Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Trump news on Youtube Oct 25 2017

A Republican senator has launched a scathing attack on President Trump over his handling

of the North Korean threat.

He also accused the president of being untruthful... and of damaging the reputation of the United

States on the global stage.

Yu Joonhee reports.

Appearing on ABC's "Good Morning America" on Wednesday,...

Republican senator Bob Corker of Tennessee,... launched a searing verbal onslaught on President

Trump,... after the two exchanged insults on Twitter.

Corker said the president was hurting America's global standing... with his "untruths", "name-calling"

and "attempted bullying",... heightening the ongoing feud between the two Republicans.

He added... that Trump was out of his depth when it comes to foreign policy,... particularly

in dealing with North Korea,... and that he should leave it to the professionals to resolve

the issue.

Corker warned... the president was taking the U.S. on "a path to World War III"... and

that Trump needed to step back... in order for positive developments to occur.

The controversy began... when Trump attacked Corker on Twitter... over his role in helping

former president Barack Obama... reach what he called a "bad deal" with Iran.

This prompted a tweet from Corker,... who accused the president of being untruthful...

while describing the White House... as an "adult day-care center".

The ongoing feud between Trump and congressional Republicans... is adding to uncertainties

surrounding the GOP's efforts... to push through its proposed tax reforms.

President Trump is hoping to score his first major legislative victory... by passing the

tax bill through the Republican-majority Congress... by the end of the year.

Yu Joonhee, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. senator slams President Trump in escalating Republican feud - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Biographer Why would Donald ever change MSNBC - Duration: 3:19.

For more infomation >> Trump Biographer Why would Donald ever change MSNBC - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Insurgency from Below: Activism in the Trump Era - Duration: 1:22:13.

- Good evening, everyone.

It's wonderful to see you here.

My name is Joy Connolly

and as provost and senior vice president,

I have the privilege of welcoming all of you

to the Graduate Center of the City University of New York

and to tonight's event.

I'm especially pleased to welcome our alumni

and our friends and colleagues

who are part of today's conference,

events that preceded tonight,

and also those who are watching livestream.

The audience is even bigger

than the people you see around you.

Tonight, we are gathered here to discuss a topic

that has become increasingly relevant

and I would say, in fact, an urgent one

given our current political and social climate,

and we're also here to pay tribute

to a legendary member of our faculty, Frances Fox Piven.

(audience cheering)

I have a feeling that won't be the only time

we have a big round of applause.

Like Frances, many of you here this evening

have spent a long time on the front lines

in the fight for social justice

and others of you may be newcomers to advocacy

and you may well see yourself

as having joined a new resistance,

and certainly, many of our alumni

and especially those here with us tonight

trace their path to political activism to Professor Piven

who's been part of the Graduate Center for 35 years.

I imagine, too, that tonight's other distinguished panelists

have inspired many of you to work towards

changing the status quo,

but regardless of where the roots of your activism lie

or how deep they run,

we're delighted to have you with us and we welcome you here.

The fact that you find yourself here at the Graduate Center,

at the center of this conversation is no coincidence.

Our conference panels earlier today

used the themes that animate Fran's work

as the platform on which to hold intents

and lively conversations about our current political moment,

that's what we do here at the Graduate Center,

we bring together people from inside and outside academia,

it's really our habit, it's baked into our DNA,

and we're a place that values local and global impact.

I strong believe after spending

a little over a year here now having moved from another

unmentionable institution downtown,

that no other graduate school in the country

takes more seriously its public responsibilities

or its mission to advance knowledge for the public good.

As our name implies, the Graduate Center

is a national leader in graduate education,

at the master's level and especially the doctoral levels.

We're one of the largest PhD granting

institutions in the country

and we're especially proud to rank among

the country's top 10 institutions

in awarding doctorates to students

from underrepresented minority groups.

We're the home of pioneering research and creative work

of Nobel and Guggenheim and Pulitzer winners.

Every year,

I repeat this statistic everywhere I go,

it's one of my favorite numbers in the worlds,

our doctoral students teach more than 200,000 undergraduates

at the City University of New York,

that means that the very best of research and learning

from the seminar room here at the GC

goes into every borough and neighborhood.

Before we introduce this evening's panel,

I would like to take just a brief moment to recognize

those who helped make this event possible tonight,

the Graduate Center's Advanced Research Collaborative,

the Murphy Institute, New York State Senator Gustavo Rivera,

the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung New York office,

the JCF/Helenia Fund,

and former GC Foundation Board Chair Craig Kaplan,

I thank them all on your behalf, on our behalf

for their generous support

of tonight's and today's programming.

So, please join me now in welcoming

Professor Alyson Cole and Professor Lorraine Minnite.

Alyson is the executive officer of our doctoral program

in political science here at the Graduate Center

and she served as the co-organizer of today's conference

together with Lorraine.

Lorraine is a GC alumna in political science,

a former student of Frances,

and currently professor of political science at Rutgers.

I could say a lot more about their achievements,

but I know you're all eager

to get on with tonight's discussion,

so you're in for a thought-provoking night,

I wanna thank you again for coming,

so please do enjoy the evening, thank you.

(audience clapping)

- So, I'm Alyson Cole

and I have the honor of chairing

the political science department

here at the Graduate Center.

They call me an executive officer, but I'm just a chair

and this is a program that Frances Fox Piven

has played a crucial role in defining

for more than three decades.

Most of today, for those of you who were able to join us,

was spent reflecting on our current political moment

through the themes that have animated Piven's scholarship,

but before we continue that conversation,

Lori and I both wanted to take a moment

just to speak about Frances.

About 10 years ago, the pundit Glen Beck

singled out Frances Fox Piven

as one of the nine most dangerous people in the world.

(audience laughing and cheering)

Now, this is before the term alternative facts

had entered our lexicon,

back when Fox News claimed that their reporting

was fair and balanced

rather than their new more accurate

and far more disturbing slogan,

must watched and most trusted,

it was a gentler time

when the principles of Hollywood spectacle

rather than those of reality TV governed politics.

Despite Beck's vitriol,

there was a modicum of truth to his charge,

Frances Fox Piven is indeed a force to be reckoned with.

She has devoted her long and distinguished career

as a scholar, activist, teacher,

and mentor to righting wrongs.

Beyond an unwavering commitment

to enlarging economic and political rights,

this has also meant toppling the mistaken presumptions

undergirding orthodoxies in the academy

and ever shaping new fields of study

and spearing policy change.

In her scholarship, Piven not only identifies

how to analyze a problem rightly, but how to address it,

more specifically how to support the victims of injustice

to see that they possess the power to enact change,

that together they can by defying rules

and disrupting routines transform the institutions

that govern their lives

and that they can do so in Piven's words,

"aggressive, proudly, and even joyful,"

that is pretty dangerous stuff.

On social media many claim the title of public intellectual,

but Piven is an intellectual activist

which is a difference in kind not just degree.

She never tells us how she knew it all along,

though, often she did,

instead her work shows us how and where to look,

so that we can see for ourselves,

in the street, at a protest, in the classroom,

even at a department meeting,

to say nothing of her numerous books and articles,

her reasoning is always analytically precise

and her political convictions resolute.

She's been honored many times for her courageous activism

and groundbreaking scholarship,

but I think her interventions begin

with the performative power of her prose.

Her language is simple, bold, and piercingly sharp,

but equally striking is the frequent use

of the word we in her text.

Now, it's true many of her pivotal monographs

were co-authored with Richard Cloward,

but this plural pronoun exceeds their collaboration,

it's an expansive we,

a we that beckons readers to join in a collective endeavor,

in turn that plural pronoun incites readers

to connect with others

and to rally to defend those under attack.

It invites us all

and we're all students of Piven, one way or another,

to combine anger with hope and imagination

to turn quiescence into indignation

and apathy into conviction.

Now, Provost Connolly already thanked

our generous supporters,

but I also wanna thank the many students and staff

who helped pull together this event,

but most of all, I wanna thank Professor Lorraine Minnite,

a distinguished graduate of our doctoral program

and important scholar of electoral politics

and voting in her own right,

the success of this conference is due largely

to Lori's tireless and extraordinary work,

so please, let's give her a hand.

(audience clapping)

- Thank you so much

and thank you so much for being here

to share this evening with us.

I wanted to just say one word really

about the conference that we've had all day.

Frances retired recently after 35 years of teaching

here at the Graduate Center

and it's a great achievement and accomplishment

and it should be recognized,

but she did not want a kind of memorial.

