Monday, May 21, 2018

Trump news on Youtube May 21 2018

DURING

SECOND VISIT TO HOSPITAL, TRUMP GIVES MELANIA THE MIRACLE OF A LIFETIME

On Tuesday afternoon, President Trump left the White House to visit First Lady Melania

Trump at Walter Reed Hospital.

This is his second visit to Walter Reed so far, as he also visited Monday afternoon shortly

after the First Lady's surgery was finished.

Melania was reportedly admitted to the Walter Reed Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland

for a "benign kidney condition" and is doing well after the procedure.

"Mrs. Trump is at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and will likely remain there

for the duration of the week.

The first lady looks forward to a full recovery so she can continue her work on behalf of

children everywhere."

The leftist media immediately called out President Trump, saying that he did not seem to care

that the First Lady had undergone such a serious procedure.

As usual, their "information" is anything but factual.

If they had done any actual reporting, the mainstream media would see that Trump departed

the White House right after Melania had gotten out of surgery.

He also made sure to visit his wife Tuesday, and likely already has other visits planned.

Despite the narrative being pushed by the left, President Trump has been extremely compassionate

and thoughtful during this tough time for his wife.

"Our great First Lady is doing really well.

Will be leaving hospital in 2 or 3 days.

Thank you for so much love and support!"

This confirms earlier reports from doctors that Melania will be able to return to the

White House by the end of the week.

Thank God!

Can we get this shared all over social media and continue to send Melania our wishes

for

a speedy recovery?

For more infomation >> DURING SECOND VISIT TO HOSPITAL, TRUMP GIVES MELANIA THE MIRACLE OF A LIFETIME - Duration: 13:16.

-------------------------------------------

Suspect In Trump National Doral Shooting In Court - Duration: 0:29.

For more infomation >> Suspect In Trump National Doral Shooting In Court - Duration: 0:29.

-------------------------------------------

Trump calls leakers 'traitors' Trump demands probe on alleged campaign 'infiltration' - Duration: 5:59.

so many media controversy swirling around the president we're joined now by

Hogan Ginley deputy press secretary at the White House welcome great to be here

this lengthy New York Times story says the FBI had at least one informant in

the Trump campaign Giuliani has been touting this he's been around a bit as

you may have noticed so the White House is perfectly willing to cite the failing

New York Times when it has some information that benefits the

administration look the New York Times obviously is a failing publication as we

all know but it's for reasons just like this I mean they can't get out of their

own way the coverage on this president has been completely negative we're

entering now into the second year of this investigation we have given over

millions of pieces of paper countless hours from our own folks in the

administration from the campaign for conversations with the investigation

we have no collusion no corruption no obstruction none of those things exist

and yet it still leads a lot of newscasts on that point the president

just the other day called the Muller probe illegal and disgusting he's had a

lot to say about it journalists say it's news do you believe

the media in general not just the New York Times are overly fixated on these

investigations without question think about last week what we've had in last

couple of weeks actually we had our Secretary of State go to a foreign

country and take three people our citizens who are being detained bring

them back to this country we got out of an Iran deal that we now know did not

prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon but actually pave the way for

them to get one well they were covered but not nearly the way in which these

salacious things are covered if given the choice

the media has policy or palace intrigue they take palace intrigue nine times out

of ten yeah I did note that the day of the freeing of the prisoners in North

Korea MSNBC and CNN primetime was heavily the Russian investigation again

in the time it takes to say the word returnees back to American soil they

were back on Russia does the President does the White House have a position on

whether the name of this FBI informant which the New York Times and washcloths

we're holding whether she others have not should be made public look I can't

get into any of this investigation stuff obviously I refer you to outside counsel

for those types of things but I just can't say again

this has been two years now and we've got nothing to show for it we've wasted

taxpayer dollars we've wasted time and in the face of all this

the president has still had record-setting accomplishments and

record-setting time it's incredible what he's been able to do well he often puts

these things out on Twitter that we then talk about and let's put one up right

now the so-called leaks coming out of the White House or a massive

over-exaggeration put out by the fake news media in order to make us look as

bad as possible with that being said the president adds leakers are traitors and

cowards and we will find out who they are so he has every right to be upset

about leaks that damage him and the administration but he's often said in

the past the media make up some of these anonymous sources does he now accept

that some of these leakers are real well what the president is trying to

articulate here and he did so beautifully in fact is that these people

are selfish they are cowardly when they do leak information he knows their leaks

absolutely but so much of these leaks are made up I get calls all the time

from reporters who try to double source things that are completely false that

I'm in the meeting and I said it didn't happen that way and they said we're

gonna run this story anyway and I say but I'm on the record I'll tell you on

the record they said but we have sources that say that are close to me not even

in the meeting close to the meeting with knowledge of Konnor and they still run

the story it's egregious what they're doing but think about how many things

haven't leaked in the past couple of days to the first lady's surgery well

the president was mocked and derided because we couldn't find our Secretary

of State when in actuality he was in North Korea we knew where he was New

York Times said we didn't know where he was we knew exactly where he was they

mocked a sport he was bringing people that are citizens of this country back

to this country but is it difficult for you too and by the way I try to check

everything and sometimes I've been told something happens in meeting and someone

who is there says no and I don't run with it but isn't it difficult for you

to go to work knowing that there are among you of people who for whatever

reason will whisper stuff to reporters that hurts the White House maybe about

you look that kind of stuff happens in in various businesses and work work

environments all over the country I've been the media now for about 20 years

that's part of the job but predominantly we have an amazing team that works in

tandem to get things accomplished for this president to tout all the

accomplishments he's been able to do in such a short amount of time but

inevitably you'll have some people who are selfish who want to

be self-aggrandizing and we'll go out to the press and try and make a name for

themselves and that's a shame and he says traitors and cowards obvious I'm

gonna ask you about it last question I spoke earlier on the program about how

some news organizations and some commentators said the president was

referring to all illegal immigrants in that meeting on sanctuary cities when he

talked about animals he was referring to spine to a question - or 13 gang members

do you believe that was sloppiness or intentional on part of these

organizations well you know they they never mess up in favor of the president

if you notice every every misreported fact is always bad to the president it's

never it never helps us out this is a gang whose motto is rape control and

kill and for whatever reason Democrats have decided to come to the defense of

this gang and they're all too quick to publish stories in the media as well

that somehow this president was talking about all immigrants was differently

defending ms-13 that identity that Democrats have multiple occasions Chuck

Schumer just did but I do think that the president's words were very clear in

comment very clear very and that was unfortunate gives you another reason to

beat up on the press Hogan Gately great to see you thanks for coming for the

time

you

For more infomation >> Trump calls leakers 'traitors' Trump demands probe on alleged campaign 'infiltration' - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Fed Up With Mueller 'Scam,' Blasts FBI For Ignoring Hillary - Duration: 10:59.

Trump's Fed Up With Mueller 'Scam,' Blasts FBI For Ignoring Hillary

President Donald Trump railed against special counsel Robert Mueller's ongoing investigation

and the FBI for not investigating alleged crimes by his former opponent Hillary Clinton

in a series of Sunday morning tweets.

Trump has been particularly incensed in recent days and appears to be reacting to a recent

story from The New York Times detailing alleged attempts by other foreign governments to influence

the 2016 presidential election.

The NYT story detailed a meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of emissaries from the

Middle East eager to help Trump win the presidential election.

