Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Trump news on Youtube Jan 30 2019

DONALD TRUMP SENT A STUNNING MESSAGE THAT JUST WIPED THE SMILE OFF NANCY PELOSI'S

FACE

Nancy Pelosi was the toast of Washington.

The fake news media rushed to publish fawning articles and glowing headlines crediting her

with forcing Donald Trump to end the government shutdown.

But the celebration was short lived as Trump sent Pelosi a stunning message that just wiped

the smile off her face.

Donald Trump agreed to reopen the government for three weeks so Congress could negotiate

a deal on border security that must contain funding for a physical barrier on the Southern

border.

Cable networks and major newspapers raced to push out stories claiming Trump had "capitulated"

or "surrendered" on the border wall.

However, that was not entirely true.

Trump set the table for three weeks of negotiations where he could still win money for the wall.

The President tweeted, "I wish people would read or listen to my words on the Border Wall.

This was in no way a concession.

It was taking care of millions of people who were getting badly hurt by the Shutdown with

the understanding that in 21 days, if no deal is done, it's off to the races!"

Trump also threatened, once again, to declare a national emergency and order the military

to build the wall if Democrats do not agree to compromise.

President Trump added, "21 days goes very quickly.

Negotiations with Democrats will start immediately.

Will not be easy to make a deal, both parties very dug in.

The case for National Security has been greatly enhanced by what has been happening at the

Border & through dialogue.

We will build the Wall!"

This is a threat Democrats should take seriously.

"The president's commitment is to protect the nation, and he'll do it either with

or without Congress," White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told Fox News correspondent

John Roberts.

If the government shuts down again in 21 days, this time it will be on Nancy Pelosi, Chuck

Schumer and the rest of the Democrats.

President Trump bargained in good faith and is merely asking Pelosi and Schumer to fund

barrier fences which they both had voted for back in 2006.

Trump offered four different honest proposals to fund the wall and address the Democrats

immigration priorities such as protecting so-called "DREAMers" and TPS recipients.

And the Democrats have a soft underbelly in this fight.

Although the media trumpeted an Associated Press/NPR poll that showed Trump's approval

ratings had plunged to 34 percent as evidence that Trump had lost all his leverage because

of the shutdown, the poll was wrong.

Multiple other polls – from NBC and Fox News – showed Trump's approval ratings

had remained unchanged from December.

In addition, the NBC news poll found Pelosi's favorability ratings had sunk during the shutdown

and she is now the most unpopular politician in America.

MORE NBC/WSJ POLL: PELOSI'S NEGATIVES SHOT UP DURING GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN MORE THAN ANY

POL // NOW THE MOST UNPOPULAR POLITICIAN TESTED IN THE SURVEY.

PIC.TWITTER.COM/PSMBFYDWX7

— JOSH KRAUSHAAR (@HOTLINEJOSH) JANUARY 27, 2019

Finally, Democrats won the House because they flipped seats in districts won by President

Trump.

Those vulnerable members felt the heat when the government closed and their constituents

demanded they compromise with the President.

CNN's Dana Bash reported that Trump's message that Democrats did not care about

the border broke through in these districts.

"I'm hearing from senior Democrats that they are hearing more and more from their

rank and file, particularly the new members who tend to come from more moderate districts

saying they're getting pounded because the Trump message, the Republican message that

they don't care about border security has started to seep in as well," Bash reported.

Can Democrats withstand three more weeks of this messaging onslaught?

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

For more infomation >> DONALD TRUMP SENT A STUNNING MESSAGE THAT JUST WIPED THE SMILE OFF NANCY PELOSI'S FACE - Duration: 15:36.

-------------------------------------------

Judd Trump vs Ronnie O'Sullivan Quarter Final Frame 5 9 Snooker Grand Prix || Snooker Line - Duration: 1:05:55.

Subscribe For More Videos

For more infomation >> Judd Trump vs Ronnie O'Sullivan Quarter Final Frame 5 9 Snooker Grand Prix || Snooker Line - Duration: 1:05:55.

-------------------------------------------

New Survey Finds Majority of Americans Support Trump's Border Security Position - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> New Survey Finds Majority of Americans Support Trump's Border Security Position - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP TWEETED ONE THING THAT COULD SEND HILLARY TO PRISON - Duration: 10:07.

TRUMP TWEETED ONE THING THAT COULD SEND HILLARY TO PRISON

Hillary Clinton is one of the most corrupt politicians of all time.

For decades her crime cabal has destroyed the United States.

But her crime spree could be over after Trump tweeted one thing that could send her to prison.

The deep state is making their final moves towards a nationwide takeover.

President Donald Trump is dismantling their entire agenda, in a fashion infuriating to

Democrats across the country.

So they are trying to take him down by any means necessary.

And their latest target in their anti-Trump crusade is Roger Stone.

Stone is a long-time Trump advisor and friend.

He is the man who built Donald Trump as a political figure; working with him since the

80's to build a Presidential bid.

In response, Special Counsel Robert Mueller is charging him with six counts, including

obstruction and lying to Congress.

To make thing all the more dramatic, his arrest was conducted with a mass of armed FBI agents.

In fact, there were more agents in place to arrest Stone than were used to raid the compound

of Osama bin Laden.

Along with the agents, CNN was on hand at the home to get the entire thing on video.

Nothing that Stone is accused of has anything to do with "Russia collusion," but instead

are processed crimes for the purpose of getting a "kill" in Mueller's investigation.

President Trump knows this and is defending Stone against the draconian methods of deep

state prosecutors.

Not only that, but Trump is pointing out a supreme hypocrisy around Stone's arrest.

In a tweet, he points out that many deep state officials, including Hillary Clinton, have

done the same thing, with no consequences:

"If Roger Stone was indicted for lying to Congress, what about the lying done by Comey,

Brennan, Clapper, Lisa Page & lover, Baker and soooo many others?

What about Hillary to FBI and her 33,000 deleted Emails?

What about Lisa & Peter's deleted texts & Wiener's laptop?

Much more!"

The difference is that Stone is fighting the deep state, and supporting President Trump.

Hillary Clinton infamously made false claims during testimony relating to the 30,000 classified

emails on her private server.

Instead of having her face those crimes, then-FBI Director James Comey let her off the hook.

The FBI instead is simply claiming that Hillary had been "extremely careless," in lieu

of admitting the crimes committed.

But Stone isn't going to be let off so easy.

For decades Stone has been one of the most effective political operatives.

In 2000, he is credited for stopping the infamous Democrat attempt to steal the election for

Al Gore.

Gore never being President is thanks to the work of Stone.

Democrats haven't forgotten that, and have been working to take him down ever since.

And when 2016 came around, Donald Trump was ready for his campaign because of Stone grooming

him for the race for decades.