She did not want people kinda standing up

and just praising her,

what she wanted, and this reflects who she is,

she wanted to talk about the world,

the way it is right now, about politics,

about what we can do to make the world better,

an analysis of how we can do it differently,

and really look to the future,

so I think that's what we try to achieve

today during the rest of the conference

by taking a look at and sort of being inspired by

some of her many works

and the many fields really that she has written about,

and in that spirit, I do not want to embarrass her

by telling her how much she means to me,

how much she means to so many of her students,

I simply wanna say that she is just a so cool,

fabulous, fantastic human being.

I am so fortunate that in my life,

my life has intertwined with hers for many years now

and this was the easiest conference I've ever organized.

I used to be on the Left Forum Board

and that was really crazy.

This was so easy because I had a happy champion

in the chair of the political science department.

I don't work here at the Graduate Center.

Alyson Cole worked as tirelessly as I did on this,

she deserves an enormous amount of credit.

Earl Fleary, I don't know if you've seen him or met him,

but he is just fabulous

and he's the administrative officer in the department.

And before I introduce Laura Flanders

who's gonna take over and get to the program,

I also wanna mention just one other supporter

I don't think was mentioned before, but the New Press,

Diane Wachtell and Ellen Adler from the New Press

have published a number of books that Frances has written,

but going way back, Frances association with that press

has been very, very important,

and they were a supporter also of the conference,

so thank all of our supporters,

we couldn't do it without you.

So, let me introduce Laura Flanders

who I know many of you know

and I was so happy that she was able to moderate.

I think she's gotta be one of the best journalists,

interviewers that I can think of.

Her work is showcased on her show, the Laura Flanders Show,

which is a weekly show that you can see

on the YouTube channel for the Laura Flanders Show

where they talk about politics

and she interviews forward-looking people

and people in the arts and people doing things

and her fairly recent work for Yes Magazine,

which I use actually in a course that I teach,

is really great

and so we're so happy to have her here,

and I'm gonna turn it over to her

and let her take over with the panel, thank you.

- Thank you both.

Laura's gonna take over, I love that.

This is the insurgency from

kind of the left hand side of the stage.

We have had a few insurgencies today already.

We've changed the format a little bit for this evening.

We're gonna do a conversation, but before we do it,

I do wanna spend a little moment

sort of embarrassing Frances, is that really off-limits?

I mean, for heaven's sake,

we're talking about the age of Trump.

I'd like to insurgent that very idea

because I feel like this is all one long age

that we have been in

since I first came to this country in the early 80s

and there's some similarity.

I feel as if I'm experiencing now and then,

then it felt like absolutely the worst of times,

Margaret Thatcher had just got elected,

Ronald Reagan had just got elected, nukes, you name it.

We were really in big trouble.

On the other hand, once I got here,

I saw a different model of women in leadership

and I saw women, Barbara as well, Barbara and Frances

both inspired me enormously,

that you could be radical and funny

and sexy and in leadership,

and really overturning applecart after applecart

in a way that I hope we can aspire to today.

Today feels a little bit like one of those moments,

yesterday I was on my way to a radio conference,

I pulled out of my pocket,

I hadn't worn my jacket for a while,

I pulled out of my pocket a flyer.

I was feeling pretty cheery, the sun was shining,

and I was on time for the train, always a plus,

there was this flyer, "Your community is under attack,"

and I was like, "Correct, I know, it is under attack."

There were more so-called candlelit vigils,

really triumphalist, racist,

supremacist, threatening marches

in Charlottesville this last week.

You've got the DACA young people in complete limbo.

You've got the Trump administration

packing the courts with people

who really just do not like women and LGBTQI people

and certainly anything having to do with love.

You have a climate catastrophe

that has reached the point of no return

and looks like there is no turning back.

You've got Amazon already responsible

for a quarter of all online sales in this country

wanna to now do a supersize purchase

of its video and television channel stable.

They're buying up television channels all across the country

to give them more ways to sell us things

as if supermarkets weren't enough

and you've got the Sinclair Broadcasting

takeover of the Tribune Company that will create

a right ideologically driven broadcasting behemoth

reaching 75% of US TV-viewing audiences.

Our communities are under attack.

At the same time, I think about what we put on our program

and I'm excited to say that the Laura Flanders Show

is back on CUNY TV, I think it started this week.

You can catch us every week

and we are soon to be a co-production of CUNY TV

of which I am immensely proud.

On that program, we say we like to interview,

it's the place where the people who say it can't be done

take a backseat to the people who are doing it

and we talk to people all across the country every week

who are doing something extraordinary.

Last week, it was people who are bringing aid

person to person from Detroit to Puerto Rico.

This week, it's people who are also in Detroit

connecting meshed internet servers

to create their own broadband providers

in a place where the big cable companies

just don't want to serve the majority people of that city.

We have the best and the worst of times

I think in these moments

and this panel I think will be the kinda panel

that unlike the flyer that says,

"Your community is under attack"

and you feel your breath getting a little shallower

and your heart racing a little faster

and you can't actually think,

I think this panel is people, women, notably, who pause,

summon us to consider deeply

where we come from, how we got here,

what is the essential makeup of the company we are in,

what mistakes have we made,

what great things have we learned.

This is an opportunity I think to talk about

how not only do we make an insurgency from below,

but from below, above, and from both sides of the stage.

So, I wanna introduce people who really need no introduction

starting at the far side.

Ai-jen Poo is the executive director

of the National Domestic Workers Alliance.

A frequent guest on the Laura Flanders Show.

She's also the author of Age of Dignity:

Preparing for the Elder Boom in a Changing America,

and I will just say there's a lot more in that book

than meets the eye.

Kim Crenshaw is a bi-tenured faculty member

at both UCLA and Columbia.

In Columbia, she is the director

of the Center for Intersectionality

and Social Policy Studies.

She's also the founder of the African-American Policy Forum

and its executive director.

Barbara Ehrenreich.

I don't know if you've ever heard of her.

She wrote a book in 2001, Nickel and Dimed:

On (Not) Getting By in America.

Her list of accomplishments is long.

She just wanted me to share with you

that she is the founder

of the Economic Hardship Reporting Project

which if you're not aware of,

you really need to check out

and you can get more information about it

both at the Institute for Policy Studies

and we will make more information available to you

if you write to us.

And Frances is the terribly distinguished professor

and public intellectual activist who brings us all here.

With Richard Cloward, she's the co-author

of Regulating the Poor, Poor People's Movements,

and I believe the New Press is giving away

copies of Who's Afraid of Frances Fox Piven

which will tell you anything you need to know.

So, let's start.

Let's start with you Ai-jen.

I come to you for notes of optimism, but in this case,

I'm serious, when we talk about

how Frances Fox Piven's work has penetrated

the work that each of us do,

what's your story?

- Is this working, okay, great.

Well, first, I actually have a gift

from the members of the National Domestic Workers Alliance

to present to Frances for telling the story

of how everyday people have changed

the course of history in this country,

everyday people like domestic workers,

and so I just wanna present that first.

And I wanna share a story about Frances with you

because I think it actually really defines,

it gets me out of bed every day.

Back in 2011, not long after Occupy Wall Street,

I had the privilege of hearing Frances speak

to a small group of organizers

and she said, it was 2011, so it was after Occupy,

after the protests in Wisconsin, the DREAMers movement,

and she said that what she was seeing

was what she thought were early signals of the coming

of the next great social movement in this country

that would fundamentally update and transform our democracy

the way that the Civil Rights Movement had,

the way that the Labor Movement of the 1930s had,

the kind that only comes around once every few generations,

the kind where your kids and your grandkids ask you,

"Where were you, what were you doing at that time?"

And she also said that we would know when it had arrived,

when millions of everyday people

were in the street in motion,

and I was in Washington

for the Women's March on January 21st

and yes, I know a lot of you were there.

And I just kept thinking of what Frances said that day.

I looked around and all I could see were millions of people

in every single direction that you could see in the streets,

millions and millions,

over four million in the United States,

and I just thought this could be our moment.

This could be it.

And I do think that it's not inevitable,

but I also think that that is the potential of this moment

and much of it is up to us.

I do think there's a real hunger and a demand

for a whole new vision for our democracy

and people are in motion.

It didn't stop on January 21st as many of you know

and so that is the opportunity of this moment

and that frame, that story that I tell myself every day

I got from Frances.

- [Laura] Same question.

- Can you hear me?

- [Audience] Yes. - Okay.

I think Frances and I kinda got together

in a similar period that is the Reagan era.

I made a big mistake.

I put together a collection of essays

I had written in that time

and called it the Worst Years of Our Lives.

I mean, unless I can do a part two.

But anyway, it was very, very bad times.

I was like so many people totally intimidated by Frances

and amazed that she thought I was somebody could

be brought into the struggle

and not that I hadn't been an activist.

