Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Jun 28 2018

A decision should take place

after the new congress is

>> What are you prepared to do

if Mitch Mcconnell goes forward

with what he said is he's not

going to follow his precedent.

He's admitted is hypocrisy that

only applies to presidents he

doesn't like.

>> The American people should

and will understand the

momentous importance of this

choice for the reasons you

discussed early.

This justice will have a

decisive vote.

Call it a swing vote or a

majority maker.

We're in an unparalleled moment

of assault on rule of law when

our fundamental liberties are in

danger.

We're going to use every tool

available and we will possibly

be creative about some new ones

in seeking to give the American

people a voice.

A decision of this historic

magnitude requires more

For more infomation >> Democrats have some new tools to stop Trump's Supreme Court nominee - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

A Bombshell Email Is The Smoking Gun In FBI Scandal Of Spying On Trump - Duration: 12:43.

A Bombshell Email Is The Smoking Gun In FBI Scandal Of Spying On Trump

The FBI's spygate scandal continues to take a turn for the worse.

An FBI spy attempted to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

Now a bombshell email offers smoking gun evidence that the FBI's covert operation was even

worse than anyone thought.

The FBI claims they opened operation "Crossfire Hurricane" – the codename given to the

counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign – on July 31st, 2016.

This supposedly occurred after the FBI was informed that Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos

blabbed to an Australian diplomat that a Maltese professor named Joseph Mifsud informed him

the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton.

But this story is beginning to look like a cover up for the real truth.

The ugly truth is that the FBI began spying on the Trump campaign far earlier than they

claimed, and their spy contacted even more Trump campaign officials than previously thought.

J.D. Gordon – the director of the Trump campaign's national security committee and

who is also a veteran – told the Daily Caller that top Trump aide Stephen Miller had also

been invited to the same Cambridge event as Carter Page back in May 2016 by the FBI spy.

Miller could not attend the July event, but Page did and described having an uneventful

conversation with Stephan Halper, the FBI spy.

The Daily Caller reports: "J. D. Gordon, the director of the campaign's national

security advisory committee, told TheDCNF he believes the invitation from Cambridge

to Miller was sent in May 2016. That's a month before a graduate assistant of FBI informant

Stefan Halper sent an invitation to Page to visit the campus.

"The invitation was to Stephen Miller who could not attend," Gordon, a former Pentagon

spokesman, told TheDCNF. "In the midst of our policy office search for a surrogate,

Carter Page informed me that he had also been invited and would like to attend."

This is a troubling development.

It was initially believed Page was targeted because in 2013, Russians agents were caught

on a wiretap discussing recruiting Page.

But what gets left out of that story was that the Russian agents never moved forward and

Page worked with the FBI to help catch the Russian spies.

The email to Miller indicates the spy wasn't necessarily targeting Page.

What the FBI was looking for was a point of entry into the Trump campaign.

The spy turned to Page when his approach to Miller failed.

This presents the FBI's conduct in an entirely new light.

The investigation was not a grand spy hunt to capture Russian agents.

Bureau officials – most likely colluding with the Obama White House – launched a

politically motivated fishing expedition into the Trump campaign to see what they could

turn up.

Operation Crossfire Hurricane did not begin on July 31st.

The FBI began digging into the Trump campaign months earlier.

President Trump sent out a series of tweets relaying the contents of an interview with

Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch and Fox Business host Lou Dobbs.

Trump quoted Farrell as stating that the active measures against Trump actually began in December

2015.

The FBI's scheme to run covert operations to spy on Donald Trump and to sabotage his

campaign is the real scandal.

That is what should be investigated. This nonsense about collusion with Russia is fake

news and the investigation needs to be shut down immediately.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you

greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article

with

your

friends

and family. Thank you.

For more infomation >> A Bombshell Email Is The Smoking Gun In FBI Scandal Of Spying On Trump - Duration: 12:43.

-------------------------------------------

Learn to Manage Like Donald Trump: Read Mismanagement Is an Art (Satire by Ronnie Champ) - Duration: 2:16.

hi everybody my name is Ronnie chimp and I'm gonna teach you how to manage your

organization like Donald Trump the greatest manager of all time now the man

is like Trump you gotta know how to appeal to the inner Klansmen that racist

inside of every good person which says that you know some people that don't

look like us don't talk like us you know they need to stay in their place like in

the projects or in the prisons or you know they can maybe also be do music

because some minority groups are talented in their area I'll give them

that or playing basketball or football or

boxing or other such things like to entertain us but they certainly cannot

live in our neighborhood and they cannot have our women and Trump is standing for

those values so he's a great leader now tomatoes like Trump you also got to

know how to appeal to that caveman inside every person you know that part

of every good man that when he sees a woman wants to grab her and sling her

over his shoulder and take him back to his cave and have his way with her

and if she start talking just hit her over the head with the club cuz ain't

nobody wanna hear a woman what a woman has to say

she just need to shut up and fix me my breakfast that's what I'm talking about

and that's what Trump is talking about make America great now to manage like

Trump you also got to know how to appeal to that frat boy inside of people

because frat boys are you know great fraternity houses that is where great

leaders are made I mean there's nothing in America that will prepare you better

for a career in business or politics like being in a frat house basically you

got a low how to appeal to that good old boy inside of everyone at least everyone

who is a good old boy because other people just don't matter that's the way

the good old boy system works right so Read mismanagement is an art by me Ronnie Champ

champ and I encourage you just Google Mismanagement Is an Art to learn more about

it or Google Ronnie Champ to learn more about me I'm the professor of

advanced voodoo economics community college thank you thank you

very much

For more infomation >> Learn to Manage Like Donald Trump: Read Mismanagement Is an Art (Satire by Ronnie Champ) - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING PRESIDENT TRUMP IS READY TO ARREST HILLARY CLINTON - Duration: 14:18.

