Sunday, January 14, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Jan 14 2018

Moby has confessed live on radio that he was co-opted by the CIA in 2017 and ordered to

spread Deep State propaganda designed to destroy President Trump's reputation.

According to Moby, the CIA asked him to spread rumors about President Trump's alleged Russian

collusion by posting about it on his social media accounts, where he has a large number

of followers.

The multi-platinum selling musician and activist gave an interview to WFPK on Thursday to promote

his new album, Everything Was Beautiful and Nothing Hurt, but spent most of the interview

talking about the CIA and mainstream media's Russian collusion conspiracy theories.

Moby said he had been befriended by a few "active and former CIA agents" over the

years, who tried to convince him they were "really concerned" that Trump was "essentially

being run as a Russian agent."

"This is the Manchurian Candidate, like [Russian President Vladimir Putin] has a Russian

agent as the president of the United States," Moby recalled his "CIA friends" telling

him.

The full interview was posted on Twitter by WFPK's Kyle Meredith.

The discussion about Trump, which sheds light on how the Deep State use celebrities to influence

the unwitting masses, begins at 8:10.

— Kyle Meredith (@kylemeredith) January 10, 2018

Moby told WFPK that he was having dinner with his CIA friends last February when they began

asking him to post several anti-Trump theories on social media.

"They said like, look you have more of a social media following than any of us do,

can you please post some of these things, just in a way to sort of put it out there,"

Moby said.

Moby said his "CIA friends" were basing their information, in part, on the Fusion

GPS report that was published by BuzzFeed last January, amid a storm of controversy.

It seems the musician carried out the orders given to him by his "CIA friends" and

actively shared Deep State propaganda on his Instagram page.

Last February, Moby wrote a lengthy post on Instagram detailing what his "friends who

work in DC" told him about newly-elected President Trump.

The post said the infamous Russian dossier was "100 percent real," adding that Trump

was "being blackmailed by the Russian government, not just for being peed on by Russian hookers,

but for much more nefarious things."

The post added that the Trump administration has been colluding with the Russian government

"since day one," and Trump was putting warships off the coast of Iran "in the hope

that Iran will attack one of the ships and give the US a pretense for invasion."

"I'm writing these things so that when/if these things happen there will be a public

record beforehand," Moby tweeted.

"These are truly baffling and horrifying times, as we have an incompetent president

who is essentially owned by a foreign power."

The propaganda post has received over 5,000 likes in the last year.

For more infomation >> Moby Confesses CIA Ordered Him To Spread Propaganda Against Trump - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Lawyer Denies President Arranged $130,000 Hush Payment To Porn Star | TODAY - Duration: 2:27.

For more infomation >> Trump Lawyer Denies President Arranged $130,000 Hush Payment To Porn Star | TODAY - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

Trump asked why Medicare couldn't just cover everybod Wolff boo - Duration: 2:07.

Trump asked why Medicare couldn�t just cover everybody: Wolff book

President Donald Trump asked his aides why the Medicare program couldn�t be dramatically

expanded, according to Michael Wolff�s new book �Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White

House.�

Trump, Wolff writes, impatiently wondered aloud during a discussion about health care

why the federally administered program could not be expanded to cover �everybody.�

Trump�s promotion of the idea reportedly shocked aides, including Steve Bannon, with

whom the president has now broken over statements in the book, which Trump has called �phony.�

Aides �were careful not to react to this heresy,� Wolff writes.

Trump slammed Sen. Bernie Sanders�s �Medicare for All� bill, which the independent from

Vermont, who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination, introduced in September.

Trump is portrayed in the book as being �rather more for Obamacare than for repealing Obamacare.�

But, Wolff writes, Bannon insisted on trying to repeal the law.

Despite holding a majority in both the House and Senate, and controlling the White House,

Republicans have failed to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

They have weakened it, however: The recently enacted tax law repeals the mandate for individuals

to have health insurance.

For more infomation >> Trump asked why Medicare couldn't just cover everybod Wolff boo - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

American President Donald Trump Talks About Pakistani Girl Zainab Ameen - Duration: 3:33.

justice for zainab

For more infomation >> American President Donald Trump Talks About Pakistani Girl Zainab Ameen - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Lindsey Graham, Who Called Trump Racist For 'Shithole' Comment, Called Mexico 'Hellhole' In 2013 - Duration: 2:51.

Senator Lindsey Graham, who called President Trump a "racist" after he allegedly called

African countries a "shithole," made a sneering comment about Mexico – referring

to Central American countries as "hellholes."

Hypocrite Graham, in 2013, said during a Senate panel discussion that people who migrate to

America from Mexico and other countries in Central America are doing so because their

countries are "hellholes."

Graham said at the time:

The people coming across the southern border live in hellholes.

They don't like that.

They want to come here.

Our problem is we can't have everybody in the world who lives in a hellhole come to

America

There are 11 million people coming through the southern border 'cause they come from

countries where they can't find work, and life is miserable.

So it seems to me that if you can control who gets a job you've gone a long way in

controlling illegal immigration.

Because as long as the jobs are available in America you can't build a fence high

enough to stop people.

Breitbart.com reports: Then-Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) — a long proponent of immigration

policy that serves the interests of the American people — corrected Graham, saying, "It's

not a hellhole, it has great things going on in Mexico, we're proud of the people

in Mexico."

Graham responded to Sessions, saying, "You're right.

I wasn't slandering Mexico, I was just talking about all the places people want to leave,

for whatever reason."

On Thursday, a leaked discussion at the White House on immigration alleged Trump asked Senators

why the U.S. was not prioritizing immigration from prosperous nations like Norway, rather

than mass immigrating foreign nationals from Haiti, El Salvador, and other turmoil-ridden

nations.

