Trump news on Youtube Feb 14 2019

CONGRESS BLINDSIDES HILLARY – DEMOCRAT PLAN FOR TRUMP GETS CLINTON INSTEAD

Democrats thought they would catch Donald – but they caught Hillary.

For years we've known Trump did not collude with Russia.

But the media and hacks in Congress kept stoking the flames.

Now both houses of Congress have cleared his name.

Big surprise you didn't hear about it from the mainstream media.

But their investigations are uncovering real collusion with Russia.

And it had nothing to do with Trump.

From The Hill: Now that both the House and Senate investigative

committees have cleared Donald Trump of Democrat-inspired allegations of Russian collusion, it is worth

revisiting one anecdote that escaped significant attention during the hysteria but continues

to have U.S. security implications.

As secretary of State, Hillary Clinton worked with Russian leaders, including Foreign Minister

Sergey Lavrov and then-President Dmitri Medvedev, to create U.S. technology partnerships with

Moscow's version of Silicon Valley, a sprawling high-tech campus known as Skolkovo…

The collaboration occurred at the exact same time Bill Clinton made his now infamous trip

to Russia to pick up a jaw-dropping $500,000 check for a single speech.

SHARE to tell Trump to make Hillary pay for working with the Russians!

Clinton was deeply involved in this project.

A big donor to the Clinton Foundation, Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, led the Russian-side

of it.

Congress has discovered that the Bill Clinton speech worried State Department officials.

They uncovered emails where they were worried about the connection.

In fact, intelligence documents showed the Skolkovo project and the infamous Uranium

One deal raised serious security concerns.

But no, Trump was colluding with Russia because Hillary Clinton said so!

Just think about it, the FBI and other agencies launched costly investigations framing Trump

as some kind of traitor—over a bogus dossier that was proven to be fake.

Yet Hillary and her husband had extensive relationships with Russian agents.

Vast amounts of money were exchanged—as well as land and technology.

AND THERE WAS NOT A SINGLE INVESTIGATION.

And the media wonders why Americans chant, "Lock her up!"

It's disgusting to see that Democrats can get away with this kind of corruption.

You don't have to be a detective to see what Hillary was up to.

She was getting big bucks from Russia in exchange for our resources, land, and technology.

She later worked with Russia agents to craft a fake dossier in order to frame her political

rival.

Yet Mueller has spent over $32 million persecuting Trump and his allies.

The swamp is deep, my friends.

For more infomation >> CONGRESS BLINDSIDES HILLARY – DEMOCRAT PLAN FOR TRUMP GETS CLINTON INSTEAD - Duration: 7:28.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump blaming and shaming FBI director Andrew McCabe - Duration: 1:41.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump blaming and shaming FBI director Andrew McCabe - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Dems Just Got More Power To Expand Investigation Into Trump And His Administration - Duration: 2:45.

For more infomation >> Dems Just Got More Power To Expand Investigation Into Trump And His Administration - Duration: 2:45.

-------------------------------------------

House Democrats are indeed dropping the hammer-take Trump down - Duration: 1:48.

For more infomation >> House Democrats are indeed dropping the hammer-take Trump down - Duration: 1:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump crows about Senate Intel Committee finding 'NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION' after senator's remark - Duration: 4:26.

President Donald Trump crowed Wednesday about statements by the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee that the panel's two-year probe has not found evidence of collusion between his campaign and Russia

The president trumpeted a fresh comment by panel chair Sen.Richard Burr, who has gone on record twice about what his panel has not found following a two-year investigation

'The Senate Intelligence Committee: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA!' Trump tweeted Wednesday morning, using all capital letters to reiterate something he has himself proclaimed throughout his presidency

Burr told reporters Tuesday: 'There is no factual evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia

' And NBC News confirmed the panel had found no 'direct evidence' of a conspiracy between the campaign and Russians, even as the Mueller probe has achieved convictions of top Trump campaign advisors and associates for lying about their Russia contacts during the campaign

