Sunday, November 19, 2017

Trump news on Youtube Nov 20 2017

North Korea WARNING: Emergency Trump request reveals US arsenal to tackle WW3 threat

sparked fears of when the hermit nation refused to back down from its nuclear ambitions despite international condemnation.

US President started a furious rhetoric war with Kim Jong-un after the despot dictator said he would look to hit the US territory of Guam with an intercontinental ballistic missile.

Mr Trump promised to retaliate with "fire and fury", even suggesting he would be willing to "totally destroy" the hermit nation if needs must.

Now, the American's administration is further planning for the possibility of World War 3 by asking for emergency funds to bolster its defences against the rogue state's missiles.

In an emergency request to Congress, Mr Trump's Government asked for $4 billion to help combat the threat of North Korea. Defence officials are concerned that the US missile defence system may not be sufficient to deter a North Korea attack.

Hidden deep within the emergency funding request lies a series of hints to new possible plans Donald Trump is using to combat the North Korea threat.

The White house is planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on two new approaches to react to a North Korea strike on the United States.

The first involves a sophisticated cyber warfare system that would sabotage and interfere with missile launches before they occur, the Pentagon has called this the "left of launch" approach.

The second solution would see North Korean missiles blown up in the "most phase" when they are slow-moving and highly visible targets. This would involve the use of rocket-firing drones to target missiles as they are launched from North Korea.

Caveny, a planner behind the rocket-firing drones, said an accelerated programme could see the weapons produced within a year.

His team are considering the use of an Avenger, a drone that has a 76-feet wingspan. Dr Caveny said: "This is going to be a game changer.

Thomas Karako, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies added: "What you're seeing is a lot more options on the table.".

For more infomation >> North Korea WARNING: Emergency Trump request reveals US arsenal to tackle WW3 threat - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

Trump frena la importación de trofeos de caza de elefantes africanos | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:12.

For more infomation >> Trump frena la importación de trofeos de caza de elefantes africanos | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

After Trump Saved UCLA Player, Ungrateful Father Just BRUTALLY Stabbed Trump In The Back. - Duration: 7:41.

After Trump Saved UCLA Player, Ungrateful Father Just BRUTALLY Stabbed Trump In The

Back.

No matter what he does and how much he wins President Trump just can't seem to make

the left happy.

Even when he gets 3 spoiled entitled ball players out of hot water in China.

President Trump was able to save and get 3 UCLA basketball players safely home.

LiAngelo Ball, Cody Riley, and Jalen Hill, who have now been suspended indefinitely by

the Bruins basketball team.

All three players apologized at a news conference Wednesday morning about the incident in China

that had them stay behind on a team trip after they were accused of shoplifting at 3 different

local area stores.

But of course, since their Messiah, Former President Barack Hussein Obama had no hand

in freeing these 3 characters, the American left and even one of the player's father

just can't seem to give Trump the credit he so rightly deserves.

In fact, LaVar Ball, LiAngelo's father is not giving President Trump any of the credit.

When asked about his son's return and the whole ordeal he actually had the galls to

say "Who?" when asked about Trump's involvement in the matter.

"What was he over there for?

Don't tell me nothing.

Everybody wants to make it seem like he helped me out."

Ummm. grammar is key!

The Mercury News Reports:

Trump scolds LiAngelo Ball: 'Are you going to thank me?'

The three UCLA players who were detained in China for shoplifting returned to the U.S.

on Tuesday night, following intervention from, among others, President Donald Trump.

As immensely relieved as LiAngelo Ball, Jalen Hill and Cody Riley must be to have been allowed

to leave so quickly (not to mention to have avoided prison sentences), they came back

to calls for strong punishments from the school – and a chiding from the president.

"Do you think the three UCLA Basketball Players will say thank you President Trump?

They were headed for 10 years in jail!" Trump tweeted Wednesday.

Among those insisting that the trio be suspended for the entire season was Los Angeles Times

columnist Bill Plaschke, who wrote Tuesday, "If the three students had any sort of involvement

in something so appallingly entitled and dumb while on a school trip to a foreign country,

UCLA's next move should be clear.

