Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 21 2018

Let's turn to the latest comments from U.S. President Donald Trump on North Korea.

He has been speaking quite openly about his feelings on the current situation and his

hopes for the future of U.S.-North Korea relations.

And Trump says... that the future could include a second one-on-one with Kim Jong-un.

Lee Ji-won reports.

U.S. President Donald Trump says he would most likely meet again with North Korean leader

Kim Jong-un,... hinting at a possible second summit between the leaders of two long-time

adversaries, following their historic first-ever summit in June.

Speaking to Reuters on Monday, President Trump answered a question on another meeting with

Kim,... but added that he did not want to comment further.

He also offered no details on the timing or venue.

And despite the widespread skepticism that Pyongyang is not taking concrete measures

in dismantling its nuclear program, President Trump said he believes the North Koreans had

taken specific steps to denuclearize, without elaborating.

President Trump also pointed at how Kim Jong-un handed over three American detainees even

before the Singapore summit.

Trump has come under fire from his critics for making too many concessions to Pyongyang,

including his decision to actually hold the Singapore summit and suspending Washington's

joint military drills with South Korea.

President Trump, however, remains optimistic, insisting that a lot of good things are happening

with North Korea.

But he also complained that China is not helping as much as it had in the past because of its

trade dispute with the U.S.

During the interview, President Trump patted himself on the back, saying that he, someone

who's only been working on the North Korean issue for a matter of months, stopped the

regime's nuclear and missile testing, something his predecessors who had been working on the

issue for 30 years couldn't do.

Trump also pointed to the great chemistry he shared with Kim as one reason that helped

ease last year's tensions between the two sides.

Trump said he and the North Korean leader like each other,... adding he has very good

personal relations with Kim, which is what he thinks is holding the situation together.

Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump says he would "most likely" meet again with N. Korean leader Kim Jong-un - Duration: 2:14.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump's pick for Drug Czar visits New Haven Monday - Duration: 1:58.

For more infomation >> President Trump's pick for Drug Czar visits New Haven Monday - Duration: 1:58.

-------------------------------------------

With Rudy's Deadline Looming, Trump Turns Up The Heat On Mueller's 'Witch Hunt' - Duration: 2:52.

For more infomation >> With Rudy's Deadline Looming, Trump Turns Up The Heat On Mueller's 'Witch Hunt' - Duration: 2:52.

-------------------------------------------

Black Communities Praising Trump For An Incredible 400% Increase In ONE Year - Duration: 6:01.

For more infomation >> Black Communities Praising Trump For An Incredible 400% Increase In ONE Year - Duration: 6:01.

-------------------------------------------

Trump will be a difference maker in Senate race: Patrick Morrisey - Duration: 5:25.

For more infomation >> Trump will be a difference maker in Senate race: Patrick Morrisey - Duration: 5:25.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says he would "most likely" meet again with N. Korean leader Kim Jong-un - Duration: 2:15.

Let's begin with the latest comments from U.S. President Donald Trump on North Korea.

He has been speaking quite openly about his feelings on the current situation and his

hopes for the future of U.S.-North Korea relations.

Trump signaled that the future could include a second one-on-one with Kim Jong-un.

Lee Ji-won reports.

U.S. President Donald Trump says he would most likely meet again with North Korean leader

Kim Jong-un,... hinting at a possible second summit between the leaders of two long-time

adversaries, following their historic first-ever summit in June.

Speaking to Reuters on Monday, President Trump answered a question on another meeting with

Kim,... but added that he did not want to comment further.

He also offered no details on the timing or venue.

And despite the widespread skepticism that Pyongyang is not taking concrete measures

in dismantling its nuclear program, President Trump said he believes the North Koreans had

taken specific steps to denuclearize, without elaborating.

President Trump also pointed at how Kim Jong-un handed over three American detainees even

before the Singapore summit.

Trump has come under fire from his critics for making too many concessions to Pyongyang,

including his decision to actually hold the Singapore summit and suspending Washington's

joint military drills with South Korea.

President Trump, however, remains optimistic, insisting that a lot of good things are happening

with North Korea.

But he also complained that China is not helping as much as it had in the past because of its

trade dispute with the U.S.

During the interview, President Trump patted himself on the back, saying that he, someone

who's only been working on the North Korean issue for a matter of months, stopped the

regime's nuclear and missile testing, something his predecessors who had been working on the

issue for 30 years couldn't do.

Trump also pointed to the great chemistry he shared with Kim as one reason that helped

ease last year's tensions between the two sides.

Trump said he and the North Korean leader like each other,... adding he has very good

personal relations with Kim, which is what he thinks is holding the situation together.

Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump says he would "most likely" meet again with N. Korean leader Kim Jong-un - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Former White House Special Counsel Explains Why Trump And Giuliani Are Freaked Out About Don McGahn - Duration: 1:42.

So I think that you're seeing a

president increasingly lash out

as this gets closer to him,

Andrea.

>> Kathy, you are a former white

house counsel.

And I want to be clear because

I'm not sure the president, at

least initially, understood

this.

Don mcgahn is not the

president's personal lawyer and

he's not even the president's

lawyer, per se.

He's the lawyer for the office

of the presidency.

So there is, yes, you tell me is

there an executive privilege?

Rudy was suggesting there is

executive and lawyer/client

privilege but a weak

lawyer/client privilege here if

at all.

But you're the lawyer.

Help me out here.

>> That's exactly right.

I think Rudy is wrong.

I understand why the president

is wanting to take credit for

the fact that his white house

counsel has apparently provided

a lot of information to the

special counsel, but it really

wasn't a choice.

Wasn't a matter of strategy.

Don mcgahn is the white house

was a fact witness in a criminal

investigation, and he has an

obligation to answer questions

that are put to him.

It's as simple as that.

The D.C. Circuit court of

appeals in 1998 decided this

question pretty defin of itly

and said if you are a government

lawyer working on behalf of the

American people, and you are

advising the president or other

government officials, there is

not a traditional

attorney/client privilege in the

way we think about if you would

go out and hire a lawyer as a

private citizen and you are able

to talk to your lawyer with an

expectation of confidentiality.

So that ship has sailed.

And, you know, did the idea that

somehow president trump allowed

For more infomation >> Former White House Special Counsel Explains Why Trump And Giuliani Are Freaked Out About Don McGahn - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian - Duration: 12:42.

Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian

Comedians have long targeted presidents in their comedic scripts.

It used to be, however, that the jabs were light and the candor of the comedian was friendly,

maybe borderline insulting.

That's changed now that Trump is in office.

Now, comedians seem to believe he's fair game for all kinds of terrible/lewd/crude

jokes.

This was especially evident when comedian Michelle Wolf hosted the White House correspondents

dinner a few months ago.

The correspondent's dinner is filled with members of the media on both the left and

the right and has been one of the few places where comedians could go after any President…right

in front of his face.

But Wolf took it to another level entirely when she "roasted" the president.

This included making jokes about pedophilia, pornography, orgasming and more.

Well, come to find out, that kind of behavior isn't well tolerated.

Even by the left (not because the left doesn't enjoy these things, but because there's

no money made in selling trash).

Wolf, who has recently been given her own TV show on Netflix, recently found out she'd

be losing that coveted spot on the "boob tube."

It turns out that her show on Netflix was pulled after just a few short months on the

air.

As the Blaze writes:

Her [Michelle Wolf]show, "The Break with Michelle Wolf," premiered in May.

The 33-year-old had then joked that she would be airing "the types of jokes my former

bosses would tell me we couldn't do on TV."

Netflix confirmed to Fox News that they would not be ordering more episodes of the show.

Wolf was widely criticized for her jokes at the White House Correspondents' Dinner that

targeted White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

"I'm never really sure what to call Sarah Huckabee Sanders, you know?"

Wolf said.

"Is it Sarah Sanders?

Is it Sarah Huckabee Sander?

Is it Cousin Huckabee?

Is it Auntie Huckabee Sanders?"

"Like, what is Uncle Tom but for white women who disappoint other white women?" she added.

"I know…

Aunt Coulter."

This is quite surprising considering NetFlix is filled with vile TV shows containing some

of the banalest plot lines imaginable.

But, at the end of the day, NetFlix is a business, and it would appear there's no market for

an acerbic and controversial comedian like Wolf.

Her frequent jokes about incest, pedophilia, and abortion may have won her some fans, but

support for her kind of comedy is obviously not worth spending money on…

Or listening to ever…

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian - Duration: 12:42.

-------------------------------------------

FBI searching for man who threatened to shoot President Trump - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> FBI searching for man who threatened to shoot President Trump - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Top Democrat Challenger To Trump Just Ended His Career With These Five Words - Duration: 3:29.

For more infomation >> Top Democrat Challenger To Trump Just Ended His Career With These Five Words - Duration: 3:29.

-------------------------------------------

Nicolle Wallace Lays Out The Trump Obstruction Of Justice That Don McGhan May Have Witnessed - Duration: 1:18.

early strategy of full

cooperation was a potentially

damaging mistake.

So here's some of the flash

points in the investigation into

obstruction of justice that don

mcgahn's 30 hours of defendant

may have helped make more clear

to Robert Mueller.

First, trump's campaign to

pressure his A.G. To unrecuse

himself in the investigation.