BREAKING PRESIDENT TRUMP IS READY TO ARREST HILLARY CLINTON

Trump told the public that he would take down Hillary.

He promised to make her answer for her crimes.

Even during the election process he made a promise.

Well Trump finally has a big announcement about this.

Clinton would be facing a trial if it weren't for FBI director James Comey.

Trump went to Fox Business Network hosted by Maria Bartiromo.

There he explained that Comey chose not to prosecute Clinton.

At least during her time as Secretary of State.

To Trump it is as Comey won, not Hillary.

He further explained that Comey read all the charges.

He knew very well that she is guilty.

And he saved her life.

Trump wasn't done yet.

He mentioned a press conference at which Comey mentioned Clinton's actions as "reckless".

All in all, Comey is the only thing keeping her from going to jail.

Trump confirms it as well.

But he isn't giving up.

And if you thought we are talking about Clinton than you are mistaken.

We already know he isn't giving up on her.

What Trump meant to said is that he isn't giving up on Comey.

He said that he will wait and see how things turn out.

He wants to give everyone

a fair chance.

For more infomation >> BREAKING PRESIDENT TRUMP IS READY TO ARREST HILLARY CLINTON - Duration: 14:18.

-------------------------------------------

Democrats Respond to SCOTUS Ruling on Trump's Ban, Get Caught in Embarrassing Lie - Duration: 5:57.

For more infomation >> Democrats Respond to SCOTUS Ruling on Trump's Ban, Get Caught in Embarrassing Lie - Duration: 5:57.

-------------------------------------------

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN - Duration: 20:27.

we briefing with dana perino starts right now

fox news alert the Supreme Court upholding president Trump's travel ban

preventing people from several mostly Muslim countries from entering this one

hello everyone i'm dana perino and this is the daily briefing

the High Court ruling was a close one 5-4 decision affirming the president's

authority to regulate immigration president Trump praising the ruling just

a short time ago a tremendous success a tremendous victory for the American

people and for our Constitution this is a great victory for our Constitution we

have to be choppered we have to be safe and we have to be secure at a minimum we

have to make sure that we vet people coming into the country chief legal

correspondent and anchor of fox news at night shannon bream is standing by

outside the court shannon i know this is as you call it your super bowl day when

all the Supreme Court decisions come out this is a big one tell us what you know

well they got to this position Dana by sticking strictly to the text of both

the federal immigration law and the text of the proclamation that's what the

White House has called it a lot of people refer to it as travel ban 3.0

they stuck to those things just the text and not the statements made by President

Trump both when he was a candidate and after he was sworn in the Chief Justice

writing for the majority had this to say quote by its plain language federal

immigration law grants the president broad discretion to suspend the entry of

aliens into the United States the president lawfully exercised that

discretion based on his findings following a worldwide multi-agency

review that entry of the covered aliens would be detrimental to the national

interest now there are countries who've worked their ways off the list by

actually complying with the u.s. request for more information and more thorough

vetting so the administration says it's working as it should two separate

dissents though both very pointed today justice Sotomayor said even though this

is the third version of the band she's not buying it

this quotes from her dissent but this new window-dressing can i conceal an

unassailable fact the words of the president and his advisors create the

strong perception that the proclamation is contaminated by impermissible

discriminatory animus against Islam and its followers so she felt that the

things the president had said some of his surrogates had said on the campaign

trail and after and on Twitter should have been factored in and she said if

you would look at all those things together that you would reach the her

conclusion that this simply was driven by religious animus now the case is not

over we want to make clear for people what was at issue here was essentially

injunction an injunction so the Supreme Court has told the lower court tossed

the injunction we think that the plaintiffs don't have a good chance of

winning this case but now you actually have to decide it on the merit based on

all of the guidance from the Supreme Court today the administration feels

good that they'll do well as it goes back to the lower court but it's not

over yet and Dana wouldn't be surprised if it winds up right back here well in

key to the president's victory was that the initial travel ban as announced in

the chaos that resulted was then rescinded and then a different executive

order much more targeted including countries like North Korea and Venezuela

not Muslim countries but that was the key to the president's win today yeah

and you know essentially the Chief Justice wrote to there's been a lot of

talk about the animus behind this but the text of the proclamation itself does

not mention religion he said listen the plaintiffs complain that five of seven

of the countries still on the list are muscle majority countries but he said

listen it's not very effective if this was supposed to be a Muslim ban because

it only impacts 8% of the world's Muslim population so they stuck to the text

they didn't take in those outside arguments and statements and said based

on the face of this thing alone we find that the president is acted lawfully he

has this power under federal law he and any other president who would do

something and craft it this way we find it's permissible right all right Shannon

brain thank you for that and we'll check in with you because there's more to come