For more infomation >> Trump's Fed Up With Mueller 'Scam,' Blasts FBI For Ignoring Hillary - Duration: 10:59.

-------------------------------------------

Moon, Trump to closely coordinate for successful N. Korea, U.S. summit - Duration: 1:52.

We start with the diplomatic drive to get Pyongyang to abandon its nuclear weapons program.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in is leaving for Washington in the coming hours to meet

with his U.S. counterpart ahead of next month's highly-anticipated North Korea-U.S. summit.

Before their fifth face-to-face,... the two leaders spoke on the phone to ensure that

the Singapore summit stays on track.

Our chief Blue House correspondent Moon Connyoung starts us off.

In just two days they'll be meeting in person in Washington, but perhaps reflecting how

serious and alarming the two leaders are taking the latest about face by North Korea, Presidents

Moon and Trump picked up the phone on this Sunday to ensure they're both committed to

the success of the North Korea, U.S. summit.

That's after the North threatened to pull out of what would be an unprecedented summit

next month.

Seoul's presidential Blue House said the two leaders spoke over the phone for about twenty

minutes and exchanged views on various actions taken by North Korea lately.

"The two leaders will work closely and unwaveringly for the successful hosting of the North Korea,

U.S. summit set for June 12th, including the upcoming South Korea U.S. summit."

Mr. Moon is due to fly out to Washington Monday afternoon for an exclusive one-on-one with

Mr. Trump on Tuesday... where the two will hold private talks with only their interpreters

present.

It will be the first meeting between the two allies since the historic inter-Korean summit

in April and potentially the last before the landmark North Korea, U.S. summit in June.

With Presidents Moon and Trump's pledge Sunday to closely work together on the issue, analysts

expect the leaders to share their deepest thoughts on South Korea, U.S. cooperation

in the denuclearization journey and joint efforts to lead North Korea to the negotiation

table come June 12th.

Moon Connyoung, Arirang News, the Blue House.

For more infomation >> Moon, Trump to closely coordinate for successful N. Korea, U.S. summit - Duration: 1:52.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Orders Justice Department to Investigate Obama Surveillance - Duration: 11:48.

Donald Trump Orders Justice Department to Investigate Obama Surveillance

President Donald J. Trump announced his decision to demand an official investigation of former

President Barack Obama's administration on Sunday for infiltrating or surveilling

his presidential campaign for political reasons.

"I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look

into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political

Purposes – and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!"

Trump wrote on Twitter on Sunday afternoon.

Trump frequently blames investigations of his campaign on Obama, suggesting that politically

motivated investigators were unfairly targeting his campaign.

He spent most of Sunday morning sharing his thoughts on Twitter about the ongoing Russia

investigation, suggesting that the ongoing "witch hunt" was out of control.

"Things are really getting ridiculous," Trump wrote, noting that so far there was

no collusion found by special investigators.

He criticized Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team as "13 Angry and heavily conflicted

Democrats" who were part of the Obama administration.

"STOP!" he wrote.

"They have found no collusion with Russia, No obstruction."

Trump again redirected the continuing investigation towards failed presidential candidate Hillary

Clinton, Democrats, Tony Podesta, the DNC, and politically biased FBI officials.

"Republicans and real Americans should start getting tough

on

this Scam," he wrote.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Orders Justice Department to Investigate Obama Surveillance - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

FBI Planted Mole Inside the Trump Campaign Under Orders From Obama - Duration: 12:45.

FBI Planted Mole Inside the Trump Campaign Under Orders From Obama

According to the Wall Street Journal, FBI director James Comey planted a mole inside

the Trump campaign under orders of the Obama administration.The bombshell investigation

by Kimberly Strassel, Robert Mueller relied on intelligence provided by an undercover

FBI agent who was planted inside the Trump campaign in order to aide the Russia investigationZerohedge.com

reports: After the White House caved to Rosenstein and Nunes was barred from seeing the documents,

it also emerged that this same intelligence had already been shared with Special Counsel

Robert Mueller as part of his investigation into alleged Russian involvement in the 2016

US election

On Wednesday afternoon, however, news emerged that Nunes and House Oversight and Government

Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) would receive a classified Thursday briefing

at the DOJ on the documents.This is, to put it lightly, incredibly significant.Why?

Because it appears that the FBI may have had a mole embedded in the Trump campaign.In a

bombshell op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Kimberly Strassel shares a few key insights

about recent developments.

Perhaps we should start with the ending and let you take it from there.Needless to say

Strassel's claims, if true, would have wide-ranging implications for the CIA, FBI, DOJ and former

Obama administration officials.

Strassel concludes:"I believe I know the name of the informant, but my intelligence

sources did not provide it to me and refuse to confirm it.

It would therefore be irresponsible to publish it."Authored by Kimberley Strassel, op-ed

via The Wall Street Journal,About That FBI 'Source'Did the bureau engage in outright

spying against the 2016 Trump campaign?The Department of Justice lost its latest battle

with Congress Thursday when it allowed House Intelligence Committee members to view classified

documents about a top-secret intelligence source that was part of the FBI's investigation

of the Trump campaign.

Even without official confirmation of that source's name, the news so far holds some

stunning implications.Among them is that the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation

outright hid critical information from a congressional investigation.

In a Thursday press conference, Speaker Paul Ryan bluntly noted that Intelligence Chairman

Devin Nunes's request for details on this secret source was "wholly appropriate,"

"completely within the scope" of the committee's long-running FBI investigation, and "something

that probably should have been answered a while ago.

"Translation: The department knew full well it should have turned this material over to

congressional investigators last year, but instead deliberately concealed it.House investigators

nonetheless sniffed out a name, and Mr. Nunes in recent weeks issued a letter and a subpoena

demanding more details.Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's response was to double

down—accusing the House of "extortion" and delivering a speech in which he claimed

that "declining to open the FBI's files to review" is a constitutional "duty."

Justice asked the White House to back its stonewall.

And it even began spinning that daddy of all superspook arguments—that revealing any

detail about this particular asset could result in "loss of human lives.

This is desperation, and it strongly suggests that whatever is in these files is going to

prove very uncomfortable to the FBI.The bureau already has some explaining to do.

Thanks to the Washington Post's unnamed law-enforcement leakers, we know Mr. Nunes's

request deals with a "top secret intelligence source" of the FBI and CIA, who is a U.S.

citizen and who was involved in the Russia collusion probe.When government agencies refer

to sources, they mean people who appear to be average citizens but use their profession

or contacts to spy for the agency.Ergo, we might take this to mean that the FBI secretly

had a person on the payroll who used his or her non-FBI credentials to interact in some

capacity with the Trump campaign.This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting.

It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about,

which was bad enough.

Obama political appointees rampantly "unmasked" Trump campaign officials to monitor their

conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance warrant against Carter

Page, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that its supporting information

came from the Hillary Clinton campaign.Now we find it may have also been rolling out

human intelligence, John Le Carré style, to infiltrate the Trump campaign.Which would

lead to another big question for the FBI: When?The bureau has been doggedly sticking

with its story that a tip in July 2016 about the drunken ramblings of George Papadopoulos

launched its counterintelligence probe.

Still, the players in this affair—the FBI, former Director Jim Comey, the Steele dossier

authors—have been suspiciously vague on the key moments leading up to that launch

date.When precisely was the Steele dossier delivered to the FBI?

