Monday, January 28, 2019

Trump news on Youtube Jan 28 2019

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney says President Trump is ready to shut down

the government again if a deal on border security is not reached.

Mick Mulvaney made the remarks on CBS' 'Face the Nation' and comes less than two days after

Trump agreed to reopen the government for three weeks to allow further negotiations.

It ended a 35-day government shutdown - the longest in American history - that saw 800,000

furloughed federal workers miss two paychecks.

Mulvaney said talks may be different this time as Democrats agree with Trump's plan

to better secure the border.

For more infomation >> White House Chief of Staff says Trump is prepared for another government shutdown - Duration: 0:37.

-------------------------------------------

Migrant Caravan BREAKING , TRUMP : Reopen the US government & funding for U.S border wall - Duration: 12:35.

Welcome to USA news today

Please subscribe and check

notification box

To get all breaking news alerts and latest updates on hot cases

For 35 days President Trump announced a three-week spending deal with Democrats to reopen the government no funding for the wall

But Trump said it could close again in mid-february or he might use his emergency powers to start border funding

Funding for the border wall joining us now to analyze the coverage Molly Hemingway senior editor at The Federalist and a Fox News contributor

Beverly Hallberg president of district Media Group and a former television producer and Jessica Tarla of a Fox News

contributor molly new york times a stinging defeat for trump washington post a humiliating low-point Daily Caller Trump caves

Are the press and all the media organs basically writing calling this a tactical defeat for the president?

well

It it just objectively was a defeat the president tried to get a broad border security bill. Not just a barrier

Beds for for people who are coming across the border more personnel

Technology that inter deck interdict drugs 800 million dollars in asylum aid

He didn't get that so it is okay to say that he didn't he didn't do that. Of course

There is a longer story here, which is the government has been reopened

You have dozens of Democrats saying they do want to vote on this now that the government is open

So I think it's it's worthwhile to wait and see how serious people were about wanting border security how willing they are to negotiate

There was a failure at this point

But the larger issues which the vast majority of Americans seem to care about are ongoing and at some point the responsibility

Can't just lie on the president other people have to get involved come back to that one second Beverly

there was an increasingly sharp and intense media focus on the hardships being suffered by

Federal workers and their families and the impact on the economy and the air traffic system

Did that boost the pressure on President Trump to make a deal I think so and you saw the president Trump what he did he?

Tried to show his own people that he was supporting that's border security that's angel families

So it's really a battle of these two narratives and the people that are being hurt

But I do think that long term going back to what Molly was saying

Is that most Americans do want some type of border security?

So while I do think that this definitely looks like a defeat for the president and the short term

I think long term there's a lot more to come

So even though many in the media we're talking about this being a major victory

I don't think that they were focusing on the fact that in three weeks the president may get a little bit more of what he

Wants and so is the press

Celebration of Nancy Pelosi taking if the president could it be premature? Could this look very different in just a few weeks?

Well, it depends what happens

I think that people like Steny Hoyer and Jim Clyburn have been right on message

You know Steny Hoyer saying a border wall is not immoral. That's the wrong word to be using here

Jim Clyburn saying we're going to put together a compromise bill that it does something a smart

Wall, right that has technology and extension of physical barriers in certain places

I don't think that the media

Calling it a win and saying that he caved is wrong because that narrative will hold again if he does shut down the government

unilaterally

Calling a national emergency in three weeks

That will not

Make Republicans happy or Democrats happy and I think that using the stories about hardship and specifically what happened when FAA

Called out sick because of what did it take an hour hour and a half with LaGuardia closed

That the president suddenly was willing to come to the table there

But Mellie the president also taking some flack from the right

And coulter famously said called him like the biggest wimp ever the service president. She's an immigration hard-line HW is worse

Well, anyway, how in your opinion?

She said all right

Does this feel like a double edged loss because the president didn't make either side?

Well, this is a great example

I think of how the media do a good job at covering surface level issues, but rarely at digging deeper

This is a problem going back decades

Trump and Pelosi are not the only figures on the scene you have other people who are responsible for the failure to do what?

American voters have asked for pleaded for

demanded for decades and when you cover it just as a win or loss for Trump versus Pelosi or

Just as a horse race type thing. You see how people get away with not handling this and I think that these are

And I guess there could be some pockets where they maybe disagree a little bit but not very much yeah

About what

Well, I'm gonna see how we do with

Going through Congress don't forget national emergency is going through Congress because that already went through doctors

That's what's so ports. If you read it, it is so clear it is so perfect

I'd rather not do it not for any particular reason other than this should be easy to get approved through Congress

There's the same people that are holding it up have approved it

Just a few years ago and now all of a sudden they're not the reason they're not is because of me hate to say

Because they know they're going to lose in 2020. They'll do anything they can

They want to win

Really large structural issues that require nuanced and deep understanding that frankly

Our media just don't have and even when it comes to the players involved in this failure to secure the border

It's not just Trump and Pelosi

it's also

Senate Republicans who played a key role

Who clearly didn't want to do this fight and whether they will want to in the next several weeks will be interesting to see you

Know just days before the stop cap deal Beverly

The president backed off at giving the State of the Union an alternate side after Nancy Pelosi had said no

You're not welcome to come to the house. He said it was her prerogative all of these headlines

Just taking the Washington Post a rival who can flummoxed Trump a powerful woman named Nancy Pelosi today. The post is back again

Pelosi doesn't mess around speaker emerges triumphant

But there was far less attention to the conservative competition said it was kind of petty

To try to exclude the State of the Union

Yeah, I would agree that I think Nancy Pelosi has every right to do so

There are a lot of people talking about whether or not he should do this

of course from the Senate floor or even when I think optically would be good which is

Maybe on the border and talking to border agents and angel families

So I do think that what the media has turned this into is more of we we don't like Trump

We don't want to

Put him in a favorable light and as Molly was saying we're not getting to the nuance because I mean when you talk about immigration

This is a battle that Republicans have fought over for a very long time and I do think it's valid to ask

Why is this fight now and not in the past two years when Republicans did have the house?