from the Supreme Court before their session is and for more I am joined by

Bret Baier he's anchor of special report great to have you on the program this

was a long time in coming and there's about a year and a half ago in January

of 2017 right after the president had taken office that all of the the

eruption of opposition to the President on this particular issue but they called

a Muslim ban really took all the headlines remember that but then the

president reissued the executive order made it much more targeted much more

narrow and I think that's probably what led to his victory in the Supreme Court

today your thoughts clearly and I was simply looking at the document looking

at the Constitution and making an assessment and this 5-4 ruling does just

that if you look at the majority opinion remember this is the third iteration of

the travel ban and it was a rocky start on the rollout much perhaps like the

rocky start on the zero tolerance and there's similarities

there and the beginning of those policy decisions but this is clearly according

to the president a huge win for him and he believes the books closed on this

there probably will be more challenges but not on that specific issue

yeah I'm perhaps not on the merits but the politics are gonna be there senator

Cory Booker of New Jersey had this to say earlier watch where a president that

wants to tear families apart this is a moral moment in our country when the

Supreme Court decided today is not just wrong it is dangerous it makes us less

safe and it undermines the values of our country and we are not defined as a

nation by what happens to us we're not defined as a nation by hateful voices

I'm curious about that if you just talk about on the merits he thinks that the

Supreme Court got it wrong fine but I'm not sure what he it's persuasive when he

says that we are less safe because of it I mean that's a really tough argument to

make I mean the the stipulation here is that these countries have to meet a

certain bar on who they're screening and how they're screening and if they meet

that bar then they're off of this list Chad was a country that did just that

and was off the list so how it is not making us safer it's really gonna be

tough on the stump to make that pitch I also think Dana if anything shows you

the power of the issue of justices and the ability to nominate Supreme Court

justices these big decisions that are coming out of the Supreme Court that

affect affect everybody really shows that that is a huge huge factor

politically as you go around the country in addition there's one more decision

that we're waiting for from the Supreme Court and that has to do with union dues

and whether people aren't have to be can be compelled to have to make them and

that if certainly all the political operatives around the country are

looking at that very closely as well so your point is very well made when I

talked about one other issue and that's that the House Republicans are going to

give it another college try on immigration congressman good lot he has

the original bill he's tweaked it a little bit he's going to include new

new words that say that it will mandate that all new employees in the US are

eligible to work using the verify system it creates a new visa program for

foreign workers in the farming and food processing industry so targeting a group

of people there that might vote for it it also says American companies can hire

450,000 foreign workers for three years if no US workers can be found to do the

job and that failure by employers to use the e-verify system could lead to

criminal charges and monetary fines those are some pretty interesting

additions do you think that that will help get this bill passed no I mean I

don't I just think it's a lot of busy work because they don't have the votes

at least not not that we can see up on Capitol Hill it clearly makes the bill

stronger but they don't even have the votes in the house let alone if you get

over to the Senate so there's a real challenge on the immigration legislation

crafting something big enough I think there's much more possibility that a

narrow bill on the issue of separating families that kind of backs up the

executive order cathy McMorris Rogers and others are working on that other

thing the other thing that's interesting on immigration is you have the vice

president down in South America along with tomorrow the Department of Homeland

Security Secretary dealing with countries directly to talk about the

root causes in those countries and now I think that's a huge story that I really

think so - because desperate people are always going to try to leave and so the

president has asked for today for more money for the wallet we're gonna talk to

Senator Shelley Moore Capito in just a little bit about his request and if that

can get done but then also should the United States invest more in these

countries in terms of rule of law to try to prevent people from wanting to leave

your final thought I'll give it to you and also just getting the word out about

what the actual policy is what the actual law is that all of these

countries understand where the u.s. is coming from and if there are root causes

that they can be helped with to prevent those people to start that journey yep

indeed all right Bret Baier will catch you tonight at 6 p.m. on special report

Thank You Dana on this very busy day in Washington

President Trump having a working lunch with Republican lawmakers so what was

discussed I'll talk to one senator who was there Shelley Moore Capito of West

Virginia plus the president getting the last word on his travel ban the High

Court handing him a big win today I'm gonna talk to Ari Fleischer about it

next the ruling shows that all of the attacks from the media and the Democrat

politicians are wrong and they turned out to be very wrong I will always be

defending the sovereignty the safety and the security of the American people

well it's today's top story the Supreme Court upholding the president's travel

ban the 5-4 decision by the High Court ending a long drawn-out legal battle

joining me now is Ari Fleischer former press secretary to President George W

Bush and a Fox News contributor whenever the Supreme Court finally makes

a decision Ari still to this day people feel like they are the final answer like

this is going to be remanded back to the lower courts with the president

certainly won today your thoughts it's wonderful to see everybody Democrat

Republican all sides salute the Supreme Court and follow you know with all the

talk about civility and how torn apart we are by politics it's wonderful to see

one institution that everybody still respects even when you disagree with it

you adhere to its rulings what else can we do and that's one of the greatest

strengths of our democracy people follow that's a really great point and it leads