Burr, a Republican senator from North Carolina, gave a lengthy interview to CBS News last week where he said his committee staff has worked for two years, interviewed more than 200 witnesses from multiple countries and reviewed over 300,000 pages

'Based on the evidence to date,' Burr said his panel could not definitively say there was collusion between Trump and the Russians

'If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia,' Burr told the network

However, panel Democrats are disputing Burr's statement.'I'm not going to get into any conclusions I have,' said top Democrat Sen

Mark Warner of Virginia, adding: 'there's never been a campaign in American history

that people affiliated with the campaign had as many ties with Russia as the Trump campaign did

' Warner told Mother Jones the probe is far from completed.'We've still got many of the most major figures to either come or come back,' he said

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe is also continuing, despite repeated claims by President Trump's legal team that it is wrapping up

Weeks ago federal prosecutors indicted longtime Trump lawyer Roger Stone with witness tampering and obstruction, and obtained electronic communications through an FBI raid on his Florida home

Prosecutors have revealed in court filings that Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort passed campaign polling to former Ukrainian partner Konstantin Kilimnik, who has ties to Russian intelligence

'The notion that the president's campaign manager was sharing internal campaign documents with the Russians in advance of the release of information that came from Russia and that interfered massively with the campaign is mind-boggling,' Warner told Mother Jones

For more infomation >> Trump crows about Senate Intel Committee finding 'NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION' after senator's remark - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

Trump likely to face legal challenge if national emergency called over wall - Duration: 1:46.

For more infomation >> Trump likely to face legal challenge if national emergency called over wall - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

Trump discusses Venezuela with Colombian president at White House - Duration: 2:25.

For more infomation >> Trump discusses Venezuela with Colombian president at White House - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

Cash Infusion Investigation Announced By Robert Mueller/FBI As Trump Continues Online Rage - Duration: 2:37.

For more infomation >> Cash Infusion Investigation Announced By Robert Mueller/FBI As Trump Continues Online Rage - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

MUELLER GOT SERVED ,FORMER TRUMP LAWYER DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER - Duration: 5:44.

MUELLER GOT SERVED ,FORMER TRUMP LAWYER DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER

A former attorney for President Trump is predicting that when all is said and done, the Mueller

probe will end with Robert Mueller silent, and President Trump cleared of any wrongdoing.

Fox News reported that the veteran criminal defense attorney John Dowd has savaged Robert

Mueller's Russia probeas a "terrible waste of time" and questioned whether a report

will ever be produced.

Dowd, who served as a member of President Donald Trump's legal team from June 2017

until March 2018, made the explosive comments during an interview with ABC News.

"I will be shocked, if anything regarding the president is made public, other than,

'we're done'," the 77-year-old said.

The veteran criminal defense attorney who headed President Donald Trump's legal team

during a crucial stretch of the special counsel investigation believes the entire affair will

end in silence from special counsel Robert Mueller, and called the massive two-year probe

into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign "a terrible waste of time."

"I don't think there'll be a report," John Dowd told ABC News in a wide-ranging

interview for the premiere episode of "The Investigation," a new podcast focused on

the probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller.

"I will be shocked if anything regarding the president is made public, other than 'We're

done.'"

Dowd, 77, left his role as Trump's lead attorney last March over differing views about

how cooperative to be with prosecutors.

But after spending nearly a year guiding the president's legal strategy, he forged a

close relationship with Trump and continues to speak with him about the Russia probe.

In one of his most in-depth interviews since departing Trump's legal team, he offered

a view of the probe very much in line with that of the president -– namely, that it

lacks merit.

"I know exactly what [Mueller] has," Dowd said.

"I know exactly what every witness said, what every document said.

I know exactly what he asked.

And I know what the conclusion or the result is," he said, describing the sweeping efforts

by Trump's legal team to assess the case by speaking to dozens of witnesses.

Based on that knowledge, Dowd said, "there's no basis.

There's no exposure.

It's been a terrible waste of time."

Dowd's overall view of the investigation — he called it "one of the greatest frauds

this country's ever seen" — echoes Trump's claim that it is a hoax or a witch hunt.