One of the big things we got into right,

well, she got me into,

was the struggle against welfare reform,

and what she said was,

"You have to start with the most oppressed,

"the most ground down

"and that would be welfare recipients."

Now, I've thought about that again and again.

Is that true?

Is that the best way to work?

It was very inspiring to me.

I'm an atheist not a Christian,

but my understanding of Christianity is

you start from the bottom.

Mostly, she's like a great friend.

- [Laura] Kim to you.

- Well, my story goes back

more decades than I actually want to acknowledge.

I went to law school in the early 80s

and during that period, we were in the midst of

perhaps the most significant retrenchment

since the first reconstruction

on questions of civil rights and race,

and when I went to law school,

there was the emergence of the Left

in critical legal studies

and at the same time, the,

I call them the liberal centrists on race

were basically in the position in law schools

to more or less dictate the terms of engagement around race

and as a young activist coming into this elite space,

I was basically torn between

these two political formations.

So, on the Left, there was conversation

around the critique of rights,

there was conversation around the idea that perhaps

a rights-based strategy wasn't the best strategy,

there were criticisms about the idea

that people from the bottom were demanding the wrong thing,

they were using rights discourse

in a way that was inevitably

going to undermine their interests in the end.

There were pieces of that that seemed to ring true,

but there still was something missing

it seemed to me in that analysis.

On the other side, there were liberal race centrists

who were completely engaged, committed,

they had consumed all the Kool-Aid

about the role of law in producing racial reform

that was sustaining and ongoing and transformative,

there seemed to be something kind of there,

but something not.

I was one of many young people of color

who were just trying to figure out

where's the space for the analysis that makes sense to us,

how do we talk about the transformative potential of law,

but also the legitimizing potential of law,

how do we talk about the fact that

rights allow people from the bottom

to actually have a language to affirm

their vision of how the world can be,

and at the same time talk about how quickly

those rights can deteriorate

once the insurgency of the moment

has basically been taken over by the idea

of we've given you what you need and now go away,

and so I was trying to write about this stuff,

trying to have debates about the critique of rights,

trying to write about what it means

to have been someone who was empowered by rights,

but at the same time realizing that there were limitations

and then I found Poor People's Movements.

I found the argument, it was all right there,

that poor people can challenge

the conditions of their lives from the bottom

and at the same time, elites at the end of the day

determine what poor people get in response to that,

so it was an answer to say,

"Look, it didn't matter what the language was gonna be

"that poor people, black people use,

"we were still gonna get rights

"whether we demanded land or something else,"

and it was also the case that

the work actually informed the title of my first article,

it's called Race Reform and Retrenchment:

Transformation and Legitimation in Anti-Discrimination Law,

that would never have been remotely

part of my understanding had it not been

for my engagement with Fran's work,

so in many ways I see her work as being

one of the unrecognized sources of critical race theory,

that work is one of the unrecognized sources

of intersectionality.

It's work that continues to bear fruit,

even in this period where the question is

who has the momentum when we're talking about

building from the bottom?

- [Laura] Frances.

- Laura.

How to say this nicely?

You're such a great moderator.

You're such a great steerer of the conversation,

can you please steer it away from me?

- [Laura] I'm going there.

(audience laughing)

Insurgencies, activism,

describe the landscape of insurgency as you see it now.

- Well, I think that the potential for insurgency

is always there

and the potential for effective insurgency is always there

because the complex institutions

of a complex modern society require intricate forms

of cooperation from lots of people.

If that cooperation ceases, if it stops,

things slow down and then they shut down

and that's what I call disruption,

that can happen,

and it often happens at a time

when observers are in a sense the least prepared for it.

This is really important

because so many of us are opinion-makers,

there are also enormous obstacles

to the activation of this insurgent power

that comes from disobeying, from rule-breaking,

and from all of the disorder,

the ungovernability that flows out of rule-breaking.

What do we mean by socialization?

We mean people as little infants,

little puddings that you can shape

are shaped into conforming animals, conforming creatures

because they want approval,

they want the support and affection

of those around them who are stronger and so forth,

and then there are of course the threats

and the incentives that come from conformity.

No matter how old you are,

you still want approval, you still want a raise,

you still want to get your pension.

There are a lot of ways in which this capacity

to be defiant, to break the rules,

and by breaking the rules,

to activate the elemental power that belongs

to all of the cooperating members of a complex society.

You have to break the rules to activate that power,

that's what the power is,

the power is in stopping things, that's what a strike is,

and we can strike in many different ways

in many different institutional contexts

and we mostly don't do it.

We don't do it, other people don't do it,

and we don't do it because the forces of conformity

are so large, so overpowering,

so comforting as well.

- [Laura] So, let me ask Ai-jen,

is it possible that the insurgency

that Fran was describing that you think about in this moment

is the insurgency of rule-breaking and disruption

and pudding-shaping from the Right?

- From the Right?

- [Laura] They claim that they are the great disruptors,

the Trump especially,

his supporters believe that he is the great disruptor,

literally those words you heard

at the Republican Convention last year.

- Yeah, I mean I think there's a way that that's true

and that there is a way that the core moral fabric

and the institutions of our democracy

are being threatened and disrupted

in pretty existential ways right now.

For sure.

And I think that I agree

we don't wield disruptive power enough

and I do think that that's something

we need to be wielding more.

I think that there's a lot of complex dynamics happening

and I think one of the things

that was so powerful about the movement for black lives

from Black Lives Matter was its incredible disruptive power

and is its incredibly disruptive power.

When Fran was saying that,

the first thing that came to mind

was a recent direct action

in LA County were they were gonna build new prisons,

some thousands of new prison beds

and the local Black Lives Matter chapter

actually organized a civil disobedience action

where they actually brought 2,000 beds

to block the statehouse

and actually chain themselves to the bed

and disrupted the business as usual in the statehouse

and I think that that kind of activity

is absolutely essential in this moment,

and I think it has to be combined

with wielding other forms of power like political power

and the power to un-elect people

and narrative power.

I mean, you're the pro at this in terms of how we actually

build the power to tell the story

of who we are as a country on our terms.

- [Barbara] If I may. - [Laura] Barbara.

- We don't have to just keep going in order

when you call on us. - [Laura] Not at all.

- Let's have our little insurgency.

- [Laura] Disruptive, disrupt.

- Because I think,

you know, Frances, people have a sense

that the rules are being broken all the time from above.

When you said the word pension for a moment I cringed,

what's that, maybe a little generation gap here, pension,

I mean, some of you may know about them, but not in my life,

but things are being destroyed so rapidly

from basic notions of courtesy and decorum

to any kind of social program that has ever helped people.

I don't have to describe what's going on.

There is an anger and there is a ripping part,

the energy of that kind of insurgency

against a technocratic government,

I'm not gonna analyze the term victory here,

but it was an attraction to what was seen as an insurgency,

an attraction that was,

I'm not also gonna analyze the social bases

of Trumpism and the votes for him,

but it was coming from a variety of people

including some very wealthy people,

but it also is true, I say with great personal shame,

comes in part from the white working class in this country

which is my class of origin.

My extended family, it's people who show up at Thanksgiving,

it's all the kinda thing.

It's large networks of people around the country.

Now, those that I am blood relatives,

none of them voted for Trump,

but there is something

that was attractive about him

to people who have every right to be insurgents

on our side or with us

because I think there could be

a few things to work out probably,

but Trump was a great middle finger

in the face of the kind of liberalism,

if you could call it that, represented by the Clooneys,

both of them.

- [Laura] Let me bring you into this.

- It had an insurgent quality.

- [Laura] Let me bring you into this, Kim,

because the first that many of us saw of that insurgency

was as soon as Barack Obama was elected,

as we saw the Tea Party Movement take to the streets,

how do you think of this language of insurgency

and activism in the Trump era?

- I clearly see that the insurgency was,

particularly as articulated by the Tea Party,

was an insurgency against the perception

of an illegitimate president,

a perception of having lost out,

a perception of diminished over-representation,

that's a phrase that my colleague Luke Harris

uses to talk about all of the backlash politics

against race and gender justice interventions,

namely these are battles over the diminishment

of the over-representation of white men,

cisgendered, straight people in power everywhere,

so you have these perceptions of loss

that create a counter response,

that to me is really not,

it's not the full part of the story

because we've had retrenchment moments in the past, too,

it's not just the impulse,

it's not just the backlash,

it's the softening of the resolve against the backlash,

it's the tying of the hands,

the inability to speak it, the inability to analyze it,

the inability to be insurgent against it,

so when the Tea Party came online,

when the disrespect of the president happened,

when Black Lives Matter came online,

the Center and I would also say some parts of the Left

were unable to respond to this

with the language that tied this

to historical moments of race retrenchment in the past.

