Google photo QA: Trump news on Youtube Jun 30 2018

Mr Trump is set to meet the Queen during his trip to the UK, which is scheduled to commence on July 13, and US ambassador Robert Wood Johnson has confirmed his trip will include an audience with Britain's Head of State – although Buckingham Palace has not commented

And Mr Fitzwilliams, the former editor of The International Who's Who, said staff close to Her Majesty were certain to be approaching the meeting, which he believes will happen at Windsor Castle, with some trepidation

He said: "They are dealing with somebody who is completely unpredictable and no doubt there is a certain amount of concern about how it will all go

"The actual visit will probably pass off with lots of controversy but no actual problems

"The security aspect will be gigantic, obviously."The problem with Mr Trump is that you never absolutely know what he is going to do

"I don't think the Queen herself will be concerned _ she's used to meeting a large number of different Presidents, as well as other dignitaries

"There is a story, possibly apocryphal, that when the Ceaușescus visited in 1978, she detested them so much she actually hid behind a bush in the gardens of Buckingham Palace to avoid them

"She has literally seen every kind of monarch and leader and nothing will phase her

"Nevertheless, I think her staff are probably likely to be looking forward to getting this one out of the way

"Mr Trump's visit is a precursor to his official State visit, the date of which has yet to be fixed

After Prime Minister Theresa May extended the invitation in 2016, a Parliamentary petition was launched which stated: "Donald Trump should be allowed to enter the UK in his capacity as head of the US Government, but he should not be invited to make an official State Visit because it would cause embarrassment to Her Majesty the Queen

" It quickly attracted the 100,000 signatures necessary to be debated in Parliament, with this happening on February 20, 2017, with 1,863,708 people having signed it as of today

With Mr Trump due to arrive in less than three weeks' time, details of his visit remain scarce

It is unclear as to whether he will meet the Royal Princes for example, or Prince Harry's new American wife Meghan Markle, a staunch supporter of Mr Trump's opponent Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election

However, widespread protests are anticipated over the New Yorker's controversial immigration policies and comments about women

For more infomation >> Donald Trump's "unpredictability" a concern for Royal staff as meeting with Queen looms - Duration: 3:24.

-------------------------------------------

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN - Duration: 18:00.

early within the scope of presidential authority under federal law the sole

prerequisite set forth in federal laws that the president find that the entry

of the covered aliens would be detrimental to the interests of the

United States the president has undoubtedly fulfilled that requirement

here says Chief Justice Roberts what does this say this decision by the

Supreme Court judge say about presidential authority and and its range

that it cannot be second-guessed by the courts it's a great question Sondra this

really goes to the heart of the difference between the majority and the

minority the the dissenters would question whether or not the president

had a basis for this decision and whether that basis was an animus against

Muslims the majority is ruling we will not question the president's basis

unless it is so irrational that nobody could accept it so if the president says

2+2 equals 22 the court is not bound by it but if the president says it is more

likely than not that harm will come to the country Oh harm will come to the

United States by the unbridled admission of people from these seven countries the

court is in no position to second-guess him because the court lacks the tools

with which the second-guess him and the president has enormous tools available

to him in the executive branch from which to come to that conclusion what do

the opponents do well Eric this is a preliminary ruling this is not the final

ruling by that by that I mean that somebody trying to enter the United

States in Brooklyn or trying to answer the United States and Honolulu from one

of those seven countries can still make an application to enter they can't claim

in that application that the travel ban is unconstitutional but they can claim

that it doesn't apply to them by demonstrating that they are not harmful

to the country and they will produce good when they come here that's for

trial courts to decide but whatever the trial courts do when

they hear those applications and trust me those applications will come the

trial courts are bound by the Supreme Court's ruling today which is that this

ban is in force and as lawful and is going to be enforced at all the entry

points starting this afternoon do you think that there was a hint that this

was eventually going to be the outcome of this judge back into summer when they

actually let travel ban 3.0 be fully implemented yes and it was that great

observation said where it was the same five to four vote that allowed it to be

implemented at the time look there's not going to be any change at the port of

entry as a result of the Supreme Court decision today except that the

procedures will be permanent the the immigration people won't be walking on

eggs wondering if they're going to lose their their authority this Authority is

now permanent as long as Donald Trump as president or unless he decides to

rescind it he may very well call up kim jongwan and say I'm taking you off the

list well that would change some things if

anybody's allowed to leave North Korea and come here because the president

wrote this executive order he can modify it or unright it however he wants but

unless changed by this president or a successor it remains the law of the land

does this give him the president expanded powers over this issue that he

could expand this disorder and to involve other countries or other issues

yes yes the president could amend this order and include Mexico if he wanted to

now again he would have to make findings that people coming from Mexico are

harmful to the national security of the United States but the Supreme Court has

said if the findings are rational we will not second-guess them as long as I

can I use my silly example as long as he doesn't say two plus two equals twenty

two we are not going to second-guess the president no matter what his political

rhetoric is so this opinion may very well give some poof if you will do

Donald Trump the president to help resolve the problems that we've all been

ringing all hands over at the United States Mexico border in the past two

weeks fair to say judge that this is the first significant legal test of

this administration's policies in power it's the first significant test of this

administration's legal policies and power with respect to immigration

absolutely and it's a wringing uncompromising endorsement of the

choices the legal and constitutional choices made by President Donald Trump

all right judge we're just learning that the remaining two opinions will be

released tomorrow the court now is recessed for now so that is the big

bombshell today that the President of the United States reacted to it by

saying simply Wow all right Judge Andrew Napolitano thank you for jumping on this

breaking news for us pleasure so the Supreme Court has upheld the Trump

travel ban travel ban 3.0 as it has been called of Chief Justice Roberts writing

that the in the majority opinion the proclamation is squarely within the

scope of presidential authority under federal law reject rejecting claims of

discrimination in that travel ban we will have more on this coming up at the

top of the hour join us for a new hour are you is the top of the hour and we

have a Fox News Alert for you a big victory for the Trump administration the

Supreme Court upholding the president's travel ban welcome to a brand new hour

of America's newsroom I'm Sandra Smith why had a busy morning this morning

Sandra hello everyone I'm owner Shaun infield bill hemmer you know it was a

five-to-four decision the justices endorsing the president's authority to

regulate immigration upholding selective travel restrictions into our country

from several mostly Muslim nations Jessie bream is live at the Supreme

Court for us Shannon a big morning there the latest and has been and for right

now this is a celebration for the White House and for the Trump administration

because the 5-4 decision for now is in their favor the Chief Justice writing

for the majority says this by its plain language the federal law the immigration

law here grants the president broad discretion to suspend the entry of

aliens into the United States the president lawfully exercised that

discretion based on findings following a worldwide multi-agency

that entry of the covered aliens would be detrimental to the national interest

there were a number of agencies including homeland security in the State

Department that tried to work with countries around the globe and said

listen if you could provide us the specific information that we have

confidence that people have been vetted from your country before they come to

ours if you can't keep up with those vetting requirements or choose not to

you're going to be on the list of those who are banned now some countries have

actually worked their way off the list but many remain on that list and today

in a 5-4 decision the court found that for now that is the right decision and

this is going to be sent back down to the lower court there's going to be more

legal procedure happening with that but with now the force and the thrust of the

Supreme Court precedent acting and talking about what the president's

powers are in the executive branch there was a lot of argument about whether or

not the president's comments during the campaign and after his election should

be factored in the plaintiff cited numerous things we talked about a Muslim

ban or shutting down the borders this is what the Chief Justice wrote he said the

proclamation is expressly premise on legitimate purposes preventing entry of

nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to

improve their practices the text says nothing about religion he says yes there

are some heavily Muslim dominant countries that are included but that

fact alone does not support an inference of religious hostility given that the

policy covers just 8% of the world's Muslim population and is limited to

countries that were previously designated by Congress not this

administration or prior administrations as opposing national security risks as

you would imagine there were two very scathing dissents I would say the most

heated came from justice Sotomayor who thinks this court got it totally wrong

by ignoring what the President had to say outside the text of this

proclamation she writes in her dissent the United States of America is a nation

built upon the promise of religious liberty our founders honored that core

promise by embedding the principle of religious neutrality in the First

Amendment the court's decision today fails to safeguard that fundamental

principle it leaves undisturbed a policy first

advertised openly and unequivocally in she quotes here as a quote total and

complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States because the policy now

she says a masquerades behind a facade of national

concerns so for now the ban is upheld that this Court finds five to four that

the president was within his authority based on the text of immigration laws

the text of this travel ban he's done the right thing but now it goes back to

the lower court reversing their decision and telling them now to re well to

thoroughly decide this case on the merits now based on this guidance that

they've gotten from the Supreme Court so it's possible the case ends up back here

