Trump news on Youtube Jan 7 2018

Trump's first year as President is breaking economic records and bringing around 40.000

new manufacturing jobs.

This is too hard for Obama as he is the worst economic president in the U.S.

Obama was asked in June 2016 from an employee at Carrier Corp. what are they supposed to

look forward to in the future.

"When somebody says like the person you just mentioned who I'm not going to advertise

for, that he's going to bring all these jobs back.

Well how exactly are you going to do that?

What are you going to do?

There's uh-uh no answer to it.

He just says.

"I'm going to negotiate a better deal."

Well how?

How exactly are you going to negotiate that?

What magic wand do you have?

And usually the answer is, he doesn't have an answer," – Obama responded, not thinking

straight about what could happen in the future with President Trump.

But everything is going great actually, new jobs are opening, the economy is growing all

thanks to President Trump's strategy, and this was better explained by economist Charles

Payne.

"It's not about the service side, manufacturing, even this morning in this morning's jobs

report you have 30,000 construction jobs, 25,000 manufacturing jobs.

ADP's number for the full year – goods-producing jobs, these are people who work with their

hands.

This is the heartland.

This is what gave Trump Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Those jobs up 600% year over year.

Over 500,000 versus eighty something thousand," – Charles announced on Varney & Co interview.

Charles Payne really did explain the whole situation and how it's like and how our

President made it a lot better than the previous president.

And it's time to give President Trump complete ownership of the American economy.

Even if this seems a bit early, it's only proper having in mind ex-President Obama's

previous economy failure.

For more infomation >> TRUMP EFFECT! Up 600% Manufacturing Jobs In The First Year! Obama Is LIVID - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

Twitter says it won't block World Leaders. Trump says he is Stable Genius. - Duration: 1:16.

Twitter has clarified that it will treat World Leaders with special status, and confirmed

that it will not block them or remove their controversial Tweets.

For the Past few days, many people are asking Twitter to ban U.S President Donald Trump's

twitter account as he used his twitter account to give Nuclear War threats againt North Korea.

Twitter explained its stance by releasing a blog post which says,

"Twitter is here to serve and help advance the global, public conversation.

Elected world leaders play a critical role in that conversation because of their outsized

impact on our society.

Blocking a world leader from Twitter or removing their controversial Tweets would hide important

information people should be able to see and debate.

It would also not silence that leader, but it would certainly hamper necessary discussion

around their words and actions."

And, Trump defends himself against claims of mental instability by tweeting as he is

a stable genius

For more infomation >> Twitter says it won't block World Leaders. Trump says he is Stable Genius. - Duration: 1:16.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Defends Himself On Twitter - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> Trump Defends Himself On Twitter - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

Simon Evans on Trump - The News Quiz - Radio 4 - Duration: 1:14.

For more infomation >> Simon Evans on Trump - The News Quiz - Radio 4 - Duration: 1:14.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING!! ESPN Just ATTACKED TRUMP! - Duration: 4:58.

ESPN's ratings have been declining over the last year.

They have become increasingly known for their support of anthem kneelers as well as their

implementation of anti-President Trump employees.

Well, it seems like as much as things have changed in the new year many things have stayed

the same.

ESPN employee Katie Nolan recently insulted President Trump by making disparaging remarks

about him.

Nolan recently appeared on Viceland's talk show "Desus and Mero."

The thirty-year-old sports journalist called the President a "f—ing stupid person."

She attempted to excuse her actions by saying she was on medicine for a case of the flu.

Despite the fact that she said it on a talk show and not on social media like Twitter,

Instagram, or Facebook, ESPN is none the less taking action against her.

A representative for the network issued a statement saying,

"We have looked into the totality of Nolan's comments, they were inappropriate, and we

have addressed it with her."

Fox News reported,

"The Nolan brouhaha is just the latest in a litany of bad press for the sports network.

Longtime ESPN President John Skipper suddenly announced in December that he was resigning

from the network due to a substance addiction problem.

A bombshell report, also published in December, described the sports channel's culture as

one of hostility and sexual misconduct toward women.

The report by The Boston Globe specifically named several men employed by or affiliated

with ESPN as being subjects of harassment complaints."

ABC reported,

"Nolan, who was hired by ESPN in October after a number of years of hosting "Garbage

Time" on Fox Sports, later tweeted that she "had the flu" during the interview.

On Thursday, ESPN announced Nolan would host a pre-game show prior to an NFL playoff game

on the network on Saturday.

Nolan's comments come less than three months after SportsCenter anchor Jemele Hill tweeted

in a reply to other Twitter users that President Trump is a "white supremacist who has largely

surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists."

Hill's tweet prompted a response from both President Trump and White House press secretary

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who suggested that Hill be fired for her comments.

ESPN apologized for the tweets, and Hill was later suspended for a series of unrelated

tweets.

Following the Hill controversy, ESPN released a set of social media guidelines for its employees."

While Nolan was warned by her superiors she was not suspended or fired from her job as

a result of her actions.

When Hill did something similar she was warned and then when she disobeyed the warning she

was suspended.

But there is no indication they would get fired.

The Washington Post had a unique take on it all stating,

"In December, ESPN's front-facing employees attended a mandatory meeting at the company's

headquarters in Bristol, Conn., to discuss the network's future and review its new

policies on social media and political commentary.

"ESPN is a journalistic organization — not a political organization.

We should do nothing to undermine that position," Kevin Merida, editor in chief of ESPN's

Undefeated imprint, told the crowd.

"ESPN's focus is sports.

By and large we are not experts on politics, health care policies, terrorism, commerce

— that's not what we do."

"Our audience is not looking for our opinions on the general news of the day," added Merida,

who was a longtime writer and editor at The Washington Post before joining ESPN.

"And believe me, I get it.