- [Laura] Why? - It was like

people took seriously the idea that we were post-racial

which was a wink-wink,

we know we're not really post-racial, but it means that,

we can't talk about race,

we can't understand the structural/institutional dimensions

that have largely been continuous

over the last part of the 20th century into this moment,

and even our president when he says that

arresting Skip Gates in his own home was stupid

ends up being so completely silenced by that

that we don't see him again talking about race

'til the second part of his term

and even then when he talks about it,

he's talking about it pretty much

in the same way that Moynihan talked about it,

so the great transition and this idea that we've arrived

actually meant that we wound up back in 1965

in the way that race could legitimately be talked about.

So, I see our reaction as a condition of possibility,

the inability to actually talk about what has happened,

to talk about it in class and race terms

and not talk about it as there's a race conversation,

a gender conversation, a class conversation,

that is what I think has undermined our ability

to think about how to move in this particular moment.

- [Laura] I wanna bring Ai-jen back in on this,

but I want to tell or encourage the audience

to raise questions on cards.

We're gonna distribute index cards,

I think they're being distributed right now.

Now is your moment to scribble down in legible writing

your questions of this august group

and Barbara, did you wanna say something and then Ai-jen?

- Yes, I'll let somebody else talk, I will.

The trouble with having that kind of conversation,

they're so intertwined.

One of the great comforting things

about being a white person

in a professional managerial class

which most of us are or retired from,

but people who've been in desk jobs

who've been telling other people what to do,

what to read, what to et cetera,

the great privileges of being in that class

as a white person is you can project your own racism

and all racism onto the white working class

and that's what's been done.

There is great satisfaction in a contempt

people of the professional managerial class

feel toward the white working class

because it's proof of how un-racist they are.

Well, fine, but now we have to connect that gap

and I know you don't start those conversations of course

with a white working class person

by saying, "You're a racist,"

it doesn't go anywhere from there, lemme tell you.

We have to understand how tangled this has become

and part of that means confronting the prejudice

in people like ourselves and I speak here as people

who are educated professionals et cetera

and particularly those who are white.

- [Laura] Ai-jen, how do you do this work?

- I'll say two things.

One is that I've been really inspired

by a lot of white organizers

who are actually from rural and small-town America

who've been organizing in communities of color

and urban areas who after the elections

went back home to organize their people,

and it's actually a real thing.

It's a trend that started happening

and I think that that is a kind of organizing

that we really need to be supporting

and doing so in partnership

with organizing in communities of color,

and modeling a kind of multiracial democracy

that we want at the other end of this.

And the other thing I'll say is that

one of the most important things

about the Women's March to me was,

for those of you who were there in DC, you'll know this,

I mean, not even thinking about

what was happening on the stage,

it was happening on the street

was that every single person made their own sign

and it was about everything under the sun

and they were way smarter signs

and way more interesting than any activist's sign,

like any sign that somebody like me could've made,

but they were about every single issue under the sun.

It was everything from education

to reproductive rights and justice

to healthcare to immigration to transgender right

and there was room for all of it,

it actually didn't feel like you sometimes do feel

in progressive movements where there's a hierarchy

of issue or constituency.

It actually felt like there was room for all of it

and there was a vibrancy

and a way that that felt organic

that was incredibly powerful.

Now, what Kim and I did that night

was we actually did a town hall meeting

that was specifically targeted to people who were coming

and Ellen was there, too, Ellen Barbo,

who were coming to the march for the first time,

like really not having been active before,

as a way of connecting new marchers,

new people to the movement, newcomers to the movement

to women's organizations, women of color, working class,

women's organizations who are in motion

on winning on real issues

like paid sick days and paid family leave,

people who were working on immigration, all kinds of issues,

so that they could actually get connected

to what it means to organize, what it means to win,

what it means to be in motion together in a deeper way.

I guess I'm saying that the fact that

we have a movement moment in a context

where we can be in motion together

and we can actually choose to create contexts

where there's room for,

there isn't a hierarchy of issue or agenda,

and then in that context,

we can have deeper conversations about race and class

and all the things that we actually need to talk about,

that I think that that's kind of,

that's some of what needs to happen.

- So, it is also true that we went home,

that we didn't make demands.

As soon as the administration took office,

we were already home,

those hallways of power, corridors of power

were suddenly occupied only by lobbyists not ours,

so I guess my question is yes,

we need the movement internal work,

but we are in a crisis, we also need the external work,

the power creation and deployment,

who wants to address that?

How do we go that next step?

What are the pieces we need or the lessons we need to learn

to take that next step to power?

- This is the core of what I was gonna say tonight

if I was giving a speech

and I'll pick up on Ai-jen's optimistic note

about the number of new people

who have come into the resistance,

we can all name some in our own households,

but one of the things that worries me very much

is that there are some deep divisions

and I'm beginning to discover that they are class divisions.

Within the resistance for example,

there are white working class people,

more than you would probably think

if you just read the paper.

For example, it's seldom pointed out

that the women who was killed in Charlottesville

was a white working class woman.

- [Laura] Heather Heyer.

- Yeah, Heather Heyer, a paralegal

who did not even have a college education,

but learned to do the office stuff in a legal office

and also worked as a waitress.

Do you remember any mention of that?

Because the white working class

has been so demonized at this point,

then another thing that really became

very clear in Charlottesville is that there are groups,

blue collar groups like Redneck Revolt, you heard of it?

This is a rural, I imagine mostly white group

that goes to demonstrations,

goes to places like Charlottesville with guns.

They go ready to shoot if they have to defend their side.

- [Laura] I've heard a rumor that the slogan

is put the red back in redneck, is that--

- Yes, put the red back in redneck, I love that.

Then the other thing I wanna mention

and I know this is gonna be somewhat controversial

because there's a little controversy about it is antifa

or antifa depending on where you live in this country,

the anti-fascist who go masked into demonstrations.

Why are they masked?

They do not want to be identified.

They are really hard for journalists like me

to sit down with and talk to.

I began to get some inklings

of it being a more working class,

I mean, it's not Princeton graduates behind those kerchiefs

or undergrads or anything really.

There was a good article in Mother Jones in August

about solid blue collar basis of antifa.

Then I would just finish with this,

a personal thing that just happened to me a few days ago.

I was talking to a friend,

I said I had like this extended family

of friends who are working class

and I was telling him that I was just sorta mystified

by who the antifa people are.

Now, that's insurgent, that's very insurgent, these people,

and the person I was talking to,

a member of this extended family of mine

started to clear his throat a little bit

and he said, "I'm one of them."

I had no idea because they don't talk about it

and what that meant is that he is part of a phone tree.

They do not use the internet,

they do not use cell phones to communicate,

but you can get a phone call saying, "Come somewhere

"because a person of color is going to be harassed,"

or because there's somebody who needs defending

and through this kinda clandestine network,

they will come together--

- [Laura] Frances, do you wanna come in on this?

Did you wanna come in on this? - I did because I think

as soon as we start talking about

the current regime in a way that

refers back to the election, the November election,

we start searching for

singular answers,

and I think it's in fact a little complicated.

The first level on which it's complicated

is that A, Trump did not win the popular vote.

His technical victory was the result

of an anti-democratic provision in the US Constitution.

In a certain sense,

we're explaining something that didn't happen.

We're explaining a majority rejection

of the Obama administration.

However, I think there were good reasons

for white, middle, and working class people

to reject the democratic party and the Obama administration

which had not been speaking

to their basic concerns for some time,

at the very least since the emergence

of the Democratic Leadership Council,

but I think long before that,

so it's complicated in that sense.

It's also complicated in the sense that

Trump voters are not exactly who we're talking about,

we're talking about the white working class

and we talk about people who are experiencing

intensified hardship and the resentment that--

- [Laura] Well, let me bring the--

- Trump voters were not that part of the working class,

they were the better off among the working class.

- [Laura] Well, that's why I wanted to bring Kim back in

'cause it does seem like nobody has been served less well

by the democratic establishment than black women

and yet black women at the very bottom

of the class totem pole supported Hillary Clinton

in the largest demographic that she had.

- Yeah, thank you.

That's exactly what I wanted to being with.

I just wanna pause and note for a moment that

our very attempt right not to figure out

how to talk about race, class, and gender is difficult

because we've all sort of taken off

with a certain understanding

of what the initial conversation is about,

about how race played out,

so we've talked about recognizing

that the white working class was not

monolithically behind Trump which of course that's true,

nobody said that was the case.

It's also the case that race did have a lot to do,

it's not exclusive,

so we have to be able to be able to talk about race

without saying or inferring

that we're saying it's all about race

and we also have to be able to talk about hardship

without the assertion of hardship

being taken as an excuse or justification

for a racist, populist movement.