When precisely did the Papadopoulos information come in?And to the point, when precisely was

this human source operating?

Because if it was prior to that infamous Papadopoulos tip, then the FBI isn't being straight.It

would mean the bureau was spying on the Trump campaign prior to that moment.

And that in turn would mean that the FBI had been spurred to act on the basis of something

other than a junior campaign aide's loose lips.We also know that among the Justice Department's

stated reasons for not complying with the Nunes subpoena was its worry that to do so

might damage international relationships.This suggests the "source" may be overseas,

have ties to foreign intelligence, or both.

That's notable, given the highly suspicious role foreigners have played in this escapade.It

was an Australian diplomat who reported the Papadopoulos conversation.Dossier author Christopher

Steele is British, used to work for MI6, and retains ties to that spy agency as well as

to a network of former spooks.

It was a former British diplomat who tipped off Sen. John McCain to the dossier.How this

"top secret" source fits into this puzzle could matter deeply.I believe I know the name

of the informant, but my intelligence sources did not provide it to me and refuse to confirm

it.It would therefore be irresponsible to publish it.But what is clear is that we've

barely scratched the surface of the FBI's 2016 behavior, and the country will never

get the straight story until President Trump moves to declassify everything possible.

It's time to rip off the Band-Aid.

For more infomation >> FBI Planted Mole Inside the Trump Campaign Under Orders From Obama - Duration: 12:45.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Donates Quarterly Salary to VA - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> Trump Donates Quarterly Salary to VA - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

BUSTED: OBAMA'S FBI MOLE INSIDE THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED - Duration: 5:26.

For more infomation >> BUSTED: OBAMA'S FBI MOLE INSIDE THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED - Duration: 5:26.

-------------------------------------------

Judge Nap's $64,000 Question on FBI Informant Within the Trump Campaign - Duration: 6:21.

president Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani saying Muller plans to wrap up the

investigation by September 1st he claims but only if Muller is able to interview

the president by mid-july a Harvard Law Professor Emeritus

Alan Dershowitz was on Fox and Friends this morning explain why this may prove

he said to be a double edged sword if the president can put this behind them

by September 1st by sitting down in a limited capacity with questions that he

can answer that would be a good thing but you know the more people could then

say oh based on the questions in the prologue you need another month here and

there so comes as the president is demanding an investigation of what he

calls a spy in his campaign joining us now is Fox News senior judicial analyst

Judge Andrew Napolitano with the latest let's talk about this while he calls him

a spy an alleged FBI informant right is it illegal to have an informant reach

out to campaign officials does that mean he's investigating the campaign or the

officials it's a great question we don't we don't know enough facts but I can

tell you what the law is first of all we know who this professor is but Fox has

chosen not to use his name even though other media outlets have if it is this

person he is a well-known intelligence resource that was utilized by the Reagan

administration and both George Bush presidencies if he was sent there by the

FBI to gather evidence of crimes that's the moral equivalent and the functional

equivalent of a search under the Fourth Amendment in order to justify that the

FBI would need a search warrant and in order to get the search want they'd have

to present evidence of crimes going on in the campaign to a federal judge to

get the search warrant if all that happened then as as outrageous as this

sounds his presence was lawful if it was short of that that is if he went there

to chat with people to see what information he could get from them to

report back to the FBI and there was not a search warrant it was an outrageous

violation of the civil rights of the people in the campaign the campaign as

an entity doesn't have civil rights but everybody that works there does

New York Times this quote informant was sent to have these discussions drinks

paid three thousand dollars you know for a paper that talked with the car to pay

the reports our quarter page Rache Papadopoulos I am call this right okay

so Sam Clovis left the campaign George papadopolis has pleaded guilty to lying

to the FBI quarter page is sort of a notorious character that is sometimes in

the middle of this and sometimes not well one point claimed you work for the

Kremlin another point claimed you work for the CIA and both of them seem to be

denying it the $64,000 question Eric is this who sent the professor was he sent

by American Intel for which he is known to have worked because of the insatiable

appetite for raw intelligence about innocent Americans that the American

intelligence community has or was he sent by the FBI to gather evidence of

crimes if he was sent by Intel it's wrong but probably not criminal it was

sent by the FBI without a search warrant then President Trump is right we have

one of the greatest political scandals on our hands because who sent him would

be the FBI under the Obama administration where did that

information go that it make its way back to the West Wing and then to Hillary

while she's combating with Donald Trump in a campaign for the presidency I mean

that's the fear I mean if that happened it's the type of surveillance

surveillance that we have not seen or known about in modern American history

judge what are those who say that this would be legitimate that there were

legitimate concerns that Russia was trying to influence the the election and

that sources saw Carter page maybe meeting with people they picked up Intel

in the Kremlin there's sort of thing right that is the basis for this

investigation to find out what what that was going on again it depends who sent

the professor your analogy is sensible and lawful if he was sent by Intel if he

was sent by law enforcement to gather evidence they want to use or to gather

evidence they want to use to get another search warrant they need a search

warrant to start that to get him and who will find this out with the IG Horowitz

find this type of information out or should it be Nunez in the house you know

when I read about this yesterday afternoon I thought the president was

asking for a criminal investigation a steady

a rather low level below the radar screen sort of lukewarm investigation by

the IG maybe he wants more general well lots of criminal investigations up with

if he comes up with evidence of crimes he's epically required to pass that

evidence on to the prosecutors in the Justice Department what about this truck

text saying this was being run out of the White House that seems to be a

reference to the Russia investigation but could that jump the shark and be a

go beyond that the here is the other $64,000 question and and this is not my

phrase this is James Freeman in this morning's New York Times where the heck

was Barack Obama what did President Obama know about this there's another

Peter struck test text and I know there are five thousand of these you can pick

and choose or wherever you want but there's another one that says the White

House wants to know everything but everything we're doing the White House

wants to know everything the FBI is doing to surveil the Trump

campaign Wow well could it be no the White House wants to know everything

they're doing to find out Russian influence in the campaign and in the

election that changed the elects that's the innocent explanation that sinister

one is the White House wants to know what Trump is up to the pass it on to

Hillary I don't know when we'll find the answer to this if ever but the people

that the Inspector General is investigating as we speak are all former

officials of the FBI and the DOJ I don't think any of them are still there so

it'll be under invested is under investigation yes all right yeah thank

you as always you're welcome guys

you

For more infomation >> Judge Nap's $64,000 Question on FBI Informant Within the Trump Campaign - Duration: 6:21.

-------------------------------------------

DOJ will investigate Trump campaign surveillance - Duration: 1:22.

The Department of Justice asked its internal watchdog to look into whether there was any

political motivation in the FBI's investigation of President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign.

The request came after Trump tweeted on Sunday that he planned to order an investigation

into whether the FBI or DOJ "infiltrated or surveilled" his campaign "for political purposes."

The DOJ announced back in March that its inspector general would look into potential abuses of

the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

It's now folding Trump's demand into that investigation.

In a statement released Sunday, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said,

The New York Times reported Friday that a confidential intelligence source interacted

with Trump campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page.

And The Washington Post later reported that same source also met with Trump's campaign

co-chairman Sam Clovis.

Rudy Giuliani, one of Trump's lawyers, told CNN he didn't think Trump would sit for an

interview with special counsel Robert Mueller without access to information on that confidential

source.