It can sometimes be difficult to control impulses or ignore trolls, but that's what we're

called to do for each other."

News outlets have been taking an increasingly commentating role in the last year since President

Trump took office.

Journalists have become pundits and commentators versus people who are meant to report on the

facts.

Sports outlets like the NFL and ESPN are taking on a political role even though their line

of work has to do with athletes and sports and nothing to do with politics.

It is why people are watching ESPN and NFL games less and less over time because people

are getting sick of it.

They want people and journalists to stick to their lane, pick it, and stay there.

However, they have been refusing to do that which is why people are getting upset.

Quite frankly, these networks have nobody to blame but themselves.

We are now living in a world where the twilight zone exists.

Pundits are reporters and reporters are pundits who do not understand what facts are.

Which is another reason why people don't trust the media anymore because they don't

trust it to report on the facts but instead their opinions.

It is a shame and not what the free press was meant for.

Share if you agree that ESPN should hold their so-called reporters more accountable for the

words that come out of their mouth.

For more infomation >> BREAKING!! ESPN Just ATTACKED TRUMP! - Duration: 4:58.

-------------------------------------------

Trump: I plan to get involved in GOP congressional races - Duration: 1:29.

the world.

Very important.

Okay.

>> Mr. President.

>> Yes, sir.

>> Do you plan on involving

yourself in the Republican

primaries?

>> Yes, very much involved.

>> On the side of -- (inaudible)

You'll have to explain that to

me some day so I will tell you

actually they've been explaining

to me, but they want me to be

involved and we're going to be

very involved, in fact not only

in the senate, but also--

incumbents.

>> Whoever I have to protect.

We need more Republicans, we

have to have Republicans.

I think we are going bipartisan

and I think we will have great

bipartisan bills.

We need more Republicans, so

that we can really get the rest

of the make America great again

agenda passed and I will be

working for incumbents and

anybody else who has my kind of

thinking.

I think we'll have a lot of

trips and very involved.

I think you folks are going to

be happy, because you'll be

travelling.

>> Does that include challenges

to incumbents, too.

>> I don't see that happening.

I don't see that happening at

this moment, no, I think they've

sort of scattered.

We have somebody who lost the

state of Alabama and as far as

I'm concerned, that's a shame

that was lost, never should have

been lost.

With it all being said we have

the right policy, we have the

For more infomation >> Trump: I plan to get involved in GOP congressional races - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

'Resistance' Heads Explode After Sarah Sanders Drops 'Truth Bomb' From Trump - Duration: 32:15.

'Resistance' Heads Explode After Sarah Sanders Drops 'Truth Bomb' From Trump

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders kept a straight face as she addressed the

press corps during her regular scheduled conference.

It seems our beloved press secretary had a secret message from President Donald Trump

just for all those leftist haters out there.

A shocked room of liberal loser reporters looked on in utter silence as Sarah told them

she had a "message from a special guest," telling them to "tune into the screen."

Don't miss this.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders (left) White House Press Corps (right) (Photo Credit: YouTube/Screengrab,

YouTube/Screengrab) President Donald Trump is winning, and he

is feeling pretty sassy as he trolls all the leftist haters who refuse to give him a fair

chance.

Over the last year, Trump has achieved more than any modern-day president, and that includes

President Ronald Reagan.

"With the passage of the GOP tax bill this week, the Trump administration has scored

81 major achievements in its first year, making good on campaign promises to provide significant

tax cuts, boost U.S. energy production, and restore respect to the United States, according

to the White House," reports The Washington Examiner.

The report adds, "And along the way, President Trump even outdid his own expectations and

slashed at least 11 major legacy items of former President Barack Obama, including cracking

down on the open border, slowing recognition of communist Cuba and effectively killing

Obamacare by ending the mandate that everyone have health insurance or face a tax."

According to the White House, the 81 accomplishments are in 12 major categories and include well

over 100 other minor achievements.

Yet, what does he get from the mainstream media haters?

He's being called mentally incompetent, a danger to the world, and worse than Adolf

Hitler and Benito Mussolini combined.

Most of us know these idiots call themselves the "Resistance," except I can't really

explain what they are resisting.

I guess they are resisting "making America great again."

Like we said, Trump has come back from his Christmas holiday all smiles, and insiders

report he is raring to go, telling them, "You ain't seen nothing yet, folks."

So, with that in mind, along with the over the top paranoia coming from the "resist"

nutjobs, the president had a little surprise for the press corps, which he knew would get

reported on all the liberal mainstream media outlets.

Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders played Trump's "straight man" as she kept a

stern face, announcing, "We have a message from a special guest I'd like to share with

you, so I'll ask you to tune into the screens, and then I'll continue from there."

Notice CNN's "headline," below the video as it plays, says, "President claims the

Resistance is destroyed (It's not)," as if to reassure their useful idiots not to

fear this message from Trump.

CNN is really losing it, and Trump has won that war.

For a major news outlet to post that kind of subtext under this report shows just how

far gone they are.

They've completely morphed into "fake news" and don't seem to care who knows

it.

"So, was this Trump or Sarah Sanders trolling the briefing room?

Because you know heads were TOTALLY exploding everywhere over this message from a 'special

guest' that Sanders shared during this briefing," reported Twitchy.

I'm betting it was Trump's idea, and Sanders, who has a darn good sense of humor, probably

said, "Hell, yes!

I'm in, Mr. President."

Twitchy added, "Yesterday the media was all pissed off because Trump was on the monitors

and not in the room, and today they get a scene from a Star Wars movie.

2018 is already making 2017 look tame in comparison.

Good times."

Good times, indeed.

I predict as the President passes more and more of his agenda and Americans across the

country start to see things get a little better, Trump will widen his base.

This is why the Democrats were going bonkers over the tax cuts because, when people start

to get jobs and the economy takes off, the president will easily win re-election in 2020.