In March trump ordered mcgahn to

stop sessions from recusing.

Next the firing of FBI director

James Comey.

Mcgahn's aides at the center and

how trump would explain it

publicly.

Then there was trump's attempt

to fire Robert Mueller.

Trump directed mcgahn to fire

the special counsel last June.

Mcgahn this time refused.

There are also concerns of

witness tampering.

"The New York Times" reporting

in March Mueller learned of two

conversations in which trump

asked key witnesses, one of them

don mcgahn, about matters they

discussed with the special

counsel, raising concerns that

the president was acting

improperly.

And then there is the spark that

ignited it all, the firing of

national security advisor Mike

mcgahn was at the center of

that, too.

He was the one who briefed trump

on Flynn's dishonesty.

And what trump knew about

Flynn's deception and when he

could -- when he knew he could

determine whether his pressure

on Comey to drop the Flynn

For more infomation >> Nicolle Wallace Lays Out The Trump Obstruction Of Justice That Don McGhan May Have Witnessed - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

Debating Donald Trump, Climate Change, and the Paris Climate Agreement - Duration: 8:43.

Hey there guys, I'm Jesse Crowe, The Travelling Scientist, here in Northern California

Now yesterday I had an interesting discussion about climate change

with an American gentleman who is pro Trump and anti Paris climate agreement

now I'm anti Trump and Pro Paris climate agreement, so it was an interesting discussion.

check it out

Hey there guys, I'm here chatting with my American friend Tom and today we're gonna be talking a little bit about climate change

So Tom I want to start by asking you about your president Donald Trump

How do you think Donald Trump is doing as the president of America

I think he's doing great

What about the fact that he's pulling a lot of money out of funding

for like our renewable energy sources and trying to pull America out of the

Paris climate agreement and putting a lot of money into fossil fuels which is

bad for the environment and what do you say to that?

Well I'd say that that one of those three assertions is correct

putting money into fossil fuels how...

how is he putting money into fossil fuels?

from my understanding, Donald Trump is very pro-coal, which is a particularly dirty fossil fuel

okay so there's big difference though between utilising the resources that we have and actually committing public funds towards that resource right?

in other words I don't think he's subsidising the industry at all, is he?

and you start off by saying... what was your first assertion?

he's taking funding away from research into renewable energies, like solar, wind power

Oh Okay...I, I don't think he has...

well so you agree that he has he is trying to remove America out of the Paris Climate Agreement?

oh no no, that is a fate of complete, he HAS removed us,

and I think that was probably one of the the reasons that I'm most proud of

because it's really easy to fill the campaign pledges, we're gonna lower your taxes

we're gonna do tax better, politicians they go and do that

but it took a real stroke of courage for him to go and get out of the Paris Climate Accords

The Paris climate agreement is basically bringing together countries

Almost all the countries in the world, uniting them for the cause that is

trying to reduce and stop the climate change caused by humans

So by America being such a big powerful country, being one of the only countries

to disagree and pull out of the Paris Climate Agreement, that's kind of like

That's bad for the environment, is it not?

WHY?

Right, so they're doing research into finding out what humans impact is on climate change

and it's been shown that since the Industrial Revolution over 100 years ago, atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions have increased greatly

along with a slowly increasing temperature which is more rapid than it has been before the Industrial Revolution

and so basically the Paris climate agreement has recognised that and is trying to get

human kind to do what they can to minimize this human impact of climate

change to try and slow down the increase in temperatures

And so, How are they trying to effect a change?

By reducing human emissions,

things like transportation, fossil fuels, agriculture, these things that

produce the most the biggest impact from humans into climate change

And is it effective? It will be!

Tell me what plan that they have to reduce anthropogenic carbon emissions?

Through research into renewable energy sources that produce less carbon

emissions by researching more efficient modes of transport and basically finding

ways that we can try and continue to live the lifestyle we live now without

causing the pollution that we're currently producing

WHY?

Because it's been shown that climate change has a direct impact on atmospheric temperatures and

those temperatures we can see over the last couple hundred years that they are

slowly rising if they continue arise they're going to cause all sorts of problems

Rising sea levels and reduced crop output, reduced... depleted food sources

that's going to directly affect human security, our food security and our way

of life is a threat here

I can tell you that back when Al Gore released his movie, sea-levels right now it should be 15 feet higher

right now there's there might be some evidence

that sea levels have risen on order of less than an inch

okay that's one interesting statistic what about...

You know, it's been a hot summer do you think that temperatures aren't increasing to some extent globally?

Why is that going to be harmful?

Because hotter temperatures are going to make more difficult for things like growing food and maintaining water supplies

Really? you know the empirical evidence out there

shows that, guess what, we as a species actually do a whole lot better when it's warmer

so I don't think that the emperical evidence really shows that there's necessarily a problem with that!

