Trump news on Youtube Sep 20 2018

Donald Trump gave James Comey and the FBI some very bad

news.

Trump is exposing their Deep State secrets to the public.

And he is releasing the smoking gun that will take down Comey and the anti-Trump FBI for

good.

Donald Trump Shocks The Deep State Trey Gowdy and Devin Nunes pushed Trump to

declassify documents about the FBI's efforts to spy on Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

They believe releasing them will show the public that the FBI ran a politically motivated

witch hunt against Trump.

Trump had already ordered the DOJ to release their warrant application to spy on Page.

It showed that the FBI had used the fake news Christopher Steele dossier as the basis for

spying on Page.

However, 20 pages of the application were still blacked out.

Critics Claim A Conspiracy Critics believe the FBI hid those 20 pages

to keep the public from knowing just how badly the Bureau abused its powers.

They contend the FBI was protecting Comey and his allies from scrutiny as opposed to

protecting national security.

Trump's allies urged the President to make the documents public.

The media spent months lying about Trump and journalists claimed Trump was making up the

idea of a Deep State.

They falsely reported that it did not exist.

A Big Problem For James Comey

Trump's allies in Congress cheered the move.

They have spent months pressing him to take this action.

Congressman Mark Meadows tweeted: TRANSPARENCY WINS.

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY THE RIGHT CALL FROM @POTUS.

IT'S TIME TO GET THE FULL TRUTH ON THE TABLE SO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES

ON WHAT HAPPENED AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THEIR FBI AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.

TRANSPARENCY IS A GOOD THING.

IF WE ARE PROTECTING SOURCES AND METHODS IN THESE DOCUMENTS, AMERICANS DESERVE TO KNOW

THE FULL TRUTH.

BOTTOM LINE: IF PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO HIDE THIS INFORMATION FROM YOU, IT SAYS FAR MORE

ABOUT THEM THAN IT DOES THE PRESIDENT OR ANYONE ELSE.

Transparency wins.

This is absolutely the right call from @POTUS.

It's time to get the full truth on the table so the American people can decide for themselves

on what happened at the highest levels of their FBI and Justice Department.

Transparency is a good thing.

If we are protecting sources and methods in these documents, Americans deserve to know

the full truth.

Bottom line: If people are trying to hide this information from you, it says far more

about them than it does the President or anyone else.

Comey and others thought they could get away with spying on Trump because Hillary Clinton

would win the election.

But since Trump won, their misdeeds are being brought to the light.

Trump ordering the disclosure of text messages and documents about the Russia probe will

show once and for all that he was correct to call the investigation a hoax.

We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Just Took Down James Comey And The FBI For Good - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

News Anchor Who Called Trump A White Supremacist Just Got Ironic Dose Of Really Bad Karma - Duration: 5:46.

The once-dominant sports outlet ESPN has come under significant fire in the last few years

for perceived political bias.

The significant and pronounced anti-Conservative bias became abundantly clear after the network

chose to continue to prop up employees that chose to push the company's pronounced and

undeniable anti-Trump agenda.

Yet at one point the same network chose to fire multiple employees simply for expressing

conservative viewpoints.

From firing baseball icon Curt Schilling to allowing prime-time SportsCenter news anchor

Jemele Hill to air her racism publically on social media, the network has an obvious liberal-leaning

and many conservatives have rightly called out this transparent bias.

In 2016 Newsbusters reported ESPN's public editor admitted the network has a known problem.

Jim Brady admitted, "One notion that virtually everyone I spoke to at ESPN dismisses is what

some have perceived as unequal treatment of conservatives who make controversial statements

vs. liberals who do the same."

He added – "ESPN is far from immune from the political fever that has afflicted so

much of the country over the past year.

Internally, there's a feeling among many staffers — both liberal and conservative

— that the company's perceived move leftward has had a stifling effect on discourse inside

the company and has affected its public-facing product.

Consumers have sensed that same leftward movement, alienating some….

For most of its history, ESPN was viewed relatively apolitically.

Its core focus was — and remains today, of course — sports.

Although the nature of sports meant an occasional detour into politics and culture was inevitable,

there was not much chatter about an overall perceived political bias.

If there was any tension internally, it did not manifest itself publicly."

Ben Shapiro notes of Brady's confession of bias at ESPN, stating –

"Brady talked to anchor Bob Ley, who admitted that ESPN has no "diversity of thought."

A conservative employee told Brady that "If you are a Republican or conservative, you

feel the need to talk in whispers."