Let the good times roll, all aboard

the

Trump train.

For more infomation >> 'Resistance' Heads Explode After Sarah Sanders Drops 'Truth Bomb' From Trump - Duration: 32:15.

-------------------------------------------

Liberals Fall All Over Themselves to Report Fake Story About Trump and Gorillas - Duration: 2:57.

While both the left and the right contain fringe elements that regularly delve in conspiracy

theories and other nonsense, it's only on the left where we frequently see reputable

people with influence and power peddling this same sort of junk.

This week, for instance, a remarkable number of fancy-pant liberals — I'm talking well-known

reporters, columnists and even an MSNBC contributor who all loathe President Donald Trump — were

caught spreading such garbage.

According to Ben Shapiro at The Daily Wire, it began Thursday night when a satirical Twitter

account, @pixelatedboat, "tweeted out a parody segment supposedly lifted from" the

book published by Michael Wolff, whom the Conservative Tribune already outed as a fraud.

Just to clarify, the guy who runs @pixelatedboat changed his Twitter alias to "the gorilla

channel thing is a joke" after it went viral.

Regardless, you would think liberals would know better — given both Wolff's lack

of credibility and the glaring absurdity of this particular snippet — than to buy into

it.

But you would think wrong.

Take Scott Dworkin, a frequent MSNBC contributor who helped co-found the Democratic Coalition

Against Trump, which describes itself as "the home of The Resistance."

He shared @pixelatedboat's story to Twitter thinking it's real.

He later deleted his retweet, but not before conservatives snapped a photo of it:

What a mindless bozo, right?

But he wasn't the only one.

Not even close.

Eric Garland, a vehemently anti-Trump stooge who provides "strategic and competitive

analysis to executives from business and government agencies," fell for the gorilla story hook,

line and sinker:

So did Sky News reporter Samantha Maiden and left-wing author/columnist LItsa Dremousis:

Brookings Institute fellow Shadi Hamid may have fallen for it as well, though it's

hard to tell if he was being serious or facetious:

As a reminder, these aren't just random nobodies falling for and then spreading conspiratorial

garbage.

Even Farhad Manjoo, a contributor for NPR, almost bought into the lie:

What does this willingness so easily believe nonsense tell us?

According to Shapiro, it tells us "people will believe anything that's convenient

for them to believe, particularly about President Trump."

I disagree.

I feel it tells us that liberals "will believe anything that's convenient for them to believe,

particularly about President Trump."

Seriously, when was the last time you saw noted conservative figures like Shapiro, Bill

O'Reilly, Mark Steyn or Michelle Malkin sharing lies?

While it's possible they may have accidentally shared "fake news" perhaps once or maybe

even twice over the course of their whole career, I seriously doubt they ever shared

anything as stupid as this.

And that, folks, is the point.

For more infomation >> Liberals Fall All Over Themselves to Report Fake Story About Trump and Gorillas - Duration: 2:57.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Gleefully Crushes Leakers, Bans Personal Cellphones From West Wing - Duration: 3:41.

There is no question that President Donald Trump's White House has had an issue with

leaks during his first year in office, and his administration just took a huge step that

should quash those leaks — even though they insist the move was made solely for security

purposes.

According to CBS News, the White House just announced a new policy that will prohibit

the use of personal cellphones and other mobile devices in the West Wing, literally just a

day after excerpts from an anti-Trump book presumably written via information from leakers

was released to the public.

But a statement from White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders made clear that the

new policy had nothing to do with leaks at all, but was focused on strengthening the

White House's cybersecurity protocols.

"The security and integrity of the technology systems at the White House is a top priority

for the Trump administration and therefore, starting next week the use of all personal

devices for both guests and staff will no longer be allowed in the West Wing," stated

Sanders.

"Staff will be able to conduct business on their government-issued devices and continue

working hard on behalf of the American people," she added.

According to NBC News, Sanders declined to respond to questions about if the new policy

would apply to Trump, and only replied, "As always we do not discuss specific security

measures around the president."

Theoretically, if the ban does apply to Trump's personal mobile device, it could conceivably

have an effect on his Twitter habits.

NBC also noted the timing of the new policy being announced right after the release of

excerpts from author Michael Wolff's new book "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White

House," which contains incredibly claims of dysfunctional infighting that could only

have been obtained through leaks or a vivid imagination.

However, it is noteworthy that this new policy didn't just materialize out of thin air,

but has been in the works for months, according to an article from Bloomberg in November 2017.

That article pointed out that White House Chief of Staff John Kelly was pushing for

the ban on personal cellphones, perhaps in part due to his own personal device being

discovered as compromised earlier in the year.

An unnamed source familiar with the proposed ban noted that not only were there too many

personal devices connected to the campus wireless network at the White House, but the personal

devices used by staff and guests weren't as secure as government-issued devices.

Previously, with an eye toward both security and the potential for leaks, the White House

had already implemented a policy which required officials and staff to leave their personal

devices outside of meetings where classified or sensitive material was to be discussed.

This new policy seems to take that move to the next logical step.

Of course, some staffers are likely to complain about the new policy, as their government-issued

devices do not allow for sending and receiving text messages, meaning some people could be

disconnected from their families throughout the workday.

Furthermore, if they use their government-issued cellphones to make personal calls, they worry

their conversations will be archived and eventually made public, as well as being potentially

accused of wasting taxpayer money by making personal calls on federal time and property.

Regardless, it would appear that the White House is placing security needs above and

beyond the personal needs of staff and guests in the White House, and though some won't

like this new policy one bit, we can't really blame the White House for implementing it.

For more infomation >> Trump Gleefully Crushes Leakers, Bans Personal Cellphones From West Wing - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING The 3 Trump Tweets that Have the Internet Melting Down - News - Duration: 1:30.