I think that humans would just like to

have more control over the climate, rather than

having it projected to just increase in temperature and atmospheric carbon emissions

increasing and things like that so I think that the Paris climate agreement

is working towards having a better understanding and gaining more control over

our climate as a protective means for the future for the future generations it

might not be a problem in you or me in 20 or 50 years or something but maybe a

hundred years from now or two hundred years from now, you know there is potential

that the temperatures could skyrocket, sea levels could rise, or they could stay the same

Like you said, the climate models aren't perfect and the science isn't clear

but it it seems to be indicating at this point in time that

in the future, there could be real problems

I don't think that, I disagree with that

so let's just disagree let's just say that

Humans want to be in control

I think that's part of all of us

we all want to control our environment

What is it that the IPCC wants big westernised countries like the United States to do?

Well you've just got to reduce your carbon footprint

You know, United States, It's really not fair for you to have your own steel industry

let all the steel be produced in developing countries like China and India, and let them catch up to you economically

you can go ahead and spew all the carbon out that you want

As long as you pay a tax on it

So we can talk about all the money that the IPCC has absolutely wasted

And continues to waste, which is one of the reasons why Donald Trump pulled the United States out of it

and I am very proud of him doing it

because it's an absolute waste of resources

It is a corrupt body, the UN is a corrupt body and I don't believe that the best research will come out of some collective..

world body which includes disparate countries like China and India who are the biggest polluters per capita

It's just a corrupt organisation and, I hate to put it to you but they are absolutely the wrong body in the world to be the one setting policy for

something as important as alternative fossil fuel that's that's just how I feel

Beautiful, well I respect your opinions and I appreciate your time

Thanks so much for chatting with me

So there we go guys thanks for watching that interview

So who do you think was right?

do you think that we should be working on climate change and doing everything we can help the Paris climate agreement?

Or do you think that America is doing the right thing by pulling out and that the United Nations is really corrupt?

Let us know in the comments section down below and subscribe for more travelling science every week!

I'll see you guys next time, Cheers!

For more infomation >> Debating Donald Trump, Climate Change, and the Paris Climate Agreement - Duration: 8:43.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Top Traitor Under Federal Investigation for $20M In Fraud - Duration: 3:10.

For more infomation >> Trump's Top Traitor Under Federal Investigation for $20M In Fraud - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Brennan Will Second-Guess Suing After What Trump Just Unleashed On Him - Duration: 2:34.

For more infomation >> Brennan Will Second-Guess Suing After What Trump Just Unleashed On Him - Duration: 2:34.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Sends Earthquake Through D.C. With Announcement Of Who He Wants To Fire ASAP - Duration: 5:06.

For more infomation >> Trump Sends Earthquake Through D.C. With Announcement Of Who He Wants To Fire ASAP - Duration: 5:06.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Speechwriter Fired After He's Linked To White Nationalist Event - Duration: 3:49.

 A White House speechwriter for President Donald Trump was fired last week following media inquiries about his appearance at a conference featuring prominent white nationalists

   Darren Beattie was terminated after the White House learned he had appeared on a panel with British white nationalist Peter Brimelow at the 2016 Mencken Club conference in the Baltimore area, CNN reported Sunday

  Screen grab/CNN White House speechwriter Darren Beattie was fired after the media questioned his appearance on a panel with a white nationalist

   Following questions about Beattie and the conference, the White House asked him to step down, The Washington Post reported

 Beattie refused, arguing that he was not a racist and had merely presented academic points at the conference

That's when he was fired, sources told the Post.  White House spokesman Hogan Gidley confirmed to CNN on Friday that "Mr

Beattie no longer works at the White House," but refused to elaborate further.  The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks extremists, called the conference a gathering of "white nationalists and pseudo-academic and academic racists

" The theme of the 2016 event was "The Right Revisited."   Brimelow runs an anti-immigrant website called Vdare

com, where he publishes pieces by "white supremacists and anti-Semitic" writers, per the SPLC

 He has described himself as a believer in "racial nationalism."  My little girls will be still in their 20s in 2040, when U

S. will go majority non-white.unless the post-1965 immigration disaster is ended https://t

co/XiCRNySPwv— Peter Brimelow (@peterbrimelow) August 18, 2018  In a statement, Beattie said he gave an "academic" talk on "The Intelligentsia and the Right

"  "I said nothing objectionable and stand by my remarks," he said. Download Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? Here's how

BEFORE YOU GO Mary Papenfuss Trends Reporter, HuffPost Suggest a correction MORE: White House White Nationalism Southern Poverty Law Center Peter Brimelow Darren Beattie

No comments:

Post a Comment