Giuliani also said Mueller's office told the president's team that the part of the Russia

investigation involving Trump could be wrapped up by the start of September if he agreed

to answer Mueller's questions.

For more infomation >> DOJ will investigate Trump campaign surveillance - Duration: 1:22.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Trump Just Found The FBI's Secret Mole In The White House – 'BIGGEST SCANDAL' - Duration: 11:48.

BREAKING Trump Just Found The FBI's Secret Mole In The White House – 'BIGGEST SCANDAL'

Democrats have a track record of doing whatever it takes when it comes to winning and keeping

their power.

The 2016 Presidental election was something to remember.

The Democrats put up the most corrupt candidate while the GOP eventually had their front-runner

Donald Trump.

Debbie Wasserman Shultz ( DNC Chair ) at the time handed Hillary Clinton the nomination

without hesitation.

America knew who Hillary Clinton was, and knew exactly what she was capable of.

The far left wing of the party didn't want Clinton they wanted Vermont Senator Bernie

"Socialist" Sanders who was cheated out of the nomination by Clinton, and the DNC.

Sanders conceded in defeat and encouraged his voter base to support Clinton.

That wasn't going to happen.

The Clinton camp knew they had to do something, and boy did they make a complete mess of it

all.

Russian meddling stories emerged, the media turned completely on Trump and gave Clinton

pass after pass.

It was set in stone that Hillary Clinton would be the 45th President of the United States.

The voters weren't stupid and elected Donald J. Trump.

News started to drip out that Hillary Clinton was cheating her way to the Presidency, and

the voters were the only ones that didn't want her in.

The media and every single special interest out there wanted Hillary Clinton because she

had power, and could give them everything they wanted.

Political influence was the biggest sponsor of the Clinton's.

Just recently it's been discovered that The FBI wanted Clinton to become President,

and sent a 73-year-old spy into the Trump campaign to report back anything that was

juicy.

The 73-year-old academic reportedly has deep ties to American and British intelligence,

having served in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations, the New York Post reported.

President Trump tweeted Friday that confirmation of an FBI plant in his campaign would become

the nation's "all time biggest political scandal."

"Reports are there was indeed at least one FBI representative implanted, for political

purposes, into my campaign for president," Trump wrote.

"It took place very early on, and long before the phony Russia Hoax became a "hot" Fake

News story.

If true – all time biggest political scandal!"

The New York Times and Washington Post reportedly have known of Stefan Halper's identity for

weeks, but chose not to reveal his name.

Then on Thursday, the Daily Caller named Halper in the opening paragraph of its report.

The Washington Post said it received warnings from U.S. officials that revealing Halper's

identity posed a security risk.

–Fox News

So who exactly is Stefan Halper?

According to Newsweek:

A U.S. citizen with doctorates from Oxford and Cambridge, Halper served in the Nixon,

Ford and Reagan administrations before becoming a fellow of Magdalene College, Cambridge,

where he is a Senior Fellow of the Centre of International Studies.

He was also a consultant on Russia and China policy issues to an internal Pentagon think

tank known as the Office of Net Assessment, according to public records cited by NBC News.

In the 1980s, he was reportedly involved in a spying operation for the Reagan campaign

that involved agents passing classified foreign policy documents from the Carter White House

to the Republican candidate's team.

Halper reportedly flew Trump foreign policy aide Papadopoulos to London and quizzed him

on alleged Russian efforts to boost the Trump campaign and undermine Democrat opponent Hillary

Clinton.

Page told NBC that he met with Halper and did not find his encounters with the academic

concerning.

Papadopoulos has not commented publicly on the reports, though sources close to him told

the network that Papadopoulos had met with Halper in 2016.

Liberal Outlets like "Mother Jones" recently put out a headline that reads "In Huge Disappointment,

the FBI's Super-Secret Trump Informant Looks to Be . . . Stefan Halper".

We call this "Trump Derangement Syndrome" where the media knows everything is a lie

and hopes they can lie their way into convincing the American people they made a huge mistake

choosing Donald Trump, and he's a horrible man despite his track record of being in office.

The economy is booming, Americans received a huge tax cut, Government is becoming more

transparent thanks to President Trump on Twitter, and his Press Secretary keeping the media

in check on a daily basis and making sure they know the facts.

Paul Krugman called it "Treason" to out Halper, but was completely trashed by Steve

Robinson on Twitter.

Others have noted that Halper, a longtime asset of MI6 and US Intelligence – is a

rabid Trump hater who openly supported Hillary Clinton during the 2016 US election.

"I believe [Hillary] Clinton would be best for US-UK relations and for relations with

the European Union," Clinton is well-known, deeply experienced and predictable.

US-UK relations will remain steady regardless of the winner although Clinton will be less

disruptive over time," Halper, who served as deputy assistant secretary of state for

political-military affairs and senior adviser to the Department of Defense and the Department

of Justice, said.

–Zero Hedge

Jack Posobiec brought Halper's hate for Trump out in the spotlight when he tweeted

a BBC article with Audio of Halper claiming how much he loved Hillary Clinton and Hated

Donald Trump.

When will the media realize the American people have caught on to their Fake News?

The constant Trump bashing has turned more viewers off than Rosie O'Donnelle's Twitter

Account.

President Trump has been fully vindicated several times, and yet we're still dripping

out more, and more lies and scandals brought on by the Deep State, and Hillary Clinton's

Campaign including the DNC, and The Clinton Foundation.

Let's hope AG Sessions has a plan, and knows exactly how to nail Hillary Clinton to the

wall and bring down

the deep state!

For more infomation >> BREAKING Trump Just Found The FBI's Secret Mole In The White House – 'BIGGEST SCANDAL' - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

Devin Nunes If FBI Paid to Spy on Trump "It's Absolute Red Line!" - Duration: 11:48.

Devin Nunes If FBI Paid to Spy on Trump "It's Absolute Red Line!"

Rep. Devin Nunes (D-CA) joined Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures to discuss the latest

developments in the Deep State interference in the 2016 US elections.

It has been widely reported that the Obama administration had a spy working inside the

Trump campaign.

As previously reported internet sleuths have determined who the FBI spy was inside the

Trump campaign.

Jeff Carlson at theMarketswork on Thursday put together a piece where he places an individual

by the name of Stefan Halper as a potential FBI spy into the Trump campaign.

(Note that some believe that Obama may have had more than one spy on the Trump campaign).

It was a lucrative business for Stefan Halper.

Stefan Halper was paid a total of $411,575 in 2016 and 2017 for work with the US government

that included his work spying on the Trump campaign.

Devin Nunes told Maria Bartiromo if this is true, "It's over!"

Rep. Devin Nunes: If any of that is true, if they ran a spy ring or an informant ring

and they were paying people within the Trump campaign, if any of that is true that is an

absolute red line.

There's not and honest person in this country who could believe that taxpayer dollars going

to fund this ring and operate like this what is said in The New York Times that has quite

a bit of detail on it, if any of that is true it's a red line in this country.

You can't do this to political campaigns.

According to them this was done in the spring before the counter-intelligence was even open.

If that's true, we need to know about it…

If they paid someone it's an absolute red line and this is over with!"

For more infomation >> Devin Nunes If FBI Paid to Spy on Trump "It's Absolute Red Line!" - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

Texas Trump Fan Stands Up To ABC's Lies, Buys Billboard To Set Record Straight - Duration: 12:13.