Jemele Hill, naturally, said "I would challenge those people who say they feel suppressed.

Do you fear backlash, or do you fear right and wrong?"

This is the problem.

And this is why ESPN and the media more generally fail.

It is suppression to label those who disagree with you politically morally evil because

they disagree.

Yet that's what Hill does.

That's what ESPN does, too.

The left believes its opinions and feelings are facts; those who disagree are therefore

either morons or fascists.

That's why Hill thinks Schilling should have been fired for putting up a meme expressing

that transgender people should go to the bathroom in the restroom that matches their biological

sex.

Schilling must be evil."

Now Hill has announced that she and ESPN will be parting ways after 12 years as a commentator,

anchor, reporter, and writer.

She posted on Twitter that Friday would be her last day, stating

This was the place where I became the best version of myself, both personally and professionally,"

she wrote.

"However, the time has come for me to begin a new chapter in my life."

Over the last several weeks, there have been a lot of rumors about my job status.

Today is my last day at ESPN.

More from me on closing one of the most special chapters in my life:

A buyout of her reported $2.5 million-per-year contract has been completed and her last day

will be Friday, sources told the New York Post.

Hill attracted a lot of negative attention for both herself and for ESPN last year, as

well as faced a brief suspension from the network for her opinionated political social

media posts and often bigoted commentary, including a tweet referring to President Donald

Trump as a "white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists."

Donald Trump is a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white

supremacists.

She also sought out and targeted Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones after he stated players

who chose to disrespect the flag by kneeling during the national anthem would not play

for his team.

She was suspended from the network for a brief period after tweeting that fans who disagree

with Jones' sentiment regarding the national anthem and his players conduct should target

the team's advertisers and refrain from buying any Dallas Cowboys merchandise.

Hill became a rising star with ESPN while hosting the opinion-based talk show "His

& Hers" with Michael Smith.

Both Smith and Hill were later asked to host a more personality-driven 6 p.m. edition of

the network's signature "SportsCenter" program.

In January 2018, Hill left this role and went to work primarily for The

For more infomation >> News Anchor Who Called Trump A White Supremacist Just Got Ironic Dose Of Really Bad Karma - Duration: 5:46.

-------------------------------------------

Can Trump control the Justice Department? - Duration: 4:04.

"I put in an attorney general that never took control of the Justice Department, Jeff Sessions.

With Robert Mueller's probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election ramping

up, President Donald Trump has pretty regularly attacked Attorney

General Jeff Sessions ... "I'm disappointed in the attorney general for numerous reasons. The attorney general made a

terrible mistake. ... intelligence and law enforcement officials ... These people have the biggest conflict of

interest I have ever seen. ... and the special counsel. The entire thing has been a witch hunt." ... a total witch hunt.

... a rigged witch hunt." And while the million-dollar question on Capitol Hill is whether — or when — Trump will

dare to fire his attorney general ... "Should the president fire Jeff Sessions at this point?" "It would be a

very, very, very bad idea." ... legal scholars and historians clash over how much control the president should have over the

Justice Department and federal prosecutors. "It's really been one thing after another, demonstrating a sustained

attitude that President Trump has toward federal prosecutors that they are, and should be, his lawyers who serve him."

Rebecca Roiphe is a professor at New York Law School and a co-author of a recent paper on the issue. She argues that while

the president's constitutional power to hire and fire his subordinates is undisputed, that power doesn't necessarily mean

he can tell Sessions and other prosecutors how to do their job, outside of general directives. "We want our president to set

broad policy objectives for the Department of Justice, like, 'We're going after k crimes'. But what we don't want the

president to do is to go in and say, you know, 'Go arrest that person, don't arrest this person, don't prosecute this

person,' because that's really scary. I mean, that's where democracy's fault lines are visible, and you could see where

it could all crumble." Roiphe, who's praised Sessions for standing up to Trump, says it's crucial for government attorneys

to put the rule of law above the president's personal interests. Otherwise, she claims, the fairness of every federal

investigation could be compromised in order to "further Trump's political ends." But because neither Congress nor the

Supreme Court has clearly settled the question, many scholars disagree with Roiphe. They say the Constitution gives

the president "unitary" power to control the entire executive branch, which the DOJ is part of. Alan Dershowitz of

Harvard Law School told Slate last December that

And Andrew McCarthy writes in the National Review:

"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Special Counsel Robert Mueller have no power of their

own; they exercise President Trump's prosecutorial power for as long as that arrangement suits President Trump."