but now it goes back to the lower court it's a win today for the white house as

they celebrate and Shannon quickly as far as any further decisions coming down

not today tomorrow though and a day extension in the term yeah we have

another day coming either Wednesday or Thursday and we're gonna get that big

union dues case we've been watching whether public sector employees can be

forced to join a union or forced to pay fees to a union whose political message

they don't agree with could impact millions of people across the country so

it's a big decision that will have a huge impact on unions in this country

we'll get it tomorrow or Thursday and we'll look forward to that meanwhile all

about the travel ban shannon bream outside of the Supreme Court thank you

Anna Shannon just said a big win for the white house and that is where John

Roberts is live in the North Lawn with reaction from the president Johnny had

one succinct specific word in his reaction to this decision

yeah Eric good morning to you the president clearly happy at least in the

initial read of the Supreme Court decision tweeting out a short time ago

Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban Wow

exclamation mark the White House continues to read through this decision

though because it needs to figure out exactly what this means particularly the

part the part about it being remanded back to the lower courts that have been

the Ninth Circuit and the Fourth Circuit and so the White House does not know

what the ultimate outcome of this is but on the surface at least the fact that

the majority in the Supreme Court has thrown its support behind the

president's authority to enact a travel ban based on national security purposes

is a big win for the White House now the president all along had said that he

thought that the first travel ban should never have been rescinded of course this

is the third iteration of that the first one was attacked in the courts quite

roundly after it was first released but the president always maintained that he

didn't like this didn't like the third one he thought

that the first one should have should have held and I wouldn't expect that the

president will go back to that first one but certainly you know he will probably

stick by his guns that I do have the authority to initiate a ban like this

and therefore that one probably should have stood all along it is important to

point out that while the Supreme Court found that this was not a quote Muslim

ban this was simply a ban of individuals from certain countries that couldn't be

vetted properly Eric the president did on several occasions at least during the

political campaign the presidential campaign say that there was a need for a

Muslim ban so we're expecting a statement from the White House soon

again the White House counsel's office the president through the communications

shop all just reading through this to see exactly what it means but we should

have a statement from them shortly Eric and John do we know one will have more

than a statement will exceed from the President himself and get his reaction

does he have a photo opportunity or an event for the media today there are a

couple of events on the calendar right now in a Medal of Honor ceremony this

afternoon it's not likely that he would say anything about it during the Medal

of Honor ceremony but the first two events are closed but I would expect

that they'll probably open one of those up to the pool particularly based on

this ruling from the Supreme Court and we happen to be the pool network today

so if the president's got something to say I'll be there in person to hear it

all right and we'll bring it to you live to our viewers of course live when the

president reacts personally to this ruling

thank you John Thanks joining us now is Georgia Republican congressman Doug

Collins a member of the House Judiciary Committee and vice chair of the House

GOP conference congressman good morning and and thanks for coming on the program

and we have you on minutes after this travel ban a ruling came down your

thoughts my thought is is the Supreme Court did what they should do and that

was if the President does have the authority he had the latitude to look in

the national security and best interest of our country they'd followed the law

instead of activist courts or judges who decided to make up their own law when

they said nothing about the previous administration many times doing things

by executive yeah they said this is proper in this regard and I think the

sprinkler ruling here how do you think that this

decision is going to play out in the in the broader context of the immigration

debate that is happening in this country right now well I think it wanted

confirms that that the problem the president did what he thought was right

and they have confirmed that and they've sent it back to the lower court to

interpret it under the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential authority which

is a good thing but I think it also brings to highlight

that we need to actually solve the problem of immigration that we have

going on in our country and we need to make sure it's done in a proper way with

security with compassion with the things that the president the four pillars that

he's talked about many times and I think he is the one that actually has said

let's solve this problem and he's made it very clear that this is not a

political issue we've got to move beyond the political issue at the Democrats

seem to like to have and say what can we do to actually solve this problem so

that we have good safe legal immigration of which we're the most generous in the

world considering the headlines right now or that this is a big win for the

Trump administration congressman how will this play out politically how will

this affect a you know the way the administration decides to move forward

with us well I think they'll be continued to decide to move forward in

the way that they have especially on the travel ban I think they'll continue that

process looking at it from the national security interest but I think it's also

going to give impetus I think maybe hope on Capitol Hill to deal with immigration

to deal with the other issues that have been involved in he's been very

outspoken about this this president wants to solve it but he's only do it

the right way the president is not willing to do a half-hearted attempt

it's something that he doesn't believe him he's going to get behind it we're

looking to do that in the house we're looking to hopefully get the Senate on

board of this but we do need to solve it's American people need stability on

both sides of the aisle we need to solve this issue and quit the political games

of making sure that our borders are secure that we're having a verifiable

system inside for businesses to actually hire people and have our economy take

care of but also keeping those out that do not need to be here when you keep

crossing illegally yeah this is obviously the first big

Supreme Court decision to come in on this administration's policies so

considering it is being viewed as a win the five-to-four opinion this was

written by Chief Justice John Roberts it found that this restriction this travel

ban fell squarely within the president's authority obviously this is going to be

talked about in the context of what the president's Authority is when it comes

to immigration how do you feel about that well I think it's it follows the

law in many cases here what we got to understand is the president is the chief

executive officer when it comes in especially his number one for mode

opinion is to actually take care of the national security interest that was

where this issue was framed he framed it as a national security interest he

framed it as a need to make sure people are properly vetted coming from places

in the world that do not like us there are people all around the world who hate

us simply because we are free they don't know closely we want to come here

legally the ones who want to come to find fun we need to find places for them

but the president said those of you who want to do us harm we're gonna make sure

we have the proper vetting in place to make this happen and the Supreme Court

upheld that saying this - chief the commander in chief has the national

security responsibilities clearly in his wheelhouse

yes Sotomayor the Supreme Court justice as she found she was a dissenter in this

she said a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was

motivated by anti-muslim animus and she was joined in dissent by Justice Ruth

Bader Ginsburg they did not mince words and their dissent of this ruling well I

think the problem is as I was in law school you actually dealt with words on

paper not emotions and feelings that you saw that maybe came out from somewhere

that they're implying words on paper matter in this town and it shouldn't

matter across the country the ban it was put out you know executive order form it

said what it needed to say and it said it in the proper context of executive

authority I think for them to come back and want to take in the opinions of

others and what they think may or may not have taken it into account is again

judicial bias in many ways to say this is what we

would have preferred but when they come to the law maybe they should go back and

remember what they actually learned or taught in law school but you actually

look at the letter of law well we got the White House reaction to this a short

time ago a simple seven word tweet by President Trump himself Supreme Court

upholds Trump travel ban Wow says the president congressman thank you good to

have you on this morning and get your reaction to this breaking news great to

be with you take care thank you all right Sandra we'll have much more on

what is seen as a major victory a legal victory by the Trump administration in

just a moment as the Supreme Court upholds the travel ban five to four in a

moment law professor Jonathan Turley will be here to give us his take on this

historic ruling

For more infomation >> SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN - Duration: 18:00.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Kicks Off The Weekend With A Pair Of Game-Changing Announcements - Duration: 2:27.

Trump Kicks Off The Weekend With A Pair Of Game-Changing Announcements

It has been a great week for America!

Moreover, with job numbers on the rise and unemployment down, America's economic engine

is all revved up!

Just in time, for the Fourth of July!

Additionally, this week, Pres Trump received a second opportunity to make a SCOUTS (Supreme

Court) nomination that will keep America on auto-pilot through the next generation.

The only thing that needs tweaking are the rising gas prices.

Furthermore, POTUS just let us know – he has it handled!

POTUS tweets earlier this morning, "Just spoke to King Salman of Saudi Arabia and explained

to him that, because of the turmoil & dysfunction in Iran and Venezuela, I am asking that Saudi

Arabia increase oil production.

Maybe up to 2,000,000 barrels, to make up the difference…Prices too high!

He has agreed!"

Pres Trump took care of our increasing gasoline prices.

And simultaneously, he let the United Nations Human Right's Council know that America

will NOT stand for human right's abuses!

In addition, DJT strengthened the Saudi Oil connection with the United States.

It is a win-win solution

Also, in his next tweet, POTUS informs American's, "I will be making my choice for Justice

of the United States Supreme Court on the first Monday after the July 4th Holiday, July

9th!"

The nomination to replace retiring Justice Kennedy comes at an extraordinary time in

American history.

Although, two Justices have been selected in past Presidency's, President Trump has

the opportunity to make several more if he wins the 2020 Presidential campaign.

Moreover, appointing conservative Justice's to the Supreme Court of The United States

of America (SCOTUS) can affect America, the protection of the Constitution and her liberties

for more than two generations!

In closing, will you be celebrating the Fourth of July this year, with more joy and patriotism

for America?

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

usa facts today.

For more infomation >> Trump Kicks Off The Weekend With A Pair Of Game-Changing Announcements - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

Ist Trump Schuld am mediendfeindlichen Klima? - Duration: 1:41.

For more infomation >> Ist Trump Schuld am mediendfeindlichen Klima? - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

CAVING to Trump's demands? US President says EU want trade talks after tariff hike threat - Duration: 3:16.

For more infomation >> CAVING to Trump's demands? US President says EU want trade talks after tariff hike threat - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

Fashion Notes: Melania Trump Struts in Flower Power Pants, Bright Stilettos for Weekend Getaway - Duration: 8:37.