That differs sharply from Justice Department officials, who have had a window into the

probe, which, to date, has pried guilty pleas out of five former Trump advisers, and indicted

26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, a California man (for assisting Russians in

faking their identities), another Trump adviser, and a London-based lawyer.

In appearances on Capitol Hill, a series of senior administration officials have disputed

President Trump's repeated dismissals of the probe.

"I do not believe special counsel Mueller is on a witch hunt," FBI Director Christopher

Wray told Congress in June, a sentiment shared by Rosenstein — and more recently — by

the man appointed to take over the Justice Department, William Barr.

Even acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker defended Mueller's work in an appearance

before the House Judiciary Committee last week.

"I do believe he's honest," Whitaker said of Mueller.

"I have been on the record about my respect for Bob Mueller and his ability to conduct

this investigation."

Known for his cantankerous demeanor and aggressive legal tactics, Dowd is a former Marine and

a veteran of high profile Washington investigations and legal disputes.

He helped clear Arizona Sen. John McCain's name during a 1989 corruption scandal, known

as Keating Five, involving improper influence on behalf of the savings and loan industry.

And he led the Major League Baseball investigation that resulted in a lifetime ban for Cincinnati

Reds star Pete Rose.

Trump brought Dowd in to lead his legal defense team one month after the president fired FBI

Director James Comey and Mueller was subsequently appointed to serve as the special counsel

overseeing the widening probe into Russian interference.

Dowd told ABC News that the president cooperated with the investigation, even producing communications

with the White House Counsel that Mueller requested.

"There's no time in history has anybody had this kind of look at communications with

the president," Dowd said.

Where Dowd said he drew a line in terms of executive branch cooperation was having Trump

consent to an interview.

"What I was worried about is that he really couldn't do it," Dowd said.

"He couldn't do it"

One concern was that it would set a precedent that would open the current president and

future presidents to this kind of interview.

"You cannot treat the president like anybody," he said.

But a deeper concern, he said, was that prosecutors might try to set perjury traps for the president

– a pattern he maintained was on display in the indictments that Mueller's team was

filing earlier in the investigation – cases brought against Trump advisors for lying to

investigators.

For more infomation >> MUELLER GOT SERVED ,FORMER TRUMP LAWYER DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER - Duration: 5:44.

-------------------------------------------

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just beat Donald Trump at his own game-Breaking News - Duration: 3:19.

For more infomation >> Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just beat Donald Trump at his own game-Breaking News - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Senate Intel Committee Chair Gives Major Announcement on Trump-Russia Investigation - Duration: 3:35.

Hello and welcome, I'm Gina Shakespeare.

Today on Declassified: the Senate Intel Committee Chair says there is no evidence of Trump-Russia

collusion.

This story by our senior political reporter Ivan Pentchoukov.

After questioning more than 200 witnesses and reviewing more than 300,000 documents

over the course of two years, investigators working for the Senate Intelligence Committee

have found no evidence to support the allegation that the 2016 Trump presidential campaign

colluded with Russia.

This is according to the committee's chairman, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.).

Burr made the remarks in an exclusive interview with CBS News published on Feb. 7.

The senator shared the same conclusion with Fox News in September 2018, noting at the

time that more facts may come to light.

The House Intelligence Committee came to the same conclusion in March last year, and found

no evidence that any member of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.

The committee instead discovered that the Clinton campaign paid a former foreign spy

to compile a dossier of opposition research on then-candidate Donald Trump.

The FBI then used the dossier, without due verification, to surveil a former member of

the Trump campaign.

Burr's committee unsuccessfully attempted to interview former British spy Christopher

Steele.

Burr said:

In contrast to the House committee led by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), Burr's committee

operated in a bipartisan fashion and only took steps that both sides agreed on.

Burr's committee also did not draw the kind of intense public attention associated with

the work of the House intelligence committee.

Burr said:

Special counsel Robert Mueller is also investigating allegations of collusion between the Trump

campaign and Russia.

Similar to the House and Senate committees, Mueller has not charged anyone for colluding

with Russia.