Roiphe's counterargument to the unitary view of presidential powers is that there are inevitable separation of powers

within each branch of the government. That concept is known as "intra-branch checks and balances." "Balance of

powers is a very complicated topic, and people have totally different views about what it mean But one thing we know it

means is, nobody should get too much power, right? And when you look at things today and you look at where the checks are

coming from, it's really not coming from Congress. And therefore, you kind of look somewhere else, and where is it

coming from? It's coming from within the executive itself.

One of the things that's holding together our democracy — and I think appropriately so — is these these

professional norms of the government lawyers. And I think that was by design."

As for Jeff Sessions, Trump recently told Bloomberg News the attorney general's job was safe — at least until the midterms.

For more infomation >> Can Trump control the Justice Department? - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump To Tour Florence Damage - Duration: 0:25.

For more infomation >> President Trump To Tour Florence Damage - Duration: 0:25.

-------------------------------------------

Will President Trump Face A Primary Challenge? - Duration: 5:58.

For more infomation >> Will President Trump Face A Primary Challenge? - Duration: 5:58.

-------------------------------------------

We'll call it 'Fort Trump!' President says he's considering a permanent American base in Poland - Duration: 5:21.

The president of Poland appealed to President Donald Trump's well known affection for slapping his name on buildings as he pitched a permanent U

S.military base in his country that he said would be named 'Fort Trump.' The president raised his eyebrow at the idea but didn't rule it out

Trump then hailed Poland's offer to pay $2 billion toward U.S.costs, even as he blasted other unnamed 'immensely wealthy' countries the U

S.effectively pays to defend.Trump says that he's considering the idea and that Poland has offered more than $2 billion to the U

S.to pay for such an effort.Trump praised Poland's defense efforts, and took a new round of digs at other NATO allies who lag on spending commitments

'When we're defending immensely wealthy countries and they're not paying for the defense to the United States they're only taking advantage of us,' Trump said, resurrecting a harangue about Germany and other NATO allies who fall short of defense spending pledges

'Ladies and gentlemen, I was smiling when talking to Mr.President,' said Duda during a joint press conference while standing alongside Trump, whose name adorns the Trump Tower residence where he lives, the Trump golf courses he frequents in Virginia, Florida, and New Jersey, as well as numerous other properties around the country and the world

'I said I would very much like for us to set up a permanent American bases in Poland, which we would call Fort Trump, and I firmly believe that this is possible

I am convinced that such a decision lies both in the Polish interest as well as in the interest of the United States

There were some chuckles in the East Room of the White House when Duda pitched the idea

After a delay, Trump smiled and raised an eyebrow.'We believe that the presence of the United States is a guarantor of security in our part of Europe

We ourselves want to invest further.We want to modernize Polish armed forces,' he said

'We are implementing the largest military investment so far as the Polish armed forces are concerned over the past 30 years,' Duda said

Trump says they agreed to bolster defense, energy and commercial ties.And he says the alliance between the two countries has 'never been stronger

' Poland has been pressing for the 3,000 U.S.troops now deployed in Poland on a rotating basis to be upgraded to a larger, permanent presence as it faces Russia's increased military activity in the region

Trump says he's 'very seriously' considering a greater U.S.troop presence in Poland as he meets with that country's president at the White House

Trump earlier told reporters in the Oval Office that Poland is 'willing to make a very major contribution to the United States to come in and have a presence in Poland

'Sitting alongside Poland's President Andrzej Duda, Trump says 'certainly it's something we will discuss

' The push by Poland comes amid historic rival Russia's increased military activity

Trump and Duda are also discussing trade and energy cooperation.The U.S.president is renewing his criticism of a planned new natural gas pipeline linking Germany with Russia

For more infomation >> We'll call it 'Fort Trump!' President says he's considering a permanent American base in Poland - Duration: 5:21.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP JUST DROPPED LIFE SHATTERING NEWS ON JOHN KERRY – ENJOY PRISON, TRAITOR! - Duration: 16:46.

TRUMP JUST DROPPED LIFE-SHATTERING NEWS ON JOHN KERRY – ENJOY PRISON, TRAITOR!

Fox News contributor Sara Carter is now reporting that the former Secretary of state John Kerry

is under investigations over his possible roll in the Steele Dossier fiasco.

Although it was previously thought that John Kerry wasn't involved in the dossier mess

Carter has no confirmed that The House Select Committee on intelligence is, in fact, investigating

Kerry's possible roll in the fake dossier which was paid by the Democrat Party and the

Hillary Clinton Campaign.