For more infomation >> BREAKING The 3 Trump Tweets that Have the Internet Melting Down - News - Duration: 1:30.

-------------------------------------------

Livre sur Trump : des anecdotes pas toujours anodines - Duration: 9:04.

For more infomation >> Livre sur Trump : des anecdotes pas toujours anodines - Duration: 9:04.

-------------------------------------------

Anti-Trump National Review Throws in Towel, Admits Trump Massive Success - Duration: 6:16.

Among the pantheon of conservative publications, the National Review — the magazine founded

by William F. Buckley, which has been the mouthpiece of the conservative movement for

over a half-century — has been the intellectual center of the #NeverTrump movement on the

right.

For all of Bill Kristol's machinations and quixotic attempts to derail Trump, his Weekly

Standard has come nowhere near publishing the amount of invective against the president

that the National Review has.

In fact, just two Januarys ago, as it became clear that the real estate mogul wasn't

just a novelty candidate but a serious force to be contended with, the magazine went as

far to publish an anti-Trump issue, complete with pieces from conservatives like the aforementioned

Kristol, Glenn Beck, Thomas Sowell, Dana Loesch and Katie Pavlich, among others.

As late as last October, the magazine was still on the #NeverTrump train, with writer

Victor Davis Hanson saying that the president "is a symptom, not the cause of the GOP's

internal strife" — arguing, of course, that those who supported him were the problem.

Perhaps it was the calendar turning over on Trump's first year in the White House, or

the fact that the president has shepherded more irrefutably conservative initiatives

than even his most staunch supporters probably could have hoped for. Whatever the case may

be, the magazine seems to have done a bit of a reappraisal on the president and his

agenda — and while it may not be a 180-degree shift, it's an undeniable sign that even

#NeverTrump conservatives are beginning to come around on our 45th president.

In a piece called "The Great Experiment" published earlier this week by National Review,

the same Hanson who argued that Trump voters are the problem said that Trump's presidency

represented the first time in the post-war era that we've gone from a "hard left"

president to a "hard right" administration in succession.

"Most new administrations do not really completely overturn their predecessors'

policies to enact often-promised ideologically driven change," Hanson writes. "The 18-year

span of Harry Truman to Dwight Eisenhower to John F. Kennedy was mostly a continuum

from center-left to center-right, back to center-left. Kennedy was probably as hawkish

and as much of a tax cutter as was Eisenhower.

"The seven years of Jerry Ford to Jimmy Carter were a similar transition — or even

the twelve years of George H. W. Bush to Bill Clinton. The deck chairs changed, but the

ship sailed in mostly the same manner to mostly the same direction. Even the supposed great

divide of 1981 did not mean that Jimmy Carter had been as left-wing as Ronald Reagan was

right-wing. Carter's fight against inflation and renewed defense build-up was continued

in part by Reagan. George W. Bush was not as markedly right-wing as Barack Obama was

clearly left-wing. In sum, there have rarely been back-to-back complete reversals in presidential

agendas."

Hanson declared — in the same publication that has repeatedly declared Trump to be a

moderate liberal in conservative clothing — that Trump had accomplished a rare feat

— being able to go from the extreme left of the Obama administration and implementing

a conservative agenda.

"Whatever Donald J. Trump's political past and vociferous present, his first year

of governance is most certainly as hard conservative as Barack Obama's eight years were hard

progressive," Hanson writes. "We are watching a rare experiment in political governance

play out, as we go, in back-to-back fashion, from one pole to its opposite."

Hanson notes Obama's foreign policy missteps in Libya, Syria, Iraq, North Korea, Iran,

Cuba, Venezuela, Israel and Egypt (quite the list, one must note).

"All reflected his own larger visions of European Union and American progressivism

as models for transnational world governance. A global council of Davos-like elites would

best adjudicate climate-change crises, the excesses of capitalism, dangerous nationalism,

the parochial and outdated restrictions on migration and immigration, and the lingering

but still pernicious legacies of Western imperialism and colonialism," Hanson wrote, noting that

Obama preferred to let crises "more or less work themselves out on their own."

And then there was identity politics, larger, more intrusive government, "big green"

and ""you didn't build that."

"By January 2017, American culture and the economy at home and foreign policy abroad

reflected Obama's values: pathways to abortion on demand, radical gun control, tribalism,

and democratic socialism," Hanson writes.

"Then came the unforeseen nomination, election, and governance of Donald J. Trump," he continues.

"Unlike George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush, Trump was determined to ram through

a conservative agenda not seen since the Reagan revolution of 1981–89 — and to govern

as conservatively as Obama had progressively."

This includes "tax reform and reduction, conservative judges and cabinet heads, stepped-up

energy production, deregulation, a new realist and deterrent foreign policy, (and) immigration

recalibration."

"In other words, free-market economics, deterrent foreign policies, and conservative

cultural reform that are championed in the abstract in think tanks, on radio and television

by conservative pundits, and in magazines and journals by conservative intellectuals

are currently being put to work concretely in the real world, a rare occurrence," Hanson

writes.

In other words, Trump's administration has been a massive success on almost every major

issue that the National Review is pushing.

Hanson sounds a note of caution — that these ideas need to undergo the test of implementation.

However, we've seen pleasant auguries so far, pleasant enough that even the National

Review seems to be throwing in the towel on their #NeverTrumpism.

What a difference a year — and an administration — makes.

For more infomation >> Anti-Trump National Review Throws in Towel, Admits Trump Massive Success - Duration: 6:16.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS President Trump Just Gave Pelosi and Schumer MORE Bad News !!! - Duration: 3:04.

President Trump Just Gave Pelosi and Schumer MORE Bad News !!!

There is a sever disconnect between some (i.e. liberal) economists and the facts swirling

around them.