School authorities should say welcome home, and see you next season."

The three Bruins were reportedly accused of stealing sunglasses from a Louis Vuitton store

adjacent to the team's hotel where it was staying in Hangzhou, as part of a weeklong

trip that involved playing a game in Shanghai against Georgia Tech.

Ball, Hill and Riley were released on bail in time for the game, but they were benched

by coach Steve Alford.

Now that they are back in Los Angeles, it remains to be seen when they will be allowed

to play.

During halftime of a nationally televised game Tuesday between No. 1 Duke and No. 2

Michigan State, ESPN's Jay Williams disagreed with fellow analyst Seth Greenberg's vehement

assertion that the three players should sit out the season.

Williams said they should be suspended for "a couple of games," adding, "We're

talking about kids."

Greenberg exclaimed, "I don't care about 'kids'!

You're taking your team to another country, a different culture, they steal things in

three different stores, allegedly.

To me, that's egregious."

"They should not be able to play this year.

This is an embarrassment," Greenberg went on.

The arrest of the players coincided with a trip to Asia by Trump, who added an unexpected

item to his agenda when he asked Chinese President Xi Jinping to help resolve their case.

"The basketball players, by the way – I know a lot of people are asking – I will

tell you, when I heard about it two days ago, I had a great conversation with President

Xi," Trump said Tuesday while aboard Air Force One in Manila.

"What they did was unfortunate.

You know, you're talking about very long prison sentences.

[The Chinese] do not play games."

In his Wednesday tweet, Trump exaggerated the punishment the players were facing.

According to a blog that specializes in decoding the Chinese criminal justice system, the players

could have received prison sentences of anywhere between one and four years under the worst-case

scenario, punishment that likely would have been mitigated by the players' ages and

the fact that they appeared to be cooperating with authorities.

It's not clear what terms were negotiated to bring the players back, but it's apparent

that they received relatively minimal punishments from China.

Now it's up to UCLA, possibly with some input from the Pac-12 Conference, to determine

how the three freshmen should atone for what is a very embarrassing incident for the school.

"I want to be clear that we take seriously any violations of the law," UCLA Chancellor

Gene Block said in a statement.

"In this particular case, both Athletics and the Office of Student Conduct will review

this incident and guide any action with respect to the involved students.

Such proceedings are confidential, which limits the specific information that can be shared."

The 23rd-ranked Bruins have their home opener Wednesday, and before the game, Ball, Hill

and Riley, as well as Alford and athletic director Dan Guerrero, are set to offer comments

on the episode but reportedly will not take questions.

Tuesday evening saw the players making their way through a media scrum after landing at

Los Angeles International Airport.

Hanson Wang, a columnist for UCLA's student newspaper, The Daily Bruin, called Sunday

for his school to "lay down the hammer" in disciplining the trio.

Citing his grandfather's firsthand, frustrating experience with the Chinese legal system,

Wang wrote that UCLA "should suspend the three players for the entire year and possibly

more."

"These players were responsible for representing UCLA and the country during their time abroad,

and they failed to meet even the most basic standards of law-abiding citizens," Wang

wrote.

"UCLA must hold them accountable and send the message that no player – or players

– can be let off the hook for violating foreign laws and making a fool out of the

school, the Pac-12 and the U.S."

However, some have pointed out that UCLA officials might be concerned with how well lengthy suspensions

may sit with LaVar Ball, LiAngelo's father, who was with the Bruins in China when the

arrests occurred and said of them, "It ain't that big of a deal."

LaVar Ball's oldest son, Lonzo, starred for the Bruins last season before being drafted

No. 2 overall by the Los Angeles Lakers, and his highly touted youngest son, 16-year-old

LaMelo, has already been ticketed to follow in his brothers' footsteps and play for

UCLA.

"UCLA officials now have the delicate task of determining a suitable punishment," wrote

USA Today's Nancy Armour on Tuesday.

"And by suitable, I mean one that won't incur the wrath of Ball's father, LaVar.