On the other hand, Hillary Clinton has been promoting the interests of the deep state

her entire career.

One of the few things that may keep Stone from prison is a pardon from President Trump.

Do you think Trump should pardon Stone if he is sent to prison?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

For more infomation >> TRUMP TWEETED ONE THING THAT COULD SEND HILLARY TO PRISON - Duration: 10:07.

-------------------------------------------

Nancy Pelosi And Donald Trump Sealed A Shocking Agreement That No One Saw Coming - Duration: 3:14.

Americans could not believe what just happened.

Donald Trump and Nancy Pelosi just agreed to end a major standoff.

And they did it by coming to an agreement that no one saw coming.

Nancy Pelosi fired a shot across Donald Trump's bow during the government shutdown by canceling

the State of the Union speech scheduled for January 29th.

Pelosi lied and claimed the Secret Service could not secure the event since they weren't

being paid during the shutdown.

The Speaker also falsely claimed that the government needed to reopen before the President

could speak.

That was not true because the government was already shut down when Pelosi extended the

original invitation on January 3rd.

It was a childish and petty political stunt.

And even when Trump did reopen the government, Pelosi still did not immediately re-extend

the invitation to the President.

That led many observers to question Pelosi's ability to negotiate in good faith.

Finally, on Monday, three days after President Trump ended the Democrat shutdown in order

to allow Congress to negotiate a deal on border security, Speaker Pelosi extended an invitation

to Trump to deliver the State of the Union on February 5th.

Pelosi wrote to Trump:

"WHEN I WROTE TO YOU ON JANUARY 23RD, I STATED THAT WE SHOULD WORK TOGETHER TO FIND

A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATE WHEN GOVERNMENT HAS REOPENED TO SCHEDULE THIS YEAR'S STATE

OF THE UNION ADDRESS.

IN OUR CONVERSATION TODAY, WE AGREED ON FEBRUARY 5TH.

THEREFORE, I INVITE YOU TO DELIVER YOUR STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS BEFORE A JOINT SESSION

OF CONGRESS ON FEBRUARY 5, 2019 IN THE HOUSE CHAMBER.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER."

Some pundits thought Pelosi might hold out until after the February 15th deadline to

see if Trump would agree to forgo a second shutdown before inviting him to deliver the

State of the Union.

However, that position was not tenable.

And it was a sign of things to come in the upcoming border security negotiations.

The pressure is on Pelosi and the Democrats to now meet the President halfway on funding

for a physical barrier along the Southern border.

Pelosi could not hold to her original opposition in preventing the President from delivering

the State of the Union until a permanent border deal was reached even though Trump met Pelosi's

condition of reopening the government.

In a press conference after Trump agreed to end the Democrats government shutdown, Pelosi

hedged on her opposition to wall funding in the three week negotiations.

Even RINO Republican Lamar Alexander expressed optimism that lawmakers could agree on a deal

that included funding for Trump's border wall.

Fox News host Maria Bartiromo asked Alexander about the possibility of Congress striking

a deal on funding for the wall.

"Well, we should," Alexander answered.

"And here's something that's overlooked.

The last four presidents, Obama, Clinton, Bush, Bush, working with Congress, built 654

miles of physical barrier — that's wall — along our 2,000-mile southern border.

That's before President Trump," Alexander concluded.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

For more infomation >> Nancy Pelosi And Donald Trump Sealed A Shocking Agreement That No One Saw Coming - Duration: 3:14.

-------------------------------------------

Liberal Actress Trashes Trump & Thanks Mueller At SAG Awards, Gets Destroyed - Duration: 3:44.

For more infomation >> Liberal Actress Trashes Trump & Thanks Mueller At SAG Awards, Gets Destroyed - Duration: 3:44.

-------------------------------------------

Fmr Gov. Christie On His Relationship With Trump, Jared Kushner, And Russia | Deadline | MSNBC - Duration: 13:11.

For more infomation >> Fmr Gov. Christie On His Relationship With Trump, Jared Kushner, And Russia | Deadline | MSNBC - Duration: 13:11.

-------------------------------------------

FINNALY TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH MASSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT - Duration: 13:16.

FINNALY TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH MASSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT

welcome back president Trump doubles down on his demands for a border wall as

he calls on Democrats to restart negotiations on funding the government past February 15th

a new number of House

Democrats appear to be supporting the idea of at least a vote on wall funding one of

them joins me right now Utah Democratic congressman ben mcadams he's a

member of the House Financial Services Committee and the Blue Dog Coalition

congressman it's nice to have you on the program this morning thanks so much for being here

Thank You Maria good to be with you you were among 30 House Democrats

who sent Nancy Pelosi a letter urging her to give Trump a vote on the

wall funding tell me what you think would come out of that vote you know first and foremost

what the the purpose of that letter was to say that the shutdown

is doing no good for anybody we're harming the US economy we're

risking a recession we're harming the federal employees who are just working to put food

on the table and let's open the government there are processes in the

in the Congress in our government laid out by the founders to have debates

like this that's what Congress has intended to do so let's open the government and then

let's have this negotiation the president has a proposal that

should be heard in the Congress we should debate it and we should work to

build common ground and try and move forward a solution on border security on immigration

reform and let's go through the proper channels of the Congress that that

are built and intended to have this exact conversation but let's not do it

in the context of a shutdown that harms the American people that harms our economy and

risks the pocketbooks of every American what I'm trying to better understand

is really the makeup of the new Congress because of course we know

that there's a pocket of Democrats who just want the president out and much of it is politics

and they are resisting anything that he would like we know that

Nancy Pelosi and many of her colleagues voted for a wall and voted for wall fencing years

ago many times we know that there's a wall right now a border

wall in Nancy Pelosi zone state of California separating Tijuana and San Diego but because

President Trump has the idea it's resist resist resist so you

come from a red state you beat out your your opponent on the Republican

side do you think a movement within your new Congress to actually get things done putting

politics aside and not necessarily resisting everything the president says because you

don't like his personality

absolutely you know there are a lot of me and my colleagues who were elected this last

year a lot of us are just pragmatist who just want to get something

done before I was elected to Congress I was a mayor and mayor's just

have this attitude of okay what can we do to move forward to solve the problem as a