Eleven-months worth of financial reports on the economy in the era of President Trump

have had the following consistent themes writes Forbes: non-farm payrolls were added monthly,

the unemployment rate remained under 5 percent (currently 4.1) and average hourly earnings

grew.That may not sound stellar and headlines worthy news, but when you consider that Obama

and his fiduciary cronies were trying to tell Americans that their best days were behind

them and that they should except the condescendingly termed 'new normal,' the growth is very

welcomed news.The growth in payrolls hinges on two key industries.

The first, healthcare, has no real bearing on economic policies since the demographic-driven

necessities of aging Baby Boom generation rules that industry.

The second, manufacturing, has a direct correlation to the economic vision of President Trump.

By rolling back suffocating regulations from the Obama, Bush and Clinton eras, Trump has

given a booster shot to the arm of a VITAL part of our economic success story.

Bloomberg has posted a chart from the Institute from Supply Management (a key watch dog of

the manufacturing industry) in which it is clear that since 2017, manufacturing took

off after wallowing for at least six years.In those years, just as a reminder, we were led

by an ineffective and indifferent president who felt secure enough during a 2016 town

hall meeting to tell manufacturers and their employees, "Some of those jobs of the past

are just not going to come back,", Legal Insurrection quotes Obama as saying.The era

of Trump has been the embodiment of the following response: 'Wanna fricking bet?"

The steady growth of manufacturing jobs under President Trump has been the best streak since

2004 and future forecasts call for the continued growth of "domestic business investment,

improving global economies and steady spending by American households," writes Bloomberg.

The chart below, tweeted by the National Association of Manufacturers, shows (with the green line)

the surge in customer orders indicative of confident consumers returning to the economic

cycle.There are also two confluent occurrences that speak well of the Trump recovery: the

stock market has gained an unbelievable 7,000 points just in 2017 and, due to a weakening

dollar, U.S. exports will be looking more and more enticing to foreign markets.With

all of this good news coming together, what does the Left say?

'What?

148,000 jobs instead of the forecasted 190,000?

This is the end-of-the-world Paul Krugman warned us about!'

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS President Trump Just Gave Pelosi and Schumer MORE Bad News !!! - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

DONALD TRUMP EN COLÈRE CORÉE DU NORD NÉGOCIER AVEC LA CORÉE DU SUD - Duration: 14:05.

For more infomation >> DONALD TRUMP EN COLÈRE CORÉE DU NORD NÉGOCIER AVEC LA CORÉE DU SUD - Duration: 14:05.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump Just Hauled 7 Of Them Off To Prison! - Duration: 5:59.

BREAKING: Trump Just Hauled 7 Of Them Off To Prison!

Food stamp and government assistance programs are a necessity in any economic conditions,

as there will always be people that will need to utilize these programs to survive until

they can improve their situation.

Unfortunately, welfare is a big target for fraud, with people lying about their financial

status to receive benefits and business owners who prey upon welfare recipients because they

know these folks are desperate and need the money.

During his campaign, President Trump made it a point to declare he would work very hard

to get people off of welfare and back to work, as well as punish those who take advantage

of the system.

Taking a look at the Trump administration's performance with cracking down on welfare

fraud in 2017, it seems the President has made good on this campaign promise.

A prime example of this crackdown on welfare fraud can be seen with the arrest of three

Muslim brothers, Emad, Jawad, and Khader Karaein, who ran the Middle Eastern Market in Grand

Rapids, Michigan.

The three brothers were involved in a food stamp scam that bilked taxpayers' for $736,000

with EBT, and an additional $544,000 from the WIC program.

The money was stolen over the course of nine years and took away money from people who

truly needed it.

According to the Justice Department, "One fraudulent scheme alleged against them was

that they allowed customers receiving federal subsistence benefits to obtain cash and other

prohibited items in exchange for the federal funds allotted to the customers.

This fraudulent activity resulted in a large amount of federal welfare money being deposited

into the MEM bank account."

Adding insult to injury the Karaein brothers' signed up for food stamp assistance themselves

while they were encouraging others to defraud the system.

The end result was that the brothers received a combined prison sentence of seven years

and restitution of about $2.5 million needs to be repaid.

Investigators under the direction of the Trump administration continued to find numerous

instances where food stamp fraud was taking place.

Millions of dollars were being misappropriated with the help of small convenience stores

located in predominantly poor neighborhoods.

The following seven cases are the pinnacle of the work the Trump administration has concluded

to rid our welfare system of fraud and abuse.

George Rafidi, 62, and owner of Breaden Market convenience store in Ohio stole $2.8 million

worth of food stamps where he allowed food stamp recipients to get cash instead of food.

Investigators with the USDA were alerted to Mr. Rafidi's illegal activity when it was

revealed in an audit that his store was cashing in on the SNAP program at a rate ten times

higher than larger stores in the area.

Mr. Rafidi was sentenced to 33 months in prison and was ordered to pay restitution of $2.8

million.

In Florida, multiple people were charged and arrested for defrauding the SNAP program,

(supplemental nutrition assistance program) after the Division of Public Assistance Fraud

and Florida's Department of Children and Families discovered more than $20 million

worth of food stamp fraud, committed by individuals' lying on their SNAP applications.

In probably one of the most notable food stamp fraud cases of 2017, Mohammad Shafiq, from

Baltimore, was sentenced to 4 years in prison after he was found guilty of pilfering $3.7

million from the SNAP program.

Mr. Shafiq was one of 14 other Baltimore business owners who stole a combined $16 million.

All 14, including Mr. Shafiq received prison sentences and were ordered to pay restitution.Kanwar

Gill, Raviinder Gill, and George Nance, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, were sent to prison

and ordered to pay restitution after law enforcement discovered the trio were using their Quick

N EZ convenience store to defraud the SNAP program.