Look, it's obscured by all the you score key figures

Of course that this was just not a good outcome for the country to go 35 days

And get the same deal that basically both sides could have gotten on day one

Yeah

and I think it's important to be pointing that out as journalists to talk about it in those kinds of terms instead of

saying

You know move the State of the Union to the border which turns it into a campaign rally and in the State of the Union

is the one thing happens every year that is actually supposed to be for both sides and

it does have it should have that level of

Magisterium and it should be in the house and I do think it was

Inappropriate for the president to want to do that while the government is shut down

There was pettiness on both sides from you can't come to I'm taking away your military plane

But okay, that's the point that was petting this on both sides, but it was Nancy Pelosi

I think who got all the glowing headlines. Let me move on to Roger stone as you all know

He was indicted in the Moller investigation and obstruction lying to Congress and other

Asks other charges having to do with his dealings his communications with WikiLeaks

During the campaign and trying to find out whether the more hack Democratic emails coming

So there was this incredible mob scene at the courthouse in Florida

And then after Stone proclaimed his innocence he did this media blitz. He was on Stephanopoulos this morning on Friday

He was on Tucker Carlson and also CNN's Chris Cuomo take a look. I

Never discussed this with Donald Trump so speculation tonight by Wolf Blitzer by a prima Hara

by others that Trump

Directed me to do this or directed someone to direct me to do this. So I'm going to say all that speculation is wrong

He's been saying that for a long time

but there is in this indictment sort of person 1 and person 2 and Trump campaigns or the media or like well

These must be really senior people maybe even the president but we don't know that well

And also it actually doesn't even matter who the person is because the indictment doesn't suggest anything to support the underlying

Narrative that has been pushed for several years now, which is treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the election

talking to people about

information that they have already put out and when the next batch is going to come out of negative information is not a crime if

It were the Special Counsel would have indicated that it was a crime that Roger stone a guy who is bragged about

During being a dirty trickster going back to the Nixon era was unable to be gone on anything other than process crimes

Does tell us something interesting and yes, he's a fun character to cover and yes

It's fun to see him coming out of the courthouse that way but we are as journalists

We are required to check that underlying issue was their treasonous collusion with Russia that justifies

Unsettling the campaign unsettling the administration and I'm sorry

but our media are

completely incapable of asking tough questions

Of the special counsel of the FBI of the Department of Justice and this just shows that well, these are process

Crimes, but obstruction of justice lying to Congress are also very serious crimes Jessica and the media right in there

whatever

Whatever is the mysterious dealings between Roger stone this longtime

Gadfly and Julian Assange as people. He was just trying to get a heads-up of what was coming out next

He was an informal Trump advisor. He was according to the indictment in regular contact with the Trump campaign

And now he's charged with not telling truth about this. I do think it is serious

It's not as serious as some people who want the Moller report to come out within the next twenty minutes because they can't just wait

Any more are making it out to be but as more and more

Trump associates who had a role in the campaign and then frankly have been around him for decades

Go down for this and potentially turn into

cooperating witnesses

people who want to turn a blind eye to it and continue to scream witch-hunt are looking more and more absurd and I think that's

What he's going on here and Donald Trump surrounded himself with Liars almost exclusively

It seems Roger stone is accused of that you have you know, Ricky, it's your Paul Manafort there Michael Cohen long list of them

We'll see what happens when they get really used a little more turns into then

I think what the media setting up is guilt by association if the collusion claims don't hold true

So I think that's what's happening as a whole you see either on CNN or MSNBC?

You almost have mug shot style of the people who've been indicted or convicted

Of crimes and they think they're laying out the case already that if collusion doesn't happen

We're gonna do guilt by association the media loving covering stone

I mean, he's a self-described dirty trickster who's been around forever and he goes and there's all these TV interviews

So just on the entertainment value

It's why they love the story. It's fine to cover it. It's good to cover it

But it's also true that this week we learned that there was major obstruction going on at the Department of Justice

And nobody covered it

We learned that they had claimed they had led Congress to believe that they didn't have access to the dossier until just before the election

Sworn testimony before Congress tells us they knew about meetings with Steele going back to July of the campaign

Nobody in the media cares about that

nobody cares that John Podesta

Sat next to the guy who commissioned the dossier and claimed he didn't have any idea where it came from

I agree that lying to Congress is a problem

But you have people lying to Congress all the time

Including James clapper and John Brennan and they don't get charged and so it's important that the media don't just in their hatred for Trump

Take Glee in this without thinking about these institutions of our law enforcement as well. It's been overshadowed

Let me ask you before we go

they've been lay out significant layouts at BuzzFeed and

HuffPost two places not friendly to Trump president treats axe Falls and fake news and bad journals have caused a big downturn

Ben, smith editor BuzzFeed said it was a disgusting thing to say because all these people are losing their jobs your thoughts

I think Trump is often a sore winner and I think this is

You

For more infomation >> Migrant Caravan BREAKING , TRUMP : Reopen the US government & funding for U.S border wall - Duration: 12:35.

-------------------------------------------

¡Trump reabrió el gobierno pero insiste con el muro! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 5:37.

For more infomation >> ¡Trump reabrió el gobierno pero insiste con el muro! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 5:37.

-------------------------------------------

White House Chief of Staff says Trump is prepared for another government shutdown - Duration: 0:41.

acting-wise House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney has says President Trump is

ready to shut down the government again if a deal on border security is not

reached with the Democrats Mick Mulvaney made the remarks on CBS's Face the

Nation and comes in less than two days after Trump agreed to reopen the

government for three weeks to allow further negotiations it ended a 35 day

government shutdown the longest in American history that saw 800,000

furloughed federal workers missed two paychecks Mulvaney said talks may be

different this time as Democrats agree with Trump's plan to better secure the

border

For more infomation >> White House Chief of Staff says Trump is prepared for another government shutdown - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trump casts doubt on seeing a budget deal that he'd accept - Duration: 1:24.

For more infomation >> Trump casts doubt on seeing a budget deal that he'd accept - Duration: 1:24.

-------------------------------------------

After New Caravan Triples In Size, Trump Drops Border Hammer On Them - Duration: 3:20.

For more infomation >> After New Caravan Triples In Size, Trump Drops Border Hammer On Them - Duration: 3:20.

-------------------------------------------

Trump NY Golf Club Discovers Illegal Employees, Promptly Fires Them - Duration: 2:46.