Texas Trump Fan Stands Up To ABC's Lies, Buys Billboard To Set Record Straight

A President Trump supporter from none other than the great state of Texas is using billboard

space to slam the "fake news" network that is ABC over its coverage of Russian interference

in the 2016 presidential election.

Kyle Courtney of Boerne, Texas, placed an ad saying he had grown up with ABC News but

has been down by what the network has turned into by reporting such fake news as the so-called

Russian Collusion narrative the Democrats conjured up in order to remove a sitting president.

According to Patriot Journal the billboard reads, "ABC News: I grew up with you.

We are through.

The Russians didn't elect Donald Trump.

I did."In a statement to San Antonio Texas' NBC affiliate, Courtney said, "ABC News

was the only channel I watched as a child growing up in Texas but I think they have

lost touch with America and forgotten the working man,"

Courtney then had an awesome takedown of the media by accusing them of acting in coordination

with the Hillary Clinton campaign during the 2016 presidential election.

"Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign was funded by the Clinton Foundation in close

coordination with the media, and now we're seeing them try to fix what they couldn't

fix during the election," Courtney said.

"They are doing everything they can, night after night, to create narratives and sway

people's direction to impeach Donald Trump."

The billboard has been confirmed to remain up for two months.

This is exactly what the media doesn't understand yet.

We the people have figured out their game and we won't be playing it anymore.

Ever since the far left liberal Walter Cronkite, who had the ear of most of American during

the 60's negligently said on his 3rd rate news/propaganda show that the Vietnam War

was lost the mainstream media took it upon themselves to form public opinion rather than

just report the news.

And although it took the American people 50 years, and an outsider as their president

to understand, they aren't having it anymore.Make America Great Again and don't let the Democrat

lapdog media dictate the agenda anymore!

Here is more on Cronkite via Accuracy in Media:

"It is wrong to speak ill of the d**d.

On the other hand, it is an insult to the intelligence of the American people to pretend

that Walter Cronkite was the "voice of God" and "universally credible," as Mara Liasson

put it on Fox News Sunday.

The terrible truth is that Walter Cronkite symbolized liberal media bias and used that

bias with disastrous consequences for our nation and the world.

His latest cause was world government and the destruction of American sovereignty.

We found out after his retirement that he was not only a liberal, which was evident

from his broadcasts, but a one-worlder.

In appearances before the World Federalist Association, which favors world government

financed by global taxes, he called for the U.S. to renounce "some of its sovereignty"

and pass a series of United Nations treaties-many of which are now being pushed in the Senate

by President Barack Obama.

Cronkite called for an "international Liberty Bell."

He called for Senate ratification of the Treaty to Ban Land Mines, the Law of the Sea Treaty,

the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination

Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Most important, he said, we should sign and ratify the Treaty for a Permanent International

Criminal Court, which would violate U.S. constitutional rights by enabling foreign judges to prosecute

American citizens and imprison them in foreign jails.

Cronkite was determined to use the U.N. and its treaties to inhibit the ability of the

U.S. to act in its own national security interests.

One of Cronkite's appearances, where he accepted a "Global Governance" award,

is available on video, at an event which featured the wife of then-U.N. boss Kofi Annan and

a video from then-First Lady Hillary Clinton.

The same "Global Governance" award had also been given to former Time magazine columnist

Strobe Talbott, another advocate of world government, later a top State Department official

in the Clinton Administration and subsequently named as a "special contact" of the Russian

intelligence service by a Russian spy.

Talbott now runs the liberal Brookings Institution.In 1988, seven years after his retirement as

anchorman of the CBS Evening News, Cronkite addressed a left-wing People for the American

Way conference and denounced President Reagan for the "unilateral" military actions

in Grenada, when the U.S. military evicted a communist gang, and Libya, when Reagan ordered

a military strike in retaliation for the acts of terrorism against Americans.

Cronkite despised Reagan's peace-through-strength policies and said that the smartest president

he ever met was Jimmy Carter.

Later, Cronkite denounced Operation Iraqi Freedom and attacked the Bush administration

for its "arrogance."

His role in the Vietnam defeat is being reported as if it were a highlight of his career.

Yet, his misreporting helped create the conditions for a premature U.S. military withdrawal,

leading to the loss of the lives of 58,000 Americans in vain, not to mention the millions

of additional deaths caused in Vietnam and Cambodia by the Communists.

Cronkite's public verdict that the 1968 Tet offensive was a "defeat" for the U.S.

is widely seen as a turning point in American support for the war.

Cronkite falsely claimed that the Vietcong had held the American embassy for six hours

and that the offensive "went on for two months."

The facts show that Tet was actually a major defeat for the communist enemy.

Accuracy in Media founder and longtime AIM Report editor Reed Irvine noted that Cronkite

"contributed a great deal to our defeat in Vietnam."

Beyond Vietnam, Cronkite got it wrong on one of the big issues-freedom versus Soviet communism.

In the 1974 book, TV and National Defense, Dr. Ernest Lefever examined how CBS News programs

for two years had covered national security issues and concluded that the news organization

was "an active advocate of several national defense positions which were frequently critical

of U.S. policy, and usually from a perspective that implied or called for a lesser military

commitment and lower defense expenditures."

In 1972, for instance, the CBS Evening News aired nearly 1,400 presentations supporting

the dovish view.

Contrary or hawkish positions were aired only 79 times.Asked about the charges, Cronkite

displayed the bias that guided his news program, saying that "There are always groups in

Washington expressing views of alarm over the state of our defenses.

We don't carry those stories.

The story is that there are those who want to cut defense spending."

The "most trusted man in America" didn't deserve our trust.

In 1979, he gave an interview to the Soviet magazine, Literary Gazette, and told Vitaly

Kobysh that the "Soviet threat" was "most likely…a myth."

According to the magazine, Cronkite went on to say that "I will never believe in a 'Soviet

threat.'"

Shortly after the interview was published, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.

He retired as CBS Evening News anchorman in 1981.

Cronkite told AIM founder and editor Reed Irvine that he had been misquoted by Kobysh,

and that he had a tape recording of the interview to prove it.

The tape never materialized.

Irvine ran into Kobysh at an international media conference and the Soviet journalist

said the interview was entirely accurate.

After Ronald Reagan took office as President and proceeded to build up U.S. national defense

capability, in the wake of the disastrous Jimmy Carter years, CBS News acted to counter

the Reagan effort.

They aired a five-part program, "The Defense of the United States," in which Cronkite

appeared to tell us that the relationship with the Soviet Union was dominated by "the

same old fears and doubts" because we didn't have a genuine dialogue with the Soviet communists.

Irvine noted at the time of the broadcast that CBS gave us "the Kremlin view that

it is the United States, not the Soviet Union, that is striving for an impossible military

superiority, while creating fantasies about Soviet aggression."

However, Irvine noted that Reagan "was not deterred" by the CBS News assault, but that

the momentum behind his election mandate to rebuild America's defense was "weakened"

somewhat by the constant repetition by the media that he was spending too much on national

security.

Cronkite's accomplices in this crusade included Dan Rather, his successor, and Bill Moyers,

then with CBS and now with public television.

For many years Irvine drew attention to the "persistent anti-defense bias of CBS News"

and reported, "One has to wonder why the anti-defense bias is so strong and persistent

at CBS.