The report claimed Trump called those turmoil-ridden nations a "shithole."

Graham jumped on the comments on Friday, using the language of the open borders lobby to

promote more "diversity" in the legal immigration system while claiming he reprimanded

Trump for making the remark.

Graham said:

Following comments by the President, I said my piece directly to him yesterday.

The President and all those attending the meeting know what I said and how I feel.

I've always believed that America is an idea, not defined by its people but by its

ideals.

The American ideal is embraced by people all over the globe.

It was best said a long time ago, E Pluribus Unum – Out of Many, One.

Diversity has always been our strength, not our weakness.

In reforming immigration we cannot lose these American Ideals.

Trump has denied using the word "shithole," but did say he used "tough" language in

the discussion about the large numbers of foreign nationals who arrive in the U.S. from

under-developed regions of the world.

For more infomation >> Lindsey Graham, Who Called Trump Racist For 'Shithole' Comment, Called Mexico 'Hellhole' In 2013 - Duration: 2:51.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's DOING IT!! BIGGEST Move He's EVER Made Against MUSLIMS! - Duration: 7:12.

For more infomation >> Trump's DOING IT!! BIGGEST Move He's EVER Made Against MUSLIMS! - Duration: 7:12.

-------------------------------------------

Three Democrats Plan Boycott of Trump's State of the Union – You Won't Be Surprised Who They Are - Duration: 2:45.

Three members of the House of Representatives have announced they will not attend President

Donald Trump's State of the Union address to Congress on January 30.

All three cite President Trump's recent comments on immigration, as well as his recent

behavior, as the reason they are not attending.

Rep, Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), and Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) have

all announced they will boycott the State of the Union speech to send the President

a message.

All three have been vocal critics of the President since he took office.

Blumenauer boycotted the Trump inauguration, and Lewis boycotted the speech last year.

Fox News reports.

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., on Friday became the latest Democrat to announce that she will

not be attending President Trump's State of the Union address later this month — amid

growing Democratic plans to protest the event.

"Why would I take my time to go and sit and listen to a liar?"

Waters said on MSNBC.

"To someone who lies in the face of facts, someone who can change their tune day in and

day out.

What does he have to say that I would be interested in?

I don't trust him, I don't appreciate him and I wouldn't waste my time sitting

in that house listening to what he has to say.

He does not deserve my attention."

Waters is the third Democrat so far to announce a boycott of the Jan 30.

event, with Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., and Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., both saying that

they would be skipping it too.

Lewis made his announcement Friday, citing reports that Trump had referred to some African

countries as "s—holes" in a conversation with lawmakers about immigration.

"I cannot in all good conscience be in a room with what he has said about so many Americans,"

Lewis said on MSNBC Friday.

"I just cannot do it.

I wouldn't be honest with myself."

Blumenauer said he would be skipping the event before Trump's remarks became public, but

said it would be a waste of time and that he was staying home.

"Rather than listening to another destructive, divisive speech by Trump, I will not attend

this year's annual address to Congress," Blumenauer said in a statement.

"Instead, like I did during his inauguration, I'll be working at home listening to Oregonians

about what they think about the State of the Union."

The boycott isn't the only protest planned, with some Democrats planning on wearing black

in order to stand in solidarity with victims of sexual harassment.

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., said she is trying to keep momentum going following last

Sunday's protest at the Golden Globe awards ceremony.

For more infomation >> Three Democrats Plan Boycott of Trump's State of the Union – You Won't Be Surprised Who They Are - Duration: 2:45.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS From DC… TRUMP IS NOT GOING!!! - Duration: 35:09.

BREAKING NEWS From DC…

TRUMP IS NOT GOING!!!

International diplomatic relationships are probably one of the most difficult and frustrating

aspects of the job of President.

Not only are you required to be firm and friendly with the other world leaders, but you also

have to do it in such a way that America stays in a position of power without offending other

leaders.

This is a balance that former President Obama never quite reached.

His modus operandi was to bow to every famous person who came along, making sure that the

United States always gave away more money and resources than we received in return.

President Trump isn't a big fan of handling international relationships the same way that

former President Barack Obama did.

Trump has gone to great lengths to repair that damage to our reputation since Obama

went on his 'apology tour' and efficiently embarrassed many Americans.

His approach to the America first policy has put the United States back in a position of

power with many entities, including the United Nations, but the job isn't complete yet.

According to recent reports, the President is having major problems with an Obama pet

project that he can't quite accept.

The issue is that the Obama Administration greenlit a the continuation of a project that

was completely unnecessary and extremely costly.

In 2008, the United States made the decision to move the United States Embassy that in

London.

Unfortunately, that move has a price tag of around $1 billion.

According to the Daily Mail, the President disproves that type of wasteful spending,

and it's causing problems with the leadership in London:

"President Donald Trump said he had canceled his trip to London out of concerns about a

'bad deal' for the new U.S. embassy building he was to officially open there –and blaming

it on his predecessor Barack Obama.

The decision to relocate to a new embassy was inked in 2008 during the administration

of George W. Bush.

Officials cited security concerns."

This is where the die-hard Obama fans feel like they've got an out.

Technically it was the Bush Administration that signed off on the relocation.

However, while the preliminary decision might have been made in 2008, it also appears as

if the decision to move was established in 2008, not the choice of where to move, or

how much money to lose in the process.

If nothing else, Obama had the chance to reverse the decision made by Bush if the economic

climate made the decision into a bad one.

President Trump was perfectly clear that his problem was with Obama because of the terrible

real estate decision that was made, not the fact that papers might be shuffled in a different

building for a while:

"'Reason I canceled my trip to London is that I am not a big fan of the Obama Administration

having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for 'peanuts,' only

to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars,' Trump wrote on Twitter.

'Bad deal.