For more infomation >> Trump NY Golf Club Discovers Illegal Employees, Promptly Fires Them - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Organization Fires Dozens Of Undocumented Workers During Border Wall Fight - Duration: 6:07.

Just a few weeks ago, Donald Trump's golf club in New York fired roughly one, doesn't

undocumented immigrants that they had working for them at that organization.

Some of the people had been there for more than 10 years working at this trump golf course

as an undocumented worker for over a decade and the administration, or excuse me, the

organization decided that now January 18th is actually when it happened, would be the

best time to start calling in some of these undocumented workers for private meetings

where they told them that their services would no longer be needed.

Now, as I'm sure you're aware, that was also during the government shutdown when trump

shut down the federal government because he couldn't get funding for his border wall to

keep out undocumented immigrants.

Now, here's the thing, uh, the story Kinda blew up over the weekend a little bit and

a lot of conservatives are saying, well, why is this an issue?

That's a good thing.

He purged these undocumented people.

They shouldn't be working there anyway.

They should fire them.

Yeah.

See, here's the thing though, conservatives, and you conveniently leave this part out.

I'm roughly a month or so ago, a massive bombshell story came out from the New York Times that

talked about how trump's golf course in bedminster was actually falsifying documents for undocumented

immigrant workers so that they could work for that golf club.

We do not yet know if that's what was happening at a New York course as well, but we do know

that it was happening right across the, uh, state over in New Jersey where trump organization

officials were falsifying documents in order to hire illegal immigrants.

Eric trump came out and gave a statement and said, yeah, you know, we, we started to audit

this.

We found these people were going to get rid of them because obviously if you're undocumented,

you can't legally work and we don't want that here at our trump organization.

He then declined to comment on whether or not the trump organization was going to join

into the federal government's everify program, which is a very simple process.

You put in somebody's information and it tells you if they're actually United States citizen.

Multiple companies throughout the United States have signed up for that.

Hundreds, in fact, and it's very easy, you get the person's name, you get whatever information

in the documents they've handed you, and it'll tell you if those documents are false, it'll

tell you if this person's a citizen, it will tell you everything you need to know about

whether or not you are legally allowed to hire this person.

The trump organization isn't a part of that and I wonder why Eric Trump wouldn't say that

they were going to join into that program and I wonder why, and the answer actually

comes from this massive story from a former manager at one of these trump golf courses

where he said that the truth is they were more put, more emphasis on us to find cheap

labor than they did to find legal labor.

In fact, it was more of a, and this is according to former manager a don't ask, don't tell

policy within the trump organization.

Don't ask them if they are undocumented.

Don't tell us if you're undocumented, you're willing to work for cheap, so we're willing

to hire you.

Let's leave it at that.

And that's the thing I've been saying from day one here, uh, you know, people like Donald

Trump, people with the business round table, the Chamber of Commerce, they love illegal

immigration because they understand that those are people they can take advantage of, they

can hire for pennies on the dollar and those people can't get mad about it because they're

illegal aliens.

They can't file a lawsuit because they're not supposed to be over here in the United

States anyway.

They would get in more trouble trying to fight back against these corrupt employers.

So they're forced to just suffer silently, take the abuse and take the low wages.

And that is what American businesses, including the trump organization, thrive upon.

So if you think for one second that Donald Trump has ever been serious about building

the wall, I suggest you look at his organization's own hiring practices because that tells you

everything you need to know about how Donald Trump really feels about illegal immigrants

in the United States.

For more infomation >> Trump Organization Fires Dozens Of Undocumented Workers During Border Wall Fight - Duration: 6:07.

-------------------------------------------

Трамп против ФРС - Duration: 6:45.

Hello, dear friends! I am Professor Panarin Igor Nikolaevich, Doctor of

Political Sciences. Today we will look at the themes of the US federal

reserve. The theme of our video: Trump vs. the Fed.

I remind you that the US Federal Reserve was created

in 1913 by a group of private individuals from London and is still

owned by these London private individuals. Also, once again I will

say that there is a hypothesis that 88

percent of the shares of the US Federal

Reserve belonged to Nicholas II, the Russian emperor. Just the

deprivation of the right of the Russian

emperor to the Fed's management was one of the goals and goals of the

February 1917 Masonic coup d'etat.

But this is a hypothesis; There are facts for there are facts and not

confirming this hypothesis. What is happening today with the US Federal

Reserve System, I emphasize, a private structure? Well, I would like

to remind you that John F. Kennedy, the US president was killed in

Dallas in November 1963 just because of my point of view that he printed

red dollars. We all see green dollars. The green dollars are the US

Federal Reserve dollars, which the London-based bankers have imposed

on the US state. Kennedy wanted to liberate the United States, but was

shot dead, and the next day the red dollars were destroyed. And now Trump

has been fighting the US Federal Reserve since coming to power in the

USA and now this fight has entered the public sphere. He remembers

Kennedy's experience and tries to act more flexibly and yet in December

2018 the fight between them went into

the public sphere. What is the matter?

In that Trump, thanks to his

energetic line on fulfilling his election

commitments, achieved US economic

growth of 3 percent. But the US Federal

Reserve, despite repeated calls from Trump himself, from the end of

November to the end of December, raised the interest rate four, four,

think about it. This hinders economic growth, in principle, hinders the

implementation of those programs,

goals and objectives that are implemented

by US President Donald Trump. And after the second increase, Donald

Trump publicly declared the Fed the main enemy of America. Not LIH,

not Russia, not Kit, but namely the Fed. That's right: "The Federal

Reserve is the main enemy of the

United States"; and urged not to raise

further the interest rate, which was ignored. And on December 20, for

the fourth time, I emphasize, in a month that the kingdom was made

unprecedentedly anti-Tramp and

anti-economic decision against the rise

of US industrial production. After that, Trump told the press that he

was going to dismiss the director of the US Federal Reserve System, which,

at the beginning of January 2019, said that "I will not resign myself

and will continue the same line". The most curious thing is that

Jerome Powell is the head of the US Federal Reserve, who was recently

appointed by Trump more than a year ago, and seemed to be listening to

Trump's voice. But, nevertheless, this

did not happen. What does this mean? The fact that the clash of two

groups: the nationally oriented

industrial capital of the United States,

which is represented by Donald Trump, and the financial globalists, who

are controlled from London, the "third Carthage", approached such a

tough confrontation point, behind which

only two scenarios are possible: either Donald Trump will put Hillary

Clinton and all these liberal globalists, financial, first of all,

behind bars, and he has the basis for this, or they will organize the

impeachment of Donald Trump and, in fact, suppress the uprising of the

industrialists of the nationalist

flax-based capital. What are the chances

of winning Donald Trump? I would

rate them as 60 to 40. Why? We recently

had a video about Trump's alliance with the Bush clan. For a long

time, hesitation was 50 to 50, and here Trump's decisions related to the

victory of Cavanaugh, the Supreme Court claimant and Trump's clear

supporter, now have an advantage in the US Supreme Court on Trump's side

and an alliance with the Bush clan. conditions for Trump to win in this

fiercest bout of financial globalists.