First Lady Melania Trump strutted out of the White House on Friday, bringing the flower power in a pair of cigarette pants, alongside President Trump and their family for a weekend getaway in New Jersey

As of late, Mrs. Trump has focused much of her style attention on pants. Yesterday, Mrs

Trump rocked a sporty chic look in a pair of ivory palazzo pants, as Breitbart News noted

On Friday, it was all about bold sunshine tones and flower power. Mrs. Trump stepped out of the White House in a menswear-inspired white button-down, a pair of Erdem floral print slim-leg pants, and bright yellow Manolo Blahnik stilettos

Mrs. Trump's Erdem pants retail for $895 and are made in Italy. The summer fashion ensemble was paired with Mrs

Trump's faded black shades for that extra cool vibe. U.S. President Donald Trump (R), first lady Melania Trump (2nd L), their son Barron Trump (L), and mother-in-law Amalija Knavs (3rd L) walk on the South Lawn of the White House prior to a Marine One departure June 29, 2018 in Washington, DC

(Alex Wong/Getty Images) U.S. President Donald Trump (R), first lady Melania Trump (3rd L), their son Barron Trump (2ndL), and mother-in-law Amalija Knavs (L) walk on the South Lawn of the White House prior to a Marine One departure June 29, 2018 in Washington, DC

(Alex Wong/Getty Images) US President Donald Trump (2nd L), First Lady Melania Trump (2nd R), their son Barron and Melania Trump's mother Amalija Knavs walk to board Marine One at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 29, 2018 as they depart for Bedminster, New Jersey

(NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images) US President Donald Trump (2nd L), First Lady Melania Trump (L), their son Barron (2nd R) and Melania Trump's mother Amalija Knavs (R) walk to board Marine One at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 29, 2018 as they depart for Bedminster, New Jersey

(NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images) US President Donald Trump (2nd R), First Lady Melania Trump (L), their son Barron (2nd L) and Melania Trump's mother Amalija Knavs (R) walk to board Marine One at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 29, 2018 as they depart for Bedminster, New Jersey

(NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images) President Donald Trump, waves as he walks with from l-r

, first lady Melania Trump, son Barron and Amalija Knavs, mother of the first lady, as they walk towards Marine One helicopter before their departure from the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Friday, June 29, 2018, for the short flight to nearby Andrews Air Force Base, Md

(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) President Donald Trump, right, waves as he walks with first lady Melania Trump, second from left, his son Barron Trump, left, and mother-in-law Amalija Knavs, second from right, as they walk along the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Friday, June 29, 2018, as they head to Marine One for the short trip to Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland

(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) President Donald Trump, left, gestures as he walks with first lady Melania Trump, second from left, his son Barron Trump, second from right, and mother-in-law Amalija Knavs, right, as they walk along the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Friday, June 29, 2018, to board Marine One for the short trip to Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland

(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) President Donald Trump, right, waves as he walks out, with from l-r

, son Barron, first lady Melania Trump, and Amalija Knavs, mother of first lady Melania Trump, as they walk across the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Friday, June 29, 2018, for the short flight to nearby Andrews Air Force Base, Md

(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) US President Donald Trump (2nd L), First Lady Melania Trump (2nd R), their son Barron and Melania Trump's mother Amalija Knavs walk to board Marine One at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 29, 2018 as they depart for Bedminster, New Jersey

(NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images) U.S. President Donald Trump (R), first lady Melania Trump (3rd L), their son Barron Trump (L), and mother-in-law Amalija Knavs (2nd L) walk on the South Lawn of the White House prior to a Marine One departure June 29, 2018 in Washington, DC

(Alex Wong/Getty Images) President Donald Trump, pumps his fist as he walks across the South Lawn of the White House in Washington with l-r

, first lady Melania Trump, son Barron and Amalija Knavs, mother of first lady Melania Trump, before boarding Marine One helicopter, Friday, June 29, 2018, for the short flight to nearby Andrews Air Force Base, Md

(NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images) President Donald Trump, first lady Melania Trump, their son Barron and mother-in-law Amalija Knavs, board Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base, Md

, Friday, June 29, 2018, for a trip to Bedminster, N.J. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and son Barron disembark from Air Force One upon arrival at Morristown Municipal Airport in Morristown, New Jersey, June 29, 2018, as they travel for the weekend to Bedminster, New Jersey

(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and son Barron disembark from Air Force One upon arrival at Morristown Municipal Airport in Morristown, New Jersey, June 29, 2018, as they travel for the weekend to Bedminster, New Jersey

(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) President Donald Trump, first lady Melania Trump and their son Barron Trump, walk on the tarmac to board Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base, Md

(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) President Donald Trump, first lady Melania Trump and their son Barron Trump, and the first lady's mother Amalia Knavs, left,board Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base, Md

, Friday, June 29, 2018, for a trip to Bedminster, N.J. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, son Barron and Melania's mother walk to Air Force One prior to departure from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, June 29, 2018, as they travel to Bedminster, New Jersey for the weekend

(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and son Barron walk to Air Force One prior to departure from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, June 29, 2018, as they travel to Bedminster, New Jersey for the weekend

(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) Mrs. Trump famously wore an Erdem glitter dress with 1980's-inspired sculptural shoulders to the Trump family's New Year's Eve party at Mar-a-Lago last year, as Breitbart News noted

For more infomation >> Fashion Notes: Melania Trump Struts in Flower Power Pants, Bright Stilettos for Weekend Getaway - Duration: 8:37.

-------------------------------------------

An Unexpected Poll Proves That Trump Has Re Election In The Bag - Duration: 11:21.

An Unexpected Poll Proves That Trump Has Re-Election In The Bag

Taking down President Trump is the Democrats one and only current goal.

Everything they do for the foreseeable future is a part of getting that done.

But an unexpected poll shows that all their work is useless, and proves that Trump has

re-election in the bag.

Presidential approval ratings are oftentimes a great way to gauge how well the country

is doing.

For Donald Trump, the odds seem to be stacked against him when being polled for approval.

No matter how well the country is doing, it oftentimes comes down to how it is being reported.

So in his first year in office, his approval rating was rather low, as none of his accomplishments

had time to make a major impact on the economy.

But going into his second year, polling has swiftly moved towards his side.

That likely had to do with the historic tax cuts passed last year going into effect.

Working-class people began to see larger paychecks, as the government was not taking as much of

their income for taxes.

When working-class people see more money in their paycheck, it becomes an impossible task

for the media to spin that in a bad way for most people.

Now as the year has gone further on, Trump has proven himself more and more competent,

most recently with his dealings with North Korea.

Even with North Korea seemingly beginning to back off from dealings with the United

States, Trump had already made his negotiations worthwhile.

He was able to get three U.S. citizens freed from North Korean prison camps, and they were

flown back to the United States.

The American people saw just how competent he was when those three prisoners arrived

at 2 am to be graciously greeted by the President.

Likely because of that, his polling numbers have gone up, with Trump getting to a 50%

approval rating as of polling on Friday.

That was his highest rating of the week, and a much higher number than he had a year ago.

As reported by Newsmax:

"PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S APPROVAL RATING STOOD AT 50 PERCENT ON FRIDAY, WHILE 40 PERCENT

DISAPPROVED OF HIS JOB PERFORMANCE, ACCORDING TO THE RASMUSSEN REPORTS DAILY PRESIDENTIAL

TRACKING POLL.

THE 50 PERCENT APPROVAL MARK WAS HIS HIGHEST RATING OF THE WEEK, ACCORDING TO RASMUSSEN.

HIS LOWEST RATINGS CAME ON MONDAY AND TUESDAY WHEN HE RECORDED A 47 PERCENT APPROVAL RATING

ON BOTH DAYS.

FIFTY-TWO PERCENT DISAPPROVED OF HIS JOB PERFORMANCE ON THOSE DAYS.

FRIDAY'S NUMBERS WERE THE BEST SINCE MAY 4 WHEN TRUMP RECORDED A 51-49 PERCENT RATING.

THE SURVEYED QUESTIONED 1,500 PEOPLE AND HAS A MARGIN OF ERROR OF PLUS OR MINUS 2.5 PERCENTAGE

POINTS."

President Trump is following through on his promise to "make America great again."

He is reversing the failed policies of former President Obama and replacing them with his

own legacy of prosperity.

The unemployment rate is at the lowest point since 2000, and diplomatic relations worldwide

are better than ever.

Do you approve of Donald Trump's performance as President so far?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> An Unexpected Poll Proves That Trump Has Re Election In The Bag - Duration: 11:21.

-------------------------------------------

Paul Ryan Just Looked Trump Square In The Eye And Betrayed Him - Duration: 12:25.

Paul Ryan Just Looked Trump Square In The Eye And Betrayed Him

House Speaker Paul Ryan recently revealed that he will not seek re-election.

So during his past few months in office, he doesn't have to worry about what voters

think of him.

And with that new freedom, Paul Ryan just looked Trump square in the eye and betrayed

him.