me to something new today is a new poll and it's been commissioned by former

President George W Bush and former Vice President Biden it's called the American

democracy poll democracy project a couple of things here 55 percent polled

said that they see democracy as weak that's a concern also a poll the poll

says 68 percent of Americans believe that the America is getting weaker and

that when asked to rank the importance of living in a democracy on a scale of

one to ten with ten being absolutely important 60 percent picked 10 in the

new poll overall 84% picked a number between 6 and 10 so it just feels a lot

different from maybe when you like grew up and even how you would answer those

questions but the the decimation of the institutions that's one thing but also

you mentioned civility if people are just feeling like they're so far apart

when in actually in America and we have so much to be grateful for

absolutely Dana and you know I think all of this is a reminder that the Twitter

world the nasty world that we see really is not the real world that we live in

and especially the farther you get away from DC right before they get away from

political to corrupt to Twitter you realize how respectful people are toward

each other despite all the anger we have in our system that still doesn't mean

it's okay to have the you're in our system democracy is

refreshing democracy is enduring and the best thing about our democracy

particularly it's self-correcting if there is something wrong we fix it and

that's the strength and we fix it through the ballot box not through

yelling or harassing or screaming at people when they're having a meal always

to the nobody is persuaded by the yelling and we see you know there

certainly are there a lot of examples of very uncivil behavior we see it across

the board and it's something that we should all

try to get a handle on that democracy project will very interesting take a

look at that I also wanted to ask you about the Harley Davidson decision

because when you and I first met way back when you were the spokesperson for

the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee and that's really when I

learned all about your free trade and taxes and the economic policy that how I

think that things should be done and I remember bristling of course when

presidents would weigh in about a company's decision because company

should be allowed to make decisions that they make

president Trump you certainly feels differently about Harley Davidson who

announced that it would be moving some of its production to Europe in order to

avoid the tariff over there because they're worried about their business in

Europe about 40% of their businesses over there your thoughts on how all of

this is unfolding the president says it's all going to be fine they quit too

early but some of these companies are making decisions before then huge

high-stakes gamble and it would take an outsider somebody like a Donald Trump

and I'd say this to his credit to try to shake up the system particularly visa V

China where we all know China has been picking our pocket and stealing from us

and we just acquiesce Donald Trump comes along and says I'll fight I'll fight for

America I'll fight for American workers I'll take on China we don't know if

he'll win the fight though and that's what harley-davidson shows when the

president slapped tariffs on Europe Europe slapped tariffs back the tariffs

hit Harley Harley moves to Europe a part of their production facilities so they

won't be hit by European tariffs that's how trade wars go so yes I was raised in

the same school as you Dana tariffs are bad tariffs are wrong they lead to

trouble on the other hand if Trump can pull this off and make the rest of the

world lower their tariffs and get back to more free trade more will he be a

successful president high states we don't know how it's

come out yet right well all right flexure we appreciate you being here

today thank you thanks Dana so dangerous drugs hidden in the mail

sent in packages from overseas but the feds with a new weapon to sniff them out

plus a critical primary day ahead of the midterms and we will look at some of the

most closely watched races happening today its primary day across the country

with voters heading to the polls in seven states including New York where

Michael Grimm is fighting to get his congressional seat back after his prison

stint as he runs against Dan Donovan joining me now is Meredith Kelly

d-triple-c communications director and Matt Gorman he's over at the NRCC also

doing communications as the director great to have you both here today Matt

let me start with you and in New York with this Michael Grimm seat against Dan

Donovan does the NRCC you know have a preferred outcome here well you know I

think you're having Dana first of all we support Dan Donovan we have from the

beginning he's run a great campaign so far he's has a record of accomplishment

and we believe he's a victorious tonight as well but that's also not the only

primary we're keeping our eye on tonight in New York upstate in John fastest

district there's a 4-way clown car primary essentially among the Democrats

we're single-payer has become the issue de jour in that race and a litmus test

and so whoever takes that position of raising taxes by 32 trillion complete

government control of health care or even abolishing the VA or Medicare Part

D as we know it is going to be rendered unelectable in general so there's plenty

of primaries to go around tonight and we're keeping our eye on that one what

are your thoughts Merritt is on that New York 11 but also if you have other ones

in New York that you're looking at sure thanks for having me Dana in New York 11

max Rose is a combat veteran in the Army and has since gone on to advocate for

affordable health care on Staten Island and he's going to be the Democratic

nominee tonight and he's prepared to run against convict Michael Grimm or the

very desperate Dan Donovan who has spent the last several months running to his

right and talking about policies that really hurt New Yorkers taking a step

back we are very excited and proud to have more veterans again running all

across the country from collar to upstate New York to that Staten

Island seat and it's a trend you're seeing everywhere Democrats with records

of service were fighting for more affordable health care lower

prescription drug costs and growing the economy so that wages can actually start

keeping up with the cost of living it's pretty interesting to watch all that I

mean of course I'm MJ Hegar the one in Texas I played up some of her ad about

the doors opening or being closed on her and her opening them so yes I see that

let me read to you something from Chris Starr Walt who wrote this yesterday in

his halftime report he said there are almost 60 districts where the

Republicans are on defense so the numbers look pretty grim for the red

team but the secret to Republican effort to save the house may come down to the

handful of seats where they are actually playing offense there are just seven

seats currently held by Democrats where Republicans look to have a chance to

actually make gains given the fact that it looks like for now the control the

house will come down to a narrow decision these seven are taking on

special significance for the GOP and Matt I think that's a pretty interesting

place for the Republicans to be right now where you earlier like in January

we're talking about this huge blue wave and now we're actually talking about the

possibility of the Republicans being on offense which our secret to all of those

well we're gonna run every single day like we're ten points down doing that

the entire cycle though I will say that the green arc ballot has been the closer

that's been all cycle and we're gonna run this race on the economy and on the

effects of tax reform both in the short term we've seen bonuses and perks and

increase 401k contributions those the type of things Nancy Pelosi is called

crumbs but also in the longer term as well we see economic growth at record

highs I just saw a poll yesterday that said two-thirds of Americans feel better

about the economy than they had in over ten years

unemployment's at record lows wages are rising so you know I think that's the

choice voters gonna have this fall whether we want to continue the economic

progress we've seen or go back to the days of Speaker Pelosi with more

economic stagnation to higher taxes Meredith I've wanted to ask Democrats

about this and you're one of the best ones to ask because how are the

Democrats going to try to say that it would be better to have Democrats if the

economy is still roaring and if the people feel good about the economy what

is the counter-argument from from the Democrats I'll give you the last word

sure well very quickly Matt mentioned the generic ballot

but I've not seen his committee released any district specific polling to suggest