The trio came to the attention of law enforcement after they had amassed $1.2 million in cash

SNAP benefits, which was highly irregular for such a small store.

Seven women in South Carolina, who were involved in a multi-million dollar SNAP fraud scheme

were arrested ordered to pay restitution when it was discovered that they were working with

store owners to use SNAP benefits for cash.

The seven women were each ordered to pay $20,000 each in restitution, while the store owners

who were responsible for the scheme, must pay back a staggering $5 million and serve

a prison term of five years.

In one of the largest welfare scams of 2017, a fundamentalist Mormon sect defrauding the

American taxpayer of $11 million worth of SNAP benefits.

The Mormon sect responsible for the theft, diverted benefits to several warehouses while

using front companies in an attempt to hide the fraud.

Ali Ratib Daham, an Iraqi immigrant from Maine, defrauded the SNAP program of $1.4 million.

Mr. Daham's scam was similar to others, where he gave SNAP beneficiaries cash for

their food stamps, and then redeemed the full value of the food stamps to further line his

pockets.

Mr. Daham is facing a prison term of 20 years, plus having to pay restitution.

The aforementioned cases are just a small sampling of the rampant fraud, which was previously

allowed to take place with the SNAP program.

Now that President Trump and his administration have sent a clear message to these and other

criminals, it is likely that the instances of fraud with the SNAP program will be greatly

reduced.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump Just Hauled 7 Of Them Off To Prison! - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

Major Announcement ! Ivanka Trump Announces Her Future Political Plans, Dems Are Stunned Speechless! - Duration: 2:44.

Since Donald Trump reported his candidacy for president in 2015, a lot of talks spun

around his family and their enthusiasm for helping him turn into the leader of our territory.

In any campaign, the candidate isn't successful unless he or she has the full help of their

family and dear companions.

The family is required not only for passionate help but rather to likewise help with raising

money and advertising endeavors.

Obviously, a campaign can be more exhausting on the relatives than the candidate his/herself.

I'm certain our present president had numerous late night talks with his wife and kids about

the pressure engaged with turning into a First Family, yet plainly they gave him 100% help

from the earliest starting point and keep on supporting him in the administration.

Furthermore, there is plainly one daughter that has gone well beyond the call of family

duty to help her father out – Ivanka.

Not just has she been a straightforward supporter of her dad amid the campaign, she has additionally

been willing to forfeit her chance in playing a non-paid part in the White House to offer

help.

This sort of forfeit ought to be taken note.

Presently as she is taking in the ropes about how a decent administration ought to be run,

it is nothing unexpected that she is needing to keep on making America great again after

her dad leaves the presidency in 7 years.

The splendid thought she has concocted is to keep running as president, and liberals

are not going to deal with this news well.

By any stretch of the imagination.

Via The New York Post:

Ivanka Trump wants to be American's first female president, according to a new book.

Ivanka and husband Jared Kushner agreed to join her father's administration — against

the advice of "almost everyone they knew" — in the hope that it would propel her into

the presidency one day, according to "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House."

"Between themselves, the two had made an earnest deal: If sometime in the future the

opportunity arose, she'd be the one to run for president," journalist Michael Wolff

writes in the book, out Jan. 9.

"The first woman president, Ivanka entertained, would not be Hillary Clinton; it would be

Ivanka Trump."

Obviously, planning a run for president quite a while from now is troublesome.

In any case, realizing that Ivanka is occupied with running and proceeding with the legacy

of her dad in ensuring citizen cash, taking out inefficient spending and regulations,

and terminating DC swampers is empowering.

The Republican party require not expect that they can't locate a decent presidential

candidate in 2024 – they have Ivanka!

For more infomation >> Major Announcement ! Ivanka Trump Announces Her Future Political Plans, Dems Are Stunned Speechless! - Duration: 2:44.

-------------------------------------------

Oil Boom: Trump Delivers Devastating Blow to OPEC - Duration: 3:56.

President Donald Trump's Make America Great Again agenda is based upon placing the interests

of "America first," and a big part of that is making sure America is not simply

energy independent, but dominant in the global energy market.

As such, the Department of Interior just announced a draft proposal plan that would unleash American

energy production by opening up vast areas of our nation's outer continental shelf

to consideration for off-shore oil exploration and drilling.

Current policy put in place by the prior administration has nearly 94 percent of America's OCS labeled

as off-limits to exploration, but a new 5-year oil and gas leasing program would essentially

reverse that number and potentially open up virtually all of America's offshore resources

for exploration and extraction, in a responsible manner.

"Responsibly developing our energy resources on the Outer Continental Shelf in a safe and

well-regulated way is important to our economy and energy security, and it provides billions

of dollars to fund the conservation of our coastlines, public lands and parks," stated

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke.

"Today's announcement lays out the options that are on the table and starts a lengthy

and robust public comment period," he continued.

"Just like with mining, not all areas are appropriate for offshore drilling, and we

will take that into consideration in the coming weeks."

"The important thing is we strike the right balance to protect our coasts and people while

still powering America and achieving American Energy Dominance," Zinke added.

The proposed program would include 47 potential new leases in 25 different areas, including

19 new leases off the coast of Alaska, 7 off the Pacific coast, 12 in the Gulf of Mexico

and 9 along the Atlantic coast.

The goal of the program is to move America beyond simply aspiring to become energy independent

and place the country on track to be highly competitive and dominant among other oil and

gas producers around the globe.

The proposal, which is still in the public comment phase and has yet to be finalized,

would be a significant shift in policy from that of former President Barack Obama's

administration, which sought to protect resources rather than exploit them.

"This is a clear difference between energy weakness and energy dominance," Zinke stated,

according to The Washington Post.

Of course, the reliably anti-Trump WaPo made sure to note the "controversy" surrounding

the proposal and highlighted the opposition the plan is receiving from various governors,

lawmakers and special interest groups, as well as the increased potential for environmental

disasters.