If hardship explained this vote,

African-American women would not have been voting

96% for the democratic party.

No one lost more economically over the last eight years

than African-American women.

African-American women have a median net wealth of $5.

African-American women are the group

that has shown the least amount

of being reintegrated into the economy.

I mean, we could go on and on and on,

so if it was just a matter of hardship being overlooked,

being forgotten, not being hailed, not being called out,

then it would've been African-American women,

the fact that it wasn't is telling us

that there is something both more that was going on

that generally this argument doesn't take up,

but what I'm mostly concerned about is what's happening now.

So, whatever we think happened,

one of the things that seems to be happening

in mainstream and progressive discourse

is we gotta figure out how to come up with a framework,

a way of mobilizing voters that we've lost

that doesn't involve using hot-button issues

or language that turns them off

and what that means is that our most loyal constituency,

our core, the people who are willing and able

to resist all the scapegoat politics,

they're basically being pushed out of the conversation,

so we gotta figure out how to have this conversation

without it prompting

or a sense of we are leaving people out.

We have to have a conversation that allows us to talk about

the race, class, and gender dimensions of all of this,

so number one, it has to be intersectional.

When we talk about class

and we're not talking about women of color,

then that's not talking about class

and we gotta figure out how to do that.

- So, Ai-jen, I'm gonna come to you

in just a second to talk about care,

how do we exercise care in our next steps,

but before we move off hardship,

I want to contribute another aspect, another lens,

and that's colonialism,

and I happen to have a call

come in this morning from a friend.

- [Rosa] Good evening, everybody.

This is Rosa Clemente reporting live

from San Juan, Puerto Rico.

First and foremost, I wanna send all my love

and thank to Frances Fox Piven

and everything she has done for people on the ground

and showing us how to do the work from the bottom up.

I just wanted to let people know

the dire situation in Puerto Rico.

I landed here Sunday with a intergenerational delegation

of all Latinx, Latina, Latino youth media-makers.

We've been here since Friday

and we'll be here 'til this coming Sunday,

whatever is being told by the mainstream press

and unfortunately, even of some of our friends

in the progressive or Left press,

is not telling the full magnitude

of what is happening in Puerto Rico.

Puerto Ricans do not need donations and supplies,

there are thousands of containers on the port

that have not been distributed to people.

There are people who unfortunately

are feeding their babies at this point

with mashed up bananas because there is no baby food.

FEMA has abandoned Puerto Rico,

the military has occupied our island once again.

Yesterday, we were able to go to Utuado,

one of the worst hit areas in Puerto Rico

and we did see military there and they were occupying a town

and we asked them, "Why are you not going

"to people on the mountain?"

And they said they didn't have the means to get there,

but we were able to get there in a Honda Access

four of us and get to the bottom of the mountain.

There are people who have not been there 21 days

without their diabetic medication, without water.

Puerto Rico is still 90% without electricity

and most if anything happening

is happening in the San Juan district.

Five mayors are being investigated as of today

including mayor of San Juan from what we are hearing

for withholding supplies to the people of Puerto Rico.

People are asking where is the insurgency

from Puerto Ricans.

The insurgency is Puerto Ricans helping themselves

because everyone, unfortunately,

including our friends all over the world,

our organizers and comrades have abandoned

the people of Puerto Rico.

People do not have water

and where we also see military the most

is guarding stores like Sam's Club and Walmart.

There are no points of distribution

in any of the 77 other municipalities in Puerto Rico.

People are bathing in river water that is toxic

and I can go on and on,

but the sounds of Puerto Rico are no longer the coqui,

the sounds of Puerto Rico are

sleeping at night to generators,

waking up to military helicopters.

We are on the ground and will continue to report.

We implore you if you can

to send any type of donation to us,

so that we could be reporting the truth.

When we went to the press convention.

- What she goes on to say is she goes to the press center

and she is at that moment

the only press from the United States there

and we'll put the rest of the audio on our website.

If you follow Rosa Clemente's Facebook page

or the Laura Flanders Show page,

we'll bring you her reporting.

Not to derail the conversation we've had so far,

but to simply add to it.

Ai-jen, I look to you, you and your colleagues

deal with people in life and death situations every day

at an intimate level.

You figure out as the domestic workers

how to deal with power across traditional power imbalances

of the client and the employee.

You deal with the state.

You're now very involved in the organizing

that has followed the Women's March on Washington.

Given everything that we've heard,

you deal with race, class, gender, all of it all the time,

what have you learned?

What is that we can learn from the domestic workers

and those you work with to apply in this moment,

so that our activism goes beyond activism to power?

In 30 seconds or, no, I'm just kidding

(audience laughing)

- I have to say I'm really just heartbroken

about the situation in Puerto Rico.

- I wanted to say one more thing

of this moment of silence I will say,

and that is to do with the urgency of this moment.

I hope the whole thing falls apart pretty soon,

the Trump thing, but what has been unleashed

is really fascist forces in this country.

I don't live in New York, in New York City,

I live in Virginia, not far from Charlottesville,

and then only a few blocks from where I live the Nazi

and that is a fair description,

what's his name, the white supremacist, Nazi guy,

yeah, he opened an office on the main street of our town.

There is a threat.

When people like Cornel West and real people deeply of peace

can go march in Charlottesville against racism

and be attacked by fascists, Nazis, that's scary,

that's why we have to take seriously

'cause it's not just any old moment.

This is what I hear from the young people

who are drawn to the resistance,

is they don't wanna hear all of our cogitations,

if they'll fight and they're ready to fight,

and that's like a whole political issue,

do you punch a Nazi?

I don't have an answer.

I wouldn't perhaps share it here.

I think there is a sense of something extreme

going on right now.

And what's thrown in our faces

every time we say, "We'll slow down.

"We have to pull this majority and everything,"

somebody will throw the line,

"We're a republic," in our faces.

- [Laura] Ai-jen?

- It's because you care.

Well, I think we have to build

the most powerful opposition movement

the world has ever seen

and I think that it has to be working

on multiple time horizons.

There is the immediate work of fighting

and fighting back and pushing back

and showing up for each other

and there is the work we have to do

to organize and build power.

We have to electoralize the anger and frustration

and fear that's out there into real electoral power,

and we have to build the capacity

of our organizations to represent

communities like women of color

who are the backbone of our democracy

and have never been supported to actually have

any real political infrastructure and capacity.

So, there's a lot of work that has to happen

on multiple time horizons

and more people have to be thinking about

what to do from a movement-wide level.

I mean, we're organized by issues and constituencies

and we each care about different things

and we focus on different things.

Well, this is a moment where we actually

have to really come together.

And the thing about this opposition movement

that we're building, it can't just be about opposition,

it also has to be about what we're proposing.

What is our vision for a multiracial democracy

in this country that actually supports

opportunity and dignity for every person in this country?

And we have to have real ideas

and I think one of the things we're trying to do

in the domestic workers movement

is propose a vision for care,

for childcare, eldercare, and paid family leave

that lifts up the predominantly

women of color and immigrant women

who've been doing this work forever

and resources families to be able to afford

the care they need to take care of their families both

and a vision for a way forward

that actually does make it real for people

why they should join our movement.

- I wanna ask a group conscious here,

we want to leave time for Frances to wrap up.

I have three questions.

I'm kinda inclined to let our panelists

share some closing thoughts

with those who posed these questions, forgive me.

One has to do with precarious workers right here at CUNY,

another one has to do with how do we do this at the bottom,

organizing to take power,

and a third one has to do

with transforming the democratic party.

If I could take your generosity to just throw it out there

and if people want to address those, that would be great,

but I really do want to hear from Kim and Barbara

and then we'll get a chance to hear from Frances

some closing thoughts here in a moment

where as Naomi Klein puts it

we could have shock doctrine one way

or we could have shock doctrine the other.

I try to focus on our program

on how into the vacuum of corporate and political fail

all across our country,

people who've been failed are moving

and they are moving with alternatives

that speak to their needs in whole different ways,

whether it's political or in the workplace

or in the home or at the level of their community.

I think there is possibility here

and I'll say it even around Puerto Rico,

we could either protect Walmart and the fossil fuel economy

or we can support a people's revitalized,

newly vital Puerto Rico

with more solar and wind power than you can imagine

and independence to make their own decisions.

I think we have opportunity.

Who wants to speak to it?

Barbara, do you wanna say a word, Kim?

- [Barbara] What?

- Do you want to give a final word, a final thought

before we turn it over to Frances?

- About Puerto Rico?

- [Laura] No, whatever you would like, on how we--

- But it just things flashing through my mind right now

was there are so many American workers of any color

who don't make enough money or don't have jobs,

could you imagine if the United States was able to pay them

to go and exercise their skills in Puerto Rico?