Democrat in a very red state I never got anything done unless I could reach

out and build bridges across the aisle so as long as the debate is

focused on you know as long as we're defining a win is meaning somebody else loses we're

never gonna have consensus so we've got to find that win win and I don't

know at this time what the win looks that win win looks like but we

have to find it and I know that a lot of my freshman colleagues are moderates who want

to find that win win that probably we should look at some things to address immigration

reform and dreamers I think is something important permanent

protections for dreamers but also border security as a mayor I saw illegal drugs and and the

impacts of that in my in my city and I want to do more to stop the flow

of illegal drugs into the end of the country so I think there's a lot of

common ground and I think the way to approach this and the way that I would approach it

if I was mayor is to say you know there's a conversation a debate about

wall or no wall let's step back from that conversation where there's

it's divided divisive and let's talk about what we have in common let's find that thread

of commonality amongst Republicans and Democrats I think the threat

of commonality is we all want to protect the border we can find common

ground on that so in some places that's going to mean technology other places in other ways

immigration reform and in some places it may mean a barrier and I think

if we step back and reframe the conversation about protecting the border

and what can we do and what's the most effective way to do that instead of debating a wall

or no wall let's debate border security and I think there's a lot

of common ground yeah I think you make a lot of good points because there

are areas of the country where they're wide open and perhaps maybe you don't need an actual

fence or wall there because you can use technology and drones

they're wide open areas that if illegals come in you can actually

apprehend them easily because it's so wide open but then there are areas like the wall

we've been looking at in Nancy Pelosi state separating Tijuana

from San Diego where you have a very dense population three million

people on one side of the wall through a Tijuana another three million people on the other

side of the wall in San Diego so what is your thoughts in terms of how much

is needed for actual barrier on the southern border and will you vote YES

for wall creation and more wall extension of what we're seeing in this picture so what

I've tried to do is not draw any lines in the sand I want to vote

to say have border protection to have border security to reduce the flow

of drugs and evil even illegal immigration that may include a barrier sure I wouldn't

rule out barriers and places where it's appropriate

I think that's I think that's acceptable but let's have this

conversation in the context of committee hearings at the Congress with a goal of finding common

ground I also think one of the things we can do to protect the border

is to reduce illegal immigration by fixing a broken immigration system if

we can make sure that those good people who are who are just looking for a job our economy

is asking to brainian workers let's find it let's make it easier

for them to immigrate legally so they're not tempted to cross the border

illegally so I think part of it part of the border part of the border protection strategy

has to be fixing a broken immigration system our laws do you feel that

you have a voice I mean I know that you did not support Nancy Pelosi's bid

to become the speaker for a second time do you feel like you're being listened to you

will you have the influence with these practical ideas that you're putting

forth I think so I mean we're just up getting up and going as a

congress right now I've been pleasantly surprised at people both on the Republican side and

even more progressive on the Democratic side who who

I felt that my voice is welcome let's let's hope that as we go into this

negotiation people can allow all voices to be at the table some of the pragmatists can

on both sides of the aisle again can really push for

common ground and trying to find that you know that solution that will

really garner a majority of support in Congress and help us to to reopen the border I'm somebody

who you know we're

gonna have disagreements from time to time but once one disagreements behind us we move

to the next issue we try and find common ground we don't carry baggage

forward for debate to debate and that's how I'd go into

this the same way we've got that behind us let's go further disagreements that are also

radical on the economic side of things you're on the Financial Services Committee

what are your thoughts on Elizabeth Warren's idea to confiscate

income to put attacks on overall assets and wealth or Alexandrian costea's idea of having

a seventy

percent

tax

rate for

For more infomation >> FINNALY TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH MASSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT - Duration: 13:16.

-------------------------------------------

Kamala Harris defines her fight against Trump in CNN town hall new - Duration: 5:09.

Kamala Harris defines her fight against Trump in CNN town hall

For more infomation >> Kamala Harris defines her fight against Trump in CNN town hall new - Duration: 5:09.

-------------------------------------------

Left Threatens Starbucks Boycott If CEO Runs For President, Trump: 'U Still Paying Rent?' - Duration: 5:15.

For more infomation >> Left Threatens Starbucks Boycott If CEO Runs For President, Trump: 'U Still Paying Rent?' - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Begs Global Warming To Come Back Fast, Climate Change Supporters Freak - Duration: 4:19.

With the Midwest experiencing record-low temperatures, President Donald Trump has taken the opportunity

to mock the idea of global warming.

"What the hell is going on with Global Warming?

Please come back fast, we need you!" the president joked.

Of course, this caused climate change supporters to freak out.

The Midwest is currently bracing for dangerously low temperatures, causing climate change skeptics

to question the idea of global warming.

Heavy snow and powerful wind created blizzard-like conditions Monday across parts of the Midwest,

prompting officials to cancel about 1,000 flights at Chicago's airports and close

hundreds of schools.

But forecasters warned the most dangerous weather is yet to come: frigidly low temperatures

that the region hasn't seen in a quarter century.

Snowplow drivers had trouble keeping up with the snow in Minnesota and Wisconsin, where

some areas got as much as 15 inches.

Chicago-area commuters woke up to heavy snowfall, with more than 5 inches already on the ground.

In Michigan, non-essential government offices were closed, including the Capitol.

[Source: Daily Mail]

But the snow is only "part one, and maybe even the easier part" because temperatures

will plummet over the next three days, according to Brian Hurley, a meteorologist with the

Weather Prediction Center.

"You're talking about frostbite and hypothermia issues very quickly, like in a matter of minutes,

maybe seconds," Hurley said.

Wednesday is expected to be the worst, with wind chills in northern Illinois potentially

falling to negative 55 degrees, which the National Weather Service called "possibly

life threatening."

Meanwhile, temperatures in Minnesota could hit minus 30 degrees with a wind chill of

negative 60.

The potentially record-breaking low-temperature forecast in Milwaukee is negative 28 degrees,

with a windchill as low as negative 50.

The current record of minus 26 degrees was set in 1996.

"That's 40 degrees below normal," said Hurley.

"When you think about it in that sense, that's a big 'whoa.'"

Wednesday is looking like one of the coldest days ever on record in Chicago, with the high

temperature expected to be 12 degrees below zero, which would be colder than some of the

most frigid places on earth.

For example the South Pole is expected to reach a high temperature of 4 below zero on

Wednesday.

Barrow, Alaska, the northernmost point in the United States, located above the Arctic

Circle, will be 7 below zero.

Zackenberg Station, Greenland, which is also north of the Arctic Circle, will be 11 below.

While there is no weather station on the summit of Mount Everest, you would certainly expect

even the base camp would be colder than Chicago, given it's at an elevation of more than

17,000 feet above sea level.

No such luck.

They're expecting a high of 30 on Wednesday.

[Source: CBS Chicago]

President Donald Trump took to Twitter to mock the idea of global warming in the wake

of such frigid temperatures.

"In the beautiful Midwest, windchill temperatures are reaching minus 60 degrees, the coldest

ever recorded," wrote the president.

"In coming days, expected to get even colder.

People can't last outside even for minutes.

What the hell is going on with Global Waming?

Please come back fast, we need you!"

In the beautiful Midwest, windchill temperatures are reaching minus 60 degrees, the coldest

ever recorded.