Wanted me to cut ribbon-NO!'

The president condemned Obama on Twitter for selling the old site on Grosvenor Square in

London's exclusive Mayfair district 'for peanuts'.

Trump tweeted shortly before midnight to criticize the move to an 'off location' at Nine

Elms, south of the River Thames, as a 'bad deal'.

At the time the government decided to relocate its historic embassy, officials said it wasn't

possible [sic] to retrofit the existing facility.

The government undertook global efforts to upgrade security at its embassies following

embassy bombings and an increase in worldwide threats after Sep. 11.

Trump's tweet, which followed the Daily Mail exclusively revealing last night that

the trip to London would be called off, sparked an overwhelming backlash on social media in

Britain.

'We looked at all our options, including renovation of our current building on Grosvenor

Square,' then-Ambassador Robert Tuttle said, CNN reported.

'In the end, we realized that the goal of a modern, secure and environmentally sustainable

embassy could best be met by constructing a new facility,' he added."

Once again, the President is using his presence as a bargaining chip with world leaders, just

as it should be.

Have a visit revoked by the President of the United States is a big international deal,

and the President knows that.

Not everyone is happy that British officials are causing problems for the President though:

Trump was previously expected to make his first trip to the UK since entering office,

but British officials were newly informed he went cold on the idea.

A new date has not been offered, raising the prospect of a major diplomatic snub.

One senior source told the Mail that Mr. Trump – who was expected to officially open the

new US embassy in London – had canceled because he was unhappy about the arrangements

and the scale of the visit.

The reversal comes despite Mr. Trump telling Theresa May last month that he would come

to Britain in the New Year.

Preparations were advanced for a 'working' visit to officially open the embassy, but

the Mail understands this role will now be performed by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.

Mr. Trump was also scheduled to hold talks with Mrs. May in No 10, with February 26 and

27 marked in the diary.

Downing Street had hoped to confirm the dates this week.

UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson appeared to allude to these promised protests on Twitter,

where he accused the London Mayor and opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn of putting the US-UK

relationship at risk by encouraging anti-Trump demonstrations.

The Prime Minister and the President clashed in November when she criticised his decision

to re-tweet anti-Muslim propaganda from a far-Right group, Britain First.

In a rare public rebuke, she said: 'I am very clear that retweeting from Britain First

was the wrong thing to do.'

Mr. Trump hit back on Twitter, saying: 'Don't focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical

Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom.'

He added: 'We are doing just fine!'"

It appears that not everyone in jolly old England has figured out that the President

won't be backing down the way Obama did.

They would do well to remember that they need us a lot more

than we

need them.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS From DC… TRUMP IS NOT GOING!!! - Duration: 35:09.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS!!! TRUMP DID IT!!! He's Been FREED! - Duration: 10:06.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS!!! TRUMP DID IT!!! He's Been FREED! - Duration: 10:06.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING News From DC!! TRUMP Just Made BORDER WALL DEAL! - Duration: 6:23.

For more infomation >> BREAKING News From DC!! TRUMP Just Made BORDER WALL DEAL! - Duration: 6:23.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING!!! Presidential Doctor Made MAJOR Announcement About Trump's First Checkup! THIS IS HUGE! - Duration: 5:32.

For more infomation >> BREAKING!!! Presidential Doctor Made MAJOR Announcement About Trump's First Checkup! THIS IS HUGE! - Duration: 5:32.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea could respond to a DEVASTATING Donald Trump attack using 'HACKED war plans' - Duration: 7:10.

North Korea could respond to a DEVASTATING Donald Trump attack using 'HACKED war plans'

Van Jackson has a history of bracing America for North Korean attacks after spending years "figuring out how to prevent or overcome future attacks". The defence expert analysed the available options to the despot leader in the event of an attack.

He explained: "If the United States attacked a North Korean missile site, Kim's immediate challenge would be trying to determine in real time whether the United States just launched a full-blown war.

"Keeping in mind that North Korean hackers stole alliance war plans last year, Kim will look for specific indicators to quickly render this judgment.".

If World War 3 had been triggered, the former Pentagon strategist detailed that the leader of the hermit kingdom would "launch a devastating retaliatory response".

He said: "If Kim concluded that war were imminent, or that it had already begun, he would have no choice but to launch a devastating retaliatory response in hopes that it raises the stakes of conflict enough to cause the United States to back off.

"There's added urgency, too: The more time passes at the start of a conflict, the greater the military disadvantage facing North Korea.

So Kim won't want to unnecessarily trigger a war himself, but as soon as he's concluded the war is on, he must take drastic action immediately to maximise his chances of survival.

"That immediate drastic action does not inevitably take the form of nuclear attacks, but the likelihood that it does is exceedingly high. "Why? Because, facing the 'fact' of war, Kim has multiple reinforcing incentives to launch a nuclear strike immediately.

"Nukes are Kim's 'ace in the hole'; if he doesn't play them immediately, the US might eliminate them in a first-wave attack." The defence expert discussed reports that suggested the US is lining up a strike on the isolationist state as a show of force.

He added: "Now, I'm getting nightmare flashbacks as I read the fragmentary reports dribbling out in the media about what seems like an intense debate inside the Trump administration.

"A recent story suggests that some on the Trump team have floated the idea of giving a 'bloody nose' to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un." Mr Jackson explained that giving Kim Jong-un a "bloody nose" would involve a "preventive, limited attack on a North Korean missile facility, nuclear facility or missile launch site".

Writing in Politico, he said: "If the United States aims to teach North Korea a lesson…it needs the attack to be public, which should rule out using special forces or clandestine means of destruction.

"The ideal target for sending a message to Pyongyang would also be the hardest to hit — a mobile missile, fired from a 'transporter-erector-launcher'.