My own feeling is that it is a reflection of the views enunciated by Walter Cronkite

that show a benign view of the Soviet Union."

In 1989, while expressing the hope that the Soviet archives would one day be opened to

demonstrate how the Kremlin manipulated American journalists such as Walter Duranty of the

New York Times, who had lied and helped Stalin cover up his monstrous crimes that resulted

in the deaths of 7-10 million Ukrainians, Irvine added that "It will be fascinating

to see what they say about Walter Cronkite, who spent two years in Moscow after World

War II as a UPI correspondent and who has been remarkably restrained in his criticism

of that country ever since."

This may sound harsh, but the fact is that Cronkite was consistently wrong about Soviet

intentions, and his attitude dominated CBS News coverage of the old Soviet Union.

After the Soviet collapse, Irvine wrote a 1990 AIM Report about those personalities

who had taken "a benign or even adulatory view of communism and the Soviet Union in

the years since the 1917 Bolshevik coup d'etat."

Cronkite was on this list of "doves," which also included "Hanoi Jane" Fonda.

It is fine to recognize Cronkite for his long life and many years as anchorman of the CBS

Evening News.

He captured important moments and reached millions.

But don't pretend that he was an objective journalist.

Cronkite's journalism cost lives and could have cost many more, had it not been for a

President named Reagan who had the courage to bypass the major media and go directly

to the American people with the truth about our crumbling defenses when America was increasingly

vulnerable.

"The country was very lucky to have him in that seat" as anchorman, Fox News Sunday

host Chris Wallace said, in paying tribute.

No.

America was fortunate to have escaped his pernicious influence.

Now we have to try to escape the fate of world government that Cronkite made his primary

cause later in life, which has been adopted by President Barack Obama and Pope Benedict

XVI."

For more infomation >> Texas Trump Fan Stands Up To ABC's Lies, Buys Billboard To Set Record Straight - Duration: 12:13.

-------------------------------------------

Texas Trump Fan Stands Up To ABC's Lies, Buys Billboard To Set Record Straight - Duration: 11:28.

Texas Trump Fan Stands Up To ABC's Lies, Buys Billboard To Set Record Straight.

Now this is classic!

A President Trump supporter from none other than the great state of Texas is using billboard

space to slam the "fake news" network that is ABC over its coverage of Russian interference

in the 2016 presidential election.

Kyle Courtney of Boerne, Texas, placed an ad saying he had grown up with ABC News but

has been down by what the network has turned into by reporting such fake news as the so-called

Russian Collusion narrative the Democrats conjured up in order to remove a sitting president.

According to Patriot Journal the billboard reads, "ABC News: I grew up with you.

We are through.

The Russians didn't elect Donald Trump.

I did."

Perfect!

Boerne man renounces ABC News, shows support for Trump with large billboard

And the best part of this whole thing is if you actually take the time to try to access

the twitter picture you find this.

It appears the billboard has upset the Twitter overseers!

In a statement to San Antonio Texas' NBC affiliate, Courtney said, "ABC News was

the only channel I watched as a child growing up in Texas but I think they have lost touch

with America and forgotten the working man,"

Courtney then had an awesome takedown of the media by accusing them of acting in coordination

with the Hillary Clinton campaign during the 2016 presidential election.

"Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign was funded by the Clinton Foundation in close

coordination with the media, and now we're seeing them try to fix what they couldn't

fix during the election," Courtney said.

"They are doing everything they can, night after night, to create narratives and sway

people's direction to impeach Donald Trump."

The billboard has been confirmed to remain up for two months.

This is exactly what the media doesn't understand yet.

We the people have figured out their game and we won't be playing it anymore.

Ever since the far left liberal Walter Cronkite, who had the ear of most of American during

the 60's negligently said on his 3rd rate news/propaganda show that the Vietnam War

was lost the mainstream media took it upon themselves to form public opinion rather than

just report the news.

And although it took the American people 50 years, and an outsider as their president

to understand, they aren't having it anymore.

Make America Great Again and don't let the Democrat lapdog media dictate the agenda anymore!

"It is wrong to speak ill of the d**d.

On the other hand, it is an insult to the intelligence of the American people to pretend

that Walter Cronkite was the "voice of God" and "universally credible," as Mara Liasson

put it on Fox News Sunday.

The terrible truth is that Walter Cronkite symbolized liberal media bias and used that

bias with disastrous consequences for our nation and the world.

His latest cause was world government and the destruction of American sovereignty.

We found out after his retirement that he was not only a liberal, which was evident

from his broadcasts, but a one-worlder.

In appearances before the World Federalist Association, which favors world government

financed by global taxes, he called for the U.S. to renounce "some of its sovereignty"

and pass a series of United Nations treaties-many of which are now being pushed in the Senate

by President Barack Obama.

Cronkite called for an "international Liberty Bell."

He called for Senate ratification of the Treaty to Ban Land Mines, the Law of the Sea Treaty,

the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination

Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Most important, he said, we should sign and ratify the Treaty for a Permanent International

Criminal Court, which would violate U.S. constitutional rights by enabling foreign judges to prosecute

American citizens and imprison them in foreign jails.

Cronkite was determined to use the U.N. and its treaties to inhibit the ability of the

U.S. to act in its own national security interests.

One of Cronkite's appearances, where he accepted a "Global Governance" award,

is available on video, at an event which featured the wife of then-U.N. boss Kofi Annan and

a video from then-First Lady Hillary Clinton.

The same "Global Governance" award had also been given to former Time magazine columnist

Strobe Talbott, another advocate of world government, later a top State Department official

in the Clinton Administration and subsequently named as a "special contact" of the Russian

intelligence service by a Russian spy.

Talbott now runs the liberal Brookings Institution.

In 1988, seven years after his retirement as anchorman of the CBS Evening News, Cronkite

addressed a left-wing People for the American Way conference and denounced President Reagan

for the "unilateral" military actions in Grenada, when the U.S. military evicted

a communist gang, and Libya, when Reagan ordered a military strike in retaliation for the acts

of terrorism against Americans.

Cronkite despised Reagan's peace-through-strength policies and said that the smartest president

he ever met was Jimmy Carter.

Later, Cronkite denounced Operation Iraqi Freedom and attacked the Bush administration

for its "arrogance."

His role in the Vietnam defeat is being reported as if it were a highlight of his career.

Yet, his misreporting helped create the conditions for a premature U.S. military withdrawal,

leading to the loss of the lives of 58,000 Americans in vain, not to mention the millions

of additional deaths caused in Vietnam and Cambodia by the Communists.

Cronkite's public verdict that the 1968 Tet offensive was a "defeat" for the U.S.

is widely seen as a turning point in American support for the war.

Cronkite falsely claimed that the Vietcong had held the American embassy for six hours

and that the offensive "went on for two months."

The facts show that Tet was actually a major defeat for the communist enemy.

Accuracy in Media founder and longtime AIM Report editor Reed Irvine noted that Cronkite

"contributed a great deal to our defeat in Vietnam."

Beyond Vietnam, Cronkite got it wrong on one of the big issues-freedom versus Soviet communism.

In the 1974 book, TV and National Defense, Dr. Ernest Lefever examined how CBS News programs

for two years had covered national security issues and concluded that the news organization

was "an active advocate of several national defense positions which were frequently critical

of U.S. policy, and usually from a perspective that implied or called for a lesser military

commitment and lower defense expenditures."