And interestingly enough this investigation has lead to a long time colleague of Kerry's

Jonathan Winer, who served as the former envoy for Libya during his tenure at the Department

to write an opinion piece in the Washington Post on February 8 where he defends his relationship

with Steele and his role in the infamous dossier.

"The House Select Committee on Intelligence is now investigating former Secretary of State

John F. Kerry's possible role into the unverified dossier paid for by the Democratic National

Committee and Hillary Clinton Campaign, this reporter has learned.

The dossier, assembled by a former British spy, laid the foundation for the FBI's investigation

into alleged collusion between President Trump and Russia and was the essential piece of

evidence used by the FBI to get a warrant to spy on a former volunteer for the Trump

campaign.

For more than a month, the committee has been in its second phase of investigations focused

on former Obama State Department officials and their role in either transmitting information

or using information provided by former British spy and investigator Christopher Steele.

Steele was hired by embattled research firm Fusion GPS, also under several congressional

and Senate investigations.

[…]

Jonathan Winer, a long-time colleague of Kerry and who served as the former envoy for Libya

during his tenure at the Department, wrote an opinion piece in the Washington Post on

Feb. 8, defending his relationship with Steele and his role in the infamous dossier."

All this comes to light after Congressman Devin Nunes from California revealed to Fox

News host Laura Ingraham that John Kerry was in fact briefed about a "Second Dossier."

The Washington Examiner's own Byron York had previously reported that the Obama State

Department was being investigated to learn if they had a hand in the dossier and made

very clear that Steele was considered a "high-value source" when it came to "all things Russia."

To the point that the Obama administration used his intel on multiple reports to clients

in the department.

A book published in November by a correspondent at the Guardian, "Collusion: Secret meetings,

dirty money, and how Russia helped Donald Trump win," noted that Steele's 2010 work

on the World Cup soccer corruption investigation won him the trust not only of the FBI,but

the State Department as well.

From author Luke Harding:

The [soccer] episode burnished Steele's reputation inside the U.S. intelligence community

and the FBI.

Here was a pro, a well-connected Brit, who understood Russian espionage and its subterranean

tricks.

Steele was regarded as credible.

Between 2014 and 2016, Steele authored more than a hundred reports on Russia and Ukraine.

These were written for a private client but shared widely within the State Department

and sent up to Secretary of State John Kerry and to Assistant Secretary of State Victoria

Nuland, who was in charge of the U.S. response to the Ukraine crisis.

Many of Steele's secret sources were the same sources who would supply information

on Trump.

One former State Department envoy during the Obama administration said he read dozens of

Steele's reports on Russia.

The envoy said that on Russia, Steele was "as good as the CIA or anyone."

Steele's professional reputation inside U.S. agencies would prove important the next

time he discovered alarming material, and lit the fuse again.

That fuse, of course, was the Trump dossier.

It is hard for an outsider to discern clearly what is going on inside the dossier investigations

on Capitol Hill.

But it appears some investigators are looking beyond the 35 pages of reports done by Steele

for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm working for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic

National Committee, that were published in January 2017 by BuzzFeed.

They're looking into whether Steele did other reports about Trump, perhaps similar

but not identical to what was in the dossier published by BuzzFeed.

And they are looking into whether those reports made their way to the State Department.

They're also seeking to learn what individual State Department officials did in relation

to Steele, and whether there were any contacts between the State Department and the FBI or

Justice Department concerning the anti-Trump material.

It's not clear whether State Department activity related to Steele's Russia project

took place in the months leading up to the 2016 election, during the transition, or both.

I don't think we have ever seen more corruption than we saw during the Barack Hussein Obama

administration.

This should teach us all a lesson that we should not elect a man based on his ability

to read a speech or the color of his skin.

For now, all we can do is sit back and wait while the investigations get to the bottom

of who did what and hope we someday see the perpetrators behind bars.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> TRUMP JUST DROPPED LIFE SHATTERING NEWS ON JOHN KERRY – ENJOY PRISON, TRAITOR! - Duration: 16:46.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Tours Areas Affected By Florence - Duration: 1:45.

For more infomation >> President Trump Tours Areas Affected By Florence - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump surveys damage in NC - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> President Trump surveys damage in NC - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump stop in Cherry Point, New Bern in visit to Carolinas - Duration: 4:30.