In coming days, expected to get even colder.

People can't last outside even for minutes.

What the hell is going on with Global Waming?

Please come back fast, we need you!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 29, 2019

Indeed, it defies logic that the world could somehow be in the midst of a global warming

crisis which so-called experts have blamed for everything from terrorism to the recent

migrant caravan.

Perhaps, this sort of fluctuation in temperature is actually normal.

After all, it has been going on for centuries.

This is just more proof that the climate change narrative was created by politicians as another

way to manipulate the public.

Do not be fooled.

For more infomation >> Trump Begs Global Warming To Come Back Fast, Climate Change Supporters Freak - Duration: 4:19.

-------------------------------------------

Government Reopen: Trump Secret Plan to Build the Wall? - Duration: 17:26.

BILL: Hi everybody, I'm Bill Whittle here with Scott Ott

And this is bill Whittle Now featuring Scott Ott, who spent the last, O, I would say maybe,

almost 10 days

Working very hard on his Clint Eastwood impression, and I think he's got it largely down

So I'm gonna do the intros and outros for this set of shows and you'll be able to hear

Scott's impression of Mr.

Eastwood in just a moment.

This show, as you probably know by now, is a pretty simple case of ambush where Scott

has a question —

I have no idea what it's going to be — and he's going to ask it and

We're going to answer it as best we can so, Mr . Eastwood. It's all yours

So Bill by now, you're probably asking yourself. Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya...

Punk? BILL: punk

SCOTT: Okay, well biggest news this week

of course has been the

restarting of the federal government after a

three-week shutdown longest shutdown in...or partial shutdown anyway as they call it...

in the history of the government and

Right after the deal was announced

- to start up the government for three weeks after a 25 days shutdown, I should clarify

the Right immediately came down with both feet on Donald Trump and...

Including Ann Coulter who authored a book called "In Trump We Trust" a year or so ago

slamming President Trump, saying that he caved to Nancy Pelosi by not getting his wall

and by allowing the government to restart.

Today, as we record this,

President Trump has told the Wall Street Journal that he's not really confident that

— he thinks it's a less than 50 percent chance that the Democrats will be able to

make a deal that's satisfactory to him between now

and the three-week deadline, and that he may just very well have to go ahead and use some

executive action.

Bill, does this sound to you like a guy who heard the criticism

when the restart happened, and is backpedaling, or does it sound like maybe this was the plan

all along and he

basically is stripping Nancy Pelosi of her excuse.

BILL: Well that's a great question

I don't know where to begin with this. So let's just start at the beginning. It's awful

late to be talking about building a wall

We...

the wall was the central campaign promise of the Donald Trump

candidacy and

While I am enormously grateful for the fact that ISIS has been smashed and the economy

is booming and North Korea

Understands that they're not playing with kittens anymore, and all the rest of these

many gains

I simply do wonder why we are speaking about this now that we've lost control of the House

of Representatives

SCOTT: Ann Coulter is saying he demanded this for 18 months and he lied — is what she's

saying now.

Well, Anne is very smart, but Ann tends to move from one position to another pretty quickly

and I'm not saying she's wrong

I'm just saying I'm not ready to go there

But...

it was certainly, I think, the first two years of the Trump presidency...

I I was very surprised at how slowly this thing was moving when I say slowly

I mean "not at all". Now before we get too much further in this I

understand that this was the first time — when Donald Trump was elected in

2016 this was the first time that that the Republican voter

had a chance to see their representatives do what they've been promising to do since

2008 and

They didn't do that.

They didn't repeal Obamacare. All of these people who've been starting in 2010 when we

flipped the House by a big margin

"Oh, we're going to repeal Obamacare. We're gonna have a conservative Republican

House Senate and presidency."

Well, here's the house. Four years later, here's the Senate. Two years after that, here's

the presidency, and now all of this legislation that's being sent or is presumably needed

to get things like the wall done —

the Republicans won't vote on them. At least they wouldn't they've been thrown out of office

now many of them.

So this failure is not just a failure of Donald Trump. It's a failure of his supposed-Republican

majority to make this thing happen. But honestly Scott

there is a very compelling case to be made for any president — not Donald Trump — just

about any president.

I would say it's a fair thing to say that even if they do two terms

90 percent of what they are going to accomplish in terms of legacy happens in the first hundred

days of their first term.

SCOTT: So the Congressional Budget Office comes out with a statement today

as we record this on Monday that

the government shut down for those 25 days

cost some 11 billion dollars, three billion of which can never be recovered. Larry Kudlow,

coming out of the White House

, spokesman...as a White House spokesman, said it's a drop in the bucket compared to

the vast size of the federal budget.

BILL: He's right.

SCOTT: And so he kind of downplayed that.

Clearly — CBO is supposed to be a nonpartisan entity —

but clearly this number is being thrown out there at this point

to put pressure on

one side of the other to say, "Look, if you don't make a deal within the next three weeks...you

already pissed away 11 billion

dollars, you're gonna waste more." Who do you think that accusation lands on?

BILL: I think the best answer to that question is: the

responsibility for the whole thing is

rests on the shoulders of

50 or 60 years of Republican and Democratic

representatives who have gone to Washington and become so intoxicated by an endless credit

card, and

lacking any sense of moral restraint or decency,

have driven us to the point where

five billion dollars is not worth talking about. It's it's it's simply: it's a rounding

error.

You know five billion dollars is a is a a simple rounding error for a government that

spends, you know

approximately three thousand six hundred billion dollars a year.

We spend 10 billion — the federal government — spends ten billion dollars a day, rule

of thumb round numbers, ten billion dollars a day.

so if we've been arguing for this wall thing for

25 days now?

SCOTT: Yes.

BILL: Right? Okay. So there's 25 billion dollars of government spending

That happened between the beginning and the end of this.

SCOTT: Now Bill, by the way,

The three billion dollars that we're not going to get back is the loss of that government

productivity that we didn't experience

Because they weren't at work.

BILL: Yeah, that's that's yeah. Well, as you know, Scotty, here's here's the thing:

We will all, you know, be old people in our rocking chairs —

we hope, some day, maybe in 20 50 or 60 or something —

and even then as our brittle bones just force us to try and rock back and forth

underneath the surveillance drones,

we will look back on the great government shutdown of

2019

with a remembrance of the unbelievable hardship and

the cruelty that we endured in our daily lives as a result of the government shutting down.

SCOTT: I'm thinking of the wave of shutdown babies...

BILL: I can't even talk about it... SCOTT: ...that will be coming nine months

from now.

BILL: I can't even talk about it Scott. It's too it's too near and it's too raw.

SCOTT: So, politically...

BILL: You, you traveled during the government shutdown. You came out here during the government

shutdown. You went to LAX

which is infamously slow. Maybe not the slowest in the world but — or in the country — but

infamously slow. You sailed through TSA, right?