The control center is located in London.

And London itself is in front of the abyss and on March 19 there

will be a separate point, and maybe already the final point, of

the London financial crisis. So my sympathy is definitely on the side

of Trump. I would like to wish him success, because this success will

create more positive conditions for

the economic prosperity of our country

- Russia. Thanks for attention!

For more infomation >> Трамп против ФРС - Duration: 6:45.

-------------------------------------------

Republicans Try To Distance Themselves From Trump's Government Shutdown - Duration: 4:18.

Well, it's the first Monday following the government reopening this past week, the end

of the week.

So a lot of furloughed workers are returning to work today, national park starting to reopen

after the cleaning process begins.

Uh, but what's really interesting is the fact that Republicans over the weekend, we're attempting

to distance themselves from the government shutdown that lasted 35 days and became the

longest in US history.

You had people like Susan Collins and Marco Rubio going on the Sunday talk shows, trying

to say, listen, we shouldn't ever shut down the government.

It's a bad negotiating tactic.

It never works.

And usually it hurts the people who instigated it.

Uh, you know, that's actually what Marco Rubio said.

It hurts the people who instigated it.

So Rubio, there is admitting Donald Trump instigated it.

Republicans instigated it and they lost big time.

So he and Susan Collins are out there saying, look, we shouldn't ever do this again.

This is bad policy.

Nobody likes this.

Let's, let's move on.

And then you have people like Mick Mulvaney, you have Kevin McCarthy, the House minority

leader.

You have Ted Cruz.

Those folks are out there trying to distance themselves from the shutdown in another way.

They're actually blaming the Democrats for the shutdown even happening there.

Just abdicating all responsibility and saying, look what these Democrats did to you.

Ignore the video that's still viral right now with Trump saying he'll own the shutdown

and he's going to shut it down and he'll take the blame and it's all on him.

Forget that.

That even happened.

Let's just keep calling it Schumer shut down.

In fact, let's make a clever little Hashtag of Schumer shut down, which is what Ted Cruz

did.

It's what Mick Mulvaney was saying.

He said Republicans were the only ones who were trying to bargain seriously here.

McCarthy said that Donald Trump was doing a great job with his negotiating tactics.

Yeah, that's not true.

None of this is true.

Your Guy Lost Your guys shut down the government.

Your guy and your party repeatedly refused to take up democratic passed legislation that

would have reopened the federal government and given furloughed workers their back pay.

That was all you.

You did that, but right now what we're witnessing is republicans attempting to rewrite history

specifically the last 40 days or so.

They want us to think that it was either the Democrats' fault that had happened or that

every republican who joined in it really regrets it and they'll never do it again and they've

learned their lesson and they're going to move on.

The truth is that we're only three weeks away from another government shutdown.

The Democrats are not going to budge and they should not budge.

Nancy Pelosi, you know, a lot of people had concerns about her becoming how speaker, again,

I was one of them and I will freely admit that and I will also freely admit that I guess

on this particular issue I was wrong.

Nancy stood up.

She stood her ground and she forced Trump into a corner and he was forced to back down.

So I am proud of Nancy Pelosi for that.

I'm proud of everything she has done during this shutdown and I hope that she continues

it and I hope that three weeks from now when Trump understands he will not get the funding

for that wall.

We do not go through another, another government shutdown and he decides to cut his losses.

Tell aunt ann coulter to basically go live in a hole somewhere because nobody wants to

hear from you and we're going to get by with government as usual.

That's what needs to happen.

Trump needs to turn off the Fox News.

He needs to stop listening to Ann Coulter.

Stop letting rush limbaugh tell them what to do and he needs to do what's best for this

country and what the American public wants.

And that is to not shut down the government.

And more importantly, not build a wall of steel slats along our southern border.

For more infomation >> Republicans Try To Distance Themselves From Trump's Government Shutdown - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

Author Claims Trump Tried To Bribe Reporter To Reveal Leakers - Duration: 5:10.

So the new book team of Vipers by Cliff simms is supposed to be hitting bookstores this

coming Tuesday, January 29th, but as is often the case, as we've seen last two years, anytime

one of these new tell all books about the Trump administration comes out, a reporters

get their hands on the copies, they release excerpts, they talk about things that happened

in the book and we've got another one of those that I feel is worthy of sharing.

Again, if you're not familiar.

We had talked about this before.

Cliff sims worked on the Trump campaign and then he worked in the Trump white house until

this past May.

So he was a guy who was there during the campaign.

He was there during the administration.

He saw a lot of things, he remembered a lot of things and he wrote a lot of things.

But today one of the things we want to talk about is the fact that according to Sims,

one of the accounts, he talks about his books, is it Donald Trump was absolutely obsessed

with the media coverage of him.

And here's the thing though, that Sim says he didn't care if it was good or bad, he just

wanted there to be coverage.

He likes to talk a lot about fake news and how they're so mean to him.

But at the same time he thrives off of people just talking about him and saying his name.

But there is one paper, he did care what they wrote about him and that was the New York

Times.

Obviously Trump's in New Yorker, he wants to know what his hometown paper has to say

about him.

And that is why according to this account from Simms, Trump was on the phone with a

prominent White House reporter trying to get the reporter to give up their sources inside

the administration.

Because Trump was also obsessed with finding the leakers, wanted to know who the hell they

were.

And so when the reporter wouldn't give up the names of their sources inside the White

House, Trump said, well, here's the deal.

My offer you this.