Speaker Ryan offered President Trump a plan on immigration that would let House legislators

vote for amnesty, and then vote against a bill containing Trump's three big immigration

reforms.

His plan uses another GOP amnesty plan around 20 representatives are pushing as leverage

to persuade Trump to remove the DACA amnesty portion of the current immigration bill, and

place it in a separate bill.

This would allow a large number of Representatives who are weak on illegal immigration to vote

for amnesty, and also vote against Trump's immigration plan, which includes funding for

a border wall.

As reported by Breitbart:

"HOUSE SPEAKER PAUL RYAN OFFERED PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP A PLAN THAT WOULD LET HOUSE LEGISLATORS

VOTE FOR AN AMNESTY — AND THEN VOTE AGAINST A BILL CONTAINING TRUMP'S BIG THREE IMMIGRATION

REFORMS, SOURCES TELL BREITBART NEWS.

THE RETIRING SPEAKER OFFERED THE DEBATE PLAN ON TUESDAY TO COUNTER THE GROUP OF 20-PLUS

PRO-MIGRATION GOP REPRESENTATIVES WHO ARE PUSHING FOR AN AMNESTY VIA A DISCHARGE PETITION.

THE DISCHARGE PETITION WOULD SCHEDULE A "QUEEN OF THE HILL" DEBATE AROUND FOUR BILLS WHICH

WOULD ENSURE PASSAGE OF AN AMNESTY BILL FOR AT LEAST 2 MILLION 'DACA' ILLEGALS.

RYAN ALSO WANTS AN AMNESTY, AND HIS PLAN, SOURCES SAID WEDNESDAY, LEVERAGES THE DISCHARGE-PETITION

PUSH TO PERSUADE TRUMP TO ALLOW HIS FOUR-PART PACKAGE OF IMMIGRATION REFORMS TO BE SPLIT

INTO A PROPOSED AMNESTY BILL AND A THREE-PART REFORM BILL.

THAT RYAN TWO-BILL SPLIT WOULD ALLOW ROUGHLY 40 BUSINESS-FIRST GOP LEGISLATORS TO VOTE

FOR AN AMNESTY AND ALLOW THEM TO BLOCK TRUMP'S REFORMS ON BORDER SECURITY, CHAIN-MIGRATION,

AND THE VISA-LOTTERY.

ONE SOURCE SAID THE AMNESTY BILL WOULD BE AN ADD-ON AMENDMENT TO THE REFORM BILL — AND

NEITHER MEASURE WOULD PASS UNLESS BOTH WON A MAJORITY.

THE TWO-BILL PLAN EMERGED FROM LEADERSHIP EFFORTS TO MANAGE THE DISCHARGE PETITION,

BUT IT LEAVES MAJORITY LEADER KEVIN MCCARTHY IN A DIFFICULT POSITION.

MCCARTHY INITIALLY ACCEPTED RYAN'S TWO-BILL PLAN, WHICH AIDS THE GOP'S PRO-MIGRATION

MEMBERS, INCLUDING HIS FELLOW CALIFORNIAN, REP.

JEFF DENHAM.

BUT THE LEADERS HAVE NOW RECOGNIZED THAT RYAN'S TWO-BILL PLAN CREATES MANY NEW PROBLEMS.

IT ALARMS THE GROWING CONSERVATIVE SIDE OF THE CAUCUS, IT ALIENATES THE GOP'S 2018

VOTERS, AND IT THREATENS MCCARTHY'S PLANS TO QUIETLY SLIP INTO THE HOUSE SPEAKER'S

JOB AFTER RYAN'S SCHEDULED DEPARTURE IN JANUARY, A SOURCE SAID.

IT ALSO TORPEDOES TRUMP'S REFORM STRATEGY BY SPLITTING THE BUSINESS-BACKED AMNESTY FROM

THE VOTER-BACKED REFORMS."

If Speaker Ryan's plan were to succeed, it would create a ton of problems for Republicans.

The biggest issue it would cause is alienation of Republican voters.

With the midterm elections just months away, a Republican push to grant amnesty to at least

two million DACA illegals could turn off a ton of pro-Trump voters.

If Republicans don't do well in the upcoming midterms and Democrats are able to take control

of Congress, it could end in the impeachment of President Trump.

Do you think Republicans should grant amnesty to DACA illegals?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Paul Ryan Just Looked Trump Square In The Eye And Betrayed Him - Duration: 12:25.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP BLINDSIDES DEMOCRATS WITH $2 BILLION MOVE - Duration: 13:48.

TRUMP BLINDSIDES DEMOCRATS WITH $2 BILLION MOVE

Before he took office, Donald Trump promised that as president, he would do whatever it

took to make this country great again.

In his first 18 months in office, he has followed through with this promise time and time again,

much to the dismay of Democrats!

Right Wing News reported that Trump just blindsided Democrats by negotiating with Australia's

richest person to invest $2 Billion in the U.S. and creating 5,000 high-paying jobs.

In announcing his investment, Anthony Pratt credited Trump's business-friendly Tax Cuts

and Jobs Act of 2017.

"It's going to lead to a tsunami of investment in the United States," he said.

"We make corrugated boxes, everything that's manufactured goes in a box.

So we think we're a barometer of the economy."

Pratt, who is the executive chairman of Visy Industries and Pratt Industries in America,

has already built 70 factories in the U.S. and created more than 8,000 high-paying manufacturing

jobs since venturing into the American market 25 years ago.

"I'm here in the Midwest today celebrating the fact that beef and dairy exports are up

16%," Pratt added.

This comes after Trump hit back at Congresswoman Maxine Waters after she incited violence against

his supporters.

"For these members of his Cabinet who remain and try to defend him, they are not going

to be able to go to a restaurant, they are not going to be able to stop at a gas station,

they are not going to be able to shop in a department store," Waters said, according

to Mediaite.

"The people are going to turn on them, they are gonna protest, they are gonna absolutely

harass them."

Trump was not having any of this, however.

"Congresswoman Maxine Waters, an extraordinarily low IQ person, has become, together with Nancy

Pelosi, the Face of the Democrat Party.

She has just called for harm to supporters, of which there are many, of the Make America

Great Again movement.

Be careful what

you

wish

for Max!" Trump tweeted.

For more infomation >> TRUMP BLINDSIDES DEMOCRATS WITH $2 BILLION MOVE - Duration: 13:48.

-------------------------------------------

Maxine Is Sick Of Trump Ignoring Her And Blast Big Demand She Wants From Him Now - Duration: 5:23.

For more infomation >> Maxine Is Sick Of Trump Ignoring Her And Blast Big Demand She Wants From Him Now - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

Ivanka Trump claims she advised her father on zero tolerance policy - 247 news - Duration: 3:26.

Ivanka Trump is claiming that she was a key player in the discussions which led to her father's decision to end his zero tolerance policy

The White House advisor told Maria Bartiromo on Friday that she spoke with her father prior to his signing of an executive order that effectively ended his administration's policy of separating families at the border

Ivanka, who had not made any public remarks for weeks prior to the interview, did not elaborate, and Bartiromo asked for no details from her guest before ending the segment

Scroll down for video That interview came just hours after it was revealed that Ivanka's top family-leave adviser was going on her own sabbatical, with Politico the first to report that Maggie Cordish was exiting her role at The White House

Cordish is Ivanka's best friend and the pair were fixtures on the New York social scene before Cordish moved to Maryland with her husband Reed

The couple were set up by the first daughter and her husband Jared Kushner, with Reed also holding a White House job until earlier this year alongside his wife

Cordish even changed her party affiliation from Democrat to undecided days after the inauguration before joining Ivanka in her paid-leave work

Share this article Share Ivanka sat down with Bartiromo on her Fox Business Network show Mornings with Maria

A majority of the interview involved the host lauding her guest and all the great things she and the administration have been doing for the economy

Many of the questions were so leading that Ivanka, who was joined at first by Steve Mnuchin and later Treasurer Jovita Carranza, had only to reply 'yes' or 'no

' Bartiromo saved the topic of President Trump's zero tolerance policy for the very last question

'Where you also a voice, a whisper in your fathers ear in terms of the family's separated at the boarder,' asked Bartiromo

'I mean Melania obviously our first lady was very moved by it, went to the boarder twice

Did you also say something to him in terms of before he signed that executive order?'Ivanka responded: 'Of course

I have very strong opinions on that topic.'She did not respond any further to the question

Ivanka has been widely criticized for her silence throughout the weeks that the controversial policy was being enacted

She only spoke up after her father signed an executive order that put a stop to separating children from their parents at the border

Her silence was made all the more glaring when First Lady Melania Trump released a statement that was critical of her husband's policy

Ivanka has now returned to her very public role in thye administration, and on Thursday presented the Trafficking in Persons report alongside Secretary of State Mike Pompeo

She did not however make any public remarks.Ivanka was also silent on Friday at a White House event to mark the six-month anniversary of the administration's new tax plans

Soon after she headed out of DFC to Bedminster with her husband and youngest son on Marine One

For more infomation >> Ivanka Trump claims she advised her father on zero tolerance policy - 247 news - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump To Announce Pick To Replace Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy On July 9 - Duration: 0:23.