"Mobile targets are elusive and made more so by North Korea's recent use of solid fuel, which gives fewer advance indicators of a pending missile launch.

"Successfully striking a mobile target located far from the South Korean border would show that no target in North Korea is out of reach of US." As the North Korea leader assesses the hypothetical situation, Mr Jackson stated that he would ask a number of questions before deciding on a method of retaliation such as "are North Korean radars, communications, or computer networks being jammed or disrupted?" and "are American civilians being evacuated from South Korea?".

However, Mr Jackson explained that if the US had instead opted against starting World War 3 and decided to give him a "bloody nose" instead, Kim Jong-un would respond with "violence" to prevent a "coup d'état" that removes him from power.

He stated: "Advocates of the bloody nose theory believe that Kim won't conclude that a single attack amounts to war despite the numerous indicators above that suggest he would.

"They're wrong, but suppose a best-case scenario for the bloody-nosers — that Kim errs on the side of caution and decides that a US preventive attack is not a war-launching action.

"Even then, though, there's a second problem that directly undermines the bloody-nose assumptions — for reasons of domestic politics and strategic culture, Kim must respond to violence with violence.

"Kim leads a military and policy elite with a very specific set of beliefs about the utility of force and how the country has managed to survive — by responding to pressure with pressure, by resorting to brinkmanship in times of crisis, and by launching occasional unprovoked, limited attacks at times and places of its choosing.

"If Kim recognises a limited attack as being limited, then he's less likely to launch nuclear strikes but much more likely to launch a retaliatory campaign of violence at a time and place of his choosing.

"To do otherwise would open him to charges of weakness and risk a coup d'état that ousts him from power.".

For more infomation >> North Korea could respond to a DEVASTATING Donald Trump attack using 'HACKED war plans' - Duration: 7:10.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Poem: Year One - Duration: 3:19.

- Caption text appears on the right side of the screen -

For more infomation >> Trump Poem: Year One - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Crooked Hillary Bashes 'Shithole' Remark, Wakes To Brutal Trump Surprise The Next Morning - Duration: 4:21.

to get daily breaking news click subscribe button and press Bell icon to

get latest updates for reasons unknown Hillary Clinton thinks that she's still

relevant and that the American people care what she has to say she proved just

that by bashing the president Donald Trump's alleged shit'll remark the only

way she knows how in a cocky and self-righteous tone for getting her own

history with Haiti too bad for her things blew up in her face as she woke

to a brutal surprise the next morning courtesy of Trump himself although she's

yet to figure it out no one wants to hear from Hillary at this point even

Democrats have expressed their hopes that she would just shut the f ck up and

go away despite this reality the woman still has a need to publicly insert her

opinion into political matters too bad for Hillary all she keeps doing is

making things worse for herself and that's exactly what happened most

recently in fact if her goal is to become the most hated woman in America

she's now well on her way the left one's absolutely berserk after a report broke

alleging that President Donald Trump referred to a few places around the

globe as shitholes just like that the liberal media reignited attacks against

Trump even going so far as to call him a racist simply because the countries he

criticized or home to people of color Trump has since denied the accusations

against him and as we've since learned Republican senators Tom cotton and David

Perdue who were both attending the meeting where the remarks were

reportedly made said that they don't recall him specifically using the term

shithole this PAC review reported still doing as she always does Hillary Clinton

decided that it was the perfect time to jump on the hate bandwagon without

knowing all the facts are considering her own sordid past in order to attempt

to give herself a little boost in popularity the anniversary of the

devastating earthquake eight years ago is a day to remember the tragedy honor

the resilient people of Haiti and affirm America's commitment to helping our

neighbors she tweeted instead we're subjected to Trump's ignorant racist

views of anyone who doesn't look like him

Matt World News previously reported how Hillary took to Twitter in order to bash

Trump's Schiphol remarks only to be slammed by angered Americans who were

quick to point out how she stole money from the Haitian people following the

earthquake that she spoke of in her tweet unfortunately for her

having her crooked Affairs exposed to her Twitter followers was the least of

her worries what she didn't realize is the fact that her criticisms of Trump

were about to come at the worst possible time proving just that Hillary woke to a

brutal surprise courtesy of President Donald Trump himself just one day after

her comments and ironically enough it centers around Haiti as well according

to its review the Department of Justice announced an 11 count indictment

connected with the uranium 1 deal and Hillary Clinton in short an American

executive has been charged with attempting to bribe Russian officials in

the uranium deal New York Post reports mark Lambert who is the co-president of

a nuclear materials transportation company has been charged with one count

of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act FCPA and to commit

wire fraud seven counts of violating the FCPA

two counts of wire fraud and one count of international promotion

money-laundering the report continues the charges stem from an alleged scheme

to bribe Adam micron a Russian official at JSC techniques port 10x a subsidiary

of Russia's state Atomic Energy Corporation and the sole supplier and

exporter of Russian Federation uranium and uranium enrichment services to

nuclear power companies worldwide in order to secure contracts with tynix

according to the indictment beginning at least as early as 2009 and continuing

until October 2014 lambert conspired with others at transportation

corporation to make corrupt and fraudulent bribery and kickback payments

of offshore bank accounts associated with shell companies at the direction of

and for the benefit of a Russian official Vadim micron in order to secure

improper business advantages and obtain and retain business with tynix source

the Department of Justice attorney general jeff sessions ordered the dodge

to look into the uranium 1 deal back in December and we're already getting

results the walls are closing in on Hillary Clinton and she's got to be

sweating at this point after all if this was all found out in a single month

imagine what we learn as time goes on in the end we may officially get to lock

her up like she so desperately deserves share the story and leave a comment by

clicking one of the buttons subscribe

For more infomation >> Crooked Hillary Bashes 'Shithole' Remark, Wakes To Brutal Trump Surprise The Next Morning - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump 'has accepted State visit invitation' and may visit UK this year - Duration: 5:08.

