling liberals.

"In the past year, DeVos has clearly figured out how to use the levers of power in her

department, rolling back Obama-era regulations and policies on everything from for-profit

colleges to campus sexual assault," wrote Vinik.One of the biggest DeVos-led "wins"

came this past week, when the Department of Education formally announced that it would

be focusing on — and channeling funding to — competitive charter schools and STEM

programs instead of vague social justice."It's a major shift from the priorities under DeVos'

predecessor, John King, which focused on socioeconomic diversity in schools," explained Politico.

Giving parents options to escape failing school systems and making sure students are prepared

to enter well-paying, tech-heavy career fields?

That definitely sounds like a conservative victory.Mexican Trade Deals Move Forward

Donald Trump was particularly critical of NAFTA during his campaign, and pledged to

re-vamp the agreement to make it more beneficial for U.S. companies and America as a whole.

It hasn't been a fast process, but the administration is steadily moving forward on this promise.

"In Mexico City this week, the U.S., Mexico and Canada continued to negotiate reforms

to the North American Free Trade Agreement, a slow process that continues to hit roadblocks,

particularly on how much of a car needs to be made in North America to qualify for preferential

tariffs," Politico reported.

This topic may not get as much focus as other Mexico-centered issues like the wall and immigration

reform, but NAFTA is a key part of the North American economy, and even slow progress on

improving the treaty is better than nothing.As he has already shown on tax reform, the president

is actually fairly adept at letting the media ruffle its feathers and squawk about the latest

controversy, while the "Make America Great Again" agenda steadily moves ahead.

It turns out that there's more than meets the eye at the Trump White House.

Press "Share on Facebook" to make sure people see what is actually getting done behind

the scenes!