How that would change the whole picture on race

and white nationalism and all of this stuff

because we could take pride in that.

We could feel that sense of community,

but as a community doing things,

caring I will even use Ai-jen's lovely word.

We need vision,

but I do want some way of answering

people who say, "Don't you realize

"we don't have that much time in this country?

Or the world doesn't have that much time to dither

and I'm gonna just leave you with that.

I'm not gonna be leading the troops in the streets.

To me, it is the time we need Frances more than ever,

certainly these other women, even me,

you and I might be getting old.

- No.

- No?

- Nah.

- [Laura] Kim?

- I feel so many of these moments

are reminders of conversations

that we started to have, but didn't.

Kanye has done a lot of crazy things,

but the one thing that he said

that still rings in my head when I hear,

when he said after Hurricane Katrina, he told the truth,

George Bush doesn't care about black people

and now we're in this moment,

we cannot be shocked or surprised about what's happened

because it happened before.

Nothing really happened to change that.

We didn't have a society-wide accounting

of the fact that people were left to die in New Orleans

and now the same thing is happening in Katrina,

so there's at least something about this moment

that I want to think makes us grapple with the hard stuff

on our own team that we've not been able to deal with.

I want to think that.

I'm not sure that it's actually happening,

so when I'm listening what foundations are saying,

when I listen to what pseudo-progressives

like Mark Lilla are saying,

when I'm listening to people who are saying,

"The problem was we were too concerned about social justice,

"too concerned about anti-racism,

"too concerned about feminism,

"too concerned about queer people,

"that's why we got ourselves here,

"so we have to turn the corner and move away from that,"

and I don't hear millions of people saying,

"Hell no, that's what we need more of moving forward."

When I don't hear that, I start getting worried.

The piece of that does make me somewhat hopeful

and this builds off of Fran's work,

that the idea about insurgency from the bottom

means that people have to cast their gaze upward

in understanding where the conditions

that they're living in have come from.

What is not part of our conversation and just hasn't been

is the massive distribution of wealth upward,

so people are looking across

and down to stabilize themselves

and while that's happening,

they're not seeing the massive theft that's going on upward,

so I wanna take the idea of insurgency from the bottom

and attach to it the implicit part of it

which means you have to have a sense of where you are

and you have to have a sense of

who you are relative to those,

not just the 1% now, but the 1% of the 1%,

we've got to have that as part of our common conversation

if we're talking about building out this moment,

trying to institutionalize a different way

of thinking about politics,

that's got to happen now by shifting our gaze.

- And that's one way to bring in the white working class

that has been alienated.

- And I would simply add we have to have

a place to have that conversation

that is not owned and determined

by for-profit corporations like Amazon and Walmart

and people who are directly invested

in maintaining the status quo.

I'm just saying a public media infrastructure

might be a good idea.

Ai-jen, do you have a final comment

and then we'll come to Fran?

- Well, we could also take over

the City University of New York.

A gathering place, a forum,

a place of dialogue for the people of New York City

and in the process do something about

the persistence of contingent precarious work

at the City University of New York.

- I guess I'll just keep playing

my optimistic role here on this panel

and say that I do feel really inspired by the ways in which

people are activated.

I mean, it's really an organizer's dream right now

to see how much people wanna show up and organize

and especially women, women are on fire right now,

and I think that it didn't just stop on January 21st.

People have been organizing in communities

that have no progressive organizations for miles

and coming together and showing up,

and new organizations like Indivisible

showing up for immigrant rights and for racial justice

and there are ways that people are showing up in this moment

that actually are objectively quite hopeful.

- [Laura] And you didn't even say Harvey Weinstein?

Fran?

- [Frances] Are these my closing remarks, Laura?

- [Laura] You are issuing us out into the insurgency.

We're closing.

I don't like to think of you as closing.

- This is a very strange moment

in American politics and world politics.

It is in a way a bizarre moment.

- [Laura] You talk with your hands so let me make it easier.

- Oh, I do.

Well, I'm a New Yorker.

It would be a comedic moment, we would all be laughing

if it weren't all so horrible

and so filled with potential danger,

where the guy in charge is an imbecile

and deeply deranged

and he has opened the doors of the federal government,

thrown them wide open,

they've always been partly open

to the fossil fuel industry and to finance,

those are the two big economic interest groups

that are going to be running the country

unless we do our part.

Now, there's a problem in doing our part

and that is the really highfalutin intellectuals

who I love to read because they are so elegant,

so well-educated, and so forth,

are kind of in an end times mood or mode.

Wolfgang Streeck is brilliant.

Buying Time is a brilliant book.

The state of exception really does cast light

on our current situation.

However, I don't think it's end times,

I think it's gonna get hotter,

it's gonna get muddier,

the air is gonna stink,

but I think the human race has some time left

and the planet has some time left,

the question therefore emerges

about the possibility of restoring a measure of democracy,

of collective self-regulation,

especially ecological regulation, can we do that?

Can we restore a democratic society

or actually create a democratic society

because it wasn't so democratic in the first place?

What is our role in that?

And here I think it's very important

that we don't take advantage of our sophistication

to go around spouting gloom and doom.

Truth is we don't know, think of all we don't know,

think of our uncertainty.

Uncertainty doesn't prevent us from sort of

sliding back on the sofa and tearing our hair

and pontificating about how terribly everything is

and how it's all gonna get worse.

I think it's not gonna get worse

'cause we can make it better.

We really do have power.

We just don't use that power.

In order to use that power,

we have to shut our ears to the gloom and doomsters

because they don't know anything, they're just talking.

It's easy to talk gloom and doom

and to do it in very fancy ways.

So, we have to help people discover

their own sources of power

which stem from the roles that they play

in major institutions in the United States and in the world

and you know never have ordinary people

had more potential power

because never have the interconnections

which bind us together

and which make them dependent on us,

never have they been more far-reaching,

more intricate, more delicate, more fragile,

we can shut it down

and we outta experiment in shutting it down continually

and when we shut it down here,

it won't only shut down here,

it will shut down across the globe,

the tentacles of disruption will reach across the globe

and it will reach as Steve Lerner

was suggesting earlier today,

it will reach to the very top of our society as well.

We are the agents that can transform our society

and preserve it from the disasters that menace it,

so that's my closing message.

I wanna thank you all.

I'm so grateful for all of you who came.

I'm so grateful to my students, former students.

I'm so grateful to Alyson Cole

and my dear friend Lori Minnite

and the other people who,

Barbara who came from Washington,

even though it's hard for her to do that now.

For Ai-Jen and Kimberle, who is my next door neighbor

and were gonna hang out together more,

anyway thanks for coming

and go out there and be tough.

(audience clapping and cheering)

For more infomation >> Insurgency from Below: Activism in the Trump Era - Duration: 1:22:13.

-------------------------------------------

World War 3: North Korea-Trump talks 'on life support' as WAR looms, warns US official - Duration: 3:33.

World War 3: North Korea-Trump talks 'on life support' as WAR looms, warns US official

Senator Chris Murphy said talks between and were on "life support" and he was not "incentivising". Speaking on , Mr Murphy said President Trump was "not wrong" to state to the North Koreans there was a option.

But he said Mr Trump was "undercutting" his Secretary of State and US diplomats.

Mr Murphy, a Democrat, said: "It's not surprising that our negotiations are on life support right now, President Trump is deploying what is perhaps the in the history of the American presidency.

"It's not just that he's out there calling this guy names, it's that he is publicly undercutting his Department of State by tweeting out that Rex Tillerson does not have his support and cannot talk and negotiate on his behalf.

"You've got to empower your diplomats and Trump is not wrong to make it very clear to the North Koreans that we have a military option, that we can take them out if they were to ever attack or threaten to attack us or our allies.

"But you've actually got to empower your diplomats to do the work and you've got to communicate that the previous nuclear deals, that other presidents have signed, are still good, by threatening to back out of the Iran nuclear agreement.

"You're not incentivising the North Koreans to enter into their own agreement. .

"So it's a combination of military threats, real bilateral, multilateral economic sanctions, which this president cannot put together because he is out there insulting all of the allies who would work with us on sanctions and empowering your diplomats, he is doing none of the things necessary to achieve a real diplomatic breakthrough on North Korea." North Korea has threatened the Unites States by warning the country is at the "door of doom" The hermit state talked tough in its latest statement released by state-run newspaper Minju.

A spokesman said: "Although the South Korean puppet authorities try to frighten the DPRK by resorting to more frantic anti-DPRK pressure campaign with the backing of the US, the army and the people of the DPRK will never be afraid of it.

"They would be well advised to behave themselves, clearly mindful that they cannot escape the most miserable end together with the US, which is at the door of doom.