Or prompt him to yank another son out of school."

In waiting to announce its disciplinary measures for Ball, Hill and Riley, UCLA might be trying

to gauge how light a punishment it can get away with meting out.

However, anything less than a full season's suspension won't go over well with at least

a few media figures.

This is everything that's wrong with our great nation.

People like this ball tosser's father are given a platform to ooze their biased hate

to the public.

Why not instead ask him what he did wrong that his son was shoplifting, to begin with?

Someone who speaks like this guy shouldn't even be asked questions by the media.

Who cares what he says or thinks.

We as a nation better start to wise up and put these people in their places.

What exactly entitles this man to give his opinion on this international incident considering

he wasn't even able to raise his son to know the difference between right and wrong?

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> After Trump Saved UCLA Player, Ungrateful Father Just BRUTALLY Stabbed Trump In The Back. - Duration: 7:41.

-------------------------------------------

ALEX WITT 11/19/17 Mueller's Russia probe continues to ensnare Trump allies - Duration: 20:50.

For more infomation >> ALEX WITT 11/19/17 Mueller's Russia probe continues to ensnare Trump allies - Duration: 20:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Holds Off Overturning Ban On Elephant Imports - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> Trump Holds Off Overturning Ban On Elephant Imports - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Crooked Hillary Just Woke Up To The Worst News Of Her Life With What Trump Announced This Morning - Duration: 8:28.

President Donald Trump just laid a smackdown at the feet of his 2016 Democratic opponent

Hillary Clinton today.

Trump took to Twitter this morning and called Crooked Clinton "the worst (and biggest)

loser of all time," and he added, "she just can't stop, which is so good for the

Republican Party.

Hillary, get on with your life and give it another try in three years!"

This would ensure President Trump wins a second term in a landslide considering that today

she has an approval rating lower than President Trump has.

The tweet was likely in response to Clinton's constant attacks on Trump.

Where she tells him to take responsibility for the sexual assault allegations leveled

at him while at the same time applauding Al Franken's response to sexual assault allegations

against him.

Let's all keep in mind that this political hack has spent the last 20 plus years defending

her husband, former President Bill Clinton from multiple allegations of molestation and

sexual assault.

While at the same time dragging his accusers through the coals and branding them as "Bimbo

Eruptions."

Yup, that sounds like the "Champion of Women" we know Killary Clinton to be.

National Review Reports:

Has-Been Hillary

Hillary is retired, but courtiers help her maintain the appearance of importance.

The funniest episode in the protective yet revealing new Hillary Clinton profile arrives

when we learn that this sad, unemployed, 69-year-old lady is so desperate to keep her self-image

alive that she still employs flunkies and retainers to treat her as though she actually

were the president, or the secretary of state, or a president in waiting, or at very least

the leader of the opposition.

Her longtime loyalists are so happy to bustle around her in the service of maintaining the

illusion that, after she takes an hour away from it all to exercise, her communications

director, Nick Merrill, breathlessly updates her on everything that's happened in the

political world in the last threescore ticks of the minute hand.

Her profiler, Rebecca Traister of New York magazine, obviously a great admirer but one

who declines to throw herself overboard from reality for the sake of giving Hillary more

company bobbing about in the sea of fancy, writes that Clinton "listens to the barrage

of updates, nodding like a person whose job requires her to be up-to-date on what's

happening, even though it does not."

Ouch.

Hillary Rodham Clinton isn't merely in a state of denial.

She has become Bruce Willis in The Sixth Sense.

Politically speaking, she is dead, but she doesn't know it.

Her staffers are so many Haley Joel Osments — too kind (and too attached to their salaries)

to tell her that her career is over.

She doesn't need briefings.

She doesn't need to do interviews.

She doesn't need to write the book she is writing (after so many indigestible volumes,

why bother with one more?).

She doesn't need to stake out a politically nuanced position on James Comey's firing

or scramble to get out in front of the Resistance parade.

She lost two exceedingly winnable presidential campaigns in Hindenburgian fashion.