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump To Announce Pick To Replace Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy On July 9 - Duration: 0:23.

-------------------------------------------

'NeverTrump' Movement Suffers Defeat After Trump Sets A Sky-High Record - Duration: 3:13.

'NeverTrump' Movement Suffers Defeat After Trump Sets A Sky-High Record

Remember Never Trumpers?

During the 2016 Presidential election, a tribe within the conservative movement was strongly

opposed to the nomination of Donald Trump.

Even as it became more and more clear that Trump was going to win the nomination, so-called

conservatives tried to undermine him.

They were incapable of believing Trump meant what he said about putting Americans first.

Either that, or these "Never Trumpers" didn't want a president who put America

first, much like their buddies on the left.

Still today, there is a contingent of "conservatives" who stand against Trump, and it doesn't

make any sense.

Amazing things are happening here and around the world.

What kind of idiot conservative would oppose that?

Well, as it turns out, very few still hate on Trump… in fact, that vast majority of

Republicans are in love with our POTUS.

From Breitbart:

"The latest polling shows President Trump enjoying record support from Republicans,

proving once again just how little influence and moral authority Never Trump has.

A recent Gallup poll shows that 90 percent of Republicans support the president.

According to the New York Times (a far-left outlet that regularly spreads fake news),

other than the historic outlier of George W. Bush in the aftermath of the September

11 terrorist attacks, no Republican president in this poll's history has garnered 90 percent

support from Republican voters at this point in a first term.

Trump's historic level of support from within his own Party is not only a tribute to the

president's verifiable successes at home and abroad (tax cuts, booming economy, regulation

reform, gutting Obamacare, North Korea under control, the Islamic State all but vanquished,

no stupid neocon wars)…

…it is also a testament to just how marginalized, tribal, and extreme the failed Never Trump

movement has become."

This is big news.

Even Reagan, one of our greatest presidents, didn't enjoy these kinds of numbers.

It makes sense, though.

Republicans are pleased that Trump is making good on his promises.

As the fake news media pushes one pathetic attack after another, Americans are seeing

a president who refuses to back down.

His achievements in the first two years of his term have been historic:

He scored a massive tax cut.

He slashed job-killing regulation.

He de-fanged Obamacare.

Companies are investing in America.

The wall is going up (hopefully).

Then there's the world-shattering progress with North Korea, which should earn Trump

the Nobel Peace Prize.

What could conservatives be upset about?

Overall, every American is benefitting from more money in their paychecks, increased opportunity,

and greater national security.

Perhaps the few "Never Trumpers" that still remain should just give up.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA FACTS Today

For more infomation >> 'NeverTrump' Movement Suffers Defeat After Trump Sets A Sky-High Record - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

Nicolle Wallace Destroys The Big Lie That Trump Is Too Incompetent To Collude With Russia - Duration: 1:00.

the judges now that's going to

decide.

I mean, he couldn't have dreamed

this up with Roy Cohn was still

advising.

>> His friends will say

privately and some of them

publicly, that he's too

incompetent to have colluded

with Russia, but he's so good

that he lured two guys off the

supreme court.

>> Lured two guys off the

supreme court.

>> One died, just one.

>> And these will be the guys

that will determine his legal

fate and in the balance is roe

V. Wade, affirmative action, all

of that, that he can go to his

base and say, yes, I may do all

of the things that you

evangelicals have been preaching

against, but look at what I've

given you.

And he can survive to destroy

another day, and this is scary,

as scary as it gets.

>> Frank, you're leaving us

after this block.

I'll give you the last word.

Too incompetent to collude with

Russia but --

>> I looked at career criminals,

For more infomation >> Nicolle Wallace Destroys The Big Lie That Trump Is Too Incompetent To Collude With Russia - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Hannity with Judge Jeanine:The Left Targets Trump Admin Officials - Duration: 15:22.

welcome back to this special edition of Hannity the Trump effect as president

Trump's agenda succeeds the left is literally unraveling and now many are

harassing Trump allies all over the country the left claims to have a

monopoly of compassion for women but take a look at how they treat women in

positions of power within the Trump administration I was asked to leave a

restaurant this weekend where I attempted to have dinner with my family

my husband and I politely left and went home I was asked to leave because I work

for president Trump we are allowed to Grist disagree but we should be able to

do so freely and without fear of harm and this goes for all people regardless

of politics three huge guys came up and started probably an inch from my face

screaming at me every word in the book cursing as loud as they could so then a

trooper my trooper came up and my boyfriend and I got our tickets were

headed in and then they ran in and circled me where I could not get into

the theater they stopped me

and on Tuesday a group of protesters in Georgetown harassed Senate Majority

Leader Mitch McConnell and his wife Elaine Chao who serves as president

Trump's Secretary of Transportation following these outrageous displays many

on both sides of the aisle have called for civility but when Hillary Clinton

was asked about these calls she responded quote Oh give me a break but

the less rhetoric is not only targeted on Republicans in leadership positions

take a look at calls from the left to get rid of ice I think there's no

question that we've got to critically re-examine ice and its role and the way

that it is being administered and the work it is doing and we need to probably

think about starting from scratch I think we need to abolish ice that seems

really clear they have strayed so far from the interests of the American

people and the interests of humanity we need to we need to abolish it

eliminating ice for instance and president drum ice isn't doing what it

was created to do it's being used as his own personal police force and in those

actions it's actually making us less safe I don't think ice today is working

as intended you think you should get rid of the agency I believe that it has

become a deportation force and I think you should separate the criminal justice

from the immigration issues and I think you should reimagine ice joining me now

with reaction Mike Huckabee Fox News contributor good evening governor now I

can't imagine as a father what it's like watching your daughters stand at that

podium and talk about her being harassed out of a restaurant because she works

for our president and and you know a man who was both a friend of yours and

obviously someone that she admires a great deal give us your reaction well

it's very frustrating to see the the owner of a restaurant not only

bullied my daughter and threw her out of the restaurant but showed a level of

bigotry and if you're gonna be that bigoted and put a sign on your

restaurant that says no shirt no shoes no Republicans no service I mean at

least be honest about it and say to people we don't want your business we

don't want the likes of you at our lunch counter you can't even sit on the back

of the bus but that's pretty sad in our country I think Sarah handled it with a

lot of dignity and class probably more than her old man would have done well

and then you know she of course is someone that all of us have a great deal

of respect for and she called herself as has done the president for civility and

then good old Hillary who I thought was still in the woods comes out again and

says you know you know forget about that give me a break

what's your take on Hillary Clinton's basic rejection of civility as the way

to approach this problem well not a surprise coming from the person who

called the Trump voters a basket of deplorable --zz it's clear she has not

gotten over the loss but here's what's even clearer this November

Americans will make a very significant decision as to whether they want to

elect the Democrats who want to get rid of ice and open the borders and treat

people who come here illegally with great level of open arms regardless of

their criminal background and even let them vote for heaven's sake yeah do we

want a party that lets illegal aliens get treated better than we do citizens

simply going out to eat are going to a movie sting and that's the America that

people will choose do you want the the civil one where you get to go to a

restaurant or the one where you don't unless you're an illegal and then of

course come on in and we want to rest you because we're getting rid of the

police force the very people who try to keep these folks out you know I must

tell you governor when I first heard the woman who's running for governor or was

sex in the city Cynthia Nixon when she says we should get rid of Isis I'm like

Ann just goes to show you someone who's never been in government before but then

they all started taking on this mantra I had to stop and say to myself

what is happening in the United States of America well it's obvious that this

is a script all the Democrats are required to read it I think they have to

memorize it it's like lines in a play and they're all supposed to audition for

it but it's getting really ridiculous when

this is their message to the American voter let's get rid of any scrutiny of

people who break into this country without any form of identification who

do not come through the legal process the judge we are a nation of immigrants

we love and welcome immigrants to this nation all of us have come here from

somewhere but my gosh we did have to do it legally and what these folks are

saying is no borders none whatsoever I can't go to any country in the world

and just walk right in why should somebody be able to come in to America

like that I have no idea well it is it is a turning point in this

country and as you say the 2018 elections are so incredibly important

anyway Governor Mike Huckabee so good to have you on this evening thanks always a

pleasure judge all right and still to come on this special edition of Hannity

Democrats in the media are completely losing it over Justice Anthony Kennedy

retirement from the United States Supreme Court and by the way don't

forget to buy a copy of my book on Amazon or Barnes & Noble Liars leakers

and liberals the case against the anti-trump conspiracy more Hannity after

the move

welcome back to this special edition of Hannity Justice Kennedy announced his

retirement from the Supreme Court this week throwing the left and the

mainstream media into utter hysteria take a look at this regardless of what

happens in his presidency now Donald Trump will leave a mark on this country

for decades to come yeah it's like it's not gonna go away

it's like he's giving America judicial herpes if you are LGBTQ if you are a

person of color if you are a woman so basically if you are not a straight

white male in America right now you are probably freaking out we're looking at a

destruction of the Constitution of the United States we're not screwed we're

actually screwed for generations clean air and water that you use and breathe

is at stake we are looking down the tunnel of potentially criminal liability

for women who are seeking to make decisions about their own bodies it's

time for Democrats to throw down and what I mean by that is that we've been

playing by the rulebook and Donald Trump and Republicans have been playing by

street rules we need to play by street rules don't allow a vote on this don't

have a hearing don't have a meeting don't let anything go forward don't play

ball with this decision Fox News is reporting that President Trump is set to

interview candidates this weekend and will announce a final decision on Monday

July 9 the president sat down with Fox businesses Maria Bartiromo to discuss

some major questions he might have for his potential nominees her interview is

going to air Sunday at 10:00 a.m. here's the preview are you going to ask your

nominees beforehand how they might vote on Roe vs. Wade well that's a big one

and probably not they're all saying don't do that you don't do that you

shouldn't do that but I'm putting conservative people on and I'm very

proud of Neal Gorsuch he has been outstanding his opinions are you know is

so well written so brilliant and I'm gonna try and do something like that but

I don't think I'm going to be so specific joining me now with reaction

former Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee and foxnews contributors