According to CBS, Burr has often been concerned that his committee's findings may conflict

with that of the special counsel.

He said he is not waiting for Mueller's report before releasing his own.

Burr said the conclusions of his committee's investigation won't satisfy Trump's ardent

critics or supporters.

He said.

Burr concluded by cautioning the media and the American people about false reporting.

Burr said:

That's all we have for today.

Thank you for joining us on this episode of Declassified; we do appreciate your company.

Be sure to leave your comments below.

Also, if you haven't already, please subscribe to our channel - also giving it a Like and

thumbs-up on the comments section really helps.

From all of us here, take care and we'll see you very soon.

For more infomation >> Senate Intel Committee Chair Gives Major Announcement on Trump-Russia Investigation - Duration: 3:35.

-------------------------------------------

A COURT GAVE TRUMP A WIN THAT LEFT CHUCK SCHUMER SPEECHLESS - Duration: 7:05.

A COURT GAVE TRUMP A WIN THAT LEFT CHUCK SCHUMER SPEECHLESS

Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democrats counted on the courts stopping Donald Trump

from building the wall.

Democrats figured friendly judges would throw out the law and hand down decisions that advanced

the left's anti-Trump "resistance."

But then this court gave President Trump a win that left Chuck Schumer speechless.

Liberals counted on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to block Trump's immigration

agenda.

When the President instituted his travel ban and changes to asylum laws, left-wing activists

on the Ninth Circuit stopped it and issued decisions temporarily blocking key parts of

Donald Trump's agenda.

So when the state of California and environmental groups filed suits to stop the Trump administration

from building a border wall prototype and repairing 14 miles of existing fencing, the

left expected to rack up another win.

But that was not the case.

The Ninth Circuit panel backed the Trump administration.

"The panel held that the plain text of section 102(a) of IIRIRA granted DHS authority to

construct the border barrier projects, and that grant of authority was not limited by

section 102(b) of IIRIRA.

The panel concluded that the district court correctly granted DHS summary judgment on

the ultra vires claims.

The panel further held that the environmental claims were precluded by the Secretary's

waiver of the National Environmental Policy Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and

the APA.

The panel held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider any argument challenging the waivers

themselves," the court wrote.

The court stated that the law allowed Homeland Security to build the wall if certain conditions

were met.

"Section 102(a) vests the Secretary with authority to "take such actions as may be

necessary to install additional physical barriers and roads (including the removal of obstacles

to detection of illegal entrants) in the vicinity of the United States border to deter illegal

crossings in areas of high illegal entry into the United States," the court wrote.

Environmental groups tried to argue that the law forbade Homeland Security from replacing

old fencing and only allowed construction for new fencing.

The panel laughed this argument out of the courtroom.

"The plain language of section 102(a) suggests no such limitation.

In simple terms, "additional" means "supplemental."

Ojai Unified Sch.

Dist. v. Jackson, 4 F.3d 1467, 1472–73 (9th Cir. 1993) (quoting Town of Burlington v.

Dep't of Educ., 736 F.2d 773, 790 (1st Cir. 1984)).

A "barrier" is "a material object or set of objects that separates, keeps apart,

demarcates, or serves as a unit or barricade."

See Barrier, Webster's New Int'l Dictionary of the English Language (3d ed. 1993).

Combining the plain meaning of "additional" and "barrier" yields a "supplemental

material object or set of objects that separates, keeps apart, demarcates, or serves as a unit

or barricade."

A replacement fence fits comfortably within that definition," the panel concluded.

This decision could have far-reaching implications.

If Trump uses executive authority to reprogram unspent federal money to complete the border

wall, it is not a slam dunk that a lower court will block Trump's move.

Even the most left-wing court in the country could not ignore the plain text of the law.

If Trump follows the letter of the law and uses his executive authority to build the

wall, Schumer and the Democrats' plan to block the wall through the courts could go

down in flames.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

For more infomation >> A COURT GAVE TRUMP A WIN THAT LEFT CHUCK SCHUMER SPEECHLESS - Duration: 7:05.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Jr. Swears Middle Class Is Getting Tax Cuts, His Supporters Disagree - Duration: 4:56.