that they have a single offensive opportunity on the battlefield when it

comes to the tax bill I think voters every single day learn more about the

fact that it is a massive handout to big corporations and billionaires and will

increase costs including health care premiums for everyone else the more they

learn about it the more unpopular it becomes we found out today that taxes

will go up for synagogues and churches and places of worship which I don't

think Republicans want to defend this bill is getting more unpopular by the

day that's because wages still aren't

keeping up with the cost of living and middle class people were not prioritized

so here you have it Republicans and Democrats going to the polls today to

see who's going to be the nominees in these big contests Thank You Meredith

Kelly and Matt Gorman I appreciate it Thank You Tina

there's a massive demonstration in Iran and challenging the government citizens

in Tehran are protesting economic problems as the u.s. restores sanctions

shouting death to high prices the currency is collapsing as the government

struggles to tackle double-digit inflation and high unemployment many

shops and Tehran's oldest bazaars shutting their doors for the day worried

about their future president Truong threatening new tariffs on Europe and a

growing trade dispute what he's now saying about harley-davidsons plan to

shift production overseas plus the Supreme Court has ruled on the travel

ban but it's not the final word just yet we'll ask our legal expert what's next

but there are no checks and allyce's and in fact the court is saying if you don't

like our interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act then

your Congress should fix it but do you think this Congress is gonna fix that we

couldn't even pass comprehensive immigration reform

For more infomation >> SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN - Duration: 20:27.

-------------------------------------------

Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban - Duration: 11:48.

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that President Trump has the authority to ban travelers from certain majority-Muslim countries if he thinks it is necessary to protect the United States, a victory

in what has been a priority since Trump's first weeks in office and a major affirmation of presidential power

The vote was 5 to 4, with conservatives in the majority and Chief.Justice John G.Roberts Jr

finding that a string of unprecedented comments and warnings from Trump about Muslims did not erode the president's vast powers to control entry into this country

Later, the White.House issued a formal response that also took a swipe at Trump's declared enemies

It called the ruling a "vindication following months of hysterical commentary from the media and Democratic politicians who

refuse to do what it takes to secure our border and our country." Lower courts had struck down each of the three iterations of the president's travel ban, the first of

which was issued in January 2017.But the administration said it fortified the order in response to each judicial setback, and it had reason to be optimistic about the Supreme Court, since

the justices previously decided to let the ban go into effect while considering the challenges to it

The ruling was one of a string of 5-to-4 decisions this term in which the.justices on the right reasserted themselves, after the addition of Trump-nominated Justice Neil M

Gorsuch last year restored a conservative majority.The campaign of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky

), who for 10.months kept the Republican-controlled Senate from voting on President Barack Obama's nominee to the court after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016, celebrated by posting a picture on Twitter

It.was of him shaking hands with Gorsuch.The current ban, issued last fall, barred various travelers from eight countries, six of them with Muslim majorities

They are Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Chad, Somalia,.North Korea and Venezuela.Restrictions on North Korea and Venezuela were not part of the challenge

Chad was later removed from the list.Roberts tried to play down the political aspects of the case,

writing that the proclamation that led to the ban "is squarely within the scope of Presidential authority" and noting that its text does not mention religion

His opinion gave a short history.of Trump's comments about Muslims, starting with a campaign pledge for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is

going on."The pledge remained on the campaign website after Trump became president

And other tweets and statements followed."But the issue before us is not whether to denounce the statements," Roberts wrote

"It is.instead the significance of those statements in reviewing a Presidential directive, neutral on its face, addressing a matter within the core of executive responsibility

In doing so, we must consider not only.the statements of a particular President, but also the authority of the Presidency itself

" He added: "We express no view on the soundness of the policy." Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a

stinging rebuttal, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.And she read part of it in a dramatic moment on the bench

Sotomayor noted the campaign statements and anti-Muslim videos and comments the president

shared on Twitter, including one titled "Muslim Destroys a Statue of Virgin Mary!" "Take a brief moment and let the gravity of those statements sink in," she said

"And then remember,".Sotomayor added, that the statements and tweets were spoken or written "by the current president of the United States

" Sotomayor repeatedly called out Trump by name in her lengthy statement and.said the majority's decision "repeats tragic mistakes of the past" and "tells members of minority religions" in the United States that "they are outsiders

" The court, she wrote, was "blindly accepting.the Government's misguided invitation to sanction a discriminatory policy

" In her passionate dissent, Sotomayor compared the decision to Korematsu v.United States, in which the Supreme Court in 1944 upheld the detention

of Japanese Americans during World War II.Both rulings, she said, will be considered historic mistakes