There is no demand for her to run again and there is nothing left for her except to receive

whatever ceremonial honors and sinecures may come her way.

She has been handed her political retirement papers by the American people.

She's done.

Clinton tells Traister, vaguely, "Take me out of the equation as a candidate.

You know, I'm not running for anything," and indeed she isn't, right now, since this

isn't an election year.

Yet nothing Clinton does these days makes sense unless you keep in mind that she actually

thinks she could run again.

Take her Wellesley address on Friday: utterly bonkers for a commencement speech.

Newly minted graduates expect to hear something useful or at least funny or informative or,

failing all else, sentimental.

Clinton did a bit of this, then started lobbing word-mortars far over their heads at Donald

Trump, making the kinds of Nixon comparisons that every Democrat, and lots of non-Democrats,

have been making for months.

Why bother pursuing such a trite theme?

Because Clinton was eager to show the Washington political hacks that she is still a tough

operator, a leader of the anti-Trump movement, a player.

She was, in other words, campaigning.

To all appearances, the game is long over.

Yet she is still on the field, because the game isn't over to her.

Hey, there's another election in three and a half years, folks.

And need we remind you who won the popular vote?

Hillary Clinton: There Are "A Lot of Questions" About 2016 Election's Legitimacy 00:15 01:15

Powered by Clinton was eager to show the Washington political hacks that she is still a tough

operator, a leader of the anti-Trump movement, a player.

In Traister's profile, Clinton (again) deflects attention from her own self-evident flaws

to blame her defeat on others.

She again blames James Comey, with zero acknowledgment that her own actions to evade scrutiny of

her e-mail were the cause of Comey's entirely justified and indeed shockingly forgiving

criminal investigation.

She (again) blames the Russians, even though even she acknowledges that the actual content

of the WikiLeaks e-mails from her own fellow Democrats was "inconsequential."

She (again) blames misogyny, a non-falsifiable theory with no evidence behind it except that

citizens supposedly came up to her and said things like, "Gosh, I'm not sure we're

ready for a woman president," with the added fillip that women who voted against her are

internalized misogynists.

She blames "the suppression of the vote, particularly in Wisconsin," channeling an

investigation from progressive fantasists published in The Nation that is so lacking

in credibility that it was debunked by Slate and ignored by most of the Hillary-friendly

media.

Clinton does not mention that she made more campaign stops in Arizona than in Wisconsin.

She forgets that she ignored the advice of her own husband that it was unwise to write

off white working-class voters.

She does not allude to her having hidden from the public a bout with pneumonia until she

was forced to release information when a random bystander happened to make a video of her

collapsing on a mild day in New York City.

She doesn't reflect on her uninspiring speeches or her off-putting personality.

Traister doesn't press her on any of these matters, and the anticipation of that treatment

is why Clinton agreed to speak to someone like Traister in the first place.

In lieu of all of this, Clinton seeks to present herself as the most forceful opponent of the

Trump administration.

Should the president be impeached, she'll be able to say: Hey, I called it!

But she isn't leading the national conversation, she's mouthing along with it, like any other

retiree talking back to cable news at home.

Even if the Trump administration proves to be the catastrophe she foresees, there is

no reason the Democrats would turn back to her for a third run.

Every time she draws attention to the Trumpian flaws that were conspicuous to all during

the campaign, she doesn't hear the obvious rejoinder echoing in every American's mind:

Then why couldn't you trounce him?

Sadly President Trump has had to have constant back and forths since his election with Crooked

Hillary because the woman just can't seem to accept the fact that she had her behind

handed to her in the 2016 Presidential election.

Trump has recently pushed for Clinton to be investigated by the Justice Department for

her, and the Clinton Foundation's part in the Uranium One scandal, which gave 20% of

our uranium deposits to Russia.

Listen up Crooked Hillary.

The difference between Senator Franken's case and the cases of President Trump and

Judge Moore is that in Franken's case there is proof.

An actual picture of him committing the crime.