I'm going to bribe you a bit here.

I'll give you better stories than any of those people could give you.

So you tell me who it is and then from now on I'll be the one feeding you stories and

you'll be getting it straight from me.

So you know you can believe it.

Luckily the reporter said, yeah, I don't believe that at all.

So I'm not going to tell you who the names of these people are.

Have a wonderful day.

Talk to you later.

So Trump tried to bribe this reporter by saying, how give you all the stories you.

I'll give you all the dirt and this White House.

Just tell me, tell me who my leakers are.

Tell me who the bad ones are.

Who can I trust?

Who can not trust?

I think that's hilarious and I think that is exactly how this conversation probably

went down, but if you think that's bad, it actually gets a lot worse because it turns

out that one of the people who is apparently been leaking some stories, at least according

to Cliff sims and according to a previous reporting, is Kellyanne Conway.

You see, according to Sims, most people in the White House did not like Kellyanne Conway.

They didn't know why she was what she did or why she even existed, but she did and they

had to deal with it, but even Donald Trump himself came to a point where he didn't exactly

trust Kellyanne Conway.

So according to one account by Sims a, he took her Mac book and was looking on it and

found messages were Kellyanne Conway was badmouthing the administration.

She was sending it to the New York Times, CNN and the Washington Post, you know, the

three top ones that Trump loves the call fake news, Kellyanne Conway.

Again, that is, if this account is accurate, and I hate having to say that because you

got to say that about everything nowadays, but according to Cliff Sims, that 100 percent

happened.

Trump took Kellyanne Conway's Mac book, saw these messages that she's sending out to these

other news outlets and probably wasn't too happy.

Uh, but you know, they say she was playing a double game, you know, trying to tell Trump

like, oh, I'm out here doing my best for you.

And also like, Hey, media outlets, look how stupid all these idiots are.

Wow.

And again, we have seen Kellyanne conway do things like that in the past where she has

attempted to say something bad about somebody and then tried to tell the reporter, like,

by the way, put that down as from an anonymous source, but the reporter said, you've already

been telling me things and you didn't tell me that beforehand.

So I'm not going to do it.

I don't have to.

So again, both of these stories from the book seem incredibly plausible, but you know, anything

coming from anyone who spent a couple years working for Donald Trump kind of have to take

it with a grain of salt because you don't survive that long working for a comprehensive,

you know, disgusting Liar, without picking up a few of their bad habits.

For more infomation >> Author Claims Trump Tried To Bribe Reporter To Reveal Leakers - Duration: 5:10.

-------------------------------------------

Why Trump Won - Duration: 5:23.

I was elected to the Parliament of Canada seven times—three times as Prime Minister.

I did not expect Donald Trump to be elected President of the United States.

But unlike most observers, I did think it was at least possible.

Why?

Because I sensed, as Mr. Trump surely did, that the political landscape had shifted.

The underlying issue is this: Over the last few decades, thanks to globalization, a billion

people—mostly in the emerging markets of Asia—have lifted themselves out of poverty.

This, of course, is a good thing.

Yet, in many Western countries, the incomes of working people have stagnated or even declined

over the same period.

In short, many Americans voted for Donald Trump because the global economy has not been

working for them.

We can pretend that this is a false perception.

We can keep trying to convince people that they misunderstand their own lives.

Or we can try to understand what they are saying and offer some solutions.

I prefer the latter approach.

Let me begin with this:

In our contemporary world, there are, as British journalist David Goodhart describes it, those

who can live "Anywhere," and those who live "Somewhere."

Imagine you work for an international bank, computer company, or consulting firm.

You can wake up in New York, London, or Singapore and feel at home.

Your work is not threatened by import competition or technological dislocation.

You vocally support all international trade agreements and high levels of immigration.

You are one of those who can live Anywhere.

There are a lot of those people.

But there are a lot more completely unlike them.

Let's say you're a factory worker, a small-businessperson, or in retail sales.

Your work has been disrupted by outsourcing, cheap imports and technological change.

Your children attend the local schools and your aging parents live nearby.

Your social life is connected to a local church, sports team, or community group.

If things go badly at your company, or if policy choices by politicians turn out to

be wrong, you can't just shift your life to somewhere else.

Like it or not, you depend on the economic policies of your national or state government.

When it doesn't come through for you, you're not happy.

And when it ignores you entirely, you get angry.

It's easy for Anywheres to dismiss these concerns.

But the Anywheres' faith in global solutions and multi-national political bodies is founded

more on fantasy than fact.

The fact is, the critical functions of laws and regulations and monetary and fiscal stability,

among other things, are provided by nations, not global institutions.

The nation, with all its flaws, is a concrete reality.

The "global community" is little more than a concept.

Yet it is the Anywheres, with their faith in globalization—not the Somewheres—who

have dominated the politics of almost every advanced country.

That is, until now.

This sea-change is not limited to the United States.

The same dynamics—"Anywhere" elites versus "Somewhere" populists—is playing

out all across the Western world.

These populists, as I've tried to show, are not the ignorant and misguided "deplorables"

depicted in mainstream media.

They are our family, friends, and neighbors.

The populists represent, by definition, the interests of ordinary people.

And, in a democratic system, the people are supposed to be our customers.

So, how then can we best serve them?

I propose an approach I call "populist conservatism."

Grounding ourselves in tried and true conservative values, we must speak to the issues that concern

the Somewheres and their families—those of ordinary people, not elites.

Those issues include market economics, trade, globalization, and immigration.

In addressing these issues, conservatives should remain pro-free market, pro-trade,

pro-globalization and pro-immigration.

Going in a completely opposite direction in any of these areas is a mistake.

But being pro-market does not mean that all regulations should be dismantled or that governments

should never intervene to protect workers.

Being pro-trade does not imply that every trade agreement is a good one.

Being pro-globalization should not entail abdicating loyalty or responsibility

to our country and our local communities.

And being pro-immigration should never mean sanctioning illegal immigration, erasing our

borders, or ignoring the interests of our citizens.

I call this "populist conservatism," but it's really just conservatism.

Conservatism is about seeing the world as it is.

It's also inherently populist because it is about serving real people rather than theories.

I'm Stephen Harper, author of Right Here, Right Now: Politics and Leadership in the

Age of Disruption, for Prager University.