Donald Trump 'has accepted State visit invitation' and may visit UK this year

They said the US President will definitely be coming to London on an official trip later this year.

Downing Street sources last night confirmed an official invitation for a State visit had already been accepted and was expected to happen this year, though they remained tight-lipped about when.

A source said: "Any discussion about a working visit was absolutely separate to the State visit, an invitation for which has been both given and accepted." US diplomats in Britain were "caught completely by surprise" when Mr Trump posted a message on his Twitter account on Thursday stating he would not be attending next month's ribbon-cutting ceremony to open the new £750million US Embassy in Nine Elms.

In his tweet he wrongly blamed the Obama administration for having relocated the embassy from its home of 80 years in Grosvenor Square to an "off location" in Vauxhall.

But last night sources close to the Trump administration said the president wanted his first official visit to Britain to be a State occasion. They said: "A State visit will happen sooner than people think.

And the feeling is that it won't be Balmoral Castle (the Queen's Scottish residence), but London." However Mr Trump, who owns two golf courses in Scotland – the historic Turnberry near Glasgow and Trump International Golf Links near Aberdeen – will use the occasion to visit one, if not both, during his visit.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn had urged people to protest at Trump opening the US embassy. President Trump was "aware" of the likelihood of some element of protest and the avoidance of two visits in close succession was "possibly also a factor".

"But actually he wants his first visit to be a State visit," added the source. "If France can welcome an important ally properly, then so can Britain."  .

Another source, who knows President Trump personally, said: "He needs something more significant than the opening of an embassy – which, for whatever reason, he has taken against – to come to.

"He does not like cutting ribbons unless its for one of his own buildings." The move removes pressure from Foreign Office mandarines, who have been anxious at the prospect of President Trump not being invited to May's royal wedding without a date for a State visit being firmly in the diary.

While former US president Barack Obama, who built a personal rapport with Prince Harry, may receive an invitation to his wedding to US actress Meghan Markle, it is unlikely one will be extended to President Trump.

Though an ardent fan of The Queen he has previously made disparaging remarks about the Princess of Wales.

London's Labour mayor celebrated news of Mr Trump's cancelled visit, claiming: "Many Londoners have made it clear that Donald Trump is not welcome here while he is pursuing such a divisive agenda.

It seems he's finally got that message." Labour's comments were seized upon by Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson who said: "The US is the biggest single investor in the UK – yet Corbyn seems determined to put this crucial relationship at risk." Apart from shared security values, Britain and the US share the world's largest bilateral investment relationship, worth almost £1trillion.

The US remains Britain's biggest single investor, contributing more than £20billion to the economy every year, while British business in the US is worth £105billion annually.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump 'has accepted State visit invitation' and may visit UK this year - Duration: 5:08.

-------------------------------------------

Trump & Sarah Sanders Just Found White House Leaker, Now They're Making Him Pay BIG TIME - Duration: 3:18.

to get daily breaking news click subscribe button and press Bell icon to

get latest updates for months now someone in the White House has been

leaking sensitive information to the public

putting national security at risk and gravely undermining the Trump

administration's progress it was only a matter of time before President Donald

Trump and one of the top officials and his administration White House press

secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders identified the culprit and it appears

that they have now Trump and Sanders are making the leaker pay for his bad

behavior as they should representative Adam Schiff D California

doesn't have the best name recognition in Washington DC but lately he's been

working diligently to change that by doing two things in particular namely

getting in front of the camera any chance he gets to trash President Trump

and leaking sensitive White House information if you're one of the

millions of Americans who have no idea who rep Chef is daily news briefing

provided a solid summary of his background if you are familiar with Adam

Schiff at all you know that he has no interest in the truth or working across

the aisle he's a partisan who only cares about

advancing his liberal agenda and bashing Trump he also loves being on TV every

time there is a camera around you will find Adam Schiff running with a phony

Russian narrative or hurling some wild accusation at Trump yep that pretty much

sums up Adam Schiff after rumors began spreading over the past few months that

Chef was the one who has been leaking sensitive White House intelligence to

the public President Donald Trump blatantly called him out in a Thursday

interview with The Wall Street Journal all I see of these Democrats like Adam

Schiff it's all he does he'll have a meeting and then he'll leave and he'll

call up the meeting and then I'll have a meeting and then he'll leave said Trump

he left meetings where people are being interviewed and then all of a sudden

they say a story about what's going on inside the meetings added the president

leaving no doubt that he believes Schiff is the leaker President Trump and White

House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders both accused California

representative Adam Schiff of selectively leaking details of the house

intelligence committees Russia investigation trumpet Schiff on blast

during an interview with The Wall Street Journal in the Oval Office on Thursday

morning source the Daily Caller Schiff demanded an apology from the White House

in a attempt to defend himself however he did

not expressly come out and deny that he was responsible for the leaks which is

very telling they owe me an apology but frankly it would be a wasted errand to

ask for one Schiff said on CNN and if Sarah Huckabee Sanders is going to have

to give out apologies to everyone that he has criticized unfairly she would be

doing nothing else all day representative Adam Schiff D California

said Thursday that the White House owes him an apology after press secretary

Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused him of leaking House Intelligence Committee

interviews to the press source the hill frankly President Donald Trump and Sarah

Sanders handled this brilliantly if all makers like Adam Schiff want to play

dirty by betraying the president's trust and leaking information to the press

then they're only getting a taste of their own medicine when the President

himself calls them out in front of the entire nation if Adam Schiff was trying

to make a name for himself he has certainly accomplished as much

unfortunately for him that name is now synonymous with the word traitor share

the story and leave a comment by clicking one of the buttons subscribe

For more infomation >> Trump & Sarah Sanders Just Found White House Leaker, Now They're Making Him Pay BIG TIME - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

sheikh imran hosein réaction sur Trump dec/17 Birmingham GB - Duration: 13:49.

la première question

- Récemment Donald Trump a annoncé qu'il allait déménager l'ambassade à Jérusalem

ce qui signifie que c'est maintenant la capitale d'Israël,

quelle est votre réaction ?