" North Koreas threat comes as the  Mr Trump upset Kim after he sent two warships to the region this week in a direct show of force to the leader.

For more infomation >> World War 3: North Korea-Trump talks 'on life support' as WAR looms, warns US official - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP, 'DI DADALO SA EAST ASIAN SUMMIT SA CLARK -WHITE HOUSE—SMNI NEWSBREAK 20/26/17 @12NN - Duration: 4:16.

For more infomation >> TRUMP, 'DI DADALO SA EAST ASIAN SUMMIT SA CLARK -WHITE HOUSE—SMNI NEWSBREAK 20/26/17 @12NN - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

Schiff on Trump dossier Sometimes opposition research is true MSNBC - Duration: 7:44.

For more infomation >> Schiff on Trump dossier Sometimes opposition research is true MSNBC - Duration: 7:44.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Obama FURIOUS After What Trump Just Suddenly ENDED For 1.5 Mil Of His 'Favorite' People - Duration: 1:28.

This news should be enough to make all us Donald Trump Supporters misty eyes with pride

in the man we chose to lead our great nation!

It's once again Morning in America!

Today it's being reported that more than 1.1 million Americans have dropped out of

the food stamp program since President Trump took office in January.

According to the latest United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) statistics on food stamp

enrollment and usage, participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

(SNAP) dropped to 41,496,255 in May 2017, from 42,691,363 in January 2017.

After 8 long years of constant increases, this steep drop started the very month that

President Donald Trump took office.Of course, this news isn't great for everyone.

Since the "Free Stuff" welfare crowd were former President Barack Hussein Obama's

most loyal voters, he and the Democrat party are livid.

But I am sure they will be just fine because we will always have a segment of society that

feels they are too good to get a normal job, are too lazy, or just simply like to sit on

their behinds all day long while the rest of us go out and provide for them.

In fact, many live better than us working stiffs do.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Obama FURIOUS After What Trump Just Suddenly ENDED For 1.5 Mil Of His 'Favorite' People - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

Trump PHYSICALLY Attacked By Protester, But His Response Will Make Americans PROUD - Duration: 22:51.

Trump PHYSICALLY Attacked By Protester, But His Response Will Make Americans PROUD

Donald Trump was attacked today by a man named Ryan Clayton, according to CNN.

But Trump didn't even give the protester a second thought.

"Trump is Treason!" the man yelled as Trump walked down a hall on Capitol Hilll.

"Why is Congress talking about tax cuts when they should be talking about treason?!"

During the nonsense tirade, Clayton hurled a handful of Russian flags directly at the

president.

Despite nearly getting hit, Trump didn't even flinch.

Trump kept walking forward, ignoring the insane man — which is ABSOLUTELY the correct thing

to do.

He even gave a casual thumbs-up to the press!

Trump has been remarkably good at fending off these accusations of Russian collusion.

It helps that the accusers have NO FACTS, but the president's ability to make them

seem silly and foolish have mostly buried the story despite the mainstream media's

efforts.

But there are still crazy men like this, who think Trump directly conspired with the Russian

government.

Luckily, Trump didn't even acknowledge this small man's existence.

Comment "We love Trump!" and SHARE if you're PROUD of how our president handled

this scary moment.

Other presidents may have run

for cover, but

Trump

was UNAFRAID.

For more infomation >> Trump PHYSICALLY Attacked By Protester, But His Response Will Make Americans PROUD - Duration: 22:51.

-------------------------------------------

Clinton campaign, DNC helped fund research that led to salacious Trump dossier - Duration: 3:51.

For more infomation >> Clinton campaign, DNC helped fund research that led to salacious Trump dossier - Duration: 3:51.

-------------------------------------------

Montini: Donald Trump is like a State Fair corndog - Duration: 1:19.

So ...

I've been asked a number of times,

"Why do you think so many people really like Donald Trump?"

And I said the best way to understand that is come to the State Fair

and get one of these.

It is a flaming Cheetos- and queso-covered corndog.

And it's delicious.

It's also terrible for you. And we know it's terrible for us.

It's just that when you come to the fair, you get tired of people telling you,

"Watch your cholesterol. Eat the right food. Take your vitamins. Here, have some kale."

Every once in a while,

what you really want is to just go defiantly against all of that

and have a flaming hot Cheetos

and Cheetos-covered corndog.

It was that way politically with Donald Trump.

Here's the difference, though. We come to the State Fair

once, maybe twice a year.

Imagine having one of these for dinner every day for four years. Or longer.

For more infomation >> Montini: Donald Trump is like a State Fair corndog - Duration: 1:19.

-------------------------------------------

The Media Doesn't Want People To See Secret Thing Trump WROTE To The Family Of Slain Soldier - Duration: 21:45.

The Media Doesn't Want People To See Secret

Thing Trump WROTE To The Family Of Slain Soldier

The President sent a gold star family a personal $25,000 check from himself on Monday after

fulfilling a promise that he made months ago.

The check was dated on October 18, 2017, and suggest that the order was put in before liberal

Congresswoman Frederica Wilson ruthlessly went after the president.

That's the check above and it shows that Trump loves our troops and follows through

on his promises despite what the media is telling everyone.

Remember this amazing moment below?

President Trump was joined by Mike Pence and met 6-year-old Christian Jacobs and his mother

(U.S. Army photo) It's only right that he followed through

in helping out Chris Baldridge and his wife, Jesse, after their son Sargeant Dillon Baldridge

when they were attacked back in June.

It wasn't until the Washington Post brought attention to the promise that White House

officials busted their buts to get the check sent.

The check is dated October 18.

"The cheque has been in the pipeline since the President's initial call with the father.

The President has personally followed up several times to ensure that the cheque was being

sent.

As stated earlier, the cheque has been sent," White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said

last week.

"It's disgusting that the media is taking something that should be recognized as a generous

and sincere gesture, made privately by the President, and using it to advance the media's

biased agenda."

Share this because the media won't.

They are on a mission to make Trump look bad.

We need to keep fighting

to help

our President.

For more infomation >> The Media Doesn't Want People To See Secret Thing Trump WROTE To The Family Of Slain Soldier - Duration: 21:45.

-------------------------------------------

Newt Gingrich Just Let Everyone In On Trump's Little Secret And Made Every Democrat Cry - Duration: 21:45.

Newt Gingrich Just Let Everyone In On Trump's Little Secret And Made Every Democrat Cry

Former Speaker of the House and regular Trump defender Newt Gingrich got on Fox News Monday

to talk about President Trump's biggest accomplishments so far.

One interesting fact that people tend to forget about is the huge number of conservative judges

President Trump has been able to nominate to the judiciary, not even including Supreme

Court Justice Niel Gorsuch.

Here's what Gingrich said:

"In a little while –another year or two– lots of reasonable people are going to start

saying they don't quite like some of his style, but he [Donald Trump] is really effective…"

"You look at the conservative judges: He and McConnell have collaborated, they've

had twice as many judges approved so far as Obama got in the same length of time, and

they are conservative, and they are on average eight or nine years younger than the Obama

judges."

That's right, folks.

President Trump's judges are nearly a decade younger than Obama's- that means on average

they're going to be around for a whole lot longer.

You do NOT hear about this so much in the news because these nominations happen without

much fanfare and the mainstream media probably absolutely hates it.

As Gingrich said:

"He's shaping the next generation of the judiciary.

All these things are happening in a methodical way."

Check out his whole interview here.

As always with Newt Gingrich, it's a must watch!

Love what Trump's doing for the U.S. judiciary?

SHARE

it everywhere!

(h/t Real

Clear Politics)

For more infomation >> Newt Gingrich Just Let Everyone In On Trump's Little Secret And Made Every Democrat Cry - Duration: 21:45.

-------------------------------------------

After Gold Star Widow Attacked Him This Morning, Trump Hit Back With His ULTIMATE Weapon - Duration: 23:33.

After Gold Star Widow Attacked Him This Morning, Trump Hit Back With His ULTIMATE Weapon

The widow of Sgt.

La David Johnson was one of the four Green Berets killed by ISIS in Niger this month.

For the first time since her phone call with President Trump that Frederica Wilson listened

in on.

The President has been in a chilling fight with Congressman Frederica Wilson about the

call in which Wilson said that Trump told Myeshia Johnson that her husband "knew what

he signed up for."

Wilson is a family friend of the Johnsons and was in the limo with during the call when

the widow was on her way to the airport to pick up her husband's body.

Trump called the master sergeant on his cell phone and pulled over to the tarmac at Dover

Air Force Base to pick up Sgt. Johnson.

Johnson put the President on speaker phone so everyone could hear.

According to her, "He knew what he signed up for, but it hurts anyway."