In 1972, for instance, the CBS Evening News aired nearly 1,400 presentations supporting

the dovish view.

Contrary or hawkish positions were aired only 79 times.

Asked about the charges, Cronkite displayed the bias that guided his news program, saying

that "There are always groups in Washington expressing views of alarm over the state of

our defenses.

We don't carry those stories.

The story is that there are those who want to cut defense spending."

The "most trusted man in America" didn't deserve our trust.

In 1979, he gave an interview to the Soviet magazine, Literary Gazette, and told Vitaly

Kobysh that the "Soviet threat" was "most likely…a myth."

According to the magazine, Cronkite went on to say that "I will never believe in a 'Soviet

threat.'"

Shortly after the interview was published, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.

He retired as CBS Evening News anchorman in 1981.

Cronkite told AIM founder and editor Reed Irvine that he had been misquoted by Kobysh,

and that he had a tape recording of the interview to prove it.

The tape never materialized.

Irvine ran into Kobysh at an international media conference and the Soviet journalist

said the interview was entirely accurate.

After Ronald Reagan took office as President and proceeded to build up U.S. national defense

capability, in the wake of the disastrous Jimmy Carter years, CBS News acted to counter

the Reagan effort.

They aired a five-part program, "The Defense of the United States," in which Cronkite

appeared to tell us that the relationship with the Soviet Union was dominated by "the

same old fears and doubts" because we didn't have a genuine dialogue with the Soviet communists.

Irvine noted at the time of the broadcast that CBS gave us "the Kremlin view that

it is the United States, not the Soviet Union, that is striving for an impossible military

superiority, while creating fantasies about Soviet aggression."

However, Irvine noted that Reagan "was not deterred" by the CBS News assault, but that

the momentum behind his election mandate to rebuild America's defense was "weakened"

somewhat by the constant repetition by the media that he was spending too much on national

security.

Cronkite's accomplices in this crusade included Dan Rather, his successor, and Bill Moyers,

then with CBS and now with public television.

For many years Irvine drew attention to the "persistent anti-defense bias of CBS News"

and reported, "One has to wonder why the anti-defense bias is so strong and persistent

at CBS.

My own feeling is that it is a reflection of the views enunciated by Walter Cronkite

that show a benign view of the Soviet Union."

In 1989, while expressing the hope that the Soviet archives would one day be opened to

demonstrate how the Kremlin manipulated American journalists such as Walter Duranty of the

New York Times, who had lied and helped Stalin cover up his monstrous crimes that resulted

in the deaths of 7-10 million Ukrainians, Irvine added that "It will be fascinating

to see what they say about Walter Cronkite, who spent two years in Moscow after World

War II as a UPI correspondent and who has been remarkably restrained in his criticism

of that country ever since."

This may sound harsh, but the fact is that Cronkite was consistently wrong about Soviet

intentions, and his attitude dominated CBS News coverage of the old Soviet Union.

After the Soviet collapse, Irvine wrote a 1990 AIM Report about those personalities

who had taken "a benign or even adulatory view of communism and the Soviet Union in

the years since the 1917 Bolshevik coup d'etat."

Cronkite was on this list of "doves," which also included "Hanoi Jane" Fonda.

It is fine to recognize Cronkite for his long life and many years as anchorman of the CBS

Evening News.

He captured important moments and reached millions.

But don't pretend that he was an objective journalist.

Cronkite's journalism cost lives and could have cost many more, had it not been for a

President named Reagan who had the courage to bypass the major media and go directly

to the American people with the truth about our crumbling defenses when America was increasingly

vulnerable.

"The country was very lucky to have him in that seat" as anchorman, Fox News Sunday

host Chris Wallace said, in paying tribute.

No.

America was fortunate to have escaped his pernicious influence.

Now we have to try to escape the fate of world government that Cronkite made his primary

cause later in life, which has been adopted by President Barack Obama and Pope Benedict

XVI."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> Texas Trump Fan Stands Up To ABC's Lies, Buys Billboard To Set Record Straight - Duration: 11:28.

-------------------------------------------

After Trump Learns The Truth About Obama's Spying FBI - Duration: 11:17.

After Trump Learns The Truth About Obama's Spying FBI, He Unloads An Anvil

For well over a year, the American people have had to put up with the "Russian probe."

The left-wing media has pushed the bogus idea that the President colluded with Russia, and

they just haven't stopped.

Even though there's been no evidence, swamp dwellers within the FBI and DOJ continue to

look for dirt; they waste millions of our tax dollars, hoping to find something to take

down Trump.

They are actually using American resources to defeat the elected President of the United

States.

But it gets worse: this probe—that started last year—is not the first.

In fact, we learned that Obama's FBI was spying on Donald Trump's campaign, as long

before he was elected President, Trump's people were being monitored by the feds.

Now the Commander in Chief is letting loose, and his words are sure to light a fire under

the GOP's caboose.

From Fox News:

"President Trump on Thursday questioned whether the Obama FBI 'spied' on his presidential

campaign, on the heels of an extensive report on the Russia investigation's origins that

said a government informant met several times with Trump's former advisers.

Rudy Giuliani, a member of the president's outside legal team, also told "Fox & Friends"

that former FBI Director James Comey 'should be prosecuted' if his bureau spied on the

campaign…

This explosive line is sure to fuel Republican efforts on Capitol Hill to review records

relating to an unidentified FBI source — and his or her role in the Russia probe."

Yeah, I'd say this is bigger than Watergate.

Nixon was taken down over a simple break-in at a hotel, but Obama's FBI and DOJ were

conducting illegal spying on a Presidential campaign.

You have to realize the FBI can't spy on American citizens, just because they want

to.

We have a Constitution and Bill of Rights that protects us from such abuses.

Law enforcement has to go through courts to obtain warrants before they invade our privacy,

and they better have good reason, or the cours will deny them.

Yet where was the reason for spying on Trump's campaign?

What credible evidence did James Comey's FBI use to embed an informant in the Trump

campaign?

Clearly, they didn't expect to be caught.

They never dreamed they'd find nothing.

Or that Trump would destroy Hillary.

Now these swamp dwellers are in it deep and they're scrambling to cover up their crimes.

And their cronies in the media are trying to downplay this massive abuse of power.

But we're on to them.

Trump is not going to forget this, so don't be surprised if Republicans in Congress open

an investigation.

H/T patriotjournal

For more infomation >> After Trump Learns The Truth About Obama's Spying FBI - Duration: 11:17.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Singing Baby by Justin Bieber - Duration: 1:34.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Singing Baby by Justin Bieber - Duration: 1:34.

-------------------------------------------

BOOM! Devin Nunes: If FBI Paid to Spy on Trump - Duration: 11:08.

BOOM!

Devin Nunes: If FBI Paid to Spy on Trump "It's Absolute Red Line!

It's Over With!…

No Honest American Will Stand for This!"

(

Rep. Devin Nunes (D-CA) joined Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures to discuss the latest

developments in the Deep State interference in the 2016 US elections.

It has been widely reported that the Obama administration had a spy working inside the

Trump campaign.

As previously reported internet sleuths have determined who the FBI spy was inside the

Trump campaign.

Jeff Carlson at theMarketswork on Thursday put together a piece where he places an individual

by the name of Stefan Halper as a potential FBI spy into the Trump campaign.