Bismilah al Rahman al Rahim

- Ce que Donald Trump a fait était

d'activer ou de faire entrer en vigueur une décision déjà prise par le Congrès des États-Unis

il y a de nombreuses années (EN 1995) pour reconnaître officiellement

Jérusalem, la capitale d'Israël.

Les présidents précédents ne faisaient que remettre à plus tard et ils le reportaient.

Mais Trump n'a pas fait comme ce qui a été fait avant lui,

il a dit nous offrons la reconnaissance officielle des États-Unis de Jérusalem comme la capitale d'Israël.

- Si Israël devait réussir à obtenir plus de pays, pour faire ce que les États-Unis ont fait,

il serait alors en mesure de passer outre les résolutions

du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies et de l'Assemblée Général.

- Et le présenter au monde comme ce qu'on appelle un fait accompli

"nous sommes maintenant en charge de Jérusalem, et nous avons la reconnaissance internationale

que Jérusalem est notre capitale, nous avons maintenant une juridiction légale" sur Jérusalem,

c'est important pour Israël parce que sans cette étape l'idée de prétendre

être l'État sacré d'Israël, est une chimére

- Et vous ne pouvez pas être le Saint État d'Israël et vous n'avez pas

un contrôle légal sur Jérusalem.

Donc c'est une partie du processus, étape par étape, à travers lequel cet Israël

pourrait finalement prétendre être .....

le saint Israël de nabi Daoud et nabi Soulayman, paix sur eux.

il y a d'autres choses qu'Israël doit faire, pour prétendre être le saint Israël, par exemple

la Torah dit que la terre sainte s'étend de la rivière de l'Égypte qui est le fleuve du Nil

jusqu'au fleuve Euphrate.

Donc Israël doit prendre

le contrôle de tout ces territoires dont celui connu comme Delta de l'Est

en Égypte, du Nil à la mer Rouge c'est le croissant de l'Est du Delta.

C'est la partie la plus fertile d'Égypte, c'est la partie qui produit toute la nourriture,

Israël devra prendre en charge ce territoire.

Ils devront également prendre les territoires de tout le chemin jusqu'au fleuve Euphrate,

vous comprendrez qu'Israël a besoin de lancer des grandes guerres, oh oui.

Si Israël doit prétendre être le saint Israël de Nabi Daoud et nabi Soulayman as,

Israël doit également reconstruire ce qu'ils appellent le temple , le temple de Salomon.

- Mais dans le Coran, Allah ne se réfère pas à lui comme un temple,

pourtant, dans le Coran Allah parle de

d'églises, de temples,

de synagogues et de mosquée ;

mais quand Allah se réfère à ce lieu, cette maison d'adoration d'Allah,

il s'y réfère comme Masjid ( Mosquée ) Masjid al-Aqsa :

"extrait sourate al isra"

- Je pense que c'est peut-être la seule place dans tout le Coran

ou le nom Masjid Al-Aqsa apparaît,

- Si Israël doit prétendre être le saint Israël de nabi Daoud et nabi Soulayman, paix sur eux,

Israël Devra utiliser ce que nous appelons dinar et dirham comme monnaie,

des pièces d'or et d'argent

parce que c'est ce qu'ils utilisaient à Jérusalem dans le saint-Israël.

- Et tous les Juifs savent que la monnaie que nous utilisons maintenant est falsifiée,

est frauduleuse et Haram, c'est faux, frauduleux, et c'est Haram,

et Je le dis depuis vingt ans maintenant, oui.

- Et parfois je perds patience, il ne faut pas être trop en colère contre moi,

parfois je perds patience parfois je peux me mettre en colère, car je parle et parle

et parle, ....mais je parle depuis 20 ans maintenant,

et ils ne m'écoutent pas.

- Et je vois mon peuple devenir de plus en plus pauvre et plus pauvre et plus pauvre.

- Le Bangladesh devient si misérablement pauvre

- le Pakistan devient si misérablement pauvre - l'Égypte devient si misérablement pauvre

- l'Algérie devient si misérablement pauvre - le Maroc devient si misérablement pauvre

- l'Indonésie devient si misérablement pauvre - toute l'Afrique devient si misérablement pauvre !

Devrais-je continuer ? ça se passe devant mes yeux, oui je le vois,

et je sais quelle est la cause de cela, et je crie depuis le haut des montagnes

mais ils ne veulent pas m'écouter que puis-je faire ?

- Israël devra restaurer les pièces d'or et d'argent comme monnaie.

Je prie Allah, je ne veux pas voir ce jour, parce que la honte et la disgrâce

sur la communauté de Mohamed, pssl, ce sera trop douloureux pour moi

- Alors s'il vous plaît, s'il vous plaît, Allah, envoie un ange et enlève-moi de ce monde avant ça,

je ne veux pas voir ce jour, où Israël va commencer à utiliser le dinar et le dihram,

et nous utiliserons encore les fausses Roupies pakistanaises, ouais!

- Donc toutes ces choses ( étapes) qu'Israël doit faire

et ce qui a été fait par Trump était un pas

vers cette éventuelle capacité de prétendre, "nous sommes l'État sacré d'Israël",

- Si nous devions ..

analyser les implications de ce qu'il a fait, Pour nous, pas pour eux

Alors j'ai offert seulement un avis rapide jusqu'à présent,

je devrais éventuellement délivrer une conférence dans laquelle je devrais

pouvoir l'analyser plus complètement.