Donald Trump Jr. is out there right now trying to convince Americans that they actually did

in fact get some of that Republican tax cut he took to Twitter yesterday.

And this was in response to all of the, uh, articles and headlines and Twitter comments

from Republicans saying that, dammit, my taxes went up after I just filed.

My refund went down.

So Trump Jr. seeing all these people blaming his father for it, decided to go on Twitter,

try to, you know, calm everyone's fears and explained to them that, no, I'm smarter than

you.

And you actually did get a tax cut.

Uh, he tweeted out this and middle-class most middle class Americans, God tax cuts, despite

smaller early refunds, the smaller refund checks, we're not indicators that taxes have

gone up for middle class families with children over 80% got tax cuts, 80%.

That's a lot.

That's, that's a big, big swath of this country.

Right.

So what's his source for this Breitbart?

Immediately after typing these words or copying and pasting them, whatever he did, he linked

to an article from Breitbart.

Well to spare you the damage.

I read the article from Breitbart, my Iq dropped a couple of points, but they will rebound

eventually, I'm sure.

Uh, there's no links in the Breitbart article.

There's nothing, there's no sources.

It doesn't say that we got this data from x, Y or z.

They're literally just making things up in saying to people, here's what happened.

Your paychecks increase last year.

That's where your tax cut was.

And, and because the IRS readjusted the way they take out taxes, that meant you weren't

overpaying your taxes.

So yeah, your refunds would be smaller because your refund only comes in when you've overpaid

your taxes.

They change the way they did the math.

So you people are too stupid to know.

You did get a tax cut.

So let us at Breitbart, let me, Donald Trump Jr. explained to you how much money you did

get.

Let me tell you something.

Donald Trump, who calls teachers losers.

Um, we didn't get tax cuts.

You asshole.

We watched our paychecks every week, every other week, whatever it was.

And they didn't change.

Last year we saw the federal withholdings and they didn't go down.

You're sitting there lying to our faces about something we see several times a month and

you think we're not smart enough to know that we didn't get a tax cut.

Luckily I don't have to be the ones to tell these, uh, to tell this stuff to Donald Trump

Jr. because everyone in his comment thread did it for him and I'm not talking about liberal

swooping in and correcting him.

I'm talking about his father's followers.

The people who say, Donald, look, I'm a real big fan of you, but you're wrong about this.

You're wrong.

You're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong, wrong all the

way down the Twitter feed your wrong.

And these are people that actually like him, people that actually respect him for some

reason having to correct him because they know what they see.

They know that they didn't get a tax cut.

They know their paychecks didn't increase last year, but they're seeing the refunds

decrease this year because the Republicans took away a lot of the things that we were

able to write off.

Home offices, you know, supplies for teachers, all sorts of other things.

These, these writeoffs that helped the middle class, those are gone and that's why our tax

refunds or the amount that we owe has either decreased if we were getting a refund or increased

if we owe something.

That's pretty much across the board.

Your 80% number that you pulled out a Breitbart, I guess is absolute fabrication.

It is pure fiction and you know it.

You just don't care about it because you were one of the top 0.01% of income earners who

got yourself a massive tax cut last year.

We know what our paychecks say.

We know what our tax returns say, we know what they had said the year before and the

year before and so on and so on.

Stop trying to lie to us, telling us that we got a tax cut that we know for a fact never

materialized.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Jr. Swears Middle Class Is Getting Tax Cuts, His Supporters Disagree - Duration: 4:56.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Ally Paul Manafort INTENTIONALLY Lied To Mueller's Team, Court Says - Duration: 5:26.

Yesterday, a federal judge ruled, did Robert Mueller special prosecutor had presented efficient

evidence to show that former Trump campaign manager, Paul Manafort, intentionally lied

to the special prosecutor's office and other investigators as part of their ongoing probe.