For more infomation >> President Trump stop in Cherry Point, New Bern in visit to Carolinas - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

Video: Trump reportedly no longer campaigning for Desantis - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> Video: Trump reportedly no longer campaigning for Desantis - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Tours Florence Disaster Zone - Duration: 2:02.

For more infomation >> President Trump Tours Florence Disaster Zone - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

The Trump tax hikes are coming - Duration: 5:26.

President Trump's biggest political win, so far, is the tax-cut legislation he signed

into law late last year.

But Trump is now taking action that is essentially a tax hike on American consumers, and will

offset a portion of the tax cuts he has been crowing about for nine months.

And in typical renegade fashion, Trump is dismissing political orthodoxy by daring to

hit voters with new taxes just weeks before a crucial election.

Trump now plans to impose 10% tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports, beginning

Sept. 24.

The tariff will rise to 25% by the end of the year.

That's in addition to a 25% tariff on $50 billion worth of Chinese imports Trump imposed

during the summer.

So by Election Day in November, Trump will have placed new tariffs on $250 billion worth

of stuff Americans buy every day.

A tariff is a tax collected when imported goods enter the country.

It raises the cost of the good by the amount of the tariff.

So a 10% tariff on a $100 product would raise its cost to $110.

Producers typically try to pass the added cost onto consumers, and as the cost of certain

imported goods rises, the cost of similar products not subject to tariffs can also rise,

since there's less competitive pressure pushing prices down.

The new tariffs will raise the cost of thousands of everyday items, including electronics,

appliances, bicycles, tires, toys, clothing and footwear.

Based on last year's level of imports, the new China tariffs amount to a tax hike of

$32.5 billion per year.

If the latest set of tariffs rises to 25% and stays in place for 2019, the total additional

tax would be $62.5 billion next year.

The Trump tax cuts, by contrast, lowered tax payments by about $130 billion per year.

So by this simple math, the China tariffs would offset about one-fourth of the Trump

tax cuts this year, and nearly one-half next year.

Waiting for a deal Trump says that would not happen.

Tariffs, in his strategy, are a way of gaining leverage in negotiations meant to cement trade

deals more favorable to the United States.

Trump has said he wants a lower U.S. trade deficit with China, and better opportunities

for American firms operating in China.

Once there's a deal with China, he will rescind the tariffs.

Except no deal is falling into place, creating what increasingly looks like an open-ended

trade war destabilizing to both sides.

Larry Kudlow, Trump's top economic adviser, said on Sept. 17, "we are ready to negotiate

and talk with China any time that they are ready for serious and substantive negotiations."

Chinese officials say basically the same thing.

Yet talks have obviously gotten nowhere, and there's no sign of a breakthrough any time

soon.

Trump seems to think his trade fight is hurting China more than it's hurting the United

States, which will ultimately give him a victory.

He's partly right.

The Shanghai stock index is down 21% this year, for instance, and it just hit the lowest

level since 2014.

The S&P 500, by contrast, is up nearly 7% and close to record highs.

But that does not mean Trump will win.

China shows no signs of capitulating, and is highly likely to retaliate against Trump's

latest move with punitive measures on US exports to China, or on American firms operating in

the country.

It might also devalue its currency, the yuan, which would make Chinese products cheaper

to foreigners.

More pain is coming for American farmers and others who export to China.

If China retaliates, Trump has threatened to slap tariffs on everything else China imports

to the United States, which totaled about $500 billion worth of merchandise in 2017.

But it's not clear China would buckle, even then, and Trump has not articulated an end

game beyond that.

"The President's experience with negotiations is centered on real estate where if you do

not get the property, you move on with another property," analyst Tom Block of Fundstrat

wrote in a recent note to clients.

"The trade war with China is more complex, and an exit strategy may not be as simple

as looking for another location for a casino or golf course."

Trump, in fact, has been the one to moderate his demands, suggesting his hand is not as

strong as he thinks.

Trump initially planned tariffs of 25% on the next $200 billion worth of Chinese imports,

but scaled that back to 10%, at least for now—perhaps out of fear of rattling stock

markets.

Trump also faces rising resistance among voters in his own country.

His trade policy is already unpopular, with 61% of Americans saying they disapprove, in

one poll.

Anecdotal reports of collateral damage, such as farmers losing access to foreign markets

or U.S. companies hurting from higher costs related to tariffs, already seem to be hurting

Republicans as they fight to keep control of Congress in the upcoming midterms.

Trump does not seem to care care,