SCOTT: I just heard on NPR on the way home today that

people — if if we go back into another government shutdown — will people be willing to put

up with the long lines at the airports?

And I thought, "Well, I don't fly very often, but when I flew to Los Angeles and came out

of there... I got dropped off by the Uber guy. I was sitting at my gate in ten minutes.

[LAUGHS]

BILL: So, this is the most visible thing that the government does. And as as we've said

many times before,

when there's a government shutdown,

it's usually because a Republican is saying, either "This is spending too much."

— usually spending too much, or "We need money for this," and the Democrats oppose

it in order to keep spending.

It doesn't matter who's president and who's not doesn't matter who's shutting down and

who's not it's more spending versus slightly less

spending so that's almost always what that shutdown comes to. But...

but it it seems to me that this time as opposed to Obama's

government shutdown or the shutdown that was imposed on him, you could you could fairly

say I guess,

the first thing that happened in that shutdown was

they roped off the Lincoln Memorial.

They they put up police tape around it.

They said you cannot go to the Lincoln Memorial because the government is shut down,

and we don't have any park rangers here in this big open field of grass

with this enormous building with these wide-open stairs and no doors. So therefore you can't

come and see your monuments.

Sorry. And what that is — and and I remember stories from back in the day, Scotty.

We were talking about stories like this before where Park Rangers

were taking people out in buses and, you know, and making them wait four or five hours without

going to the toilet so they could put some pressure, you know, kind of tighten the screws

on the American people.

I think, I think as with everything that the left seems to do,

the more they do it the less effective it becomes.

SCOTT: I was going to ask you that BILL: it's certainly true for the race card.

So now

so now

O, a government shutdown. I remember the first one, thinking, "Holy cow, you know,

is it gonna be like y2k? And turns out, Yes, it was exactly as catastrophic as y2k.

SCOTT: Well, people went a month now. Do you think that that that kind of that threat has

lost its sting?

BILL: Scotty we don't have a government anymore, and we haven't had one for a long time.

How many years did Barack Obama go without without, without the Senate submitting a budget?

Was it four or five?

SCOTT: At least. BILL: Okay, so — and I'm not saying the

problem began with him, but I think it grew significantly with him.

So when the job of

the of the legislature is to produce a budge,t or approve a budget and

they don't produce a budget.

They don't do their fundamental basic job. Forget all the laws and

legislation all the posturing and all and all the parties and all the gifts and all

rest of that stuff. Their fundamenta,l bottom level, baseline job is

to execute the simple commands of running this monstrosity,

called the US government. And if they ran it without a budget for six years, is that

a constitutional violation?

I guess it's not or else we would have...well, who cares, right?

Who cares... SCOTT: Well, the House is supposed to draw

up, and the Senate and is supposed to

approve it, and the president's supposed to sign it...

BILL: Or reject it, right? SCOTT: Yeah, or reject it.

BILL: And that didn't happen did it. It just simply didn't appear, so...

SCOTT: So, I guess my question in this though is

has has the Democratic Party overplayed their hand?

to the extent that, you know, the big threat used to be: "O, the Republicans are shutting

down the government!"

Well now we've been through a month of a shutdown government

and for most people, all the impact they've really had is hearing over and over on the

news that the government was shut down.

BILL: Something that needs to be said as well: When I talk about "the government" I'm talking

about the thing. There are many fine people —

many fine people, in fact virtually all of them that I've run into who actually work

in the government —

who are hardworking people, love their country, and are doing, essentially, a very difficult

job

as as best as they possibly can. Those people have been working now for almost a month without

pay and

they should get their back pay. It's not it's not a promise

of retirement luxuries in the future. It's like, they put in the work, they need to get

their back pay and there's no question

they need to get their back pay.

So when I talk about the government

I'm not talking about the people that make up the government . Many of them are very

fine. Some of them are not,

just as in the rest of the world.

So you're right

the more the more government

shutdowns that we have, the less a

government shutdown is going to mean anything. And as I said before, we don't have a government

anymore.

I can remember very clearly. I want to say in the 80s. Was that Graham-Rudman spending

caps. Was that right? SCOTT: Yeah.

BILL: Yeah

Okay, so we can't control our spending. We had a deficit (debt) of something incredible

like almost a trillion dollars.

It's 25 now, or something like that.

And so we passed legislation that said that, "These are the limits on how much you can

spend. That's it.

This is the law. You cannot spend more than this."

And the first thing we did was

pass executive orders and amendments and so on and and just keep raising the... past Graham-Rudman,

it

kept going past it and past it and past it.

We've got to get here — and one of the reasons we had the government, one of the government

shutdowns, was because

because the spending was greater than was allowed by these these laws. And then they...

people just ignored them and they kept spending anyway.

And so the whole idea of the of the limited ...

of using the legal means — the legislature of the United States — to limit the spending

of the legislature of the United States...

Once those limits have been broken as many times as they were broken,

they became so irrelevant that we don't even hear the term anymore.

I don't think most Americans know what Graham-Rudman is,

but it was it it was legislation designed to stop spending. And they didn't stop spending,

because they can't, because they're addicts and

and and you're never ever gonna find a

cocaine addict who's going to get a whole bunch of cocaine out, and gonna say "I'll

have this now, and I'll leave the rest of

this till next week. You're never going to find that guy. It doesn't work that way.

So, the idea of this government doing its fundamental basic duty of

managing the actual

personnel of the government, doing the things that the government should be doing, plus

all of the other

thousands of things that it shouldn't be doing —

it is not a government anymore.

And when you say that... when you look at the budget and you talk... I know

we're talking about like five — three, four, five billion dollars — but you're looking

at two hundred and twenty, two hundred thirty billion dollars

Into social programs. And that's considered sacrosanct. You can't cut that.

It's non-discretionary spending. Essentially, we promised it to people.

And when you're telling me that the people who have been elected

to run this

organization called the United States government — when you're telling me that they no longer

can

control how much money this thing?

spends, that tells me that no one can control how much money this thing spends. And if no

one can control it, then you can't call

this a government. You can call yourself a train conductor if you want to sit up by the

smokestack and

wave a little flag, you know.

But if that trains going downhill and you can't stop it, or at least

attempt to stop it —

If you don't know what lever to pull you're not a train conductor.

You're just a passenger. And that's what these people in Congress are no. They're passengers

and they're, and they're passengers who are

accelerating this downward plunge as fast as they can and and,

you know, as our friend Glenn Reynolds says, you know, that which cannot... which cannot

continue, will not continue.

SCOTT: Well, Bill before you say goodbye here. I just want to say a

personal "thank you" to all the Members at BillWhittle.com, who this week have reached

out and offered

prayers and words of support for me on the Bill Whittle Facebook page and and elsewhere.