As in the case of your husband having to settle the sexual assault cases, there is no concrete

proof whatsoever of any wrongdoing on the part of President Trump or Judge Moore.

For more infomation >> Crooked Hillary Just Woke Up To The Worst News Of Her Life With What Trump Announced This Morning - Duration: 8:28.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump Upholds Ban On Elephant Trophy Imports | TODAY - Duration: 2:11.

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump Upholds Ban On Elephant Trophy Imports | TODAY - Duration: 2:11.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump Just Reversed Major Ban But Liberals Are Even More Enraged About It Now – Here's Why - Duration: 5:11.

Liberals will always find a reason to have a problem with President Trump.

It's why they are always protesting over something no matter how ridiculous it is.

Whether it's a travel ban or not you can count on them taking the streets.

Another issue has come to the forefront that has them protesting yet again.

President Trump reversed his decision to repeal the elephant trophy ban after an immense amount

of public backlash.

This past Friday he tweeted out a message on social media that he will be upholding

a ban for importing trophies of elephants that are hunted and killed in Zimbabwe.

This will be pending further review.

His tweet read,

"Put big game trophy decision on hold until such time as I review all conservation facts.

Under study for years.

Will update soon with Secretary Zinke.

Thank you!"

Secretary Zinke also echoed the decision and intimated that he and the president had discussed

the issue and were concerned about conservation and the critical need for healthy herds.

The statement came hours after a statement by Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Sanders had defended the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services decision to end the 2014 ban that

had been previously initiated under President Obama.

On Thursday the service noted that through December of 2017 they would issue permits

to import sport-hunted trophies from Zimbabwe elephants.

The Daily Mail reported.

"The move was met with a barrage of criticism from animal rights groups and activists.

It also came on the same day that the US State Department presented to Congress its first

annual report on wildlife trafficking which, it said, 'remains a serious transnational

crime.'

French screen legend and animal rights activist Brigitte Bardot added her voice to the growing

chorus of criticism, slamming Trump as 'unfit for office' after his administration's

'shameful actions.'

'No despot in the world can take responsibility for killing off an age-old species that is

part of the world heritage of humanity,' Bardot said in a letter to Trump, released

through Fondation Brigitte Bardot.

The move is 'a cruel decision backed by Zimbabwe's crazy dictator and it confirms

the sick and deadly power you assert over the entire plant and animal kingdom,' the

83-year-old actress added.

'Your shameful actions confirm the rumors that you are unfit for office.'

According to the Great Elephant Census project, African Savanna elephant populations fell

by 30 percent between 2007 and 2014, while Zimbabwe saw a drop of six percent.

Despite an overall fall in poaching, Africa's elephant population has declined in part because

of continued illegal killing, said a report this year by CITES, the Convention on International

Trade in Endangered Species.

African ivory, in particular, is highly sought in China where it is a status symbol.

A provision in the Endangered Species Act says the import of such trophies can be legal

if accompanied by proof that the hunting benefits broader conservation of the species.

Trump's sons are known to have a passion for hunting.

In one widely shared photograph, Donald Trump Jr poses with a knife in one hand and an elephant

tail in the other, the animal's corpse beside him.

The US decision follows tumultuous days in Zimbabwe, where President Robert Mugabe refuses

to resign after the military seized control of the country."

SCI President Paul Babaz said in a statement,

"These positive findings for Zimbabwe and Zambia demonstrate that the Fish and Wildlife

Service recognizes that hunting is beneficial to wildlife and that these range countries

know how to manage their elephant population."

Wayne Pacelle, the organization's president and CEO said,

"Let's be clear: elephants are on the list of threatened species; the global community

has rallied to stem the ivory trade; and now, the U.S. government is giving American trophy

hunters the green light to kill them."

SCI Director of Communications Steve Comus told NPR in an email,

"In some occasions, the skull might be (could even be skull with tusks).

And, there are other parts imported sometimes, as well.

What happens is that all of the meat, etc. is consumed by local people there in Africa

(typically a village close to where the elephant is harvested).

So, most of the elephant not only remains in Africa, but in the stomachs of local Africans."