And because the judge says Paul Manafort intentionally and deliberately lied to the prosecutors,

uh, there are no longer bound by this agreement that they had the plea deal.

So Robert Muller no longer has to come in and try to argue that Paul Manafort should

receive some kind of reduced sentence for the fraud and conspiracy charges that he was

guilty of.

So now, Paul Manafort, because of this ruling yesterday, is looking at a full prison sentence

and given his advanced age, almost 70 years old, it's likely that Paul Manafort is never

leaving a prison again for the rest of his life.

All because he chose this is according to prosecutors in this case, he chose to mislead

everyone about his connections to people in Russia who had connections to intelligence

agencies in Russia.

So the big question is, who gives a shit about Paul Manafort?

What does this mean for Donald Trump?

Right?

I know that's what everybody's wanting to know here.

Well, the answer is not a whole lot.

See, most of the things that Paul Manafort was convicted of where things that actually

happened long before he ever joined the Donald Trump campaign.

So this is not necessarily the end of the line for Donald Trump, but Manafort was cooperating

with Muller's office in order to get this reduced sentence.

So if Manafort is feeling a little, oh crap, they don't have to abide by this plea agreement

anymore, maybe I'll go ahead and shovel out every piece of information.

I know.

Stop lying to everybody and tell them everything that happened during this campaign.

Who reached out to whom were the other people were from?

What governments were they working on behalf of?

Was it Saudi Arabia was a UAE, was it Russia?

Paul Manafort might be the kind of guy who would know those kinds of things and sensing

the fact that he could be facing the rest of his life in prison.

He may be willing, if he has that info, to turn it all over to Robert Mueller in an attempt

to get them to still honor that plea deal.

However, none of this is certain at this point.

We don't know what Manafort knows.

We don't know how much he understands things.

We don't know his involvement in any of that.

So I guess basically this story gives us a much bigger question mark than we had even

before the story came out.

But we do know one thing, and this is one thing for certain, for a guy who claims that

he didn't do anything wrong, Donald Trump, he sure surrounded himself with a lot of people

who have routinely proven to be liars, thieves, and con men.

It is incredibly unlikely that Trump himself is not cut from the same cloth.

You don't surround yourself for your entire life with nothing but criminals.

If you yourself are not

also a criminal.

For more infomation >> Trump Ally Paul Manafort INTENTIONALLY Lied To Mueller's Team, Court Says - Duration: 5:26.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Is Being Sued AGAIN - Duration: 4:26.

Donald Trump is being sued.

Once again, the man who just seems to be sued by everyone for everything, whether it's not

paying as contractors or you know, all of the horrible policies he's put in place.

All the emoluments that he is accepted, the guy just constantly gets sued.

Well, this new lawsuit is actually similar to other law suits that have been filed against

him and his administration.

This one is being brought by six migrant families who the Trump administration's separated from

their children at the border and they're now suing Trump and the administration for the

unnecessary pain, suffering and trauma that they caused to these families.

Right now there's only six in the lawsuit.

It's very likely that that number is going to increase dramatically.

Assuming this case has given permission to move forward and it should be able to move

forward.

I don't think that's going to be a question, but there probably will be a hearing to determine

whether or not these people have standing and here's the thing though, they absolutely

do have standing.

They were in here in the United States on American soil.

At which point they are protected by the laws of the United States of America citizen or

not.

So yes, that argument's pretty easy to settle.

Do they have standing?

Hell yeah, they do, but here's why they're suing.

Again, these are mothers who had their children in some cases actually literally ripped out

of their arms and taken away.

The parents were not told where their kids were going there.

We're not told how long they would be separated.

They were not allowed to contact them.

They didn't know a thing.

They were taken to a separate cage and locked up.

Their kid was taken to a different facility, sometimes a different city, sometimes a different

state, and they had no idea.

The kids didn't know where the parents were.

The parents didn't know where the kids, where they couldn't communicate with each other.

They were abused while in custody and according to the filing of this lawsuit that has caused

insurmountable damage psychologically to both the parents and the kids leaving them with

this PTSD and they want something done.

They want something someone held accountable.