- Roy Murdoch and Robert Jeffress alright I got to start with you pastor

Jeffress right now the right of course is looking for the President to appoint

someone who is pro-life the president has indicated in the preview that he's

not going to ask that direct question what do you think the president is going

to ask as it relates to whether or not a person is pro-life well the president is

exactly right not to ask a specific question about roe v wade and judge he

doesn't need to and here's why it's the philosophy of this justice that really

counts you know for the last 50 years the only way liberals have been able to

enact their agenda is through the judiciary by having justices who create

imaginary rights for some Americans while at the same time erasing the real

rights of other Americans there is no right to abortion that's nowhere in the

Constitution but there is a right to life that there's been a race for 50

million children butchered in the womb since 1973 roe v wade and if the

President and I know he will will appoint a conservative justice with a

conservative philosophy roe v wade and all of these other atrocities from the

judiciary will take care of themselves Austan Goolsbee all right so I assume

you're gonna have the opposite opinion but isn't the president almost required

to suggest someone who is an originalist who is a constitutionalist I mean I

think we can all agree the justices are not supposed to write the law they're

supposed to interpret precedent yeah look I can see why the Democrats that

that you showed on the Calipari's agitated as they are Justice Kennedy is

really quite a centrist

oats that the president is required to suggest or nominate someone who's gonna

be like Kennedy or he can nominate anyone he wants cuz I mean anybody he

could nominate a very left-wing judge if he wanted a very right-wing judge a

centrist I assume he's gonna pick somebody off that list that he

publicized 21 originally 21 it's up to 25 judges which basically have been

vetted by the Heritage Foundation the Federal Society

he's been very public he's been very open and transparent these most these

names were out there before he was elected so people knew what they're

gonna get when they voted for him and whether you like or dislike these people

he's been very transparent about putting these names forward and people have had

but basically a year and a half to look into them and their backgrounds their

judicial judicial outlooks and so forth all right and I'll ask you this pastor

Jeffress because and then I want to go back to Austin again look that the truth

is that you know these justices I mean judges who were up for it to be a

justice I mean if they if they have too many decisions that are controversial I

mean that's going to cause a whole you know uprising but if they don't have a

lot of controversial decisions then on the other hand they're gonna be

conservatives who are going to say well maybe they're not conservative enough

and in the end what we got is Murkowski and collins who are votes that we need

who were the Republican senators who are Bundren pro-choice so how does the

president balance that to get the 50 Republicans that he needs because pence

will be the if there's a tie the the 50 you know judge night not long ago the

president asked me why I thought he had a 75% of provoked rating with

evangelicals and I said it's very simple you are delivering on your promise to

put conservatives on all of the courts judge the president knows this this is

what he ran on and I'll have to tell you if we were dealing with a President Bush

either one of them or heaven forbid a president Romney I would be nervous

tonight that that president would waffle and give in to the Democrats and liberal

Republicans but this president has the guts to deliver on his promise and I

believe he's going to do it well clearly he does I don't think there's anyone at

this point it would say that President Trump doesn't have guts

mean but but let me go to Austin now you know that there are Democratic senators

Heidi Heitkamp as well as Manchin okay they are in red states they are

Democrats what happens to them if they vote for a conservative nominee in a

state that is overwhelmingly read what happens among their voters or what

happens do they get elected you know I don't know that they are you're quite

right they're in tough races you know it I would be remiss not to remind everyone

that that the Democrats were in office and they had the longest filibuster and

held up the proposed justice Merrick garland so you can see why the Democrats

are feeling like this was a power play that was not justified I think the

Democrats in red states that are in tough races it's going to matter a lot

to them who gets nominated as a candidate like someone reasonable or

does it seem like someone extreme it's going to be conservative and they're not

going to be happy if they're not happy people going to the restaurants you can

be sure they're not gonna be happy with the president's nominee thank you

gentlemen and coming up Daniel Hoffman and

Sebastian Gorka on president Trump's upcoming summit with Russian President

Vladimir Putin

you

For more infomation >> Hannity with Judge Jeanine:The Left Targets Trump Admin Officials - Duration: 15:22.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Supporter Could Lose Multi-Million Dollar Company to U.S. Tariffs - Duration: 4:56.

SOLEDAD: PRESIDENT TRUMP ARGUES THAT TARIFFS, A TAX ON PRODUCTS IMPORTED FROM OVERSEAS ARE IMPORTANT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY AND WILL BOOST THE U.S. ECONOMY.

HE EVEN TWEETED THAT TRADE WARS ARE GOOD AND EASY TO WIN.

SAY THE PRESIDENT'S TRADE POLICY IS COSTING MILLIONS IN REVENUE AND FORCING THEM TO CUT JOBS.

AMONG THE COMPANIES WHO HAVE CRITICIZED THE MOVE IS A REALLY DAVIDSON.

THEY ANNOUNCED THIS PAST WEEK THEY WOULD HAVE TO MOVE REDUCTION OUT OF THE U.S. SAYING THE PRESIDENT'S WI-FI PERCENT TAX ON FOREIGN STEEL AND FOREIGN ALUMINUM WILL COST $20 MILLION.

PRESIDENT TRUMP TWEETED, IF THEY MOVE, WATCH, IT WILL BE THE BEGINNING OF THE END, THEY WILL BE TAXED LIKE NEVER BEFORE.

IT IS NOT JUST HARLEY DAVIDSON, THE LARGEST NAIL MANUFACTURER IN MISSOURI SAYS THAT TARIFFS HAVE PUSHED THEM TO THE BRINK OF CLOSURE.

AND AN AUTO SUPPLIER OUT OF MICHIGAN ONCE THEY WILL NOT LAST THE QUARTER.

JOINING US NOW IS MARY BUCHZE IGER FROM SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN.

MARY: THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

SOLEDAD: TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IT.

MARY: WE ARE A WORLDWIDE MANUFACTURER.

WE MANUFACTURE PARTS NOT ONLY IN THE U.S., BUT CHINA AND TAIWAN AND WE ARE GETTING INTO EUROPEAN OPERATIONS AS WELL.

AND WE PRODUCE ROUGHLY 80% OF OUR PRODUCTS THROUGHOUT CHINA AND TAIWAN RIGHT NOW.

SOLEDAD: YOU'VE GROWN PRETTY IMPRESSIVELY.

WHAT I READ WAS YOU HAD REVENUES IN 40 MILLION DOLLARS AND YOU WERE LOOKING REALISTICALLY AT MILLION DOLLARS.

IS THAT RIGHT?

MARY: YES THAT IS RIGHT.

OVER THE LAST TEN YEARS WE HAVE COME FROM UNDER 2 MILLION DOLLARS IN SALES TO OVER 40. AND WITH OUR CURRENT CONTRACTS AND OUR GROWTH RECORD WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW WE SHOULD BE AT OVER

50 NEXT YEAR.

OUR ULTIMATE GOAL IS TO BE A BILLION DOLLAR COMPANY IN THE NEXT 10 YEARS.

WHICH HAS A NICE RING TO IT , DOESN'T IT?

MERRY: IT DOES.

SOLEDAD SO YOU'VE BEEN REMOVED : FROM THIS LIST OF THE 25 PERCENT TARIFF, WHICH I KNOW WAS KIND OF WHAT SENT YOU INTO A BIT OF A TAILSPIN THE OTHER DAY.

YOU'VE BEEN TAKEN OFF THAT LIST.

SO WHAT TARIFFS DO YOU FACE RIGHT NOW?

WHAT IS THE RISK?

MARY SO WE WERE TAKEN OFF THE : ORIGINAL LIST OF 301S.

UNFORTUNATELY ON MAY 2013 OUR ADMINISTRATION CAME OUT WITH A NEW INVESTIGATION INTO THE SECTION 232 TARIFFS STATING THAT

THEY WERE GOING TO POSSIBLY PUT A TARIFF ON ALL IMPORTED VEHICLES AND ALL IMPORTED AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENT SOLEDAD: I HAD READ THAT YOU WERE GENERALLY -- GENUINELY

CONCERNED THAT YOUR BUSINESS MIGHT STRUGGLE OR NOT LAST THROUGH THE QUARTER IS THA STILL TRUE?