While animal welfare issues have not been a huge priority for the administration the

issues related to it occasionally come to the forefront of the media.

The President and his family have received criticism and backlash for trophy hunting

in Africa and have almost never spoken out in defense of themselves for it.

While others have considered it a non-issue that should not be worried about.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump Just Reversed Major Ban But Liberals Are Even More Enraged About It Now – Here's Why - Duration: 5:11.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Panama building a magnet for dirty money laundering - Duration: 17:06.

For more infomation >> Trump Panama building a magnet for dirty money laundering - Duration: 17:06.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP HUMILIER PAS SES SOLDATS US (QUI CONTROLE L'ARMÉE) - Duration: 22:33.

For more infomation >> TRUMP HUMILIER PAS SES SOLDATS US (QUI CONTROLE L'ARMÉE) - Duration: 22:33.

-------------------------------------------

Justice With Judge Jeanine 11/19/2017, Fox News Today November 19 2017,Pres trump News Today - Duration: 40:52.

Justice With Judge Jeanine 11/19/2017, Fox News Today November 19 2017,Pres trump News Today

For more infomation >> Justice With Judge Jeanine 11/19/2017, Fox News Today November 19 2017,Pres trump News Today - Duration: 40:52.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump Just Ended Welfare For One HUGE Group For 5 Years! – Let The Riots ERUPT! - Duration: 6:09.

President Trump is about to end the longstanding abuse of the American welfare system and ban

migrants from getting free money and handouts for five years.

The immigration rules will prohibit migrants from coming to the country and taking advantage

of free American welfare money right away.

It will slow down, or stop, chain migration while protecting American workers and potentially

saving taxpayers money.

What used to happen is that people would migrate to America and just live on the free money

they received.

That's called welfare abuse.

America is open to migrants, but perhaps we don't want migrants who can't fend for

themselves.

Maybe it's better if people who are self-sufficient migrate to the country so that we can reduce

the amount of citizens living off the system.

President Trump wants to introduce a merit-based Green card system in which migrants compete

for Visas.

Migrants can earn points for themselves by learning to speak English, gaining job training

or job offers, or doing something else that is considered a benefit to the America.

The idea seems to be that in order for America to grant Visas or citizenship, the migrant

has to give something back to the country.

It's as though the government wants to stop people coming to America and living off the

system and would prefer people coming to the country to be contributors.

Do something for America and America will do something for you.

Migrants to those countries must compete for a limited number of visas by gaining points

for English proficiency, competitive training, a job offer or another major achievement that

benefits the host country.

The concept, which is modeled after similar programs from Australia and Canada, is taking

harsh criticism from activists.

It's like they want an open border policy where everyone gets free welfare money, but

that would just be the downfall of America.

If we observe what's happening in Germany, with Merkel's "come on in" policy, then

we see a mass increase in horrible crimes like gang rape.

Do we want mass amounts of migrant gang rape in America?

There's already enough trouble with crime in sanctuary cities that protect illegal immigrant

criminals.

Those folks should be deported because of their bad behavior and often violent crimes

they commit on American people and even other immigrants.

If America prevents immigrants from getting free benefits for five years, then that makes

people think twice about coming here.

If a family who thinks about crossing the border to start a new life knows that they

cannot live for free, then they may not come at all.

If they have possible jobs lined up and will be almost instantly integrating successfully

with society, then that's a great match.

America is the land of the free, but not the land of the free money.

Migrants who enter the United States cannot receive welfare during their first five years

in the country, President Trump revealed from his upcoming immigration overhaul.

"Just this week, we announced a historic immigration bill to create a merit-based Green

Card system that ends the abuse of our welfare system, stops chain migration, and protects

our workers and our economy," he stated on his weekly radio address.

"As an example, you cannot get welfare for five years when you come into our country."

"You cannot just come in like in past weeks, years, and decades, you come in immediately

and start picking up welfare.

For five years, you have to say you will not be asking or using our welfare systems."