Ce que j'ai fait, c'est pointer vers le fait avéré, que Jérusalem est la ville la plus

importante dans le monde pour un chrétien en tant que chrétien.

- Jérusalem est la ville la plus importante dans le monde pour un Juif en tant que Juif.

- Et pour un Musulman à "La fin des temps", Jérusalem

est la ville la plus importante dans le monde en tant que Musulman à "La fin des temps".

- La ville la plus importante dans le monde pour un musulman est Jérusalem.

- Alors qu'est-ce qui aurait dû être fait ?

réponse : vous auriez dû faire ce que nabi Mohamed,

pssl, a fait quand il est allé à Yathrib au nord (de La Mecque), mais maintenant

on l'appelle Médine.

- Il a passé sept mois de négociation pour un accord

où toutes les différentes tribus vivraient et partageraient la ville

sur la base de la paix mutuelle entre les uns et les autres,

et ce fut appelé

"le pacte de Médine ", ils ont apporté un modèle pluriel d'état.

- Où l'unité de l'état n'était pas l'individu

comme au Pakistan et en Grande-Bretagne, etc

où l'individu est l'unité de l'état et l'individu va voter aux élections.

Mais à Médine ce n'était pas l'individu, l'unité de l'état, l'unité de l'état était la tribu,

les tribus et il y avait une multiplicité de tribus dont certaines d'entre elles

composer de juifs, certaines autres d'Arabes païens,

et certaines d'entre elles ,de musulmans.

- Et donc il a amené ce qui est un modèle d'état pluriel

dans lequel ils allaient partager la ville.

- Et cela aurait été une solution intelligente au problème de Jérusalem,

que l'Islam, le Judaïsme et le christianisme auraient partagé Jérusalem en paix.

- Sur la base de l'égalité politique et religieuse.

aucun prétendant être supérieur aux autres et le respect mutuel pour l'autre,

vous ne pouvez pas attaquer ma religion et vivre ensemble dans la même maison

n'est-ce pas ?

Donc le modèle d'une ville-état plurielle,

Le modèle d'une ville-état plurielle, dans lequel tous les trois:

les musulmans, les chrétiens et les juifs auraient partagé Jérusalem pacifiquement.

- Et j'ai fait remarquer que si l'empire Ottoman a fait beaucoup de mauvaises choses

ils ont fait cela de bien,

-Ils ont géré Jérusalem pendant quelques centaines d'années et quatre cents années

sous la domination ottomane, les Juifs ,les Chrétiens et musulmans

ont partagé Jérusalem pacifiquement, c'est ce qu'à réalisé l'Empire ottoman.

- Ce que les États-Unis font maintenant, est de livrer la ville à un seul groupe,

les Juifs

et laisser les musulmans dehors et laisser les Chrétiens dehors.

Quelle en sera l'implication ?

Il y a des chrétiens qui s'opposent à ce qu'il a fait,

s'opposent au fait que le christianisme soit ainsi méprisé.

- Dès que Trump a fait sa déclaration,

un Homme de tête de l'église égyptienne copte, a annulé un rendez-vous

avec le vice-président des États-Unis le giflant au visage ouais.

- Voilà comment les chrétiens orthodoxes se sentent à propos de ce que Trump a fait,

Donc il y a certains chrétiens qui s'opposent à ce que Trump a fait

Mais il y a d'autres chrétiens que j'appelle les gens qui suivent le Père Noël,

et eux supportent Trump.

Il y a des musulmans qui secrètement soutiennent Trump.

- Mais l'écrasante majorité des musulmans autour du monde rejette ce qu'il a fait,

l'écrasante majorité, sauf les gouvernements bien sûr, ont deja plié l'échine la dessus

- Alors ce que Trump a fait c'est qu'il a abandonner ce que pensent

cette partie du monde du christianisme, dehors et cette partie

du monde de l'Islam, dehors dans le froid

Quelles seront les implications?

réponse : l'implication c'est qu'à cause de ce que vous avez fait

c'est maintenant plus probable qu'il y aura une réconciliation entre Chrétiens orthodoxes

et musulmans et créeront l'amitié entre nous et éventuellement une alliance et (la cause de )

Jérusalem nous aura remis ensemble, c'est ma première analyse du sujet,

- Et bien sûr les sionistes vont se mordre les doigts de frustration

parce que c'est quelque chose qu'ils ne veulent pas du tout, ils ne veulent pas

voir le monde de l'Islam et le monde du Christianisme orthodoxe à jamais revenir

ensemble dans l'amitié en alliance, c'est banni !!

- Et maintenant à cause de Trump c'est ce qui va devenir plus probable que jamais,

c'est ma réponse pour vous.

For more infomation >> sheikh imran hosein réaction sur Trump dec/17 Birmingham GB - Duration: 13:49.

-------------------------------------------

Trump accuses FBI agent of 'treason' - Duration: 3:21.

Trump accuses

FBI agent of �treason�

President Trump on Thursday accused an FBI agent who criticized him while serving on

special counsel Robert Mueller�s team of committing �treason� against the U.S.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Trump argued that FBI agent Peter Strzok had

plotted to undermine his presidency before he even came into office.

Strzok was once a key figure in the 2016 FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton�s handling

of classified material.

He was removed from the special counsel investigation into Russian election meddling after it was

discovered that he exchanged anti-Trump text messages during the investigation with fellow

FBI agent Lisa Page, with whom he was reportedly having an affair.