YOU THINK THAT IS A POSSIBILITY?

MARY: IF THESE TARIFFS WERE TO TAKE EFFECT. ABSOLUTELY.

WE POTENTIALLY COULD GO OUT OF BUSINESS.

YEAH I MEAN THE ORIGINAL SECTION 301 TARIFFS WOULD HAVE COST US OVER 7.5 MILLION DOLLARS ANNUALLY.

I DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF MARGIN IN MY 40 MILLION DOLLAR COMPANY.

SO WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF BUSINESS WITHIN 2-3 MONTHS TOPS WITH A SECTION 301.

NOW THIS NEW SECTION 232 IS AGAIN WE DON'T KNOW THE ANSWERS.

SOLEDAD: YOU'RE A TRUMP VOTER AND A TRUMP SUPPORTER.

HE WAS PRETTY CLEAR DURING HIS CAMPAIGNING THAT THAT TARIFFS WAS GOING TO BE NOT JUST ON THE TABLE BUT YOU KNOW HE REALLY HAD A PLAN TO GET INTO A TARIFF FIGHT WITH CHINA.

HE SPELLED IT OUT PRETTY OFTEN.

MARY: WE SUPPORT THE NEED FOR CHANGE BECAUSE YOU KNOW THERE ARE - THERE ARE TRADE DEFICITS.

THERE ARE DEFINITELY TECHNOLOGICAL- TECHNOLOGY ISSUES WITH CHINA.

BUT WE WOULD HOPE FOR A BETTER EXECUTION.

TARIFFS ARE NO MORE THAN A TAX ON AMERICAN COMPANIES. AND I DON'T THINK THAT REALLY PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT.

SOLEDAD: I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT ABOUT THAT I DON'T THINK PEOPLE - IT SOUNDS VERY FANCY. BUT IT'S JUST CONSUMERS PAY MORE. THAT'S THE TAKE AWAY.

KATHERINE: -- MARY: THAT IS ALL IT IS.

PEOPLE DON'T GET THAT IT'S A TAX ON AMERICAN COMPANIES AND AMERICAN CONSUMERS. IF THESE, IF ALL OF THESE TARIFFS THAT ARE IN PLACE RIGHT NOW AGAINST THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY WERE TO

ACTUALLY COME INTO FORCE. AND THEY'RE ESTIMATING RIGHT NOW, THE GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE ALLIANCE, RIGHT NOW IS ESTIMATING THAT VEHICLES COULD GO UP BY MORE THAN $6,000 PER VEHICLE.

SO AT THE END OF THE DAY THAT'S JUST THE AMERICAN CONSUMER PAYING THESE.

SOLEDAD: WHAT HAPPENS IS AMERICAN CONSUMERS DON'T PAY IT AND PEOPLE DON'T BUY VEHICLES

For more infomation >> Trump Supporter Could Lose Multi-Million Dollar Company to U.S. Tariffs - Duration: 4:56.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Destroyed Bill And Hillary Clinton With One Tweet - Duration: 11:14.

Trump Destroyed Bill And Hillary Clinton With One Tweet

Hillary Clinton crawled back into the spotlight once again to lob attacks at Donald Trump.

She lost her mind over his speech at the U.N. General Assembly where he tagged Kim Jong

Un with the nickname "Rocket Man."

But Trump fired back and destroyed both Bill and Hillary Clinton with one tweet.

During Trump's speech, he declared Kim Jon Un – whom he labeled as "Rocket Man"

– was on a suicide mission by continuing to develop nuclear weapons.

Trump said the United States would destroy North Korea if they threatened America or

her allies.

Trump's "Rocket Man" nickname for the North Korean tyrant was a big hit and other

world leaders quickly adopted it.

But not everyone was pleased.

Hillary Clinton appeared at one of her safe spaces – Stephen Colbert's late night

comedy show – and attacked the speech as "dark" and "dangerous". Trump immediately

fired back.

He pointed out he was only in this dangerous situation because of the Clintons.

Trump correctly noted that in 1994, then-President Bill Clinton made a deal with the North Koreans

where they obtained fuel and nuclear power plants in exchange for freezing their weapons

program.

The deal failed and North Korea gained the wherewithal to develop nuclear missiles.

Hillary Clinton – as Secretary of State – presided over Barack Obama's policy

of "strategic patience."

This amounted to doing nothing and hoping someone else would clean up the mess.

Now that Trump is taking steps to correct the Clintons errors, they are heckling him

from the peanut gallery.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Trump Destroyed Bill And Hillary Clinton With One Tweet - Duration: 11:14.

-------------------------------------------

'We don't want a new COLD WAR' - NATO's relief at Trump and Putin historic first meeting - Duration: 2:35.

For more infomation >> 'We don't want a new COLD WAR' - NATO's relief at Trump and Putin historic first meeting - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

► KELLYANNE CONWAY I SENIOR COUNSELOR TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP-PUTIN SUMMIT - Duration: 13:39.

let's get to it now their headliner killing untimely lives on North Lawn

Senior Council the president joins us now from the White House and Kellyanne

good morning and welcome back it's it's a Friday and you are in you're in the

hot seat here okay so let's get to the Supreme Court first what is the state of

the process if there is not yet a short list of nominees where's the president's

head on this well you saw just last night the president returned from a

two-day trip out meeting with Americans and came here and met with senators from

both parties because it is the Senate's job constitutionally to advise and

consent the president on such matters and the president is taking to account

their advice at the same time it will be a presidential decision this president

owing back to the campaign for two straight years now bill has been very

transparent and therefore accountable with respect to the type of person and

indeed the specific individuals he would consider to put on the nation's highest

court yes as you just mentioned the elevated justice nail Gorsuch he's been

an outstanding jurist in his first term and a half on the Supreme Court but look

also at what the president has done in the u.s. circuit courts there are 21

confirmed judges on the US circuit courts one out of eight US Circuit

judges right now is a trump appointee and so we we already see the way the

president approaches this I think Neil Gorsuch and his confirmation hearings

put it best when it came to some of these hot-button issues like abortion

where he said it's settled precedent and it's not my job is not relevant whether

I like a particular precedent or don't and I know people on the other side who

are really losing and every turn these days politically then practically they

are going to try to make this about one or two issues we know that this that the

Supreme Court covers any number of issues under the Constitution in a given

term just this past week and last week they decided cases on the impropriety of

using unions use compelling people to use them for political purposes

obviously they they ruled in the president's favor and the travel ban

they have released opinions very recently on on internet taxes so the

court is very active breath of issues this president has says

he will choose from that list and he's been very clear in his appointments we

make to the type of jurists that he likes not to do does he make a decision

before the summit with Vladimir Putin into an athlete's he may I don't think

that the timeline has anything to do with a summit this is a president as we

all know is the original and unbelievably peripatetic multitasker he

does many different things at a given day moment and week I think the sheer

volume the velocity of the way he works is mind-numbing to many people I find it

to be a privilege so I don't think that a timeline is going to be according to a

summit so much as the president takes very seriously a Supreme Court vacancy

and knows that we should we should move with some dispatch in filling that

vacancy down as a maybe then based on the timeline for July 6 things was a guy

who moves with alacrity on everything as you know so maybe sooner maybe sooner

maybe sooner I think that person could be confirmed this year why not okay that

being said Kellyanne this upcoming summit with the president and Vladimir

Putin what does president Trump what is he heading into that summit hoping to

accomplish and get done the president has made very clear a couple of things

one is to improve relations with countries and its leaders where we can

where it makes sense for the United States of America and for peace-loving

people everywhere to improve relationships and this president

followed the same model that he that he did with the Singapore summit and mr.