It's really been heart warming.

I apologize for being the sole reason why we have been unable to

create content for the last week. And this voice that you hear now — this is the first

day that I've been able to muster even this much.

BILL: We had a conference. I'm sorry.

SCOTT: Go ahead. No, please. BILL: We had a conference call — Scott and

I did — end of last week... and when I say "a conference call," it was a Skype call.

I would talk. Scott would nod, shake his head, and then he would type things and I get the...

I'd get the respons. He was

really really out of it.

But that was, you know... I have to tell you Scotty —

I don't know if I told you this already: But I was sick a little while ago just briefly,

you know

the flu or something — food poisoning something like that. And you put up a Facebook post

explaining that I was out for a while and you and you used language

which is perfectly good, in fact, excellent language, but it's a little bit archaic

you say "Bill Whittle has fallen ill," and all of a sudden all of the...

All of the sympathy and all of the respect and the love and the warmth that we get from

our people just started flowing.

And just as a matter of revenge, I

really seriously,

seriously, gave some thought to putting up a post that said,

"Conservatism has lost one of its most powerful voices today with Scott Ott."

SCOTT: [LAUGHS]

BILL: And then when people would have done the what they do because they're good people...

SCOTT: Yes.

BILL: No, he's he's got laryngitis. He's, you know, probably three, four days.

SCOTT: The headline that we put on BillWhittle.cpm

was that Scott Ott was struck dumb.

BILL: Struck dumb by

many things. He's speechless.

That'll do it for this edition of Bill Whittle Now,

brought to you by the paying members of BillWhittle.com. They make all of the content that comes out

of this

little workshop of ours — this little

bastion of common sense and decency. And if you think the world could use more common

sense and decency, we agree with you. And

the way to do that is to have more people with common sense of decency go

to sign up to become members over at BillWhittle.com.

So for Scott Ott, Bill Whittle, and the rest of the tiny little team here that lifts such

heavy burdens with such amazing

grace

Thank you very much for joining us and we'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> Government Reopen: Trump Secret Plan to Build the Wall? - Duration: 17:26.

-------------------------------------------

Ann Coulter Admits She Was A "Stupid Girl" For Letting Trump Con Her - Duration: 5:40.

For the last two years, Ann Coulter has had this love hate relationship with Donald Trump.

She loves him when he's down there talking about we're going to build this wall, we're

going to make it happen.

And then she hates him when he doesn't actually follow through.

And this past weekend during an appearance on real time with Bill Maher Ann Coulter admitted

that she and countless others in the Republican base had been conned by Donald Trump.

Take a look.

Donald Trump was the guy.

You voted for him, Donald Trump.

And now you're finding.

You're finding out he's a lying.

What was your first clue?

Okay, this is the thing.

Not even.

Okay.

I'm very stupid girl.

Fine.

But that was actually a selling point with Trump.

I mean, you can make fun of me for also writing "In Trump we trust.

E pluribus Awesome.

Alright.

So I know Ann Coulter was not being serious when she says, okay, I'm a stupid girl.

Cause here's the thing.

A coulter is not a stupid person.

She, she honestly is not.

Ann Coulter is very manipulative.

She's very bigoted.

She's a horrible human being.

She is a lot of bad things, but stupid isn't one of them.

You see, Ann Coulter has made her fortune, made a name for herself, tapping into the

anger and rage of the Republican Party and she knows that as long as she continues to

do that, she's gonna make a ton of money and that's what she's done.

She found her niche there.

Whether or not she believes it, I do feel like she believes most of the horrible things

she says, but I also feel like a lot of times she just goes out there to say outrageous

things in order to sell more books because she's smart and she knows how to manipulate

people.

But back to the big point here, she is 100 percent correct.

Also in her assessment that Donald Trump, all these people, and that's something I've

been saying for a long time too, and she actually brought up a lot of the points that I've used

and that is that the wealthy elite people like Donald Trump love cheap immigrant labor.

Donald Trump has never, ever had the actual intention of building this wall.

He knows that's going to hurt his businesses.

He is never going to make it happen.

He is going to consistently failed to get it done and when he does fail, he's just going

to blame the Democrats.

While as soon as the cameras turned off and nobody's looking at him, he's going to breathe

a huge sigh of relief.

We know that at least two of his golf courses up in the northeast have been hiring routinely

illegal undocumented immigrants because they put the emphasis on cheap labor over making

sure somebody is a legal resident of the United States and legally able to work.

We know down in Mar A Lago, they're constantly to get those, uh, h one visas in order to

bring in guest workers for the season.

Donald Trump loves cheap immigrant labor and it is disgusting that these immigrants come

over here and get taken advantage of.

In that way, if they were paid a living wage, if they were treated like human beings, this

wouldn't even be a problem.

I would welcome this because our economy is 100 percent dependent upon immigrants.

We've seen that with his cutting back of the visa program and trying to crack down on immigrants

coming into the United States.

In general, it is crippling small businesses throughout this country.

We need them, but we also have to treat them like human beings and that's the part, you

know, business owners, people like Trump and the wealthy elite, they don't want to do that

part.

They didn't want the cheap labor, but nonetheless, Ann Coulter nailed it there.

Trump is not ever going to build this wall.

She knows it and as long as she keeps saying it, then the base that helped propel Trump

into office is going to know

it

as well.

For more infomation >> Ann Coulter Admits She Was A "Stupid Girl" For Letting Trump Con Her - Duration: 5:40.

-------------------------------------------

Ocasio-Cortez Says Removing Trump Won't Solve All Our Problems - Duration: 4:48.

This past weekend, representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, appeared via Skype at the Sundance

Film Festival to speak after a documentary.

The documentary was called knockdown the house.

It talked about Ocasio-Cortez and several other freshmen members of Congress, all of

them women, and that's basically the point of the film.

They wanted to show how these women overcame these great odds to get into office and during

her skype talk, after the film aired, Ocasio-Cortez made one of the greatest points that I have

been waiting for an elected official to make since the day Donald Trump was elected.

She told the crowd this.

This is her exact words.

This is not just about the president of the United States.

He could be gone tomorrow and that will not change the systemic injustices that led to

his election.

So it's important that we continue to be all hands on deck in this fight.

Now, here's the thing, a lot of us in the progressive media have been talking about

that since day one.

All of the problems that we see, what the Republican Party, all of the racism we've

seen spring up since Trump was elected, Trump is not the cause of any of this.

He is the symptom.

The Republican Party has been leading itself down this path for well over a decade.

Trump is just the end result and he might not even be the end result.

There could be something even worse that follows him, but nonetheless, getting rid of him doesn't

solve the problems.

All it does is put a nicer face on those problems.