Roberts objected."Whatever rhetorical advantage the dissent may see in doing so, Korematsu has nothing to do with

this case," he wrote, adding that "it is wholly inapt to liken that morally repugnant order to a facially neutral policy denying certain foreign nationals the privilege of admission

" But he.said the reference did give the court a chance to make official something it never had before: "Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the

court of history, and — to be clear — has no place in law under the Constitution." Justices Stephen G

Breyer and Elena Kagan also dissented, in an opinion with less-explosive language

Breyer.said it was not clear that an important part of the order — its "elaborate system of exemptions and waivers" for refugees, asylum seekers, students and others — was working

"While more.than 15,000 Syrian refugees arrived in the United States in 2016, only 13 have arrived since January 2018," he wrote

Breyer thought the case should be sent back to a lower court.for an examination of that issue

But without that, he said, he would, "on balance, find the evidence of antireligious bias

 . .a sufficient basis to set the Proclamation aside." Neal Katyal, the.Washington lawyer who argued the case for Hawaii and other challengers, expressed disappointment at the ruling and called on Congress to step in

"We continue to believe, as do four dissenting justices,.that the travel ban is unconstitutional, unprecedented, unnecessary and un-American," he said in a statement

". . .The travel ban is atrocious policy, and makes us less safe and undermines our American ideals

Now that.the Court has upheld it, it is up to Congress to do its job and reverse President Trump's unilateral and unwise travel ban

" The administration said the third edition of the.ban responded to the judicial criticisms of the first two and was a result of a "worldwide review of the processes for vetting aliens seeking entry from abroad

" But a unanimous.ruling from a three-judge panel of the U.S.Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit said that the third version of the travel ban suffered from the deficiencies of the first two

— that Trump had again exceeded his lawful authority and that he had not made a legally sufficient finding that entry of those blocked would be "detrimental to the interests of

the United States." The U.S.Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond struck down the ban on the constitutional question

The 9-to-4 decision took a deep dive into Trump's statements and.tweets, and concluded that the proclamation, like the first two, was motivated not by national security concerns but by antipathy toward Muslims

Even the Supreme Court dissents did not make much of.a claim that Trump lacked the statutory authority to bar the entry of those the administration had reason to believe could harm the country

And Roberts rejected the notion that the court.was prohibited from examining the reasoning for the president's actions on immigration matters

But Sotomayor said the majority failed by not finding that the policy was inspired by "animosity toward a disfavored

group." "Our Constitution demands, and our country deserves, a Judiciary willing to hold the coordinate branches to account when they defy our most sacred legal commitments," she wrote

"Because the Court's decision.today has failed in that respect, with profound regret, I dissent

" Roberts seemed careful not to tie the court to Trump's remarks."The President of the United States possesses an extraordinary power

to speak to his fellow citizens and on their behalf," he wrote, and was almost wistful in remembering presidents — he named George Washington, Dwight D

Eisenhower and George W.Bush — who."used that power to espouse the principles of religious freedom and tolerance

" "The very fact that an official may have broad discretion, discretion free from judicial scrutiny, makes it all the

more imperative for him or her to adhere to the Constitution and to its meaning and its promise," he wrote

For more infomation >> Supreme Court upholds Trump travel ban - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump tweets about the strength of the US economy - Duration: 7:02.

For more infomation >> Trump tweets about the strength of the US economy - Duration: 7:02.

-------------------------------------------

Baier: The politics of President Trump's travel ban - Duration: 10:11.

the Supreme Court ruling was a tremendous victory for akka we have to

be toughened we have to be safe and we have to be secure this is a moral moment

for our nation who our president who openly wants to put a religious test on

citizenship this is not a religious band and you're picking out countries with

higher threat levels with a poor vetting process so it makes sense and I think

this really makes us safer well today the Supreme Court handing President

Trump and his administration a big win upholding travel ban 3.0 5-4 decision

the majority you see the justices voting in the majority there and the dissenting

of the opinion on the majority saying quote prod the proclamation is squarely

within the scope of presidential authority under federal law indeed

neither dissent even attempts and a serious argument to the contrary the

dissent written by justice Sotomayor says quote this repackaging does little

to cleanse presidential proclamation number 96 for five of the appearance of

discrimination that the president's words have created based on the evidence

in the record a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was

motivated by anti-muslim animus with that let's bring in our panel byron york

chief political correspondent of The Washington Examiner Molly Hemingway

senior editor at the Federalist and Charles Lane opinion writer for The

Washington Post okay Byron significant ruling today it was this was all we were

talking about in the first few months of the Trump administration and it should

have been a slam dunk for the White House and the fact that it is not as

there was not as really amazing at John Roberts is correct it was clearly within

the scope of the president's constitutional powers and the biggest

argument against it was that even though it was a legitimate presidential power

that this president Donald Trump had exercised it with impure motive and you

had a situation in which an executive order

word for word if signed by another president would have been constitutional

and yet since it was signed by Donald Trump with his history of anti-muslim

statements it was therefore unconstitutional it was a that

would have been a crazy legal area to go into in the court it's a relief really

that the court did not do that Molly Chief Justice Roberts specifically

addressed the issue of whether it was a religious test or not pointing out that

it covered only 8% of the world's Muslims that it was using a list that

had been developed by a previous administration the Obama administration

while she's talking there and that it also included North Korea and Venezuela

so that it was hard to argue that this was even though this is what the

conversation had been in the media that this was a Muslim ban and even Donald

Trump referred to it as that it really is an important decision dealing with

whether the executive has the authority to make decisions about national

security related to immigration and it's important also to consider how the Obama