"I heard him stumbling on trying to remember my husband's name and that's what hurt

me most.

Because if my husband is out here fighting for our country and he risks his life for

our country, why can't you remember his name?

And that's what made me upset and cry more," she added.

President Trump shot back this morning on twitter, via Daily Mail.

This widow is making her husband's death political and it is really sad.

It is sad that her husband died and it is sad that he cannot rest in peace.

His memory is now going to get drug through the mud so that the Democratic party can try

and take down our sitting President.

Share this if you feel sorry for her loss but are tired of the Democrats and people

politicising the deaths of our soldiers.

God bless America.

God bless Trump and God

bless

every

single

one

of

our troops.

For more infomation >> After Gold Star Widow Attacked Him This Morning, Trump Hit Back With His ULTIMATE Weapon - Duration: 23:33.

-------------------------------------------

Retiring GOP Senators Call For More To Speak Out Against Trump - Duration: 2:04.

For more infomation >> Retiring GOP Senators Call For More To Speak Out Against Trump - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

World War 3: Trump pushing North Korea to BOILING POINT warns former Intelligence boss - Duration: 3:23.

World War 3: Trump pushing North Korea to BOILING POINT warns former Intelligence boss

's "intemperate statements" regarding North Korea are concerning according to James Clapper, ex director of National Intelligence in the US military.  Speaking on , Mr Clapper added was a "deity" in and Mr Trump's insults were stoking tensions in the country.

Asked if he thought Mr Trump was setting the United States on a path to war, Mr Clapper said it was becoming more likely.

He said: "It's certainly a possibility and that's what concerns me about some of the President's intemperate statements in relation to North Korea.

"No one knows what the ignition point is for Kim Jong-un and Kim Jong-un is not surrounded by a group of seasoned, capable, temperate advisers like President Trump is.

"What you see surrounding Kim Jong-un is a bunch of sycophants, medal be-decked generals who dutifully follow Kim Jong-un around with their notebooks open, taking notes about his every utterance. "That's a management technique that Kim Jong-un has used pretty effectively.

He gets very little pushback and I do worry about what his boiling point might be in the face of some of these inflammatory tweets and statements that the President makes.

"It's worth remembering that to the extent that there's religion in North Korea, the deity is Kim Jong-un and his predecessors, his grandfather and his father. .

"When you insult the head of state of North Korea, you're also insulting their deity and, of course, the regime plays that to the hilt with their domestic audience." North Korea has threatened the Unites States by blasting that the country is at the "door of doom" The Hermit state talked tough in its latest statement released by state-run newspaper Minju.

A spokesman said: "Although the South Korean puppet authorities try to frighten the DPRK by resorting to more frantic anti-DPRK pressure campaign with the backing of the US, the army and the people of the DPRK will never be afraid of it.

"They would be well advised to behave themselves, clearly mindful that they cannot escape the most miserable end together with the US, which is at the door of doom." North Koreas threat comes as the US ramps up its military presence in the Korean peninsula.

Mr Trump upset Kim after he sent .

For more infomation >> World War 3: Trump pushing North Korea to BOILING POINT warns former Intelligence boss - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

'You'll be surprised' Donald Trump lifts lid on visit to Korea war zone - Duration: 4:04.

'You'll be surprised' Donald Trump lifts lid on visit to Korea war zone

Trump will go through Japan, South Korea, China, Vietnam and the Philippines from November 3 to 14.

It will be his first trip to the region as President, and comes as Kim edges closer to getting a missile capable of hitting the US.

A White House official previously said Trump is not likely to visit the Korean demilitarized zone during the trip. But today he appeared to have changed his mind.

I'd rather not say, but you'll be surprised, Trump told reporters on the White House South Lawn as he prepared to depart on a trip to Dallas.

The White House has reportedly sent a team of officials to the Peninsula to check potential sites for Trumps special activity when he is there.

They looked around Panmunjom and Observation Post Ouellette, a source said while speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Truce village Panmunjom and the observation post are both within the heavily-fortified Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) and are literally a stones throw away from the regime.

Trump is widely expected to send a message to North Korea – either verbally or kinetically – when he makes the foreign visit.

Trump will likely do something like that and his aides are making the relevant preparations, the source told Yonhap News.

He added: He may instead visit frontline islands such as Yeonpyeong-do or Baengnyeong-do. I am not sure whether the advance team went there, too. The visit would come as Trump stepped up his war of words with Kim Jong-un.

It has prompted numerous security experts to warn the world is literally on the brink of World War 3.

Trump has repeatedly threatened to go to war with the hermit state, most recently hinting there is "only one way" to deal with the crisis.

North Korea has also accused the US of "declaring war" on them while continuing to test nuclear-capable ICBMs. It has launched more than a dozen missile tests this year and detonated their most powerful ever H-bomb.

And tonight there are new fears of a new nuclear test over the Atlantic Ocean. North Korea has form for provocations on major anniversaries, but its founding date on October 10 surprisingly passed without incident.

Trumps speech may be the next big opportunity for Kim to show the US he means business.

The Norths foreign minister Ri Yong Ho said last month: The whole world should clearly remember it was the US who first declared war on our country.

Since the United States declared war on our country, we will have every right to make countermeasures. These include the right to shoot down United States strategic bombers even when they are not inside the airspace border of our country..

For more infomation >> 'You'll be surprised' Donald Trump lifts lid on visit to Korea war zone - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Addresses Critics Before Departing DC For Dallas - Duration: 2:40.

For more infomation >> President Trump Addresses Critics Before Departing DC For Dallas - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Is Thin-Skinned And Reckless, Majority Of Americans Say - Duration: 4:55.

According to a new pole by Politico and Morning Consult, the majority of Americans in the

United States, view Donald Trump as both thin-skinned and reckless in his job as president of the

United States.

Now, depending on which numbers you're looking at within this pole, something interesting

happens.

According to one analysis, about 52 to 53 percent of people in the Unites States believe

Donald Trump is trustworthy, however, 51 percent say that he is not honest.

Now, I'm not exactly sure how somebody can be both trustworthy and not honest, but that's

what the pole shows us here, but again, that's more of an aside.

The biggest issue that we have right now is that a majority of Americans understand that

Donald Trump is a thin-skinned, reckless individual that for some reason, still has access to

the nuclear codes in this country.

We already saw earlier this week that the military is preparing to go on a 24 hour alert

to arm their nuclear bombers to be ready in the event that Donald Trump launches a nuclear

war at any time of day.

They want to make sure that they have those plans with those bombs ready to go as soon

as Donald Trump gives the go-ahead.

This reckless and thin-skinned president can do that at any point.

This is why that's important.

The thin-skinned part is obvious.

We know that Donald Trump cannot handle criticism of any kind whatsoever from anyone on the

planet.

He's so fragile that even the slightest little attempt to call him out on something sends

him into an unhinged rage.

White House staffers have confirmed this, cabinet members have confirmed this, past

friends of Donald Trump have confirmed this and the American public has clearly seen it

via Donald Trump's twitter feeds and some of his press conferences.

What happens when you have somebody who is this combination of thin-skinned and reckless?

Well, we're seeing it play out in North Korea.

Every time Kim Jong Un comes out and says something negative about Donald Trump, Donald

Trump once again starts beating the drums of war, threatening to go over there and kill

millions of people just to spite one guy that pissed him off.

What's happening to the people in North Korea is disgusting and appalling and they need

help.

But Donald Trump is going to allow one lunatic, Kim Jong Un, to goad him into dropping a nuclear

weapon over there.

That reality of Trump dropping a nuclear weapon over on North Korea or possibly even Iran,

is a hell of a lot closer than most people in this country truly understand.

That is why the military is preparing to go on 24 hour alert.

Something that hasn't happened since the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis and yet, we're

there and people aren't paying attention.

So, they go out and, "Yeah, I'll take your pole.

Yeah, he's thin-skinned, yeah he's reckless, yeah he's dishonest ..." But that's just the

surface.

It's great that the public recognizes this, but we also have to understand and we have

to do something about the fact that Donald Trump is inching closer and closer every single

day to launching us into a full-blown nuclear war.

So, it's great that we understand that he's thin-skinned.

It's great that we understand that he is reckless, but he already has the power that he needs

to destroy everything that this country has built over the centuries.

Remember that.

Remember these poles.

Remember the way you feel right now if Donald Trump survives the Mueller investigation and

does run for president again in 2020.

Because we can't go through eight full years of will he or won't he, with regards to launching

a nuclear weapon.

We have to get past this and it's up to the voters to remember exactly how they felt,

exactly how they felt about the president and exactly how they felt about the future,

because if they forget that, then yeah, we're probably looking at eight full years of Donald

Trump as president of the United States.

No comments:

Post a Comment