Compare that to Germany, where Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the border to millions

of unvetted migrants who can't speak German and lack employable skills, which dooms them

to perpetual welfare paid by German taxpayers – and boredom that manifests into terrorist

attacks against, once again, German taxpayers.

Last year the German government admitted that only 2.8% of over 1.2 million migrants had

gotten a job – but even then those statistics might be exaggerated, according to journalist

Chris Menahan.

"They said back in July only 55 out of one million migrants had got jobs with any major

firms and 50 of those jobs were working at the post office," he reported.

"Two-thirds or more of these migrants are illiterate in their own languages."

"They came because Merkel promised them free money if they can just make it into the

country."

What in tarnation would be a good reason for any country to accept illiterate people who

don't work?

There is literally no benefit to the host country to admit people like that.

I know it sounds mean to say this, but they don't offer anything to the country other

than leeching the system of funds and it's a complete downgrade to the population.

If you let too many low illiterate people into the country, then they have kids who

could be illiterate, then over time, it would only decrease the overall intelligence of

the country and civilization in America would suffer.

We need hard working and intelligent people who bring promise and productivity to further

the advancement of Americans and mankind.

That sounds like quite a stretch but think of the impact of accepting one million people

who mostly can't read or don't work.

Now the government has to pay for them.

Let's say one million immigrants each get $30,000 worth of welfare benefits per year.

That's $30,000,000,000 of free welfare money sucked out of the American budget for people

who put NOTHING back into our society, culture, or anything at all.

That is literally a $0.00 return on investment.

Not that people are a business, but that's really bad business.

And as you can see, Germany has turned into a cesspool from all the migrants flooding

the gates and ruining their nation.

Prepare for a massive backlash from liberals, democrats, and activists.

There's sure to be protests regarding Trump's potential immigration policy.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump Just Ended Welfare For One HUGE Group For 5 Years! – Let The Riots ERUPT! - Duration: 6:09.

-------------------------------------------

NIGHTMARE on TRUMP Street - get your happy ending! - Duration: 3:25.

Hey fam, it's me Donna. Did you know kids are having bad dreams?

I mean there's so much racism and a hatred in the world. Check out the dream I'm having right now.

The sky is falling. The sky is falling.

What do you mean the sky is falling?

Frogs are falling from the sky.

Interesting. I know, right?

Why did you choose frogs? What do you mean?

I mean why didn't you choose people to fall from the sky,

...or, Skittles?

...or, Dirty Jokes?

You're being silly. This is serious!

You mean...

THIS?

Never mind.

Excuse me, you look wise.

I need your help. What is it my dear?

I think the sky is falling

How do you know the sky is falling?

If you could just see inside my head you'd understand.

I can do that.

That's the craziest thing I've ever heard.

You need a doctor. Is there a doctor in the house?

Well yes I'm a doctor.

Go out and get me a cheeseburger, I'm starved!

Doesn't anyone care? The sky is falling.

Why the long stick face?

I'm sorry, I don't understand.

Well, I tell everybody - the sky is falling, the world is coming to an end...

And they do nothing.

What?

Celebrate the Good.

Celebrate the good. Celebrate the good.

The tree is right, if I focus on the bad,

then I can't celebrate the good.

I was wrong.

The sky is not falling.

Bloopers!

Clapped the bird. You hit the bird, 'member that?

(Ha, ha) That laugh though...

For more infomation >> NIGHTMARE on TRUMP Street - get your happy ending! - Duration: 3:25.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Considers Elephant Trophy Ban Lift - Duration: 2:18.

For more infomation >> Trump Considers Elephant Trophy Ban Lift - Duration: 2:18.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's 1st SCOTUS Appointee Threw Down Constitutional Gauntlet During Moving Speech. - Duration: 3:43.

Trump's 1st SCOTUS Appointee Threw Down Constitutional Gauntlet During Moving Speech.

If there were any remaining conservatives who had a doubt that President Donald Trump

picked the right man to succeed Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch should

have made them believers Thursday night.