Indeed, both Democrat and Republican governors and lawmakers in East Coast states from Florida

to New Jersey have all said "not in my back yard" when it comes to new leases for off-shore

drilling, citing potential economic damage to their beach tourism industry and even threatening

legal action to prevent the new leases.

But the time to strike at energy dominance likely couldn't be better, as the Financial

Times noted that crude oil prices are once again on the rise for the first time since

2015.

The supply of oil produced globally has shrunk as Russia and the OPEC nations have reduced

their production in an effort to push prices back up.

However, U.S. shale oil production is set to double this year over last, and with the

accelerating U.S. economy pulling along the global GDP to nearly 3.6 percent growth, demand

for oil is growing at a rapid clip.

When increased shale oil production is combined with new offshore oil production, the U.S.

will be flush with energy resources in such a way that it won't matter as much what

the OPEC nations do with their oil production as the U.S. will be able to meet its own needs

and set a price for everybody else.

For more infomation >> Oil Boom: Trump Delivers Devastating Blow to OPEC - Duration: 3:56.

-------------------------------------------

Under Trump, opposing 'chain migration' is even bigger than 'amn - Duration: 7:16.

Under Trump, opposing 'chain migration' is even bigger than 'amnesty'

One word defined the immigration debate under former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack

Obama: amnesty.

Under President Trump, it might be two: chain migration.

�Our current immigration system fails Americans,� Trump said at the White House on Thursday

�Chain migration is a total disaster, which threatens our security and our economy and

provides a gateway for terrorism.�

Trump said it again when spelling out what would have to be in a bill to codify the Deferred

Action for Childhood Arrivals program, ending in March, in order for him to sign it.

DACA protects undocumented immigrants who arrived in the U.S. as minors from deportation.

Because Obama created it through executive action, there are questions about its legal

and constitutional basis.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced in September that the program would be phased

out for these reasons.

�Any legislation on DACA must secure the border with a wall,� Trump remarked after

meeting with Republican senators on the issue.

�It must give our immigration officers the resources they need to stop illegal immigration

and also to stop visa overstays.

And, crucially, the legislation must end chain migration.

It must end the visa lottery.�

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders described the president as reiterating in

the meeting with GOP senators the administration�s �view that any action on DACA must come

with action on the president's immigration reform principles, which were released last

year.�

�These include a physical border wall on the southern border; interior enforcement,

which includes more ICE and Border Patrol agents; as well as a crackdown on sanctuary

cities; and reforms to our legal immigration system, like ending chain migration and the

visa lottery program in favor of a merit-based immigration system,� Sanders said at Thursday�s

press briefing.

�Next week, the president is inviting a bipartisan group of senators to the White

House to discuss next steps on responsible immigration reform and to continue that discussion,�

she added.

�Chain migration� is a phrase used to describe a feature of immigration law that

allows immigrants to sponsor their relatives to come to the U.S. Family reunification is

responsible for more than two-thirds of legal immigration annually, while less than 10 percent

come for primarily employment-based reasons.

Immigration restrictionist argue this produces a mismatch between immigrant skill levels

and the U.S. labor force, at the expense of American workers and recent immigrants.

A bill introduced by Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and David Perdue, R-Ga., endorsed by Trump

in August, would cut immigration in half in part by limiting family-based immigrant sponsorship

to spouses and minor children.

They would like to see something like this provision be part of any DACA deal.

�Look, if you give amnesty to one or two million illegal immigrants who were brought

here through no fault of their own, as kids, you�re going to have at least a couple negative

effects,� Cotton said on Fox News.

�And one of those negative effects is you�re going to have a whole new chain of chain migration.

The way to control for that negative effect is to stop chain migration.�

The immigration hawks at Numbers USA have launched a six-figure ad campaign to inform

the public and to help the phrase "chain migration" take its place in the political lexicon alongside

"amnesty."

The group�s president, Roy Beck, uses the words together.

�While Congress debates yet another amnesty, we want to help Americans visualize how the

presence of chain migration categories means that amnesties are never limited to the people

receiving them but instead open up lifetime work permits to millions more of their extended

family and in-laws,� Beck said in a statement.

Many of the Republicans negotiating with Senate Democrats on a DACA fix favor more expansive

immigration policies than Trump.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., for example, was part of the Gang of Eight and is a co-sponsor

of the Democrats� preferred bill for resolving the status of DACA.

Social conservatives helped beat back a 1990s attempt to reduce immigration in part by limiting

chain migration on the grounds that family reunification was a pro-family policy.

Many immigrant communities and their advocates also oppose the change, arguing that it is

already too difficult to immigrate to the U.S. and, this is, itself, a driver of illegal

immigration.

But Graham suggested Thursday that Trump could succeed where Obama and Bush failed if lawmakers

were willing to compromise.

�There's a bill to be had,� he said at the White House.

�If you want it bad enough, we'll get it and it will be good for the country.

Everybody has got to give a little bit.

But I've never been more optimistic about an immigration reform proposal making it to

the president's desk right now.�

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., has been a persistent critic of Trump on immigration, among other

issues, and asked for a place at the table on DACA negotiations when the administration

was lobbying him on tax reform.

Still, Flake tweeted in December that he could make some concessions the White House wanted,

specifically mentioning chain migration.

�We can fix DACA in a way that beefs up border security, stops chain migration for

the DREAMers, and addresses the unfairness of the diversity lottery,� he wrote.

�If POTUS wants to protect these kids, we want to help him keep that promise.�

Trump has held to these positions even after his split Steve Bannon, who pushed for immigration

restrictions when he was working at the White House and has published numerous articles

on the subject on his media site Breitbart.