Again, we've all been talking about this for years, but it's refreshing to finally see

someone in Congress and elected official come out there and tell us, hey, we know we all

want to get rid of Trump, but that doesn't solve anything.

Yes, he's a horrible person and should be removed.

He likely committed a lot of crimes, but then we still have to deal with the mess.

That is the current incarnation of the Republican Party.

They're still packed with bigots.

They're still trying to take away basic civil rights from American citizens.

They're trying to strip people of their right to vote.

They're trying to decimate the environment.

They're blocking things like Medicare for all the green new deal, a $15 minimum wage.

That is what the Republican Party is today and it would still be that way.

Even if Donald Trump wasn't sitting in the Oval Office.

It would be that way.

If Trump got impeached and was replaced with Mike Pence, we would see absolutely no difference

whatsoever in any of the policies coming out of the Republican Party or the White House.

None.

We would see the same policies in place today had ted Cruz or Marco Rubio won the Republican

primary.

We would see the same if it was Lindsey Graham, except we might actually have a wall completed.

At this point.

Trump is not the cause of the problems within the Republican Party and that is what Ocasio-Cortez

was trying to tell us.

And honestly, it's not just the Republicans as she pulling out the systemic injustices

here in this country.

You know the, the corporate policies that favor men over women, you know the gender

gap in pay, the racial disparities in pay, those things still exist with or without Donald

Trump.

The fact that we have more men in office than women, even though we've got more women as

citizens here in the United States, everything is rigged in favor of white men.

That's just a fact and those are the systemic injustices that are going to exist with or

without Donald Trump and to be honest with or without Republicans calling the shots in

DC.

They have existed for a long time, but this documentary film that she was speaking about

is he showing us that we can overcome that and Ocasio-Cortez Rashida Tlaib and so many

others that just got elected to Congress.

They are living proof that we're not stuck in the systems of the past and that we can

if we work towards it, break out of this cycle

of injustice.

For more infomation >> Ocasio-Cortez Says Removing Trump Won't Solve All Our Problems - Duration: 4:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Has Been Slandering Past Presidents To White House Tour Guests - Duration: 5:12.

According to a new report in the Washington Post that was corroborated by several insiders

in the White House as well as passages from former White House aide, Cliff Sims, new book,

Donald Trump has repeatedly taken people on tours of the White House and lied about what

a horrible person Barack Obama was.

According to the reports, Donald Trump has taken people under the official White House

dining room and it's pointed and said, Barack Obama would sit in here all day every day

watching basketball.

Trump also claims that there was a hole in the wall, the actual hole in the wall that

was somehow caused by the Obama administration.

Maybe Obama got angry watching a basketball game and punched the wall.

Who knows, but Trump's out there telling them, look, Obama put a hole in the wall.

He sat on his ass all day watching basketball.

What a horrible guy.

Now let me show you where I sit on my fat ass all day watching Fox News and tweeting

out nonsense.

I'm sure that part of it never comes up on the tour, but I would love to see that, wouldn't

you?

It was maybe lazy.

Boy, and I'm not talking about the president talking about his chair, probably covered

in Cheeto dust, Doritos all around the floor, like he's a toddler.

Yeah.

I am willing to put my next paycheck that something like that actually exists in the

White House right now, you know, probably about three feet away from a massive TV blaring

Fox News 24 hours a day.

Back to the story though.

He also takes people and points out like, oh, this is where Bill Clinton had that affair

with Monica Lewinsky.

What he's doing, and this is according to multiple sources, including Cliff Sims, is

he's basically just lying about how horrible and disgusting all of the past presidents

were.

He tells people there's a real fly problem when we moved in.

You know, I can't help but feel like this is some kind of attack on Obama just because

he's black, right.

You know, the black guy sits in the dining room and watches basketball all day.

The black guy put a hole in the wall.

The black guy had a real fly problem and turn this place into a quote real dump.

We remember when Trump said that, right, I can't help but feel like there is some very

severe, disgusting racial overtones to these statements, but here's what this is really

about.

This about a man who's so insecure that he's willing to lie about Barack Obama and what

a slob and filthy human being he was.

Now I don't care if you liked Obama's policies or if you didn't.

I didn't like most of his policies.

I don't think he was that great.

He was an incredible centrist and did not do everything that he should have done, but

in terms of being a decent human being and you know, basic maturity and cleanliness,

I think he was probably a really good guy.

I think it was probably a clean guy and I don't believe any of these nonsensical stories

that Trump is apparently telling people on his unofficial White House tours that according

to sources he's done for hundreds of people.

Now, whether or not they believe the stories, he has to tell us another thing, but we shouldn't.

We shouldn't believe a single word that comes out of this man's mouth.

Considering the fact that in two years in office, he's told more than 8,000 lies, Trump

is the disgusting one.

Trump is the slob, and if that White House is in fact a real dump, it's most likely because

of the current inhabitant.

For more infomation >> Trump Has Been Slandering Past Presidents To White House Tour Guests - Duration: 5:12.

-------------------------------------------

PRF Review: Trump wants Puerto Rico to fail - Duration: 11:21.

In today's episode I'll be discussing recent events that highlight how

President Trump not only doesn't care about Puerto Rico's development and

ultimate recovery, he actively opposes it.

My name is Andrew Mercado-Vázquez

you can actually listen to on Patreon, Google Play, iTunes and other platforms.

Now, as I mentioned at the beginning what we're going to be talking about is

recent events that have highlighted how it is that the Trump administration has

become a obstacle in Puerto Rico's development.

Now, the first article we're going to be discussing comes from the Washington Post.

It was published on January 16th and it was written by Tracy Jan, Arelis Hernández,

Josh Dawsey and Damian Paletta.

Now, the title is the following.

Now, you read that title and you think this has nothing to do with Puerto Rico, but it does.

Who is this top HUD official? It's actually none other than

Deputy Secretary Pan Patenaude. She was second-in-command at

the agency led by Ben Carson and was widely regarded as that agency's most

capable political leader. This is a person that has knowledge about her

agency, knows how this agency works and can speak with authority about about it.

Later down the article they talk about different instances that actually led

this person to depart the administration. But in particular to the

Puerto Rico issue they talked about the following and I'm gonna quote.

Now what is was this "concern" from Trump's part?

The article talks about that as well, I'm gonna quote.

"He" being, of course, Donald Trump.

Essentially what this all means is that Donald Trump was worried. What was he worried about?

That when the money that Congress had appropriated for Puerto Rico would

arrive to Puerto Rico, that government officials and other people, apparently, would misuse it.

Okay. You could say that that concern is valid.

Maybe.

But it becomes baseless once we consider the following, and I'm going to quote again from the article.