(Note that some believe that Obama may have had more than one spy on the Trump campaign).

It was a lucrative business for Stefan Halper.

Stefan Halper was paid a total of $411,575 in 2016 and 2017 for work with the US government

that included his work spying on the Trump campaign.

Devin Nunes told Maria Bartiromo if this is true, "It's over!"

Rep. Devin Nunes: If any of that is true, if they ran a spy ring or an informant ring

and they were paying people within the Trump campaign, if any of that is true that is an

absolute red line.

There's not and honest person in this country who could believe that taxpayer dollars going

to fund this ring and operate like this what is said in The New York Times that has quite

a bit of detail on it, if any of that is true it's a red line in this country.

You can't do this to political campaigns.

According to them this was done in the spring before the counter-intelligence was even open.

If that's true, we need to know about it…

If they paid someone it's an absolute red line and this is over with!"

Via Sunday Morning Futures:

For more infomation >> BOOM! Devin Nunes: If FBI Paid to Spy on Trump - Duration: 11:08.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Campaign Spy's Past Exposed: Worked to Flip Past Pres. Election Too as CIA Spook - Duration: 5:23.

Trump Campaign Spy's Past Exposed: Worked to Flip Past Pres.

Election Too as CIA Spook

The political scandal of the decade is brewing in Washington, D.C., and it may leave President

Donald Trump in a very different position than his enemies wish: Not destroyed, but

largely vindicated.

Details have finally started to emerge about an establishment-led effort to plant a "mole"

within the Trump campaign, and evidence is beginning to mount that its goal was to undermine

and derail his run for office.

The facts are suggesting something chillingly sinister: A government operative directed

by the Obama-run FBI purposely infiltrated the campaign of a candidate with the training

and background needed to destabilize elections.

In a detailed piece published by The Intercept, investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald summarized

the scandal and gave a blow-by-blow account of how its beginning to unravel.

"Over the past several weeks, House Republicans have been claiming that the FBI, during the

2016 election, used an operative to spy on the Trump campaign, and they triggered outrage

within the FBI by trying to learn his identity," he explained.

"The controversy escalated when President Trump joined the fray on Friday morning.

'Reports are there was indeed at least one FBI representative implanted, for political

purposes, into my campaign for president,' Trump tweeted.'"

Amazingly, FBI and Department of Justice sources did not deny this claim.

It's worth remembering that while the media and DOJ insiders were laughing and dismissing

Trump's accusations a year ago — especially regarding wiretapping and the Steele dossier

— he has been proven right on almost every point.

Nobody is laughing now.

Instead, they're scrambling to cover their tracks.

"On May 8, the Washington Post described the informant as 'a top-secret intelligence

source' and cited DOJ officials as arguing that disclosure of his name 'could risk

lives by potentially exposing the source, a U.S. citizen who has provided intelligence

to the CIA and FBI,'" Greenwald reported.

That was almost certainly a last-ditch effort to protect the mole and save face.

Then came the threats.

"The top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, Mark Warner … actually threatened

his own colleagues in Congress with criminal prosecution if they tried to obtain the identity

of the informant," Greenwald reported.

Journalists, including Greenwald and veteran gumshoes at several major media outlets, didn't

stop.

After a few rounds of newspaper one-upmanship, the mole's name has been revealed.

"As a result of some very odd choices by the nation's largest media outlets, everyone

knows the name of the FBI's informant: Stefan Halper," Greenwald wrote.

Here's the truly important and shocking part: Halper is no run-of-the-mill FBI operative.

He has a history of being involved in shady CIA operations to infiltrate and derail U.S.

elections.

"To begin with, it's obviously notable that the person the FBI used to monitor the

Trump campaign is the same person who worked as a CIA operative running that 1980 Presidential

election spying campaign," Greenwale wrote.

Yes, it was Halper, a former Nixon insider and the same man at the center of the anti-Trump

scandal today.

Nearly 40 years ago, a largely buried scandal was playing out in Washington.

In involved some famous Republicans, including old names that even today are firmly in the

"Never Trump" camp.

"Halper was responsible for a long-forgotten spying scandal involving the 1980 election,

in which the Reagan campaign — using CIA officials managed by Halper, reportedly under

the direction of former CIA Director and then-Vice-Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush — got caught

running a spying operation from inside the Carter administration," the Intercept explained.

In other words, there may be a structure within the foreign policy and intelligence communities

that goes back to at least the time when George H.W. Bush ran the CIA.

That behind-the-scenes power structure — "Deep State," to borrow the term — was on the

side of Hillary Clinton and believed that Trump needed to be stopped at any cost.

One look at the now-public text messages from FBI officials in the weeks and months leading

up to the 2016 election definitely seems to support this.

And it's worth pointing out that the now 93-year-old George H.W. Bush admitted to supporting

Hillary Clinton.

By any measure, the Bush dynasty has not been friendly to Trump.

"Whatever else is true, the CIA operative and FBI informant used to gather information

on the Trump campaign in the 2016 campaign has, for weeks, been falsely depicted as a

sensitive intelligence asset rather than what he actually is: a long-time CIA operative

with extensive links to the Bush family who was responsible for a dirty and likely illegal

spying operation in the 1980 presidential election," explained Greenwald.

"For that reason, it's easy to understand why many people in Washington were so desperate

to conceal his identity, but that desperation had nothing to do with the lofty and noble

concerns for national security they claimed were motivating them," he added.

Deep operatives.

Election interference.

Moles and spies deployed against a candidate by our own government agencies.

It's a chilling picture, but one that all of the evidence so far supports.

There's a power struggle of shadows within the swamp in Washington, and it is at odds

with the American people and their sovereign voice.

For more infomation >> Trump Campaign Spy's Past Exposed: Worked to Flip Past Pres. Election Too as CIA Spook - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

Moon Jae-in visits DC to save Trump-Kim summit - Duration: 1:46.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in is more popular than ever at home, and he has diplomacy

with North Korea to thank.

Now he just needs to make sure it survives contact with President Donald Trump's negotiating

tactics.

"We cannot let that country have nukes.

We just can't do it," Trump told the press recently.

Trump is scheduled to meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un next month, and he's not

backing down on his insistence that North Korea should completely dismantle its nuclear

program in exchange for sanctions relief.

But North Korea has strongly rejected that plan — so much so that Trump is reportedly

rethinking attending the summit after all, according to The New York Times.

Now Moon is visiting the White House, and his top priority is to convince Trump that

diplomacy is still worth pursuing with the North, even if he doesn't get what he wants

right away.

Moon helped lay the groundwork for the summit by emphasizing the North's willingness to

eventually denuclearize.

He also credited Trump for a lot of the diplomatic progress on the peninsula, even suggesting

Trump should win the Nobel prize.

Now that tensions are flaring up again, Moon is on the hook to convince the U.S. that North

Korea really does want to reach a diplomatic agreement.

Relations between the U.S. and South Korea could sour if Trump feels like Moon overpromised

on what Kim was willing to give up.

But Moon's faced political risks throughout the process.

His approval rating in South Korea dropped several times during the 2018 Winter Olympics

due to concessions he made orchestrating North Korea's participation.

And it's worth remembering that less than a year ago, Moon had to worry about North

Korean missile tests and U.S. plans for a pre-emptive strike.

Trading those fears for diplomatic headaches still probably seems like a good deal to South

Korea.

No comments:

Post a Comment