For more infomation >> Why Trump Won - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's DOJ Narrows Definitions Of "Sexual Assault" And "Domestic Violence" - Duration: 4:02.

Recently, the Justice Department's Office on violence against women did something that

is incredibly bizarre and incredibly damaging for women here in the United States, and what

they did was they rewrote and narrowed the definitions of domestic violence and sexual

assault.

It's not really clear at the moment why they decided to do this, but we do know that during

the Obama administration, the definitions of these two things, sexual assault, domestic

violence were broadened a little bit.

They included more things including for domestic violence, psychological abuse and manipulation,

things that experts in domestic violence counselors, therapists, law enforcement people say are

absolutely part of domestic violence.

In fact, those are usually the beginnings of worst domestic violence to come.

If somebody engages, a spouse, engages in psychological abuse or manipulation, they

do eventually most of them escalate into physical violence, and if that is not stopped, that

could eventually and frequently does escalate into homicide.

The Obama administration heard from these experts, they talk to these experts and that's

why they broadened that definition because they recognize that as a threat to women here

in this country, the trump administration has decided to do away with that from now

on, coordinator the Justice Department's own definitions.

Domestic violence is just hitting or kicking or, you know, doing something physical to

them to cause them physical harm, psychological abuse.

Now, okay, they don't care about that.

You do that?

Sure.

Whatever manipulation go forward.

We don't care.

Just don't hit her sexual assaults even worse.

Uh, they have narrowed the definition of sexual assault to only include here we find it, uh,

any nonconsensual sexual act, the Obama administration, their definition was sexual assault is any

type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient

falling out of the definition of sexual assault or sexual activities as for sexual intercourse,

forceable, sodomy, child molestation, incest, fondling and attempted rape.

There's just any nonconsensual sexual act.

It's not going to include groping, fondling, you know, verbal threats or humiliation.

None of that things that women experience all the time.

In this country and that experts have told us half to be included in these definitions,

but the trump administration for some reason to just do away with this and that to me is

the.

The weirdest part of this is why this doesn't seem like something that they needed to do,

and yet they did it and it shows one of two things to me.

Either they're trying to cover their own asses to make sure nothing bad happens to them in

the future or their buddies in the future seems plausible, unlikely, or the other, which

is also plausible and incredibly likely is that they just hate women so much that they

are willing to let them go through a little bit more hell in their lives just because

they have the authority to do so.

Whichever one of those two reasons are correct, it's an absolute disaster and a threat to

every woman in the United States.

For more infomation >> Trump's DOJ Narrows Definitions Of "Sexual Assault" And "Domestic Violence" - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

Joe: Donald Trump's Phony Crisis Created A Real National Security Risk | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 11:30.

For more infomation >> Joe: Donald Trump's Phony Crisis Created A Real National Security Risk | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 11:30.

-------------------------------------------

GAME OVER! Some House Dems BETRAYS Pelosi & SUPPORT Trump's Wall! President Trump WINS HUGE(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 11:48.

GAME OVER! Some House Dems BETRAYS Pelosi & SUPPORT Trump's Wall! President Trump WINS HUGE

welcome back president Trump doubles down on his demands for a border wall as

he calls on Democrats to restart negotiations on funding the government

past February 15th a new number of House Democrats appear to be supporting the

idea of at least a vote on wall funding one of them joins me right now Utah

Democratic congressman ben mcadams he's a member of the House Financial Services

Committee and the Blue Dog Coalition congressman it's nice to have you on the

program this morning thanks so much for being here Thank You Maria good to be

with you you were among 30 House Democrats who sent Nancy Pelosi a letter

urging her to give Trump a vote on the wall funding tell me what you think

would come out of that vote you know first and foremost what the the purpose

of that letter was to say that the shutdown is doing no good for anybody

we're harming the US economy we're risking a recession we're harming the

federal employees who are just working to put food on the table and let's open

the government there are processes in the in the Congress in our government

laid out by the founders to have debates like this that's what Congress has

intended to do so let's open the government and then let's have this

negotiation the president has a proposal that should be heard in the Congress we

should debate it and we should work to build common ground and try and move

forward a solution on border security on immigration reform and let's go through

the proper channels of the Congress that that are built and intended to have this

exact conversation but let's not do it in the context of a shutdown that harms

the American people that harms our economy and risks the pocketbooks of

every American what I'm trying to better understand is really the makeup of the

new Congress because of course we know that there's a pocket of Democrats who

just want the president out and much of it is politics and they are resisting

anything that he would like we know that Nancy Pelosi and many of her colleagues

voted for a wall and voted for wall fencing years ago many times we know

that there's a wall right now a border wall in Nancy Pelosi zone state of

California separating Tijuana and San Diego but because President Trump has

the idea it's resist resist resist so you come from a red state you beat out

your your opponent on the Republican side do you think

a movement within your new Congress to actually get things done putting

politics aside and not necessarily resisting everything the president says

because you don't like his personality absolutely you know there are a lot of

me and my colleagues who were elected this last year a lot of us are just

pragmatist who just want to get something done before I was elected to

Congress I was a mayor and mayor's just have this attitude of okay what can we

do to move forward to solve the problem as a Democrat in a very red state I

never got anything done unless I could reach out and build bridges across the

aisle so as long as the debate is focused on you know as long as we're

defining a win is meaning somebody else loses we're never gonna have consensus

so we've got to find that win win and I don't know at this time what the win

looks that win win looks like but we have to find it and I know that a lot of

my freshman colleagues are moderates who want to find that win win that probably

we should look at some things to address immigration reform and dreamers I think

is something important permanent protections for dreamers but also border

security as a mayor I saw illegal drugs and and the impacts of that in my in my

city and I want to do more to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the end of