Now, each of the families, the six families involved or seeking $2 million a piece for

the suffering and the pain and the trauma that was caused to them by the administration.

But it's not necessarily about the money.

What they want to do is send the administration a message, which is actually what most lawsuits

are about.

It's not just about getting money, it's not a cash grab.

What it is is to highlight a policy or a problem, bring it to the public's attention and then

force a change.

We have seen that with lawsuits since the beginning of this country.

You know, the last century alone has shown us how powerful lawsuits can be in changing

the laws in this country.

Tobacco laws, seat belt laws, uh, you know, pharmaceutical testing requirements, all kinds

of things that only came about because of lawsuits as best as agent orange.

That's what they're trying to do with this policy here.

They're trying to show that there is very real damage being caused by the Trump administration's

family separation policy, and that the policy was only enacted so that the president could

prove to the rest of the world how cruel he truly is.

This was not a safety issue.

This was not a security issue, and it did nothing to deter people from coming into this

country.

This entire family separation policy was built on one thing and one thing alone, and that

was to show everybody how horrible and heartless the United States government can truly be.

And that is what these lawyers representing these families are about to go argue in court.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Is Being Sued AGAIN - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Official's Wife Goes Full Anti-Vaxxer – "Bring Back Our Childhood Diseases!" - Duration: 4:19.

Darla shine the wife of bill shine, who just happens to be the communications director

for the Trump White House.

Went on an unhinged Twitter rant yesterday.

Apparently after watching a clip on CNN that triggered her so much that she actually ended

up calling for the return of her childhood diseases.

Uh, here is what Miss Shine tweeted out.

Here we go.

Lol.

Measles outbreak on CNN, the entire baby boom population alive today had the measles as

kids bring back our childhood diseases, they keep you healthy and fight cancer.

Um, I don't know what Darla shine has a degree in, but I'm going to go ahead and assume that

it's not an internal medicine because yeah, guests, what?

Darla, I don't know if you've been paying attention to medical statistics and cancer

rates in the United States, but as it turns out, baby boomers can and do in fact get cancer.

Whether or not they had measles as a child or any of these other childhood diseases that

you're clamoring to come back.

Um, they still get cancer.

In fact, uh, it's one of the top three I believe, killers of not just that generation, but American

citizens in general.

And so you're going to sit there, it say that, dammit, all these people need measles so that

we don't get cancer later in life.

Um, it would be awesome if that's how it worked, but unfortunately it's not.

Now, to the other point, I guess Darla is also sitting here telling us that we should

all be anti vaccs.

Everybody needs these diseases.

Let's get as many kids sick as possible because all it's going to do is tough.

And I'm up, right?

Well, no children under the age of five and actually anyone over the age of 30 are incredibly

susceptible to the worst effects, including death from catching something like the measles,

which yes, there is an outbreak right now, uh, in the northwest because the rate of vaccination

continues to drop in those areas.

And that's all based on things that aren't actually science.

The scaremongering of the anti vaccs crowd that has no basis in actual science.

They're believing one guy who was widely discredited, proven to falsify information, stripped of

his medical license, and they somehow think that that dude who is a national and international

disgrace at this point is correct.

Well, that's not how it works.

And those people that we have catching measles, losing their hearing because of it possibly

losing their lives because of it.

That's not a good thing.

Darla, she later went on to tweet after everybody on Twitter told her how stupid she is.

She said, was waiting for the left to come after me.

As soon as I retweet a fact about Hashtag vaccines, they come after me, bring it on.

You didn't state any facts.

You said stupid jibberish and everybody calls you out for it.

Don't sit there and act like, yeah, I'm so tough.

Bring it on.

You're getting decimated.

You're getting ratioed.

Everybody is telling you what a moron you are and that science disagrees with everything

you have to say and you're standing there as if you just won some kind of combat.

You are losing.

Do you understand that?

And the saddest part is I don't think she does.

I honest to God, don't believe that this woman has enough intelligence in her to understand

that not only is she wrong about all the facts, but that everyone in her comment thread is

making fun

of her.