In one of those text exchanges, Strzok says that there�s �no way� Trump gets elected

but that if he does there needs to be an �insurance policy� in place because �we can�t take

that risk.�

�A man is tweeting to his lover that if [Clinton] loses, we�ll essentially do the

insurance policy,� Trump said in the Wall Street Journal interview.

��We�ll go to phase two and we�ll get this guy out of office.��

�This is the FBI we�re talking about�that is treason,� Trump continued.

�That is a treasonous act.

What he tweeted to his lover is a treasonous act.�

Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) may have tried to discredit Republican scrutiny

of Fusion GPS and its dossier�s role in the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign,

but could have ended up justifying it instead.

Feinstein � against the wishes of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley

(R-IA) � on Tuesday morning released the full transcript of an interview in August

with Glenn Simpson, the co-founder of Fusion GPS, the firm hired by the Hillary Clinton

campaign and the Democratic National Committee to dig up dirt on Trump�s ties with Russia.

Trump critics immediately latched onto Simpson�s testimony that the FBI believed the dossier

was credible because they had �other intelligence about this matter from an internal Trump campaign

source.�

�They believed Chris�s information might be credible because they had other intelligence

that indicated the same thing and one of those pieces of intelligence was a human source

from inside the Trump organization,� Simpson told the investigators.

Simpson said it was a �voluntary source� � someone who was concerned about the same

concerns we had.

�It was someone like us who decided to pick up the phone and report something.�

For more infomation >> Trump accuses FBI agent of 'treason' - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea could respond to a DEVASTATING Donald Trump attack using 'HACKED war plans' - Duration: 7:10.

North Korea could respond to a DEVASTATING Donald Trump attack using 'HACKED war plans'

Van Jackson has a history of bracing America for North Korean attacks after spending years "figuring out how to prevent or overcome future attacks". The defence expert analysed the available options to the despot leader in the event of an attack.

He explained: "If the United States attacked a North Korean missile site, Kim's immediate challenge would be trying to determine in real time whether the United States just launched a full-blown war.

"Keeping in mind that North Korean hackers stole alliance war plans last year, Kim will look for specific indicators to quickly render this judgment.".

If World War 3 had been triggered, the former Pentagon strategist detailed that the leader of the hermit kingdom would "launch a devastating retaliatory response".

He said: "If Kim concluded that war were imminent, or that it had already begun, he would have no choice but to launch a devastating retaliatory response in hopes that it raises the stakes of conflict enough to cause the United States to back off.

"There's added urgency, too: The more time passes at the start of a conflict, the greater the military disadvantage facing North Korea.

So Kim won't want to unnecessarily trigger a war himself, but as soon as he's concluded the war is on, he must take drastic action immediately to maximise his chances of survival.

"That immediate drastic action does not inevitably take the form of nuclear attacks, but the likelihood that it does is exceedingly high. "Why? Because, facing the 'fact' of war, Kim has multiple reinforcing incentives to launch a nuclear strike immediately.

"Nukes are Kim's 'ace in the hole'; if he doesn't play them immediately, the US might eliminate them in a first-wave attack." The defence expert discussed reports that suggested the US is lining up a strike on the isolationist state as a show of force.

He added: "Now, I'm getting nightmare flashbacks as I read the fragmentary reports dribbling out in the media about what seems like an intense debate inside the Trump administration.

"A recent story suggests that some on the Trump team have floated the idea of giving a 'bloody nose' to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un." Mr Jackson explained that giving Kim Jong-un a "bloody nose" would involve a "preventive, limited attack on a North Korean missile facility, nuclear facility or missile launch site".

Writing in Politico, he said: "If the United States aims to teach North Korea a lesson…it needs the attack to be public, which should rule out using special forces or clandestine means of destruction.

"The ideal target for sending a message to Pyongyang would also be the hardest to hit — a mobile missile, fired from a 'transporter-erector-launcher'.

"Mobile targets are elusive and made more so by North Korea's recent use of solid fuel, which gives fewer advance indicators of a pending missile launch.

"Successfully striking a mobile target located far from the South Korean border would show that no target in North Korea is out of reach of US." As the North Korea leader assesses the hypothetical situation, Mr Jackson stated that he would ask a number of questions before deciding on a method of retaliation such as "are North Korean radars, communications, or computer networks being jammed or disrupted?" and "are American civilians being evacuated from South Korea?".

However, Mr Jackson explained that if the US had instead opted against starting World War 3 and decided to give him a "bloody nose" instead, Kim Jong-un would respond with "violence" to prevent a "coup d'état" that removes him from power.

He stated: "Advocates of the bloody nose theory believe that Kim won't conclude that a single attack amounts to war despite the numerous indicators above that suggest he would.

"They're wrong, but suppose a best-case scenario for the bloody-nosers — that Kim errs on the side of caution and decides that a US preventive attack is not a war-launching action.

"Even then, though, there's a second problem that directly undermines the bloody-nose assumptions — for reasons of domestic politics and strategic culture, Kim must respond to violence with violence.

"Kim leads a military and policy elite with a very specific set of beliefs about the utility of force and how the country has managed to survive — by responding to pressure with pressure, by resorting to brinkmanship in times of crisis, and by launching occasional unprovoked, limited attacks at times and places of its choosing.

"If Kim recognises a limited attack as being limited, then he's less likely to launch nuclear strikes but much more likely to launch a retaliatory campaign of violence at a time and place of his choosing.

"To do otherwise would open him to charges of weakness and risk a coup d'état that ousts him from power.".

For more infomation >> North Korea could respond to a DEVASTATING Donald Trump attack using 'HACKED war plans' - Duration: 7:10.

-------------------------------------------

GOP senator 'Gross misrepresentation' of Trump's 'shithole' remarks - Duration: 3:35.

GOP senator 'Gross misrepresentation' of Trump's 'shithole' remarks

No comments:

Post a Comment