the country so I think there's a lot of common ground and I think the way to

approach this and the way that I would approach it if I was mayor is to say you

know there's a conversation a debate about wall or no wall let's step back

from that conversation where there's it's divided divisive and let's talk

about what we have in common let's find that thread of commonality amongst

Republicans and Democrats I think the threat of commonality is we all want to

protect the border we can find common ground on that so in some places that's

going to mean technology other places in other ways immigration reform and in

some places it may mean a barrier and I think if we step back and reframe the

conversation about protecting the border and what can we do and what's the most

effective way to do that instead of debating a wall or no wall let's debate

border security and I think there's a lot of common ground yeah I think you

make a lot of good points because there are areas of the country where they're

wide open and perhaps maybe you don't need an actual fence or wall there

because you can use technology and drones they're wide open areas that if

illegals come in you can actually apprehend them easily because it's so

wide open but then there are areas like the wall we've been looking

at in Nancy Pelosi state separating Tijuana from San Diego where you have a

very dense population three million people on one side of the wall through a

Tijuana another three million people on the other side of the wall in San Diego

so what is your thoughts in terms of how much is needed for actual barrier on the

southern border and will you vote YES for wall creation and more wall

extension of what we're seeing in this picture so what I've tried to do is not

draw any lines in the sand I want to vote to say have border protection to

have border security to reduce the flow of drugs and evil even illegal

immigration that may include a barrier sure I wouldn't rule out

barriers and places where it's appropriate I think that's I think

that's acceptable but let's have this conversation in the context of committee

hearings at the Congress with a goal of finding common ground I also think one

of the things we can do to protect the border is to reduce illegal immigration

by fixing a broken immigration system if we can make sure that those good people

who are who are just looking for a job our economy is asking to brainian

workers let's find it let's make it easier for them to immigrate legally so

they're not tempted to cross the border illegally so I think part of it part of

the border part of the border protection strategy has to be fixing a broken

immigration system our laws do you feel that you have a voice I mean I know that

you did not support Nancy Pelosi's bid to become the speaker for a second time

do you feel like you're being listened to you will you have the influence with

these practical ideas that you're putting forth I think so I mean we're

just up getting up and going as a congress right now I've been pleasantly

surprised at people both on the Republican side and even more

progressive on the Democratic side who who I felt that my voice is welcome

let's let's hope that as we go into this negotiation people can allow all voices

to be at the table some of the pragmatists can on both

sides of the aisle again can really push for common ground and trying to find

that you know that solution that will really garner a majority of support in

Congress and help us to to reopen the border I'm somebody who you know we're

gonna have disagreements from time to time but once one disagreements behind

us we move to the next issue we try and find common ground we

don't carry baggage forward for debate to debate and that's how I'd go into

this the same way we've got that behind us let's go further disagreements that

are also radical on the economic side of things you're on the Financial Services

Committee what are your thoughts on Elizabeth Warren's idea to confiscate

income to put attacks on overall assets and wealth or Alexandrian costea's idea

of having a seventy percent tax rate for the top earners well I think I've

jokingly said before if you if people think that there are only two political

parties in this country watch the Financial Services Committee over the

next several years you're gonna see a broad array of people across the

political spectrum you're gonna see someone on the more progressive side

like representative Ocasio Cortez myself who's you know a moderate a centrist

that believes in in the power of business and markets properly regulated

of course to make sure their protections for for consumers and individuals that

the power of markets can really do a lot of good and has done all that force high

earners to hide income where you won't get the revenue anyway will it change

behavior in terms of philanthropy will it what do you think that does to an

economy if you see those kinds of tax rates seventy percent tax on on assets

and wealth I'm not kidding you know I'm not convinced that a seventy percent tax

rate is the way to go any time you have you know tax policy drives behavior and

so we you know that's not a direction I think we should go in as a country I

we should look you know what's what behavior are we in trying to drive and

what is good for the American economy and good for the American people I'm

sure when you make a lot of good points we so appreciate your time this morning

thank you sir Thank You Maria congressman ben mcadams there president

Trump and Democrats reaching a three-week deal to end the longest

government shutdown in history it does not include funding for a border wall as

the president had demanded House Minority Whip Louisiana Republican

Congressman Steve Scalise joins me right now and Congressman it is a pleasure to

see you thanks so much for joining us good morning Maria always great to be

back with you do you expect to have border wall funding in the next three

weeks before the next deadline I sure hope it's gonna be part of a final

agreement and you know while President Trump said we're going to give you

another three weeks kind of call in the Democrats Bluff who were saying we won't

negotiate on while while the while the government's closed

okay now the government's reopened we have to have a real specific

conversation about how much money they will support president said and it's not

the president it's our experts who protect the border

who say it's gonna cost 5.7 billion for all the technology including wall what

are the Democrats willing to support they're gonna have to put a real number

to paper now in these next three weeks Maria so what do you think they will

support I know that you've actually had support from your colleagues on the

other side some college on the other side but is the Democratic Party facing

its own division where part of it is to part of the party is just resist resist

resist whatever the president comes up with yeah I think we were starting to

see fissures and in fact you saw even the House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer

saying physical barriers should be part of the solution you had committee

chairmen on the Democrat side saying give the president the money for the

wall and so I think this growing drumbeat got Pelosi nervous but at the

same time she's gonna now have to confront it because in every negotiation

I've been in when we've had meetings in the White House with the president when

pressed on what what about a money will she support she always said I won't talk

about numbers while the government's shut down okay now the government's back

open it's time to get serious about these negotiations hopefully there is a

State of the Union that happens in the next two weeks which I think there will

be and the president can make even a stronger case to the rest of the country

because it's that growing support across the country that ultimately will push

more Democrats to our side no wait a minute what do you mean that you think

there will be a State of the Union the American people want a State of the

Union the State of the Union was supposed to be this Tuesday it feels

like Nancy Pelosi has bested the president obviously she now forced him

to not have the State of the Union this week I'm being told it's going to be

February 5th is the State of the Union happening on February 5 well the the

Nancy Pelosi was holding the state in the Union hostage and ultimately the

speaker has to invite the president the Constitution requires the president to

give a State of the Union doesn't mean it has to be in Congress but it ought to

be in Congress and in Moorea I'm hearing similar things that February 5th is

likely the date but all that's something that's up to the

speaker the house if it's going to be in the House chamber which it should be I

thought it was disgraceful that she removed the State of the Union from the

invitation that she had already issued to the president to say that she was

going to uninvite him it had never happened before in the history of our

country I think Nancy Pelosi is afraid of the country hearing this message that

the president has about why we need to secure the border

Kandra stay with us we're gonna slip in a short break I've got more to talk with

you about this situation it certainly feels like politics House Minority Whip

Steve Scalise thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> GAME OVER! Some House Dems BETRAYS Pelosi & SUPPORT Trump's Wall! President Trump WINS HUGE(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

SENADOR REVELA QUE TRUMP DISCUTIU ATAQUE MILITAR À VENEZUELA - Duration: 3:18.