administration fared with the Supreme Court when it tested executive authority

it repeatedly was turned away by the court sometimes by nine nine to zero

decisions so this is something that I think is the Trump administration can

legitimately be pleased with on the question of executive authority

interesting reaction from all over Capitol Hill and elsewhere here's one

commentator on another channel with an interesting analogy what Osama bin Laden

hoped to provoke was a war of civilization a war between the West and

1 billion Muslims and so what Donald Trump in this Muslim band signal to the

world is that Muslims are not welcome here that this is whether the

conservative justices say that in fact this is about executive power the

president clear intent was to impose a religious test and that is as

fundamentally unamerican as anything that he's done over the

course of this presidency what about the majority opinion that was looking at the

words on the paper there well you know I would like to just react to that in

tandem with reacting to Byron the Byron's absolutely right if you just

took the let's say the 3.0 version of this not the first two which were quite

different the biggest problem was the problem the president created for

himself through all this extravagant hasta

rhetoric toward Muslims George W Bush of course who is president right after 9/11

went out of his way to signal that the United States did not have a quarrel

with all Muslims just the Islamist terrorists and so I think that

commentator you just put up there has a point that the atmospherics around this

we're terrible one of the lessons of this decision though is not everything

that has terrible atmospherics that's perhaps even stupid and offensive is

unconstitutional or even in this case because it was a statutory argument

against it against the statutes either I don't consider this so much a victory or

even a vindication which is the president's other word for this I think

what he got from the Supreme Court today was a rather a grudging almost

acknowledgment that okay you can do this if you insist there's no there's no

rhetoric in that any of the majority of concurring opinions saying yeah this was

absolutely necessary etc it was like well you know we can't stop you we have

no basis to stop you so you can go ahead but at its heart Mali it was an increase

in this 3.0 version of the the stipulations to get in the what these

countries were doing to vet the people who were actually getting to the u.s.

chad was on the list but then taken off because they met the stipulations right

so it's hard to argue that it was some arbitrary lists and in fact I think the

first version of the ban actually would have held up under the decision-making

that the court had today another issue where atmospherics was bad though is

that you had a district court doing an injunction against a national ruling and

this is a trend that we're seeing a lot particularly during the Trump

administration where district courts are thwarting national issues and Clarence

Thomas specifically said in his concurring opinion that this is

something that might have to be taken up soon to discuss the legality of it

the fact that this was a 5-4 decision is also significant because it means that

we're getting very narrow decisions based on you know in on highly political

cases it is a tremendous argument in favor of those people who did vote for

Donald Trump that they were able to get a 540

sitting on this and also the decision that forbids the state of California

from forcing pro-life groups to advocate for abortion

but the fact that there are five four decisions means that we're going to see

this court continue to be a very political issue it shows also how

important being able to have a nominee that becomes a Supreme Court justice is

in this political well world that we live if Donald Trump ever says anything

bad about Mitch McConnell again he shouldn't he will I'm sure but but he

shouldn't but look at some of the precedents that could have happened if

this had gone the other way the the shackles that have been could have been

put on a future presidents ability to act in national security instances and

also it seemed to want to create some of the some of the proponents the opponents

of the ban with foreign nationals physically outside the United States

seem to create some sort of constitutional right of entry into the

United States and that would have been a terrible president our late friend

Charles Krauthammer weighed in on this last year I'm not against tightening the

vetting we should but I think what we're saying is the kind of kabuki that we do

as a way to make ourselves think that we are safer from terrorism there are a lot

of sources of terrorism the whole list probably has a at the bottom is the idea

of infiltration from these states these are seven states in 15 years since 9/11

there hasn't been a single murder of an American by a national of these two

countries Chuck well that's another good point is that quite a few of the recent

lone wolf attacks have taken place by people who are either born in the United

States or who were here on green cards and the relationship between terrorism

these particular countries though not completely disjointed is a little

tenuous it's just that I think what the court was wrestling with particularly

justices Robert Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy do we take this

power away from all future presidents because we're so uncertain about the

trustworthiness of the current one and I think they felt we're gonna have

to swallow this exercise of the power in the case of a very very inflammatory

president because it could be used legitimately when the presidency is

occupied by a different person later on let's look at the circuit courts that

were willing to do that not just the Ninth Circuit the Fourth Circuit all the

judges short of the Supreme Court big majorities were willing to do that with

the president and some of them will be changed because as the judges get

through the process up on Capitol Hill including Monster

you

For more infomation >> Baier: The politics of President Trump's travel ban - Duration: 10:11.

-------------------------------------------

La coiffure de Donald Trump - Le JPI 6h50 (27/06/2018) - Duration: 1:09.

For more infomation >> La coiffure de Donald Trump - Le JPI 6h50 (27/06/2018) - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING TRUMP REVEALS WHY HE FIRED COMEY – HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT OUT OF HOT WATER YET - Duration: 11:40.

BREAKING TRUMP REVEALS WHY HE FIRED COMEY – HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT OUT OF HOT WATER

YET

Everyone had their own version of why former FBI director James Comey lost his job.

Some even hesitated to cheer or boo.

Democrats in particular were not ready for this.

Well it's time President Trump put everyone's minds at ease.

In an interview with Judge Jeanine Pirro, Trump reveals why he fired Comey and everything

else you need to know.