Kim with Russia meaning he sent over one of his top diplomats one of his top

security officials in the case of North Korea secretary Pompeo in the case of

Russia NSC director NASA security adviser Ambassador John Bolton and that

person goes over there and lays the groundwork we got other people working

on logistics and this president has said from the beginning that he is willing to

talk to leaders when it is in the best interest of America if Russia and the

United States of America can work on national security issues together the

president will do that but at the same time this president has had no

reluctance whatsoever to push back when he has felt Susan

there's Russian officials I'd like to know that push your back on the side and

and I just want to say one more thing you had President Obama whispering and a

hot mic that he would have more flexibility after the next election you

have this president as transparent as can be on going away to be president but

to have a summit like this you gotta get some sort of win-win on each side and

what is the win/win for Vladimir Putin what is the win/win for President Trump

is it some sort of deal on Syria is that is that where the ground could move well

the wind winds and having the conversation to begin with but another

win would be the president's vision with respect to Syria this president has

pushed back on Assad twice when he's gassed his own people with the support

of Russia continuing the conversation about a nuclear capable North Korea and

nuclear capable of ran I mean this presidents been so active around the

globe to not involve Russia in some of these conversations and I'm sure because

this is what the media will say to is what are you talking about with respect

to interference and elections everything's on the table you know when

mr. Putin and President Trump met the last time that particular one-on-one

meeting lasted much longer than quote people anticipate on why they were

anticipating a certain timeline and it covered an array of topics and you can

expect that to happen again meanwhile what a hearing that was

yesterday Kellyanne you know Christopher Rea rod rose and signed the heads of the

FBI and the DOJ sat in a hearing room and faced a grilling from Republican

lawmakers with the president able to to witness a few of those exchanges what

were his thoughts when he looked at really the anger and frustration that we

continue to see in this case from House Republicans over lack of documents

getting handed over and lack of quite frankly questions getting answered well

again you see the transparency and accountability of the process that was a

televised a briefing folks are under oath when they're answering those

questions and director Ray and Deputy Attorney General

rod Rosen Stein made clear that they feel they are they are complying with

the request some of the Republicans and others disagree the house obviously

passed a bill yesterday or past a festival and it's evolution yeah

resolution yeah excuse me and and the fact is that people do it is true that

many Americans are tiring with the length of the process here that is

absolutely true if you look at the polls the number of people who are saying that

the investigation is a good idea has it gone on too long is it interfering with

other things fortunately the present United States

does not allow it to interfere with his major duties which is to be the chief

economic steward of our nation's economy it could not be doing any better than it

is we're having this six-month tax cut and Jobs Act anniversary together here

today grazie yeah Benghazi going on for two and a

half years that I know the Republic is it fresh to the comparison no specific

question I know the president was traveling Wisconsin yesterday did he

watch the hearing did he watch any of it Kellyanne well he can access clips any

time he wants and he's aware he's fully briefed on everything of that nature he

certainly knows that he certainly knew that the hearing was taking place he

certainly knows some of the highlights of not the specifics and everybody's

been playing on their choice and they're they're chosen and curated clips from

the last day so I think the president could not be more clear he tweets about

it and puts it on social media off and he talks about it freely often that he

believes this is a witch hunt and that there is no collusion he he goes back to

what we were promised at the very beginning of this which is that this

changed votes and he wasn't duly elected that's all a load of bunk and everybody

knows it he was duly and democratically elected he doesn't let any of it get in

his way of presiding over the strongest economy in generations if not our

lifetimes if not ever and continuing to meet with leaders here in America but

across the globe and at different summits to try to bring more peace and

prosperity wherever you men chief of staff what are the plans there

what is the president actively doing right now as as far as looking for a

replacement I don't understand these stories in that the media sort of like

ants on a sugar cube always go and focus on one thing it seems to come up every

month or two or three months if I went back and I looked at a bunch of

inquiries from February four December and now from June they all say

the same thing I try not to respond to them to allow the pressure op and others

to do that but here you got responses directly from the President and from our

chief of staff John Kelly yesterday that it's all news to them we have no talent

I'm sorry that this is popping out I'm delighted to serve under chief of staff

Kelly and I work with whomever the president asked me to work with here in

the West Wing and across his administration but I know that it's

easier and maybe more fun for folks to to play the Paula game and learning the

intricacies of policy since again stuff goes so quickly here but I guess

eventually everybody's going to leave it eventually everybody who said people are

going to leave will be right just not dominate the coverage I know the

Europeans felt like just just to be specific about it

general Kelly is staying is that what you're saying as far as I know general

Kelly wants to stay and he is staying he hasn't said anything differently to me

and I come here to work every day with the team that the president has asked us

all to work with and we do I find this place to be much more streamlined and

much more sophisticated and running in a very good way a year and a half into the

presidency and we don't run around wondering who's leaving next who's going

to be forced out we get to work every day and there's so much on our plate as

you know that's just not one of them okay you bet well what does the White

House have to say given the shooting in Annapolis just for you well it's a it's

a horrible tragedy what we're trying to I think us being all of America

is pieced together that this person the shooter this murderer had some kind of

grievance against this paper obviously it filed a lawsuit lost that lawsuit and

seems to have been very active on social media very threatening it seems to me

and about this paper and went in yesterday and did what he did the

president expressed his sympathies it continues to be briefed by the FBI and

others and we'll continue to talk about this as the different facts develop but

obviously people who go to work every day innocent Americans should not have

this as an occupational hazard and I think is our press secretary made clear

last night in a on innocent journalists innocent

Americans attack on all of us what's the president's plans next week a

lot of people a fourth of July week and he's gonna be making a trip out to

Montana yes the plan is for him to go to Montana on July 5th and the day before

the president the first lady will host for the second consecutive year the

military families here at a picnic and then later celebrate America's

Independence our 240 second year of our nation's independence out here on the

South Lawn the fireworks display for all to see and we're very excited because

it's a great celebration of our nation's independence and this president has done

a great deal to advance the cause of democracy and freedom everything from

economic freedom to national security and freedom and our ability to be free

and prosperous and should be a great joy yeah you came out to talk about taxes

six-month anniversary today what do you think the impact of the tax plan has

been on America today go ahead and sell it easy votes they're very it's been

very positive any metric that you look at the confidence number is historic

confidence numbers among consumers among small business owners among

manufacturers the job creation the growth numbers all the critics saying is

that you can never even get it above 3% that's fantasy its projected to be well

above 4% and that I think what it's done in addition to giving the millions of

Americans hardworking Americans the bonuses and the raises it has a

stimulated growth and a buoyancy and optimism in our economy that people feel

free to move around in the job market six point seven million available jobs

now it outpaces the number of actual job seekers so that gives people freedom to

think about their next job or the next career move

also the repatriation a word that Americans really should learn more

handily because you're going to hear a lot of it bill and Sondra repatriation

of 300 billion dollars so far that was wealth parked legally overseas that now

these companies can bring back the corporations that were that people said

they're not going to vet they're investing in their workplace or in

record investing in their workforce and and also you see this child care tax

credit people feel like they can make more free decisions I think the number

one the number one byproduct of tax cuts is freedom it's individual freedom and

liberty hey listen thanks for being here today we've covered a lot of ground and

have a great weekend happy July 4th to you and every bear

For more infomation >> ► KELLYANNE CONWAY I SENIOR COUNSELOR TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP-PUTIN SUMMIT - Duration: 13:39.

-------------------------------------------

GM says new Trump auto tariffs threaten American jobs - Duration: 5:11.

General Motors headquarters at the Renaissance Center in Detroit in 2014. The company said Friday that President Trump's tariffs risked weakening its global competitiveness

(Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images) General Motors came out swinging Friday against President Trump's proposed tariffs on foreign automobiles, saying they risked weakening the company's global competitiveness and would lead to job cuts at home and abroad

In comments filed with the Commerce Department, which is evaluating whether auto imports threaten U

S. national security as the president has suggested, GM said the new tariffs would hurt the economy

Trump's proposal "risks undermining GM's competitiveness against foreign auto producers by erecting broad brush trade barriers that increase our global costs" and could invite retaliation by U

S. trading partners, the automaker said. The company's blunt statement underscores the increasing frustration among American multinational corporations, which fear that the president's "America First" trade policy ignores the realities of a global economy

"The overbroad and steep application of import tariffs on our trading partners risks isolating U

S. businesses like GM from the global market that helps to preserve and grow our strength here at home," the company said

Consumers "at some point" will feel the impact of Trump's tariffs in higher prices for passenger cars and auto parts

The per-vehicle increase of several thousand dollars will hit "customers who can least afford" the higher costs, the company warned

If the company instead absorbed the tariff, it would reduce hiring, investment and wages, according to the filing

GM has 47 manufacturing sites and 25 service-part facilities in the United States, where it employs about 110,000 people

Since the 2009 depths of the Great Recession, the company has invested more than $22 billion in its American factories, it said

Instead of additional tariffs, the administration should concentrate on reaching agreements with Mexico and Canada on a modernized North American trade deal, GM said

Those negotiations, which began in August, have stalled. GM said Trump's earlier decisions to levy import taxes on steel, aluminum and billions of dollars in Chinese goods also was damaging its prospects

The president's interest in taxing foreign cars, perhaps as a tool to encourage the European Union or Japan to open their markets further to American exports, sparked quick opposition from prominent Republicans

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, called Trump's push for auto tariffs "deeply misguided

" The president, however, has repeatedly complained about the E.U.'s 10 percent tariff on American cars

The United States imposes a 2.5 percent tax on cars imported from Europe and elsewhere

"They send Mercedes, they send BMWs, they send everything; we tax them practically nothing," Trump said this week at a rally in South Carolina

The Commerce Department already has received more than 2,100 comments from businesses, trade groups and individuals in response to the tariffs

Two days of public hearings are scheduled July 19-20, and the president could go ahead with his additional tariffs shortly thereafter

The Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association, representing 1,000 vehicle parts-makers, told Commerce it "strongly opposes" Trump's tariffs

"Counterproductive unilateral actions will place manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage to their global counterparts, erode U

S. jobs and growth, and will not protect the national security of the United States," the industry group said

Google photo QA

Saturday, June 30, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Jun 30 2018

No comments:

Post a Comment