That's why it becomes baseless. That's why it can't be

just a "concern" from from President Trump. Because you have a HUD

official - second-in-command, not just anybody - telling you that this agency is able to completely

oversee and make sure that the money is used correctly. You don't even have to

trust the people that are gonna receive the money anymore because

your own administration is gonna be able to oversee it. So it becomes baseless, it

becomes empty. That seems to be just a facade that's constructed because of other motivations.

Now, what would these other motivations be?

That question is addressed in a Vox article that was

actually published the next day, January 17th. It's written by Matthew Yglesias (Yglesias with a Y).

This article is properly titled. It's the following.

THAT'S the right way of describing this particular situation.

The article basically talks about the Washington Post article and provides

the same general information. But towards the end the author does some some

reflecting, and I think this type of thought is very important to

highlight, and I'm gonna quote from the article directly.

So what exactly are we looking at here?

In this first example ,what we're looking at is a President that sees Congress

acting in a way favorable to Puerto Rico...and actively stands in its way.

And let's not forget the history that this administration has and the way that

it behaves towards certain segments of society. This author seems to feed from

that when he highlights the possibility that the President and his

administration is behaving, not from a place of general concern but rather from

a place of bigotry, a place of ignorance, a place of racism, or or both.

That's just the first example. The second example comes a little bit more recently.

Actually I think it was during the same time, more or less.

It's highlighted in an article from a local news outlet called El Nuevo Día.

It's an article titled"Trump attempts to block funds for Puerto Rico again" and it's

written by José A. Delgado Robles. This is an interesting article it's talking

about something new that happened. And I'm gonna go ahead and quote from it.

"Emergency nutrition assistance."

We're talking about money that goes to people so they can feed themselves.

The administration - Trump's administration - is opposing this. Why exactly are they

opposing this? Article talks about that as well, I'm gonna go ahead and quote again.

So, money for people to be able to feed themselves "is unnecessary and excessive."

We need to ask ourselves: would this be the same narrative if we

were talking about people that weren't in Puerto Rico, but some some segments of

society or people that lived within one of the 50 states?

We can ask ourselves that question as we read on. I'm gonna quote again.

There's there's the motive. The Trump administration is using

the $600 million dollars that should be

intended for people in Puerto Rico be able to feed themselves as a

playing chip in this push-and-pull that the administration has. We're gonna

go ahead and read one more time from the article, the following and I quote.

And he's talking about beneficiaries from this

nutritional assistance program. So, we're not talking about people getting rich.

We're not talking about people receiving loads of money. These are people that

just receive what's needed in order to buy what they need to survive, to subsist.

We're talking about a situation where the President of the United States first tries to block

Congress itself in appropriating money for disaster relief for Puerto Rico.

And then that same President comes in

and tries to block any effort in regards to Puerto Rico's ultimate development.

Which includes allowing people to receive a little bit more in order to

buy a little bit more food. Because what they receive currently on average is $135 per month.

And these are people in need.

What are we looking at here? We're looking at a series of current events

that basically highlight what we've always thought here at Puerto Rico Forward

and PRF Review. We're dealing with an administration that looks

at the Puerto Rico issue and not only does it ignore it, not only does it just

set it aside and pretend it doesn't exist like other presidents and other

administrations have done, and other congressional bodies have done - both

Republican and Democrat - but we're also seeing something a little bit more egregious.

We're looking at something different.

This administration is trying to prevent Puerto Rico from getting ahead.

It's trying to prevent Puerto Rico from developing and to ultimately recover from a natural disaster.

And that is...

...that's horrible.

Well that's going to be it for today's episode.

As always, thank you for time, thank you for listening, y que viva Puerto Rico.

For more infomation >> PRF Review: Trump wants Puerto Rico to fail - Duration: 11:21.

-------------------------------------------

New Reports Detail Contact President Trump 2016 Campaign Had With Russians | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 2:15.

For more infomation >> New Reports Detail Contact President Trump 2016 Campaign Had With Russians | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

MASSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT ROCK WHITE HOUSE,TRUMP DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER,IT'S ALL OVER - Duration: 10:51.

MASSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT ROCK WHITE HOUSE,TRUMP DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER,IT'S ALL OVER

major news out of the White House trump drops massive nuke on Mueller Robert Mueller's anti-trump

witch-hunt has proved a lot about his flawed character but

he has for many years found himself in the center of shady activities and

the worst thing that Robert Mueller has ever done was just revealed prior to serving as

special counsel for the Department of Justice leading the investigation

into suspected Russian

collusion during the 2016 election Robert Mueller spent a decade as director of the

FBI during his time as

FBI director Mueller found himself at the center of numerous scandals perhaps the most

troubling of those scandals had to do with four men wrongfully imprisoned

in 1965 the four men Louie Greco Henry tame Leo Peter Lee Monet and

Joseph Adi were convicted for murdering a man named Edward Eddie Tegan in an alley during

a bank burglary Deegan the man they were suspected of murdering was a

well known criminal at the time just days after the men were wrongfully

imprisoned in 1965 FBI agents in Boston knew the identities of the actual murderers

despite reporting that information to J Edgar Hoover in Washington a mob hit men was allowed

to falsely testify that the

four men had taken part in the murder while this was all old and troubling history the

four men faced many years in prison the lawyer for Louie Greco who was

wrongfully convicted filed suit to seek a posthumous pardon for his client

Greco was a decorated World War two veteran who was living in Florida at the time of the

murder he was wrongfully convicted of and later died in prison

this is when the nefb I Director Robert Mueller came into the picture after receiving a damning

report proving the innocence of Greco and requesting the posthumous

pardon Mueller directed his agents to oppose the pardon which would

have exonerated all four men because of the objection by the FBI the request was denied

in July of three casting doubt on the possibility of

the wrongfully convicted men having their reputations cleared the family of

Greco was devastated and lost hope in the possibility of having their innocent family

member's name cleared it took over ten years after the initial denial for

the four men to finally be pardoned

and it was with no help from the FBI before leaving office then governor of Massachusetts

deval Patrick chose to pardon the four men in 2014 along with a pardon

the four men or their estates were awarded 102 million dollars any

stigma and disgrace is hereby removedthe governor stated at the time of the pardon even after

being dead for 19 years Greco finally had his name cleared but

despite the fact that he had been dead

Robert Mueller still refused to acknowledge the fact that he was wrongfully convicted

there's no way to know why Robert Mueller would do something

so cruel

it could be because he has no regard for anyone but himself or because he was so willing to

cover for the FBI that he was willing to let the

stain on his record remain whatever the reason this is very likely the worst

thing that Robert Mueller ever did and something he will have to live with for the rest of

his life thank you for watching our video please support

us by sharing this video so youfriends can see it give us a thumbs up

to this video and leave us a comment= below with your opinion on this subject

thank you

No comments:

Post a Comment