At first Trump started talking about Democrats.

Their reactions were unexpected.

In fact they were the ones hating on Comey for apparently destroying Clinton's chance

at victory.

Well Now everything is clear.

Trump is certain of it.

Democrats are beyond hypocrites.

What Trump had to say next is something everyone must hear.

Comey gave Hillary Clinton a free pass like no one before.

That's a fact.

Hillary is also responsible for deleting more than 30,000 emails during an FBI investigation.

That's another fact.

In the end all Comey did was let her walk away.

So there you have it.

What more of a reason for firing a FBI director do you need?

Trump said everything he had to say.

He made it loud and clear to everyone watching.

Maybe this will clear up the whole commotion and Democrats can stop with their crying.

In the end, their former leader got

the good

half

of

the deal.

For more infomation >> BREAKING TRUMP REVEALS WHY HE FIRED COMEY – HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT OUT OF HOT WATER YET - Duration: 11:40.

-------------------------------------------

Kamala Harris just issued a devastating threat to Trump - Duration: 1:23.

For more infomation >> Kamala Harris just issued a devastating threat to Trump - Duration: 1:23.

-------------------------------------------

Chuck Schumer's Insane Lie About Trump Just Blew Up In His Face - Duration: 11:09.

Chuck Schumer's Insane Lie About Trump Just Blew Up In His Face4

Chuck Schumer has sunk to a new low.

He went on national TV and exploited a soldier's death to make an attack on Trump.

But the insane lie he told just blew up in his face.

Schumer – like other Democrats – was quick to try and twist the death of four U.S. soldiers

in Niger to their political advantage.

He appeared on Meet the Press and claimed he had no idea U.S. troops were even in Niger.

Real Clear Politics reports:

"CHUCK TODD: YOU HEARD SENATOR GRAHAM THERE.

HE DIDN'T KNOW WE HAD A THOUSAND TROOPS IN NIGER.

DID YOU?

SEN.

CHUCK SCHUMER:

UH NO, I DID NOT. AND WHAT IT MEANS, UH CHUCK, FOR THE WAR AUTHORIZATION, IS I AGREED WITH

SENATOR PAUL THAT WE OUGHT TO LOOK AT THIS CAREFULLY.

WE ARE IN A BRAVE NEW WORLD, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE NO SET BATTLE PLANS.

YOU DON'T DECLARE WAR AND THEN FIGHT THREE WEEKS LATER.

BUT HAVING SAID THAT, THE CONSTITUTION SAYS CONGRESS HAS THE POWER TO DECLARE WAR, AND

IF YOU'RE IN A LONG-TERM WAR, CONGRESS OUGHT TO KEEP THAT ABILITY.

SO WE NEED TO REEXAMINE THIS.

WE'RE ON AN A.U.M.F.

THAT EXTENDS UH 16 YEARS, FROM RIGHT AFTER WE WERE ATTACKED AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER.

SO I WOULD BE FOR REEXAMINING IT.

ABSOLUTELY.

THERE'S NO EASY ANSWER, BUT WE SHOULD LOOK AT IT.

THE ANSWER WE HAVE NOW IS NOT ADEQUATE."

Schumer gave the impression that Trump was conducting some kind of secret war without

Congress's approval.

But there are two problems with that.

First, U.S. troops were sent to Niger under Barack Obama in 2013.

Secondly, Trump informed Congress in a June 6th letter that there were 645 troops stationed

in Niger.

Finally, the official twitter account of US AFRICOM tweeted repeatedly over the years

about the good works being done by U.S. soldiers

in Niger.

For more infomation >> Chuck Schumer's Insane Lie About Trump Just Blew Up In His Face - Duration: 11:09.

-------------------------------------------

Trump and Putin meeting is ON, Kremlin confirms as tensions SOAR - Duration: 3:13.

For more infomation >> Trump and Putin meeting is ON, Kremlin confirms as tensions SOAR - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

Trump North Dakota rally: A look at state's economy amid trade conflict - Duration: 3:44.

For more infomation >> Trump North Dakota rally: A look at state's economy amid trade conflict - Duration: 3:44.

-------------------------------------------

Juez ordena al gobierno de Trump que tiene 30 días para reunificar a menores separados de sus padres - Duration: 1:55.

For more infomation >> Juez ordena al gobierno de Trump que tiene 30 días para reunificar a menores separados de sus padres - Duration: 1:55.

-------------------------------------------

Trump said in campaign he would use tariffs as leverage: DeMint - Duration: 3:19.

For more infomation >> Trump said in campaign he would use tariffs as leverage: DeMint - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Trump admin. pulls back on Chinese restrictions - Duration: 1:01.

Despite reports on Monday, the White House has decided not to put an outright limit on

Chinese investments and will instead use a government panel to evaluate deals.

President Donald Trump said in a statement Wednesday he's decided to rely on updated

legislation Congress has made "significant progress" in passing.

As Newsy previously reported, the Trump administration was reportedly planning to announce two new

initiatives including blocking firms with at least 25 percent Chinese ownership from

investing in U.S. tech companies and barring additional technology exports to China.

Now, the president says he plans to implement the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization

Act.

Trump says FIRRMA will protect the U.S. from foreign investment threats and allow the country

to remain committed to open investments.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says the move isn't meant to target China, but to protect

U.S. technology.

The announcement comes in the midst of a brewing trade war between the U.S. and China.

No comments:

Post a Comment