For more infomation >> SENADOR REVELA QUE TRUMP DISCUTIU ATAQUE MILITAR À VENEZUELA - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump Poll Numbers Slip As He Ups Pressure For A Deal | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 9:23.

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump Poll Numbers Slip As He Ups Pressure For A Deal | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 9:23.

-------------------------------------------

IT'S HAPPENING!! DID YOU SEE! TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH THE UNTHINKABLE ACT! - Duration: 14:24.

IT'S HAPPENING!!

DID YOU SEE!

TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH THE UNTHINKABLE ACT!

breaking news night we start this morning before sunrise heavily armed FBI agents dressed

in full tactical gear surrounding the home of a 66

year old man drawing their weapons pounding on the door and they took him into

custody now this was not a

suspected murderer drug kingpin not a part of the mob no this was Roger stone accused

of making a false statement to Congress stone is just the latest

American to be persecuted by Robert Miller's witch-hunt because of his connection

to President Trump now coming up tonight longtime Roger stone

confidant and fellow mulher target he's identified as person number one in this indictment jerome

corsi he will join us for an exclusive interview but first big news

we start with the partial government shutdown President Trump

announced today that after 35 days a deal has been reached to reopen the government

temporarily until February

the 15th he's given Congress now three weeks to agree on legislation to build

the wall secure our borders and he was speaking earlier today from the Rose

Garden and here's what the president had to say it's just common sense walls work that's

why most of the Democrats in Congress have voted in the past four bills that include

walls and physical barriers and very powerful fences these barriers are made

of Steel have seeped through visibility which is very important and

are equipped with sensors monitors and cutting-edge technology right in our Hannity watch segment

we have the real behind-the-scenes story nobody else in the

media will tell you numerous Democrats both in the House and

the Senate for the last two weeks they have been speaking to their Republican colleagues

they have been asking them to

broker this three-week opportunity to support the wall and negotiate other parties like

another issues like daca and dreamers they've been begging their Republican

colleagues to make that deal with the president so the president well

he showed leadership rose above the partisan bickering in the swamp or bring relief to

federal workers all

while sticking to his commitment to secure our border now the president was very clear

no ambiguity in three weeks if Congress cannot do their job secure a deal

to protect our borders then the president will do what he lawfully has

the right to do and that's declare a national emergency and he will be

building the wall with funds that he allocates most likely from the Defense Department this

is indeed a real crisis in three weeks he will declare a national

emergency and look at what the president's done up till now he's

offered concessions things the Democrats say they wanted daca dreamers TPA he's standing

up for life versus death to him

he's been arguing safety and security for the people of this country but tonight we

have to ask ourselves this question what are the Democrats what are the

Nancy and Chuck been standing up for actually nothing

there's no position here they have only been placating what is now the radical extreme

base of the socialist Democratic

Party of today and all they do is fuel their daily anti Trump rage and hate ask that question

of tonight Democrats what did they do they went on vacation the president

stayed at the White House luxurious junkets really paid for by

lobbyists while the president stays at the White House refusing invitation after invitation

to sit down with the president who's saying I'm willing to work

with you I'll work on Doc I'll work on dreamers but we've got to secure the

border to save the lives of our fellow countrymen because of the problem with open borders now

these other Democrats privately they have been going behind the

leadership in their own party asking leaders like Lindsey Graham and others

hey help us get this period where we can try to get this job done they want the wall as

well but they're just not

telling Schumer and Pelosi if not they know the president will declare that national emergency

now the president to his credit he has tried every single thing

he could possibly do he has been reasonable he has been fair

he's offered concessions but in the end it's his job as commander-in-chief to keep us safe

he'll do his job

so now Congress they have their three weeks to do their job and secure our border Democrats

we need Republicans they to remember the facts now we have built

so far 654 miles of border wall over the

last 15 years with notable results for example the wall in Yuma Arizona after it went from

5 miles to 60 Plus miles well that led to a 91% drop in crime remember

Democrats they actually used to be for strong borders just a few years

ago that's when Obama was president actually if they sounded more like Trump

than Trump before they were consumed with all this anti Trump hate and rage every day

take a look people who enter the United States without our permission are

illegal aliens and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who entered

the US legally to so many

Americans we do not want the wall to be a symbol of America much preferring the Statue

of Liberty be that simple all of us agree that we need to have comprehensive

bipartisan immigration reform that can only begin strong border

control we must have that we must control our borders is an immorality it's not who

we are as a nation walls work but we've got to finish the job I've

said so many times on this program the cost of a porous border they're

enormous and it's growing more serious every single day human trafficking drug trafficking

gangs cartels it is a life-and-death situation talk to angel moms

and Angel dads talk to the parents that have lost their kids

because of the opioid crisis and then to make matters worse another ten thousand person

migrant Caravan right now as we speak is headed our way so you say tonight

to Chuck and Nancy all right behind your back your fellow Democrats

they want that wall they also want to deal with daca they want to solve problems they

want solutions will you work for it now you can either work with this

president do what's right for the country or the American people will see

you for who you are just obstructionist hating a president and anyone out there by the way

thinking president Trump cave today you don't really

know that Donald Trump I know he right now holds all the cards he will

secure the border one way or another and what President Trump works hard to solve

serious issues of life death facing the country well we do have another issue tonight Hannity

watch on

the deep state robert muller and his merry band of democratic donors they continue their

quest literally to destroy the lives of everyone and anyone that's

associated with Donald Trump today Roger stone was their latest

target our own trace Gallagher has the very latest pre-dawn raid on the Fort Lauderdale

home of longtime president Trump confidant Roger stone began with the

FBI shouting opened the door it ended with stone being led away in handcuffs the seven

count indictment is

the first criminal case in months from special counsel robert muller and alleges that senior

members of the trump campaign tried to benefit from the release

by wikileaks of hacked democratic emails damaging to the

Clinton campaign Stone called the special counsel politically motivated and vowed to

fight the charges

saying

he

No comments:

Post a Comment