That's when the newest justice on the nation's highest bench delivered a speech to the Federalist

Society in which he threw down the gauntlet on constitutional originalism, the judicial

philosophy of both himself and the late Justice Scalia.

"Tonight, I can report that a person can be both a publicly committed originalist and

textualist and be confirmed to the Supreme Court of the United States," Gorsuch said,

according to the Washington Examiner.

"Originalism has regained its place at the table … textualism has triumphed … and

neither one is going anywhere on my watch."

The Federalist Society is a right-leaning legal organization that Democrats have accused

of being a secretive enclave from which suggestions for President Trump's nominations to the

federal bench have emerged.

During his Thursday remarks at the Antonin Scalia Memorial Dinner at Washington's Union

Station, Gorsuch chided those pushing that narrative.

"For starters, if you're going to have a meeting of a secret organization, maybe

don't have it in the middle of Union Station," Gorsuch said, according to The National Law

Journal.

Union Station, a D.C. landmark, is the chief rail station in the nation's capital and

serves as a hub for the Metro as well as a prime retail destination.

He also said that if it wants to remain secretive, the society should also abandon its very public

stances on our judicial system, such as that a judge should "say what the law is, not

what it should be."

"You're a bunch of radicals," Gorsuch quipped.

But humor aside, Gorsuch's speech was a testament of fealty to the Constitution that

was moving to any conservative who cares about the future of the country.

Not familiar with originalism?

Well, I can only assume you're a liberal reading through this just to post an angry

response and not one of our regular, well-informed Conservative Tribune readers.

However, Scalia himself described the judicial philosophy best: "The Constitution that

I interpret and apply is not living but dead, or as I prefer to call it, enduring.

It means today not what current society, much less the court, thinks it ought to mean, but

what it meant when it was adopted."

Gorsuch talked about his application of this philosophy in a case that was brought up by

Democrat opponents during his confirmation hearings: a 2016 dissent in which Gorsuch

said an employer could fire a trucker from walking away from a broken-down vehicle after

three hours in the cold because the applicable law only allowed employers to fire a trucker

if there was a safety concern.

He said that good judges in the case ought to have known three things: "One, the law

is telling me to do something really, really stupid," Gorsuch said.

"Two, the law is constitutional and I have no choice but to do that really stupid thing

the law requires.

And three, when it's done, everyone who's not a lawyer is going to think I just hate

truckers."

Gorsuch, of course, is not a man who hates truckers.

He's just a man dedicated to the simple belief that what a law says is what a law

means, and if that law is constitutional and dumb, that law ought to be changed by legislators,

not the court.

That's the way the Founders set it up, and that's the way it should be.

And thankfully, we have a judge on the Supreme Court who, much like Scalia, is willing to

vigorously champion this way of thinking.

What are your thoughts on the Scalia Gorsuch approach to the Constitution?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> Trump's 1st SCOTUS Appointee Threw Down Constitutional Gauntlet During Moving Speech. - Duration: 3:43.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking News TONIGHT : Justice With Judge Jeanine Pirro 11/19/17 | TRUMP NEWS ALERT - Duration: 26:55.

For more infomation >> Breaking News TONIGHT : Justice With Judge Jeanine Pirro 11/19/17 | TRUMP NEWS ALERT - Duration: 26:55.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING News Today About President TRUMP & Hillary Clinton 11/19/2017 , Latest "Bombshell" - Duration: 15:27.

For more infomation >> BREAKING News Today About President TRUMP & Hillary Clinton 11/19/2017 , Latest "Bombshell" - Duration: 15:27.

-------------------------------------------

Spendenkampagne für Mittelfinger an Trump - Duration: 0:53.

For more infomation >> Spendenkampagne für Mittelfinger an Trump - Duration: 0:53.

-------------------------------------------

WikiLeaks Cold Open - SNL - Duration: 4:59.

For more infomation >> WikiLeaks Cold Open - SNL - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

PRESIDENT TRUMP BREAKING NEWS TODAY 11/19/17 , DNC scandal will haunt Hillary Clinton - Duration: 14:31.

No comments:

Post a Comment