Pressure is building to craft a legislative solution for DACA, as beneficiaries� work

permits are starting to expire and there are concerns about how long it would take to ramp

up the program again if Congress authorized its revival.

�We must BUILD THE WALL, stop illegal immigration, end chain migration [and] cancel the visa

lottery,� Trump tweeted Thursday evening.

�The current system is unsafe [and] unfair to the great people of our country � time

for change!�

For more infomation >> Under Trump, opposing 'chain migration' is even bigger than 'amn - Duration: 7:16.

-------------------------------------------

What Joy Behar Just Said About President Trump Should Have Her KICKED OUT Of Hollywood Forever - Duration: 3:15.

With the left practically owning all of the major news and television networks on cable,

and with all of those in existence applying every spare moment they seem to have to attacking

Donald Trump, it's no longer that much of a surprise to hear about someone slamming

the president.

In fact, it's so common place, we've all sort of grown to expect it and when it doesn't

happen, or in those rare moments the furnace goes out in hell and things get frosty down

under and the media gives Trump praise, it becomes front page news.

That's why no one is shocked to hear about the ever irritating Joy Behar going off on

Trump, stating he would do anything to save his sons from going to prison, including launch

a nuclear war with North Korea.

Fox News has more:

Whoopi Goldberg called Trump the "tweeter in chief," and the panel didn't like that

he responded Tuesday night after the North Korean dictator claimed to have a "button"

for nuclear weapons on his desk.

"North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the 'Nuclear Button is on his desk

at all times,'" the president tweeted.

"Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too

have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button

works!"

Goldberg set up the segment and asked her co-hosts, "Is this kind of a crazy game

we're playing?"

Behar was the first to chime in, saying Trump needs to be "medicated and hospitalized

… or he is going to just kill all of us."

"My feeling is that probably they are getting closer to him in the Mueller investigation,

and that's what this is about," she said.

"A lot of it.

He'll blow the whole world up so that his stupid sons don't have to go to jail."

And of course, what dialogue smashing on the president for trolling our enemies would be

complete without accusations of mental illness?

Sunny Hostin made such a comment during the show, making sure the quota of tired insults

and digs was met during the episode.

Meghan McCain, daughter of RINO Sen. John McCain, wasted no time seizing the opportunity

to score a few feminist points by stating Trump's tweet is proof we need a "female

president," name dropping UN Ambassador Nikki Haley as her pick.

McCain had a golden opportunity to set the record straight about how nuclear launches

really work, pointing out that there isn't an actual button and there are a serious of

steps that have to be completed before this is allowed to happen.

But she didn't.

Whoopi decided to try making a funny by bringing out a big, red prop button and slapping it

on the desk, saying " I got a big button."

The crowd was thrilled.

Behar couldn't resist sharing more of her thoughts, noting that since Kim Jong Un doesn't

have the same checks and balances as Trump, he must be exercising greater self-control

than our president, thus he's more stable.

Yes, she's praising a communist dictator who has violently oppressed his people for

years, for having "self-control."

How did Behar finish up?

By slamming Vice President Mike Pence, stating he has "zero charisma" and that she'd

prefer him as president because he wouldn't win reelection.

These ladies sure are full of charm, aren't they?

For more infomation >> What Joy Behar Just Said About President Trump Should Have Her KICKED OUT Of Hollywood Forever - Duration: 3:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump 'would talk to Kim' but hopes North Korea talks with South will STOP threat of WW3 - DAILYNEWS - Duration: 3:31.

Trump 'would talk to Kim' but hopes North Korea talks with South will STOP threat of WW3

DONALD Trump has revealed he would talk to

Kim Jong-un but hopes the discussions between South and North Korea will end the rising

threat of war.

The US President said that he hopes talks between North and South Korea will go further

than just the Winter Olympics when they meet for high-level talks next weeks.

Trump also told reporters at Camp David that he was willing to talk to the leader of the

dictator-run state, Kim Jong-un under the right conditions.

Mr Trump said: "I would love to see them take it beyond the Olympics.

"And at the appropriate time, we'll get involved."

North and South Korea are set to meet on Tuesday at the truce village of Panmunjom to talk

about the hermit kingdoms possible participation in next month's Winter Olympics in PyeongChang,

South Korea.

This will be the first time the nations have talked since December 2015.

When Trump was asked whether he was willing to speak he said: "Sure, I always believe

in talking."

He went on to add: "He knows I'm not messing around, not even a little bit."

Seoul has said that the upcoming talks will focus on the Winter Olympics amid concerns

amongst critics who have said that Pyongyang is trying to drive a wedge in the Seoul-Washington

alliance.

The allies have pursued a campaign of sanctions and pressure to force North Korea to abandon

its weapons program.

Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee representative Ed Royce said the US President

must keep "pressure" on the secretive state.

He said: "I think it's very important we keep the pressure up.

"Look if the talks are going on during the Olympic Games in February maybe that quiets

the neighbourhood there for a bit."

North Korea has refused to give up developing its military arsenal despite the UN decision

to hit the regime with a new series of sanctions targeting Pyongyang's economy and trade.

Mr Royce said he was concerned that if South Korea concede even a little bit during talks

with Kim Jong-un, the rogue state's leader will channel the resources into his nuclear

arsenal.

He said: "But my main concern is that South Korea not give away anything such as resources

or money to North Korea in any of these talks.

"Why?

Because the money always finds its way back into their nuclear weapons programme.

"Virtually 100 percent of whatever gets into the hands of Kim Jong-un is deployed

for his military or his ICBM and nuclear weapons programme.

"That's why we've got to be so careful in not allowing resources to be transferred

to that regime."

South Korean President Moon Jae-In said that "overly optimistic expectations" were

"undesirable" but added: "We will do our best to make the Pyeongchang Olympics

an Olympics for peace and settle the nuclear issue peacefully."